/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13666037
>can't even stake RLC

have fun convincing people to do high value smart contracts with rlc

>>13666062
>staking RLC is quite literally the core of iExec and the PoCo algorithm
Retard spotted. Cope harder!

>>13666062
Imagine anyone trusting their data to a non secure enviroment on some beta virgin faggots machine

>>13666062
>>13666095

>>13666084
Spoon-feed then pls. I have not heard about this

The fact that they released this after Chainlink's mainnet announcement shows how absolutely terrified they are. The fact that they fucking MENTIONED Chainlink and put those red crosses and everything shows how fucking DESPERATE they are. It's literally "LOOK LOOK WE HAVE DECENTRALISED ORACLES!! THEY ARE MUCH BETTER THAN CHAINSTINK!!!!"

But ok I'll bite. How can I run a node? Can I stake RLC? Are there any pools where I can just "lend" my RLC to the node operators and get stake rewards minus fee back?

>>13666120
iExec tasks gets verified using PoCo consensus algorithm. Each worker needs to stake X quantity of RLC to execute a task, if task isn't validated, it loses the stake. This way it prevents malicious workers from cheating. Yes, it has a staking mechanism.

>>13666221
Is this in production right now? Thank you btw anon

Fundamentally this is inferior to link.

>>13666248
you can literally join the pool now and you will need to stake RLC and you will lose it if you temper with calculations

>>13666248
Yes with V3 is in production for computing tasks, I dont know about the state of the Doracle since it's news from today.

>>13666269
Fundamentally iexec is superior to link

>>13666215
you can join public pool right now, insturctions: https://docs.iex.ec/worker.html
you stake RLC and do some tasks. but you are not getting ROI just because you stake, you are getting money for providing your machines power. no you can't lend RLC and there is no need to do it. but you can start your own worker pool and schedule tasks, for effective scheduling you can earn a fee from all the workers

>>13666269
>60% of LINK is centralized
>most of RLC is in circulation
Watch sergey dump all his centrally owned coins on your faces and buys RLC with the profits LOL

>>13666420
How can I run a node that offers data?

>>13666037
This is so feminine and insecure. It is the equivalent of a girl writing on her facebook:

"Stacey, despite what you may have heard, has a MUCH looser pussy than me."

Ya, like I'm gonna trust these sluts on what they write on their own website about their competitors. What other coin has had so many people "call them out"? Didn't ENG have a shrieking meltdown in the chainlink telegram?

>>13666603
>COPE: THE POST
It's glorious watching linkies scramble

iexec doesn't support multiple blockchains, defeats the purpose of a descentralized oracle if you can just apply it on one blockchain

>>13666646
It doesn't need to support multiple blockchains for the oracle, ETH is the only blockchain that matters outside of BTC.

>>13666037

>>13664344
This is exactly what was OP saying

>>13666672
lol no

>>13666599
https://docs.iex.ec/doracle.html

>>13666672
Look up hyperledger

>>13666672
hyperledger, corda, plus more private/distributed networks

>>13666706
lol yes. Getting outside world info into RLC/ETH is all that matters. You can do literally anything from that point.

meanwhile chainlink is and has consistently been called the industry standard by nearly everyone in the space.

oh well, good luck.

CHAINLINK LITERALLY OWNS TOWNCRIER HAHAHAHAHAH

>>13666713
Like I'm gonna read some shitty ass projects documentation. Either explain it to us or stfu.

Link - $291M
iExec - $58M

redpill me on why link is 5x iexec

>>13666037

based

>>13666672
> doesn't realize the majority of high value smart contracts will occur on enterprise chains

oh anon...

>>13666741
No you dumb fuck.
New DLT tech is taking over as we speak and ETH (2.0 or whatever the fuck they will be running) will be obsolete

>>13666757
you can fuck off and hold link retard

>>13666755
This. They have all these red crosses on even SGX, meanwhile Chainlink owns Towncrier. It's so pathetic and desperate.

Another thing that is such a big red flag and a sign of desperation is the constant flooding of marketing bs on their Twitter. Literally 10 posts a day full of marketing jargon.

>>13666766
It is a scam that is being PUMPED by McDonalds to increase the awareness of big mac combos.

>>13666830
see >>13666095
>>13666119

you precious link can't prove it onchain

>>13666830
SGX is not exclusive to towncrier

>>13666037
Chainlink literally owns towncrier.
what else needs to be said?

>live on ethereum mainnet
so will link on may 30th
>support for TEE enclaves
what is town crier?
>supports multiple blockchains
link is blockchain agnostic

>>13666860
so? the RLC site says chainlink isn't using SGX, even though they own towncrier. what does this tell you? it's false advertising and it's scummy. chainlink doesn't need to partake in these scammy practices because they're widely regarded as the industry standard and they let their work do the talking. OP's post is a joke.

>>13666860
Towncrier is literally the main project for SGX.

Also who the fuck are you guys? It doesn't feel like linkmarine fud. It's kinda like genuine, but then again skewed. You guys aren't the RLC team members right? Right?! Lmao. Oh and btw just by looking at RLC chart I can say this shittoken is dead.

>>13666909
>>13666852
jesus christ. how fucking stupid are you.

>is on eth mainnet?
NO
>support TEE
but cant prove it onchain
>support multiple blockchains
on paper but not in reality

Iexec is also blockchain agnostic, but they did not check themselves green because they cannot do it yet likewise link

>>13666959
>Towncrier is literally the main project for SGX
What do you mean? Intel developed SGX just for Towncrier? I find this hard to believe

town crier helped develop SGX

>>13666789
>doesn't realize iExec v3 is literally the Enterprise edition
>>13666798
>thinks ETH will be obsolete
absolute retard

IMAGINE THESE LINKIES GRASPING AT STRAWS
>MUH LINK OWNS TC
>B-B-BUT THEY'RE GONNA DO IT ANON

>>13667124
>Owning town crier
>Grasping at straws
I don't think linkies are the ones grasping at straws, it's the rlc team

>>13666037
It's the bsv is the real bitcoin all over again, fuck me. Fucking stop sucking other projects cock to gain a little visibility before succumbing, just fucking die already!

>>13667188
see>>13666095
>>13666119
you solution is not onchain. basically it is a single point of failure

>>13667364
Except they are going live with a decentralised oracle service at the end of the month. Sgx will just be an additional layer of security if wanted on the chainlink network

>>13667364
The attestation service can be distributed away from intel, intel made this possible recently (but I haven't seen chainlink mention this)

>>13667472
decentralised oracle for some shitty yahoo finance api. what about sensitive data retard

>>13666215
There will be "compute" nodes listed on the Chainlink Marketplace that will eat their breakfast, lunch, and supper.

I used to think RLC might have some kind of future, be a network to run some LINK contracts on.

This is absolute desperation and should be a red flag to anyone holding RLC.

Your team had no real vision for their project, reeks of a scam.

They will bend the knee.

>>13666970
>>support TEE
>but cant prove it onchain
That doesn't make any sense. The whole point of TEE is to be offchain.

>>13667554
This.

>>13666037
>https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/

The fact they mentioned Chainlink by name is very childish and unprofessional, and makes me believe their attempt at making a decentralized oracle is worthless. They are just trying to stay relevant.

>>13667880
I mean, the last E stands for "enclave", which implies separation.

>>13667945
>t. butthurt retard

>>13666037
Competition is good. Although I don't agree with some of the points on the website, some of them are left for interpretation.

> t. 20k link and 20k rlc holder

>>13668372
You're rationalizing. This is a massive street shitter move.

>>13668223
says the butthurt retard buying a coin with no working product and no partnerships

oof
yikes
cringe

>>13666037
good we are gonna make it with our iexec frens how about iexec yacht party same time near our LINK yacht ?

>>13666954
lol noone can refute

>>13668924
sorry mate iexec holders are never having a yacht party, you're not the standard, oh well

>>13668883
>no working product and no partnerships

ONCHAIN ATTESTATION TEE CONFIRMED
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ypKdvjQVyQJW

GET FUCKED RLC FAGGOTS

>>13667945
Ctrl f "chainlink"
No results

>>13669400
Nothing wrong in updating the chart

>>13669092
Based