/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13462200
Hello mr. dev do you need liquidity for dumping?

>>13462208

disproven by data & facts, plebtard!

ownies assemble

Comfiest hold,top 100 wallet here, none of you plebs are welcome to my moon, please keep fudding and selling

>>13462200
all fake and gay astro-turfed by telegram and discord trannys

sage

>>13462411
>all fake and gay astro-turfed by telegram and discord tranny

just promiz not 2 get mad when moon & call scam when we tried to tell u over & over agn....

Yep.. accumulation time again biz.

>doesn't have a subreddit
not gonna make it

>>13463013
does: https://www.reddit.com/r/OwnMarket/

follow the breadcrumbs, /biz

COSMOS creating Tendermint

Own did a better version

up 50x and listed on Binance, heheheeh, we gunna make it ownies

Own Whales not selling. Top wallet movements in the last 7 days pic related.

>>13462270
The dumping FUD has been around since early February, actually, when an anon wanted to buy a stack cheaper.

>>13463060
That article was written by an OWW bagholder who lives in the Telegram chatrooms and Binance Info just happens to publishes whatever he submits to them.

Shill attempt rating report from @anon on project Own (CHX). Rating: 2/10.

>>13463080
>holded by whales
>holded

**WARNING**

Own (CHX) is a pump and dump scam coin.

The fraudster devs pumped the price of their token by lying about mainnet being Q1, lying about having tokenized billions of dollars worth of assets, and lying about having STO's lined up until 2020. The devs have been dumping their tokens on exchanges for months.

They will keep delaying mainnet until they have dumped all their tokens and then walk away from the project. Mainnet was supposed to be Q1, then Q2, now it's "end of the year". They can't dump all their tokens at the same time because there isn't enough liquidity to do that. They can only dump about 10,000 tokens per day, so they need to keep stringing you a long to make you hold.

Chx admins are doxxing and banning people on telegram for raising concerns.

>>13463096
>ignores facts
>buys the fud

>>13463237
Yes, that is exactly what you're doing in usual bagholder fashion. If OWN is that great of a buy, why do hundreds of people disagree? I care about whales, I care about the graph, the price, and the volume. There were plenty of whales in BitConnect as well.

>>13462200
Sure, I admit to shilling CHX and dumping. Only delusional bagholders left kek

>>13463267
>why do hundreds of people disagree?
because they are sheep and don't DYOR.

FRAUDSTER DEVS ARE DUMPING THEIR TOKENS ON US ON EXCHANGES. LOOK AT THE CHART. IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS FALLING OFF A CLIFF. IT IS GOING BACK TO 700K MARKETCAP WHERE IT WAS ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO.

>>13463328
>because they are sheep and don't DYOR.
What about when the price pumped for two and a half months? They did the research then?

>>13463345
>They did the research then?
nope

enjoy the show, sir

MAINNET DELAYED UNTIL END OF YEAR SO THEY CAN KEEP DUMOING THEIR TOKENS ON US. CHX DEVS ARE FRAUDSTERS

>>13463374
I am. I would like CHX to be worth more so I could double or triple my stack with two mouse clicks. All I care about is profit. But almost anything positive about this project can be refuted with legitimate fud.

>>13463434
I don't have CHX anymore, I meant double or triple my ETH. Got out of CHX a long time ago.

>>13463434
>can be refuted with legitimate fud.
Nope, it's all been proven to be bullshit.

>>13463466
>Nope, it's all been proven to be bullshit.
Name two and I will prove you wrong.

>>13462200
This is god awful. Unironically neck yourself you piece of dogshit.
>he hasn’t seen the lition news
You’re about to really kys after you miss the lit rocket to 20m mcap

>>13463470
>Name two and I will prove you wrong.

Refer to token balance of the company above. Ignoring the ICO transfers, the initial + bonus, the token payouts to employees, is less inflationary than Ethereum.

so if you're getting 'meh dumped on buh devs', then your eth stack is getting dumped on 'buh miners'

>>13463560
>>13463549
They're paying over $60,000 in bonuses every month to the development team, a designer, and social media marketer working out of Bosnia. Does that sound reasonable to you?

Sascha said they're not dumping, they simply give the CHX to the development team and they can do whatever they want with it on the market. So it's not "OWN" dumping technically, it's the development team. They said each member can only sell 10,000 CHX a day and no more than 3 or 4 thousand at a time with no market selling. That was in their contract and have had to remind certain members about it before. There are at least five people on the development team, which would mean they can dump up to 50,000 CHX a day.

Why are these Bosnian developers to keen to selling their keys to their lambo?

>>13463601
It's mostly for developers, and it was an incentive to work overtime (weekends) for over a year. Now exists a blockchain that was built incredibly fast.

If you do some digging on ethscan, you can see a few are holding relatively large stacks. As an employee or working person, you generally have bills to pay, and those bills don't accept fiat. Would you work for free?

PS: Don't be salty because you were banned for being a dick.

>>13463719
It's easy to give away so much CHX when it personally costs you nothing. Bonuses for all! Especially when by their own admission the price of CHX doesn't matter in the end. They're fine CHX going down to 1 cent, because they will simply lock up more when companies are doing STOs with them.

PS: I wasn't banned anywhere.

>>13463719
>you can see a few are holding relatively large stacks
only because there is no liqudity to dump.. devs have same problems. there is only enough luqidity to dump 10k tokens per day. scammers

chx devs are exit scamming because lition btfo's them

>>13463827
And this. A single 50,000 CHX market sell would take out at least 50% of bids on IDEX.

>>13463827
>>13463860

is QNT exit scamming and dumping too? Because their price is down the same %.

>>13463848
Lition's pumping at last, it's up 1.5%. KEK.

>>13463107
Not my website, but the account data is real.

Only reason it didnt dump more over the last few days is the team stopping selling..Once the order book fills up again they'll resume dumping. They dumped like 1.5 million tokens last couple of weeks. Devs over there must be eating nicely

>>13464050
yes they are

>>13464666
>Only reason it didnt dump more over the last few days is the team stopping selling..Once the order book fills up again they'll resume dumping.
this

>>13464050
>is QNT exit scamming and dumping too? Because their price is down the same %
polkadot /cosmos > quant

>>13462200
>**WARNING**
>Own (CHX) is a pump and dump scam coin.
>The fraudster devs pumped the price of their token by lying about mainnet being Q1, lying about having tokenized billions of dollars worth of assets, and lying about having STO's lined up until 2020. The devs have been dumping their tokens on exchanges for months.
>They will keep delaying mainnet until they have dumped all their tokens and then walk away from the project. Mainnet was supposed to be Q1, then Q2, now it's "end of the year". They can't dump all their tokens at the same time because there isn't enough liquidity to do that. They can only dump about 10,000 tokens per day, so they need to keep stringing you a long to make you hold.
>Chx admins are doxxing and banning people on telegram for raising concerns.

>>13464738
>polkadot /cosmos
> up 50x

We'll hear your opinions about it in the next month, kek

>>13464762
>We'll hear your opinions about it in the next month, kek
oh im waiting for cosmos to dump to $1 first before i buy

never touching quant. it's just a shitcoin

>>13463806
You've provided irrefutable FUD as you said, just sold my 250k stack

>>13464976
I really did because Sascha said many times that the value of CHX is irrelevant as businesses will not have to deal with the crypto, they're paying in fiat.

$1000 can be 1 CHX or 100000000000 CHX. Doesn't matter to Sascha. Good thing you sold. I'm just surprised you were able to sell 250,000 CHX so quickly! Must have cleared the whole order book there.

>>13464762
He'll understand how terribly and pathetically wrong he was soon enough, anon.

own is a business. they get paid for consulting

the crypto/chx thing is separate. they only made this to fund their business. we dont profit from their consulting business. sashs doesnt give a fuck about chx. or mainnet.

and that project x. it's an exchange. in an earlier ama they said they wanted to make an exchange built it would take years. this shitcoin will bleed for the next couple of years

>>13467279
>and that project x. it's an exchange. in an earlier ama they said they wanted to make an exchange built it would take years. this shitcoin will bleed for the next couple of years
It's actually a name they gave for their "dream team" ala Michael Scott in The Office: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhPN8l8Z7IU

They will be tasked with making deals and getting on exchanges. Hinted in the previous AMA. Bagholders are going to be real disappointed when "Project X" comes around.

>>13467315
You're ignoring all of the incredibly bullish facts about this coin/company because you're letting your emotions get in the way due to price going down. Great strategy.

>>13467315
chx is a joke

>>13467566
>You're ignoring all of the incredibly bullish facts
I am not. They failed to deliver on their promises way too many times, from big partnership announcements to mainnet, I do not trust them. Also in the latest AMA someone asked if they still have ICO money and whether OWN is profitable and all Sascha said was they have money and laughed it off as a silly question. Which means they do not have any of the initial money left and are not profitable. You're funding their operation by letting them dump on you every week.

>>13467682
They were working fine at less than 1 mil in marketcap and they'll be working fine if it goes back to it. I've been keenly following them for more than a year, and the fact that their operations don't care about the short term CHX price or hype is incredibly bullish to me.

>>13467808
I'm sure they will deliver by 2021 but it's not going to be with my money being in their dump pile. I might buy a small stack before the token swap, if they make a legitimate announcement, but I'm not holding my breath.

>>13468037
Delivering in May. A lot of fud in here.

Suppoman shilling STP as an 'Own killer' while STP won't be doing anything until 2021 est.

AMA.

>>13468037
>>13467682
these

>>13468941
12 fud posts.