/biz/ - Business & Finance

If you dont know then fuck you.

>>13660279
post source please sirs, will send curry to your rlc address.

>>13660279
>made me look myself instead of just telling me...

thanks fucking faggot
Watch LIVE 16:00 UTC youtu.be/xfIThShzefQ $RLC $ETH pic.twitter.com/YRR6AbdNYG

>>13660274
2.5 hours

>>13660304
https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1128652791566802945

>7 Major Announcements
this will be good I think

>>13660274

ˇ ˇ ˇ
>>13659693

>>13660274
guys I already made 0.1 btc in this
I dont even think im gonna sell at this point
its a moon mission

>>13660307
>>13660494
This. OP there was literally a live watching thread already up when you posted this. Started an entire thread to ask one question.

>>13660509
HUGE sell walls on binance
BULLISH AS FUCK

>>13660527
based bittrex topped at 11K sats I sold 1000 lol lol now send eth to binant tu buy dirt cheap sub 10K oooo sacre bleu what a day. I made 50% of my month income in fours hours smoking legal CBD weed

>>13660523
yes kind sir we all understood you are a huge faggot and to far up your own ass to simply post this >>13660494 now do the needful and stop bumping this bread and move to official

have a nice day
>>13659693

>>13660567
Are deposits even open on binance right now?

>>13660586
yes yes

>>13660591
I don't know much about arbitrage, how much % difference in price is required to be worth it?

too late to jump in?

>>13660622
I think rlc will hit $20 sooner or later. up to you to decide. would wait for announcement tho if it's not that great price will tumble down. if it's great tho you will probably never see [insert current price] again. tough call fren tbdesu

>>13660622
we didnt even start yet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfIThShzefQ

Add reminder

>>13660622
>Up 30% since February
>Total volume is only around 1 million
>90ish on CMC
>Announcing an announcement several times
I doubt it will even move besides dumping a little bit.

>>13660605
if you have rlc on bittrex already, it has sense to sell

its 10400 sats
binance is 942 sats

not nothing, man, it's 10% <

fortunately I keep USDT on poloniex to prevent CZ to fuck my plans ..

It will move, but absolutely sell the pump.

>>13660657
i think i will wait for the classic dump after an anouncement. pray for me frens.

>>13660676
you are still here? but why?

>>13660700
Because OP shitted up biz with a dumb thread

>>13660672
Literally 0 liquidity there. If you want to make $50 go ahead

>>13660714
guess OP is a faggot like always

>>13660714
>Proceeds to post link thread

>>13660725
Pls do the needful all my BTC is on bittrex and I want binance price RLC.
>deleted my binance account

>>13660676
I'm scared to sell the pump man what if it 10xs after a 1x

>>13660739
now they have the same price and by the time my btc reaches BINANCE i will lose 100 rlc.

i will let you know whats gonna happen

>>13660846
sold 1794 RLC

I hope ill be buying 1900 on binance but Im afraid I wont be able to

Ive been swinging RLC for months. It always, always, always corrects. Just try to sell the top. Buy back in a week if you miss it by a bit.

> thinking about selling this coin under 1$
> thinking about selling this coin under 10$
Iexec's potential is huge. Fucktards.

>>13660877
checked
this. I wont sell under 20$ not a chance. and not going to pay the tax jew for a few shitty swing trades here and there either.

>>13660834
It’s not going 10X. It would be amazing if it did a 2X.

>>13660865
I'm too scared to sell it this time. Maybe for past announcements it was smart to swing, but imagine trying to swing ETH from $0.50 to 4$ and then missing out on the rest of the gains.

>74 waiting
will max out at around 550 I think. how is this even possible? either we are absolutely deluded or we are going to be so fucking rich.

>>13660963
Odds are they will just announce some literal who or announce Intel deploying again. I can’t imagine them actually causing the price to spike more than 50%.

>>13661052
I am not in it for the short game fren I am long term investor. As long as this project stays on track I see potential for huge gains

I predict that we will go to around $1.10. I will rebuy at $0.75.

>>13661052
Some literally who like Alibaba, IBM or Intel

>>13661172
yea, literal who's amirite guys kek fucking retards would hold this coin right g-guys, right????

>>13661052
pajeet fears the revolutionary tech

this yellowblack masterpiece will rule the Earth!

>>13660864
>>13660846


I indeed lost 70 RLC
so I bought link because its less expensive now

guys, dont arbitrage
I was literally 10 minutes late.

FUCK MEMPOOL

>>13660432
>>13660274
why does RLC pepe drink piss from a glass like this?

>>13661309
It's a delicacy on the moon.

>>13661309
There's no water on the moon, piss is quite expensive there

>>13661309
good for your skin

>>13661511
fucking KEKKED

made a new Honker for this special occasion

Honk Honk

>>13661145
Reasonable.

>>13661672
Honked.
Also, 11k on bittrex bois les gooooooooooooooooooooooo
20k easy today, 30k most likely.

>>13661804
Delusional.

>>13661672
Based and honkpilled

>>13661827
Not really. The announcements could finally help RLC get the recognition it deserves.

>>13661689
I swung my entire LINK stack into this so I will be taking profits on the way up this time. Wish me luck.

>>13661873
Announcements of this nature are always a let down because they never live up to the hype people and the ones promoting it create. It will probably be a low to middle tier tech company and the actual nature of the interaction will be overblown.

I could be wrong of course as Intel was a surprise when it happened but I don't think I am.

>>13661899
>of this nature
You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
This is the biggest point in iExec's history. v3 is a huge deal for the tech.

>>13661899
* Intel Alibaba TFCloud Ubisoft IBM were surprises

>>13661976
I will (Hopefully assuming no nukes or sudden assassins) be here after its over so if I'm wrong I will say so.

But I don't think I am.

t-30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfIThShzefQ&feature=youtu.be

>>13660834
Long time RLC holder here, I used to make the DBZ edits for iExec threads months ago.

It won't 10x over this announcement but it definitely has the ability to do a 10x over a week or so

Think logically, Binance still has halted withdrawals on the exchange, people will be nervous putting in too much money if they can't take it out when they want.

It all depends on if the announcements are enough to live up to hype today. I just bought what I had sitting out back in for announcements.

>>13662019
If it doesn't pump directly from the news it might pump insanely in the days/week after. It takes a while for news to get spread, and people to do research into projects.

This is really still a medium-long term hold. Swing a few, sure maybe, but keep a suicide stack.

Ubisoft, AMD, Google Cloud/Stadia

SCREENCAP THIS

>>13661881
good luck. you are brave and bold. at least you tried. never regret this. you are not an NPC

>>13662157

>>13662096
Oh I have a little stack just in case but I'm not terribly worried.

>>13662090
Let me ask you. What announcement could possibly live up to the hype? People are thinking Google Cloud or Amazon Cloud. Anything less than that will be a disappointment.

>>13662190
If it's anything with any of the giants it's a big deal IMO

>>13662190
I think it's more realistic to hope for an AMD partnership or something of that sort.

Only time will tell, I have hope these frogs wont let me down. I'm holding for the long run.

Good luck /biz/

>>13662317
Will find out shortly but I wouldn't get your hopes up.

t-5
let's go frens see you on the other side
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfIThShzefQ

GO BOIS!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfIThShzefQ

It beegeens

>dat gyno

god I hate french speaking English

>>13662550
LE HERE VE GO BOIZ

>paid by smart contract
Link confirmed.

>selling data
fml this will be huge

>>13662602
>selling data
rip ENGIGGERS

>usage of Intel SGX enclave
Yeah, Link double confirmed.

why is this mooning?

>>13662628
GPU CONFIRMED

EDF

EDF, The fifth largest electrical utility company with a $33 billion market cap,has launched its visual simulator software GPUSPH on iExec, a decentralized application that operates on ethereum mainnet

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

It's dumping!

>>13662663
PUBLIC WORKER POOL ENABLED FOR EVERYONE

HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIT
THIS IS IT

>>13662705
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

onononono SELL SELL SELL

"major announcement" was V4 release in december kek

>>13662705
Just people who bought the rumor now selling the news. Hodl steady. Most of them will pile back in anyway, because this news is massive.

V4 THIS YEAR
THE ABSOLUTE MADMEN DID IT

it's tanking now
guess it was bad news
glad i held onto all my link

Broke even on my link. whew.

that ending was abrupt kek

yikes
looks like there werent ANY major announcements its going to tank now

DAMN FRENCH BAGUETTES MY LIFE SAVINGS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

fuck it's dumping sell all your RLC bros
i promise i wont buy it

Honestly its as I expected.

KEK, burn faggots BURN

Doracle?

lol, link btfo. rlc impelemented oracles

Well, to be fair the EDF partnership/usage is pretty significant, but most fags won't understand it.

>>13662663
>>13662707
Brainlets are ignoring this

>hype up V3
>biggest news is V4 may be coming a bit sooner

This was an announcement of an announcement of an announcement.

Relax bois you can always swing it back. Just watch for increases in volume and sell a couple of times per week.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lectricit%C3%A9_de_France
this is the international company they were talking about

I have 3 ETH left, should I let them pump or use it for RLC when it dips?

>>13662779
It always is. Buy the rumor sell the news, no exceptions.

>>13662810
I hope every rlc faggot kills themselves now, cancer of biz

>>13662810
>biggest news is v4
well, v4 coming early is big but EDF and public worker pools open now is bigger imo.

>>13662822
32nd biggest company in europe by revenue and still dumping loll

>>13662825
who knows where it's gonna go
the news was medium-big not OMFG huge (but EDF usage is pretty big IMO but not flashy for retards here)
you might have an opportunity to buy a dip around 8.5k sat

what does this mean please explain

>>13662832
It wasn't even a big pump. It rose by around 10% and is now returning back to where it was. From start to finish it got zero attention.

>>13662863
who cares about some baguette eurofag corp. Google/AMD/Amazon or bust. Sell this shitcoin.

>>13662822
>>13662822
>company that is semi-state run
That's basically the best possible partnership. A state owned company will be kept financially afloat even if it turns a loss for decades.

>>13662870
it means that link is made obsolete by RLC

Doesn't look like it's dumping any more than it usually swings around. Ven used to dump a lot harder than this after presentations.

>>13662870
They want to compet with Chainlink lmaoooo

>>13662870
LMAO LINK IS MADE OBSOLETE BY RLC
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>13662870
It means they're trying to compete with Chainlink, even though they are confirmed to be using SGX, meaning they're going to be using Chainlink anyway.
It's pretty stupid.

FRENCHINKED. Not buying your bags ever again fags

>>13662863
I watched the video and I wish they stressed who this company was because I had no idea
>>13662870
I thought iexec was for computing power... honestly they should let chainlink handle the oracle stuff since theyre more specialized for it

>>13662917
Price only dropped like 1000 sats nothing new for RLC
but the EDF partnership and LINK getting btfo is pretty good

This is their doracle logo.

Yeah.

>>13662870
i still bought the fucking top because my fucking bank only lets me put in measly amounts every fucking day and i missed every other ~20% the past few days because of how fucking slow they are and how fucking shit every exchange but binance is and binance was closed

>>13662907
except links mainnet is launching in two weeks and iexec's v4 is still 7 months away

You are legit retarded if you dont at least buy link to sell the news even if you dont believe in it at current price.

is this ever going to be at 11k again?

>>13662924
>I thought iexec was for computing power
iExec can do anything

lol, link btfo

>>13662910
>even though they are confirmed to be using SGX, meaning they're going to be using Chainlink anyway.

How so? Chainlink is not the only project utilizing SGX

>>13662933
kek'd

>>13662953
wtf LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

iExec BTFOS ENG and LINK all in the same day.

>>13662953
That strikes me as being incredibly inaccurate.

>>13662910
retard. RLC has pioneered all work on blockchain with sgk

>>13662994
cope harder desperate linkie sir gay

>>13662953
Source to this image?

>>13662910
>confirmed to be using SGX, meaning they're going to be using Chainlink
You sir are retarded

EDF partnership, worth 69 billion.
> Price dumps.

>>13662950
ahhahahaha wtf its just a matter of days, relax. why buy the top tho

>>13662940
public worker pools are out for iExec starting today so I don't know what you're talking about. Sorry, not buying your shitlink bags

Looks like it’s about to pop off

>>13662764
>>13662769
Hahahahahahaha rlc fucks on suicide watch. Absolutely snail'd

>>13663089
>he sold the shakeout
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>13662953
LMAAAAO I CAN’T BREATH
Fucking BASED AS FUCK

>>13662958
>>13662997
>>13663040
>what is TownCrier
No really, you should look it up.

>>13663025
it is on their wepbage https://iex.ec/decentralized-oracles/

>>13662953
>"Chainlink has no "support for TEE enclaves like Intel SGX."
Even though Chainlink literally owns TownCrier, the premier smart contract development for Intel SGX.

>Chainlink has no "clear and compettitive pricing policy",
Even though Chainlink is about an open marketplace where nodes will compete openly for pricing (see Sergey's speech at Consensus yesterday for instance)

>Chainlink does not "support multiple blockchains"
Even though the Chainlink white paper (which came out over 1.5 years ago) LITERALLY says the following: "we intend for it (= Chainlink) to support all leading smart contract networks for both off-chain and cross-chain interactions

>Chainlink has no choice between different types of consensus
Even though the Chainlink white paper (which came out over 1.5 years ago) LITERALLY says the following: "As we explain below, their (=Chainlink Nodes) individual responses are aggregated via ONE OF SEVERAL POSSIBLE CONSENSUS MECHANISMS into a global response"

iexec are retarded

>>13663138
holy shit LOL
iExec is going to take 100% of both LINK and ENG's marketcap this week

MASS EXODUS FROM LINK AND ENG INCOMING

SHITTY PARTNERSHIP AND THEY CANT EVEN TALK PROPER ENGLISH. IM OUT FAGS

>>13662953
Chainlink does support multiple blockchains right? It's blockchain agnostic.

>>13663161
Pretty much all of those points are blatantly false.

>>13663146
>we intend
>is about to
>literally owns
>a bunch of empty promises meanwhile iExec is getting shit done
imagine thinking LINK is going anywhere
iExec will have first mover advantage and become the next BTC level gains.

>>13663174
>iExec will have first mover advantage
In the blatant lies department, yes.

im confused why theyre blatantly going after chainlink
a BIG mistake
if they want war.... they've got it

>>13663173
>>13663161
actually link does not do anything at all now

>>13663155
This is the voice of retarded America, I urge you guys to pay attention

>>13662953
>supports multiple blockchains
You can tell whoever made this is French and has no idea what the fuck they're talking about.

>>13663189
In the everything department.
Imagine thinking chainlink can compete with a decentralized computing marketplace that also does the job of LINK on the side as a hobby.

>>13663068
i bought in february at 870 and sold during 16k pump
rebought later at 11k and been holding until now

>>13663193
war with what? fat beta neets?

>>13663202
>In the lie-about-everything department.
ftfy

>>13663202
Like they did with golem ahah

>>13663155
Shitty partnership ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lectricit%C3%A9_de_France

LMAO, basically, it is the French government that uses the iExec technology.

>>13663243
>lies
meanwhile LINK has done absolutely nothing while the iExec team has delivered hand over fist.

Keep thinking you can compete, you can't. LINK is dead in the water.

>>13663258
>while the iExec team has lied hand over fist.
ftfy

>>13663193
Love Iexec when they are brilliant enough to look entering in competition. RLC to be a store of value in 5 years!

we are now competing with chainlink. I feel there will be a memewar that biz/ hasn't seen yet.

Hahahaha

>>13663243

Why cant you guys just admit when your wrong instead of diggin in the trenches and compounding your mistakes?

I havent seen anything concrete from link in a fucking year meanwhile iexec is blazing forward and even ahead of schedule.

Almost feel bad for you fucks.

>>13663151
Glad I sold out of ENG before but I am worried about my LINK stack.

u knw reqt team are frenchies right? u know rlc team are frenchies as well now tell me what significan thing frenchfags have done the last 50 yrs?aside from getting mozarillad

>>13663295
I want them both to be successful :)

>>13663298
I'm rounding up the troops as we speak
iexec made a huge mistake today
sad

>>13663333
Was gonna make this point too. Imagine trusting French people to work hard kek.

They couldn't even explain what they do properly. I expected a nice video but it's just the team barely speaking english over fancy words. All this hype and they can't even pump it over Golem which is a piece of shit.

>>13663174
lmao no

>>13663363
they work at 6hrs max a day was assigned to work in paris several yrs ago heres the typical work day 9AM arrived 10:30 take 30 mins coffe brk 12:30 take 1 hr lunch and 30 mins for coffee while taking nonsense in cafeteria 4pm another cofer break go home 5:30

>>13663306
>years
>hasn't even been out for 2

oof it looks like salesforce, microsoft and swift aren't enough for you

fucking retard

>>13663424
Yeah sure you know how people work

>>13663424

>Average productive day is about 5 hours in software development

Sounds about right. They may even be overworked.

>>13663433
None od those are partnerships

>>13663452
isure do sirs coz i was there anyway have u ever been out of ur moms basement?

>>13663487
Wtf Ahahah

>>13662953
lol!
>>13663146
>>Chainlink has no choice between different types of consensus
Read the chart properly, because that's not what it says. Man, what's wrong with chainlink cultists?

>>13663580
I wonder, did iexec genuinely not know about TownCrier?

French corporate culture is absolute shit. There's a reason why nothing major ever comes out of france. The crypto space will be no different. A French company isn't going to come out and take over the oracle market. Itll be American as always.

>>13663298
is this a telegram group?

>>13663763
Cope harder pajeet

>>13663804
Name one big global success to come out of france.. can you?
shut up faggot unless you name something

>>13662953
Bullish for Chainlink.

>>13663872
>>>13663804
Daft Punk?

>>13663872
citroen peugeot carrefour cartier

AXA (chainlink) louis vuitton

l'òreal, total gasoline, chanel, auchan

michelin, BIC, lacoste, bugatti, iEx.ec RLC

>>13663872
motul sephora christian dior lancome gauloises garnier.

you realize that USA is just a copycat of europe and that FIAT (italian) bought general motors?

how thick are you, son of a putaine

>didn't buy in at 20 cents

>>13663804

Evian water lol , perrier, BNP paribas

>>13663872
Sacre bleu! these linkies are really l'arriération

>>13663298
omfg another team of scammers....omg

>>13662834
not link? hmmm.

at this point is safe that RLC will run a chainlink node right? lol

>>13663424
Implying hours = work done.

Ameri Fats are watching blacked in their cubicles during wageslaving 90% of the day anyway.

>>13662953
lets be real here these charts are always biased as fuck to make the first coin look the best. they dont mean anything. when have you ever seen one of these that didn't look exactly like this.

>>13664077
Not to mention the hilarious lies on there.
Truly first-rate Pajeetism.

>>13664077
even if this chart is inaccurate RLC team is just 10 times better that LINK team, it does more, it is ahead of LINK it has much more going for it that just fucking oracles, biggest names have partnered with them, they are the most experienced people in distributed computing. Wile sergey is just fat slav

>>13663872
lol what a fat ignorant incel lol. you unironically owe your life to napoleon

LINK will win. Sorry RLC shills.

>>13664161
LINK already lost

>>13664115
>RLC team is just 10 times better that LINK team
And this Pajeety chart with blatant lies proves it?

>>13663872
Whoa you really pissed this frenchie off
>>13663914
>>13663937
>>13663958

>>13664420
Yeah, and the Frenchie dunked on him

>>13663914
Bugatti is Italian retard

>>13663914
>>13663937
>>13663958
All gay shit
> b-but 3rd worlders use it
Not an argument lol

>>13664718
>Bugatti
its fkin french u nigger

GET BAGUETTED

>>13664982
Already recovering.
Keep selling fools

>>13665075
just sold my DGB up 30% to nearly double my RLC stack

I am fucking strapped in

>>13664718
It’s french faggot

>>13665075

Down to 870 sats. So I guess no V3 pump then? Well either way shouldnt dump too hard going forward we are out of a bear market and V4 is ahead of schedule. This shit will explode within a year or two I feel.

>>13665075
>Recovering

>>13665163
moonboys are dumping
it's okay, it doesn't bother me if it goes lower because I will just quadruple my bag.
I got in well below the current price so it doesn't bother me at all, in fact I hope it goes lower.

>>13665149
>>13664752
German now, espèces de Arschlöche.

>>13665203
>COPE

>>13665192
Eh, BTC is making a move and the bots are reaction selling alts, combined with v3 sell the news moonboys. DCA into the dip and thank me later.

>they have announcements all month

>>13665224
Where did they say they will be anouncing over the coming weeks again?

News today are :
1- EDF partnership
2- V4 in December

What else ?
I was wagecucking all day.

>>13665448
3. they will be launching an oracle service to compete with LINK

>>13665448
public worker pools are open to everyone to join now.

data set wallets/monetizing data

i forget the last ones

>>13665203
who the fuck are these moonboys?

>>13665465
>>13665476
I can't find a single project with better news.
How Iexec is not already at 5$ ?

>>13665512
the market is actually retarded
it's a good thing, keep accumulating fren

>>13665512
It will be $50 once KRW pair hits

>>13665512
Do you understand they just humiliated themselves pretty badly? No more credibility if there ever was.

>>13665598
>humiliated themselves
>partnered with one of the biggest electrical companies on the planet
>btfo'd link with doracles
>released public pools
>gpu capability
>v4 in december instead of next year
im sorry, repeat that?

>>13665612
based

>>13665598
It definitely would not have dumped so hard if they had swapped places their v4 announcement and EDF partnership.

>>13665612
>hasn't done anything of these things
>doesn't have a product
>has no 1 real partnership
it's sad you're so stupid, rlc will never work with swift, microsoft or salesforce, unlike chainlink

Fucking hell there's much positive news, iExec releasing decentralised oracles too. Holy fuck

Anyone 200IQ analysed their DOracle document yet and know how it compares to Chainlink? iExec isnt even mainly about that but is it competitive?

Shitlinkers btfo
Part 1

Part 2
Some fat beta retard is spergin out in slack, kek threatening to dump 330k rlc if team does not retract their claims

>>13665612
Wonder how long it will be before rlc ends up using link like all the other "competitors" before it. Imo <3 months

>>13665709
No one is using link because it is not working

>>13665645
Is this some sort of delusional bait post or are you serious?
>>13665690
>>13665660
holy shit linkers actually BTFO LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>13665753
this is coming from team member - Hadrien

>>13665598
>Do you understand they just humiliated themselves pretty badly?
stop fudding, it hasnt even broken support. fucking zoom out you incompetent moonboi.

>>13665660
>>13665690
So they REALLY don't know about TownCrier.
God damn that's sad.

>>13665774
That's what makes it so hilarious. He knows what he's talking about.

>>13660274
The greatest war biz has ever seen is upon us.

Will it be civil war? Or will Chainlink bend the knee to its superior and make peace?

>>13665660
>>13665690
Also, their website says Chainlink doesn't have SGX integration, but this guy is admitting they do have SGX integration.

Which is it, scammy frogs?

>>13665804
didn't you read what was written? how delusional are you?

>>13665853
LINKsters refuse to read especially when it shows glaring flaws in their investment.

This is actually hilarious.

>>13665834
he says that chainlink integration is so worthless that it really cannot be considered integrationt. because your "integration" in simple words is not integrated into blockchain, kek. link pajeets will not understant it, but man this is hilarious

>>13665826
WHO WILL WIN
>5 PHDs and a team of super computing rockstars building a bleeding-edge global computation network
OR
>one overweight sergey in a plaid shirt

>>13665745
Hahahahahahaha. Kek.

Got my stack ready for the bart up, you guys holding on?

>>13665917
6* phds

>>13665917
Yeah okay. What about the motherfucker that coined "Pow"? :) suck it.

Lol nice pump and dump today. Wonder how many of you retards got dumped on.

I bought ~100k RLC at >10k, (80% of my portfolio), what should I do? I expected a pump during the annoucement to sell and make quick gains but I got JUSTED instead.

I somehow want to hold but I'm also scared of a general market dump in the coming days, what do

>>13666044
That's what you get for being a gambling retard.
Buy and hold.

>>13666044
it'll keep dumping
no good news until V4 in 6 months

>>13665853
>>13665870
I really really really pity you people.

These pics: >>13665660
>>13665690
say Chainlink has no on-chain proof of enclave use, but it literally does have on-chain attestation.

See Chainlink's white paper, which as been out for OVER A YEAR AND A HALF:
https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper
>Figure 5 (taken from [24]) shows the operation of the functionality Fsgx. Upon initialization, it runs outp := progencl.Initialize(), generating and attestation to the code of progencl and outp.
>An attestation σatt is a digitally signed statement by the platform that progencl is running in an enclave and has yielded output outp.

Consider yourselves absolutely, irrevocably BTFO.

>>13665917
Suckerberg > psychology
Steve jobs > dropout
Name one fang company started by phd protip u cant phds r for wagecuck
U know what sirgays major is?
Its about knowing how people think and less about phds

>>13666098
you have zuck and steve on one side and fat slav on the other

>>13666044
jesus christ look at the volatility
its gonna bart back up

either buy more as it goes down to bring down your cost average or just wait for it to test 11k again like its done twice in the last 2 days

>>13660274

>OG failed

>>13666096
you are not proving it on chain

>>13666096
Holy shit, lmao

>>13666194
That's what attestation means, you clown.

>>13666013
Ari Juels is listed as a "technical advisor" which means he isn't actually working on the project he was contacted once for advice on infrastructure and now is just listed to give sergey street cred

>>13666194
This

>>13666244
He co-wrote the white paper, and TownCrier is literally owned by Chainlink.

>>13666220
no it does not

>>13666270
Hes working with towncrier as a fucking professor you dumbass, Fan Zhang is listed on Ari's website as a phd student of many phd students that he's currently working with.

>>13666078
They have stuff planned for the rest of the month fucko

here comes the bart up bois

hope you didn't drop your stack like a bitch

>https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/code-sample-intel-software-guard-extensions-remote-attestation-end-to-end-example
So basically if Intel says you're safe you can run an oracle? Fuck that, what if intel starts abusing that power to access data from its competition?

>>13666220
nope
THE LEVELS OF COPE ARE SO HIGH

>>13666506
I doubt
Why not release it during their hyped up V3 release

>>13665660
>>13665690
why would an oracle need SGX execution anyways?

>>13666546
also new vulnerability was found today on intel, kek
https://techcrunch.com/2019/05/14/zombieload-flaw-intel-processors/

>>13666546
Then Intel will get fucked by coverments and investors. Are you that stupid to think Intel would leak data on purpose?

>>13666546
Intel have taken steps to remove themselves, they announced you can do attestation independent of them now. But not sure if link / iExec are doing this. Probably.

>>13666591
>Why not release it during their hyped up V3 release


To prevent a dump from moonbois

>>13666506
pussa

>>13666591
well you don't want your sensitive data leaking anon

>>13666616
Also attestation is only required on boot so if you leave the node running in the enclave its done after one time.

But yeah if you search you'll see that non-intel parties can set up their own attestation services now

>>13666044
please don't dump on us you are not the only one with heavy bags
like >>13666153 we should go back in a few days

>>13666244
Now this right here is some supreme fucking cope. Almost reaching bsv levels of cope.

>>>13666666

>>13666784
ari juels got on the "chainlink" team from the towncrier acquisition

ari was only an "advisor" in towncrier because he's Fan Zhang's professor at Cornell as Zhang is a phd candidate and Juels gave him permission to list him on his project

Ok goys got 50k at 840 stop d fud its time to pump
Chinklink btfo by 10 phds

>>13666822
Roulette gambling confirmed as best investment

>>13666194
>>13666259
>>13666559
Fucking lmao, yes it does.
Read the fucking TC whitepaper (which was written before

Here's Enigma spelling out its version for you.
>Once the key is generated, the enclave should generate a quote proving that the key-pair was generated properly inside the enclave. The enclave should then create, produce, and sign a quote. The quote is then verified with Intel and sent on-chain.

This is too fucking precious, you brainlets are making my day here.

>>13666385
>TownCrier is a professor with phd students
Holy shit, you're just now looking into TC, aren't you?

>>13666853
>ari juels got on the "chainlink" team from the towncrier acquisition
Then how come his name is on the CL whitepaper from 2017?

>>13666916
>Holy shit, you're just now looking into TC, aren't you?
Yes.
link your source then and show me ari's involvement other than being Zhang's professor as a phd candidate
>you can't

>>13666942
>Yes
It shows.
You must be an iexec dev, they seem to be literally the last people in crypto to know what the fuck TC even is.

>show me ari's involvement other than being Zhang's professor as a phd candidate
His name is on Chainlink's whitepaper, from 2017.

>>13666942
>† Ari Juels is a faculty member at the Jacobs Institute at Cornell Tech. He co-authored
this work in his separate capacity as an advisor to SmartContract ChainLink Ltd., in
which he has a financial interest.
>if you help us with our whitepaper, we'll give you a million LINK

>>13666983
>someone paid someone else for their work
Yes, that's how "working for" works.

wew this pajeetery is pathetic

>>13666916
>shoulda coulda woulda
>TC whitepaper
absolute kek. LINK is useless.

>>13667006
so let me get this straight then
>contact ari juels at his email
>say you're starting a crypto project and youll pay him in crypto for his help
>takes him hardly any effort
>list him as an advisor
>project looks credible
>...
>profit
that said given that Juels was already familiar with Link and was Zhang's professor regarding Towncrier I wouldn't be surprised if he facilitated the acquisition, thinking "hey, I know a guy I helped before who was doing something similar to this, let's see if I can get you working together"

>>13666916
>the quote is verified with intel

So chainlink aren't using their own attestation service yet? Intels is a single point of failure .

>>13667088
Next time actually look into things before you make hilariously wrong statements on your website.

>>13667111
>Intels is a single point of failure .
Imagine fudding 80% of the world's computing power just to take a jab at Chainlink.

>>13666614
mate, if intel gives a certificate to one of its own computers and then hijacks competitor data, who would know, huh? They would think they can get away with it.

>>13667110
Imagine coping this little.

>>13666732
and what stops any of these parties from selling certificates under certain bribes?

>>13666980
>>13667149
lol this delusional linkie actually thinks that paid professionals are spending their time arguing with him and trolling him on 4channel.
Haha wow. You are completely out of touch. Go outside once in while.

>>13667149
That's not an argument against what I said. I've been in on link for ages and one of the weaknesses has been the intel attestation service, its a single point of failure for nodes

It's talked about it in the Ethereum Trusted compute talk.

Now intel has made it so people can set up their attestation service. Chainlink isnt doing this so keeps the single point of failure?

>>13667276
I dont care about link vs rlc someone address the fucking intel fud. It's a major flaw in the whole oracle thing.
The certificate granting itself needs to be decentralised on a blockchain, not dealt with by a single or several potentially colluding companies

>>13667175
The certificates just validate that the enclave is legit right? Not sure how that would work out, but sounds like it could be a problem with authenticity so people could create fake enclaves and see the data being sent to contracts

But there's an option to set up your own attestation available for chainlink to implement, not sure if they have though

>>13667294
>That's not an argument against what I said.
Of course it is.
You said "intel is a single point of failure", so this compromises around 80% of all computer-stored data out there.

>muh Chainlink making its own attestation service
They could do so at any time; but much like the reputation, consensus, ... the idea is for users/nodes to use their own.
You know, the whole decentralization thing?

Also, I love how you faggots are now discussing the minutiae of Chainlink's SGX integration, while iexec IS ON RECORD CLAIMING CHAINLINK HAS NO SGX INTEGRATION.
Peak retardation.

>>13667345
>someone address the fucking intel fud
See the past 1.5 years of Chainlink-specific intel fud on here.
>>/biz/

Based newfren.

>>13667380
Read what I said about the attestation service. That's the point of failure. And it matters for chainlink significantly more than non blockchain uses because it needs to be decentralised. Having a central point of failure goes against the whole idea of it.

Where have they said they're having the node operators set these up themselves?

>>13667456
>Read what I said about the attestation service. That's the point of failure.
Right. Intel.
The same company that made about 80% of the world's CPUs; with all of the ones produced after 2015 having the enclaves.

Imagine fudding 80% of the world's computing power just to take a jab at Chainlink, lmao.

>>13667492
Now read what I wrote about it being more important when it comes to chainlink brudda

>>13667519
More important than 80% of the world's computer-stored data?
You really think very highly of Chainlink, huh?

>>13667531
I think LINK and iExec are both gonna make it. Have a good life bruh, see you at the yacht party

>>13667492
That's the whole point though you idiot we don't want another google we want data to be decentralised. As >>13667456
said chainlink definitely needs to look into this

>>13667649
Soooo what? Chainlink should advise against any nodes using Intel chips, even for non-enclave contracts?
And what if AMD becomes compromized?

>>13667678
No they should use them but decentralize the node sgx authentication.

>>13667755
>they should use them
But what about muh Intel compromization?
Today's news has nothing to do with enclaves, for instance.