/biz/ - Business & Finance

Guys... maybe someone should keep an eye on Craig...

May 21

>>13681063
>ATO agent creates fake document to try to get CSW in trouble
>instead the ATO agent goes to jail for fraud
>IRA Kleiman gets sent the forged document by gmaxwell
>Sues CSW for ten billion dollars based on ATO's fake document
>submits fake document as evidence

>>13681063
Who does it belong to?

>>13681140
He posted the private key for it, so ... everybody now.

>>13681140
It belongs to an anonymous user who posted CSW is a fraud.

>>13681162
>>13681169
link?

>>13681169
This. Its probably gmaxwell. The guy is mentally ill and obsessed

>>13681189
no, BTC

OH NO NO NO NO

Maybe it was a mistake? Craig included many addresses, it's possible he accidentally copy and pasted the wrong one.

>>13681140
its roger's

>>13681278
That's not an acceptable defence for perjury.

"Sorry your honor, I lied to you under oath. Won't happen again, probably."

>>13681278
>has to provide evidence he's satoshi in court
>extremely important to get it right
>copies and pastes a load of addresses off the internet
yeah he's satoshi

>>13681189
https://memo.cash/post/9d41091fd659287c496c239b3b43000f8b7949dc98bcdc54cca5a501a3062dd6

>>13681572
Holy shit. Was that actually one of those "innovators" who discovered bitcoin right when it was launched?

>>13681696
He was probably the guy on bitcoin talk who offer 5k to buy ancient BTC private keys.

>>13681803
But there must be the other side who he bought it from. Doesn't make sense desu

>>13681572
Just checked it myself and it does verify

>>13681838

>>13681162
>He posted the private key for it, so ... everybody now.
Where did he post the private key for it? It's a signed message in the screenshot.

This is damn fucking epic. Think about it, one of those early guys signed the message with one of the first wallets ever.

This does not prove he is not Satoshi though. All his knowledge and degrees still point to him being Satoshi. If that was one of the adresses put in the trust, it means someone else controlled the keys. It does not mean it was not controlled by Craig in the first place

>>13682150
Hi Craig!

>>13681278
>it's possible he accidentally
yes, 'accidentally' is definitely always a possibility with Creg. I forget exactly which bank accounts are mine when I'm making up endless lists of them, under threat of perjury, as well. dont you ?

>>13682177
What gave it away?

>>13681063

>>13681572
fucking rekt

>>13681241
The new one or the old one? or the gold one?

>>13681063
Craig is a lunatic. Went through all this hassle and thought he could bluff his way to the satoshi identity. This is one sick man.

>>13682150
>muh degrees
>le tulip trust
Holy fucking shit, do you even understand how it works? If you own a private key, you own it for good. You can't transfer possession just by saying, "okay, I give up my private key and PROMISE that I forget it and don't have a copy saved somewhere".

>>13682302
A walking case study in malignant narcissism.

>>13681696
>mfw was an innovator trying to mine BTC in 2009 but struggled too much with the build
>spent 10 years ignoring it cause I missed my chance in 2009
>fomo into the market late 2017 as a laggards
I legit remember hearing about bitcoin again when it hit $10 and thinking, "damn, I can't believe I missed out on that."

>>13682317
I'm the lunatic who sold at $10, believe it or not.

>>13682317
Were still in the early adopter stage
Please remember this post 5 years from now
Burn it into your brain

>>13682317
you fared better than I did. I'm net negative on this shit.

eh, >>13682431
meant for >>13682390

>>13682430
early adopter, maybe....maybe. but easy 1000x gains are gone.

>when you buy an old wallet to prove you own the keys but the seller kept a copy

>>13682430
Don't be stupid.

>>13681063
Holy shit...
JUSTED

>>13681063
>these are the public keys
>they have the bitcoinz
>these are mine because I signed a paper with a marker

>>13681572
that's Roger's address I think
BSV will win where you at?

>>13681162
nobody posted any private keys
have you ever seen how a private key looks like?

>>13681063
KEK, I WILL ROLL THIS THREAD FOREVER
THX ANON

>>13681063
literally just CSW fudding BSV to accumulate

>>13681572
What did I do wrong?

>>13681278
cope

>>13683809
Believing that craig may not be satoshi after all

>>13683809
you forgot the new paragraph after "...Craig Wrigth."

The message is
Address 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT does not belong to Satoshi or to Craig Wright.
Craig is a liar and a fraud.

>>13683719
Unironically no and I been in since 2017

Is that the app I would use to sign/send messages?

>>13684239
jesus christ

>>13684239
'17 summerfags are the worst

>>13681169
i always wanted to do that cool

>>13684239
>mfw this anon will probably STILL make it before me

AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH
sorry do i laugh too hard?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBITGyJynfA

>>13684239
electrum does it
but you can verify online too

>>13681063
This is most likely one of rogers or martti malmis addresses

>>13684224
>Craig is a liar and a fraud.
ROLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

TULIP TRUST IS BULLSHIT

A Guy, writes to his best friend's dad and ask him to take care of wallet.dat on son's hardware, later he will give instructions what to do with it and how to access it.
>meanwhile on anonymous boards
>The sounds of screech, similar to cats having sex, overwhelms anonymous boards calling A Guy names and so on.
You already know the truth, what's stopping you from accepting it? Chain Split? late to the train? never bought at 5$?
Why screechers refuse to see the truth? is it a problem with them taking loans to buy BTC?
Truth is out, why people still argue it?

>>13681278
Sure

>>13682150
Yeah, Theology?

>>13684326
Link to verifier?
Post the full address and full message and fill signature

>>13681572
Lol get Rkd fudders I'm actually gonna go buy more now
https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/tx/cb66e5ae9abdf9110d40561f3c0539365262ccec36fb999c4bdb0a633b0cc1b8
>These people are stupid

>>13685494
Fyi you fuckin idiots that's a kleinman submitted document too Christ so stupid the lot of you

>>13682390
>2012, I buy 50 BTC at $5
>Christmas time rolls around, I'm broke af and BTC is now $12 so I sell to buy gifts
>Planned on buying back in, but the price only goes up and hits $100+ a few months later
>want to kms and don't buy back in until years later

>>13685494
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/the-reason-for-law-8ffb7adc8957
That daft cunts literally mental. Utter babbling horseshit, entirety of which boils down to 'Werent me, a big boy did it, then ran away'. Was pleading insanity (with some carefully pre-laid goundwork) part of his plan? The fuck is he babbling about hearsay for, his fucking signature is on the fucking thing, ffs

>>13685494
>CSW has claimed before this signing that this list of addresses is fake
That's a lie. Craig's post is dated April 8 while the signed document was submitted on 02/14/2018

>>13685549
>Craig's being sued based on his own previously made claims
So basically Craig's only option is to admit that the whole Tulip Trust thing is bollocks and maybe he'll even get away unscathed, albeit denigrated.

>>13685650

https://www.scribd.com/document/372445141/Exhibit-11
page 9

>>13685892
>Objection! Hearsay!
why don't you attempt contributing something intelligent, just for once? I realize anything factual maybe difficult, under the circumstances. But dumb 'npc' meme responses just show you up for what you are, a cretinous fucking womble who is merely wasting both oxygen and everyones time here. Now either put up, or fuck off already

>>13686022
K, fraudulent doc submitted by Kleinman in February, CSW refutes doc authenticity in April, NPCs unleash this "proof" that CSW is not Satoshi with signature from address in fraudulent document CSW says is not his address anyway
>Aussie Man Bad

>>13686928
he is nor bad
he is the worst that came from upside-down

>>13686928
Perhaps because his own claims of possession are turned against himself. It looks like he tried to present some casino bullshit he was working on with Dave as "the creation of bitcoin". Dunno if it's too late to admit for him that the "Tulip Trust" is a bunch of horseshit.

>>13684239

>and I been in since 2017

kek

>>13686928
>K, fraudulent doc submitted by Kleinman in February, CSW refutes doc authenticity in April..
Noce try. This was however originally filed in February 2018, NOT 2019. Thats well over a year ago.
SO, Creg 'didn't notice' Ira Kleiman had filed a fraudulent document with random Bitcoin addresses and forged Cregs signature, this in a court filing, for, what, 15 months or so? And he THEN decides to complain about this in a medium blog, rather than to the court?
What actually happened, Creg concocted this horseshit himself (and signed it) in a competence-free attempt to prove the existence of the 'Tulip Trust' - as he (obviously) had no suitable BTC wallets, was padded with rnd Mt Gox wallets and similar trash. This then ends up before the court (and public record, which he fought VERY HARD to avoid). The addresses were then analysed and torn apart, not least by the excellent wizsec blog as early as Feb 2018:
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html
Creg then finally disowns this Bullshit (wisely), blaming Kleimans, hackers, his staff, forgers, Santa and his reindeers etc. on April 8th 2019. 15 fucking months later. tldr, its all just Yet More Fraud and Forgery hes been caught out on, like Daves forged signatures, these doubtless to be explained away in a Medium blog sometime in 2025. This hopefully written from a prison cell, where this fraudster inarguably belongs

OH FUCK HE POSTED THE BTC PRIVATE KEY DID SOMEBODY SNATCH ALL THE SHITCOIN BTC SPLIT COINS?

>>13681063
Hey hey hey

>>13687497
he should be in jail soon then right :)

>>13681140
Roger. He has a history of calling Faketoshi "a liar and a fraud" in those exact words. The fact there's a newline in there to separate the last sentence means Roger probably wants CSW to know it's him signing the message

>>13687608
nobody posted any private keys you numbfuck

>>13684239
full adoption is comin right guys?? ppl will be able to use this technology??

>>13685494
full damage control
the worst part is that when all of this is over, you're not going to come back to /biz/ and apologize for shit posting