/biz/ - Business & Finance

it's a scam

it's going down the drain

sorry anon

>>13354929

Mainnet will be released during summer but still the big players stay hidden. The price increasing slowly along with BC

>>13354929
Care to explain exactly WHY it is a scam? What about all the acquisitions and partnerships? All part of the ruse?

>>13354944
thats absolutely checks

It’s just vaporware, just like everything else shilled here

>>13354925
Fuck off delphi shill

>>13354992
How is it vapor ware? Be specific.

>>13354944
Is that for real? Nice!

Link is a stable token, will probably maintain around $.50 for the next couple years. In the white paper it mentions that Link being worth more than $1 entirely defeats the purpose of token.

IF you are building a smart contract and need swift messaging, docusign signatures, or other enterprise level items, the only way to get will be using chainlink oracles

>>13355058
Is this true? What's then the purpose of holding this token?

>>13355064
Why you didn't tweet this?

>>13355091
to suffer

>>13355091
No, its not true. Look at the whitepaper yourself. It makes no mention to specific price target for the value of the token.

>>13355091
It’s the keep yourself ON chain with your crypto. So if things fluctuate too much you keep your self linked to the chain of crypto and when things start booming you relink back to btc, ethereum; that kind of thing.

>>13354925
It's gonna dump, slow bleed to an atl

>>13354929
>boomertier meme

>>13354992
>I-it's vaporware. I'm Vaporwareanon, see my other 15 posts.

>>13355160
>is gunna domp guize low effort post

Whoever is paying for this brigade isn't paying too much.

Vaporware pic related.

Yes total

i did dive deep... did you?

>>13354925
I-I'm selling anons. Don't try and stop me.

>>13355020
t. delphi

>>13354925
this coming bull run will see LINK pump to $25 because BTC will hit $80-100k
ETH will hit $5k

be sure to take profits and sell into TUSD and just wait for the crash and buy even more bags before BTC goes to $1 million usd and above.

>>13355091
you bought a funding token. remember that. they FUNDED 32 million, TWICE AS MUCH AS ETHEREUM. and for that they still kept 65% of all tokens.

the economics of their funding token are terminally busted, ignoring the fact that it is after all just a funding token, something that isn't required by the tech in any way, and given how ethereum and the api providers hold all the power in the relationship, completely replaceable with something else.

>>13355336
I searched GitHub exclusively via google and various pieces of this text, no results. I guess it could be a closed repo but I think it’s fake.

>>13355531
>swimming the ganges counts as research.

>>13355865
It's not a closed repo. https://github.com/NavyAdmiral/linkmarines/
t.spoonfeeder

I'm a brainlet. I've not seen an explanation as to why the token is needed aside from Sergey exploiting the ICO craze. Why would a stable token not make more sense?

>>13354979
>Mainnet will be released during summer
That's what they said last year.

>>13354992
this

>>13355022
Over 1.5 years since ICO, and nothing has been delivered.

>>13354944
Link?

I'm sorry guys but just by me having link prevents it from ever mooning.

>>13356136
To prevent Sybil attacks. There's a reason why only a third of the total supply was sold. You can be sure that it will take a very long time before the rest of the tokens are released.
Stable coins can go to 0 if a fundamental flaw is discovered or people realize tether is insolvent. MAKER seems legit tho.
Links value is derived solely on the usefulness of the network, using Link you avoid all the btc/eth crypto drama. If the network has value link has. Value. In time we will become an independent ecosystem.

>>13355531
>>13355913