/biz/ - Business & Finance

OHNONONNONONONO

Hahahaha all you losers who bought bsv got btfo

>>13781538
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>13781538
Yeah, I saw this pop up on my phone and read it, but, is there a SINGLE fucking shadow of a source for that “clarification” by the copyright office?

Not a BSV disciple in the slightest, btw. Just fucking amazed that crypto journalism seems to continue being SO...FUCKING...exceptionally BAD

first sentence
>”Even as bitoin sv (BSV)”
>bitoin
Jesus Christ pajeet

>>13781538
>>13781562
>>13781616
>>13781622
>Rubes celebrating fake news.
>No actual source, no problem!

Craig, there’s something you should know about me...

>>13781780
>>No actual source
Just like there’s no source that creg is satoj

>>13781538
Nothing burger

So should people sell or nah?

>>13781847
Yes sell lol.

>>13781538
>Fuddesk

>>13781847
You should've sold yesterday.
It was obvious that this was just hype to pump the coin one last time before it all falls apart.

>>13781538
Fud is so bullish lads.

>>13782009
Is this fud?

>But he owns the copyright.
satoshi nakamoto owns the copyright and he released it under mit license which explicitly allows alter distribute and even re-license by anyone.

>>13781538
BSV DUMPING

>>13781823
Except for John M, Gavin A and everyone else who has supported the Satoshi claim.
>>13781891
Cope
>>13782112
More cope. Can't wait for the bitcoin.org faggots to start autistically screeching when they are forced to take down the whitepaper from their fraudulent website.

>>13782186
>Except for John M, Gavin A and everyone else who has supported the Satoshi claim.

Gavin has since stated on his own blog that he regrets any involvement and thinks CSW should be ignored.

>>13781538
Thats why he got a new copyright the previous one using the Satoshi pseudonym is unenforceable.