/biz/ - Business & Finance

You are either going to be insanely wealthy, or you are going to lose everything.

>>13592477
so no in between? for once im taking a big risk and i kind of like it :)

>>13592340
Absolutely not.

>>13592488
Yup. It's all or nothing, baby. You call it's gonna be all over.

>>13592625
>You call it's gonna be all over.
what?

>>13592659
It's a Scotty Nguyen reference, the fairly famous poker player. In this context I meant it's in the bag, you got it. BSV is indeed going to moon hard or go to zero. It's one coin win all, and that holds true for the entire "crypto market."

>>13592340
Not likely with this poo team, I'm sorry anon you got scammed.

>>13592693
oh thanks
>>13592697
if i did get scammed its alright cause i made 40k net profit in 2017 from crypto. this is what remains

Fuck sake

I hate to tell you this, but you've been fed a lie. Ignore me, slate me, tell me I'm wrong - go ahead, put your fingers in your eyes and scream "lalalala"

But BSV isn't and will never be the 'real' bitcoin and thus will never take any big part of its market share. If you want to go 'to the moon', diversify into solid projects that have a use and keep half of your holdings in the real bitcoin. Not Cash, not Diamond, not Gold, not ABBC not SV - but BITCOIN - BTC

This guy is not Satoshi - I still think /biz/ is memeing, he hasn't proved it, we've told him what to do and he won't do it.

>>13592704
You're not getting scammed. Don't listen to these racist cucks. Pic related isn't even on their website: https://bitcoinsv.io/team/..

No one can guarantee you $$$ gains, but at least you're invested in the only coin in all of crypto that also understands economics.

>>13592754
im not memeing and i understand how ridiculous it is to all in a fork but this is an all or nothing gamble. i have enough money saved up to be comfortable
>>13592768
yea i know but in order to really take off it needs network effect something that it is surely lacking

>>13592340
lol no

>>13592800

it's a nothing gamble, there's no all about it.

At what point does this take the crown from Bitcoin? It's not going to happen. The computing hashpower is devoted to mining the real bitcoin, you have a whole world decentralized network, Lightning Network being developed and increasing in usage everyday.

BSV isn't going to stop that

You sound really young so when you do lose all your money, you have time to reclaim it all back. But take this advice from me: Diversify

45%: BSV, 45% BTC, 10% Alts - Why take a risk of all in? When you can guarantee something back at the end

I mean, sure, you'll have $250 eventually so I guess that's something.

>>13592800

BTC only has network effect on gambling platforms. Businesses have been unadopting it since 2017.

BSV has DRIVE markets that will use BSV infrastructure to build its platform on coming out shortly. And you got CSW claiming VIsa is going to build its worldwide infrastructure on BSV within the next 42 months. Maybe his timeframe is wrong, but you better know businesses are going to build their products on a stable protocol that scales. This ain't rocket science.

>>13592907
thanks senpai, good advice
>>13592926
yes its all very interesting

>>13592754
>we've told him what to do and he won't do it.

THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF COREKEKS

>>13592907
There's actually real people who still believe in the Lightning scam? Am i hallucinating or are you that retarded?

>>13593815
Lightning is OVER.

Invest in BTC and lose all your money. It's one giant ponzi, it is literally unscalable technology.

You've been warned.

>>13592340
You won't make it, you're already rekt.

>>13593815
>>13593827
look at the paid fud pajeets

nobody gives a shit about Ryan

Nice anon. I'm 50% in bsv with 120. We're gonna make it.

>>13592926
>And you got CSW claiming VIsa is going to build its worldwide infrastructure on BSV within the next 42 months.

Sauce pls!

>>13592477
This. I'm betting on the former.

>>13592754
>I still think /biz/ is memeing
I'm not. BTC is a shitcoin and Craig is Satoshi.

>>13592800
>all in a fork
Segwit is a fork
Cash is a fork
SV is also a fork, although its the closest to the original Bitcoin created by Satoshi Nakamoto and in February is setting literally everything back to .1 Bitcoin.

>>13593913
It's in his medium article on how to measure the value of a digital ledger. I think. It's in one of his medium articles that speaks on price (theres not many) in the last 10 months.

>>13592907
>Lightning Network
Doesn't work and even if it did, it'll be considered a money transmitter under the new guidance. Meaning all hubs require KYC and other heavy regulation to facilitate trade for people on the network. So basically only banks (as intended) Core's only objective was to steal from the miners and centralize the network around banks.

>>13593974
Thanks.
>>13593946
I agree that BTC is garbage now and that 99% of alts are ponzi schemes which deliver zero value beyond hustling pajeets out of their rupees.
Also if BSV is successful (and I have a feeling it will be- Creg and others keep hinting at so much going on behind the scenes) LINK becomes redundant- all data will be stored on-chain, which is an infinitely more sensible solution than muh oracles.

>>13593913
Here we go: https://medium.com/@craig_10243/valuing-systems-the-margin-of-substitute-goods-891b47fe381e

Pic is a quote from the article.

>>13592697

lel now I understand the pajeet satoj meme. So Creg hires a bunch of currybrapping street shitters as his team and expects people to take him seriously?

>please sirs do the needful and buy real Satodji Mahamootoo coin

>please sirs is very bargain buy our bags sirs

>>13592340
never

>>13593975
>The US is gonna go door by door looking for LN nodes
Hahahahahaha. It's like needing KYC Everytime you make a cash transaction. Good luck enforcing that.

>>13592697
Thanks for this, I've been on the line and haven't done research into BSV. I unironically refuse to invest my money in teams that have blacks or pajeets. I don't even care if BTC goes to 0 and this shit takes over I refuse to give my money to indian projects

>>13594037
>LINK becomes redundant
>considering this as an outcome before the network is up and running

>>13594386

Nice concern troll, everyone knows this is a shoop

>>13593975
Good luck banning Lightning nodes.

It sure worked well last time with Bittorrent

>>13594361
>It's like needing KYC Everytime you make a cash transaction. Good luck enforcing that.
Literally not at all. All nodes on lighting have visible IPs. If you think they can't get a subpoena to get info from you ISP for moving around money as a custodian, you're a retard.