/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13502134
>he back the fucked out white racist males
>implying thats a good thing

The only legit reason for Craig to come out as Satoshi other than that he is Satoshi is that people think he needed money, as his businesses were failing. So we have to assume Craig lied to the father of his best dead friend, lied about 12 million dollars and lied about
the shares the Kleimans would get or at least they would be useless shares. Now think about this for a second.

Why would Craig promise things to his best friends family when it is impossible to make true this promise. Ie. he had to either have the money back then, or
he would be completely insane to get them involved and promise them complete bullshit, which would come out either way, 1.5 years earlier before he came out as Satoshi.

But he had those businesses, he also had intellectual property, so he always had a way to get out of debt?
The assumptions that are made for Craig not being Satoshi are ridiculous, they don’t add up at all.

The fake pgp keys, the fake posts (if true) can all be waved away, if Craig didn’t want to be known as Satoshi, which it looks like.

>>13502147
It is a good thing you frothing white racist ONIONS-boy. The real world doesn’t care about your racism, which is why you have to hide behind a keyboard.

Go pay a monthly subscription for another trad thot. You’re the real SJW.

>The assumptions that are made for Craig not being Satoshi are ridiculous, they don’t add up at all. The fake pgp keys, the fake posts etc... can all be waved away, if Craig didn’t want to be known as Satoshi, which it looks like.
This is based on the premise that Craig Wright only fabricated evidence as long as he didn't want to be known as Satoshi. By now he supposedly changed his mind and is intent on proving his authorship of bitcoin. But that is wrong. It's known that Craig Wright still continues to fabricate evidence now, in 2019 (see: the recent bitcoin.org purchase history). Which makes no sense according to this narrative, because he DOES want to be known as Satoshi, but his actions aren't in his favor.

>>13502183
Prove that the bitcoin.org domain history was faked.

>>13502160
>implying anyone will read this absolute shit of a waste of motherfucking time

>>13502171
no u

>>13502318
Here's the current package page:
https://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_hosting_virtual.aspx

Here's the package page from 2009:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090410023048/http://www.anonymousspeech.com/anonymous_hosting_virtual.aspx

The package name and the price correspond to the current day rather than 2008, and you can order a package for a certain domain without actually owning it.

>>13502396
And this is Craig's original "evidence" that he posted himself. Or maybe someone posted it from his medium.com account.

>>13502396
You know that is only Greg and friends that caim you're pic is something craig posted as proof? It was just and illustration to his blog, and of cource a way to troll brainlets like you

Kek no one cares about this literally who coin anymore dude CZ fucking axed it. It's done. Dead. Let it die

>>13502396
>>13502427
Kys greg. Ur a fat piece of shit

>>13502440
But he never said it was "an illustration". He said, "What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services." and "The records of the same payment are required to be kept by the banking system for 25 years. It hasn’t been that long". Most people who read Craig's blog are his supporters and they took this screenshot as a genuine piece of "evidence". Considering that Craig's supporters are mostly in the lower bracket of intelligence and people of Indian ancestry, I wouldn't expect them to take anything from Craig critically. Why would Craig dupe his own supporters? What's the plan?

>>13502596
> of Indian ancestry

Implying that you're not employed by an Indian manager at a tech company.

No, people who are white, black, or anything else recognize that it's most prudent to wait for the end of the court case. As Craig said himself, if he lies, the maximum prison sentence is 20 years.

In regards to your picture, what if the product simply updated to a current version of it? In regards to the price, it starts with 7 something. How does this match with the current price, when you can't even see the full price?

>>13502396
>>13502427
>>13502446

>>13502396
The back statement from 2009 will prove it, not a screenshot taken a couple of months ago you fucking NPC

>>13502160
>if Craig didn’t want to be known as Satoshi, which it looks like.

yeah, sure. that's why he says he is satoshi every chance he gets.

>>13502651
>In regards to your picture, what if the product simply updated to a current version of it?
The whole point of a purchase history is that it never changes even if the product is changed or replaced, it's immutable in that regard. Moreover, today's packages and 2008 packages are different structurally: each of today's packages can come with any OS, each 2008 package comes with a specific OS.

>In regards to the price, it starts with 7 something. How does this match with the current price, when you can't even see the full price?
You can see today's price, it's 59.95 € per month for a yearly plan (which makes up 719 € in total). The 2008 pricing did not have any limited offers.

>>13502751
The bank statement, you mean? You can compare the prices from now and ten years ago on the same website, Craig's screenshot matches today's prices and today's package name that didn't exist back then.

>>13502819
Please show me explicit evidence were he States that the screenshot is refered to 2009. It's pretty clear that the screenshot is only ilustrative, the only really proof is the bank statement .

>>13502651
Racism is wrong by the way. Deal with the facts and answer the questions.

>>13502847
He did not say it's illustrative either. Instead he said, "What you don’t realise yet is that I used my credit card. Yes, as crazy as it might seem to you, I used my credit card to purchase anonymous services." and "The records of the same payment are required to be kept by the banking system for 25 years. It hasn’t been that long".
Most people who read Craig's Medium are his supporters, do you really think they're intelligent enough to take it as a mere illustration?

>>13502889
You are clearly are a brainlet that's trying to imply that the screenshot is the proof, that clearly shows you don't understand evidence at all, or you are a blockstream shill. Bank statement or nothing. Anyway have fun wining a couple of cents a day posting this stupid fud, BTC is already dead.

>>13502396
That seems to suggest he paid for hosting, not the domain

>>13502889
If his bank statement says that he bought the domain package, do you realize that it is hardcore proof?

>>13502171
This is Craig Wright typing btw

>>13502953
You know you have no argument when you resort to racism.

>>13502921
Of course it's not the proof, but it was taken as proof by those who read the article and are looking for "breadcrumbs" from Craig. Keep in mind that the article with the screenshot was posted on Craig's medium, who do you think reads it other than Craig's followers, sexual and ethnic minorities?

>>13502948
Yes, right. The trick is that you can buy a hosting package for a domain that you don't actually own.

>>13502959
It's not racism, he just gained a slight tan from partying in the Caribbean.

>>13502952
>bank statement
Well, good luck with that. We'll see how it turns out.

>>13502995
That wasn't the question. Do you admit that if a bank statement exists showing that he purchased the domain, it is very solid proof that he is satoshi, unless you believe in the conspiracy that he was merely the person who bought the domain based off of someone else's instructions (very very unlikely)?

>>13503152
Yes, a bank statement would be very solid proof that he purchased the domain and is directly related to Satoshi. How likely that outcome is, is another matter altogether.

lmao bsv haters BTFO kek