/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13333089
Nothing is gonna pissing happen for the past bloody time

Why people think this is where mainnet drops? Doesn’t even make sense

Just a big greasy nothing serger

just because everyone doesn't expect anything to happen something major will fucking happen since this is clown world now
"its not what you dont know, its what you know for sure that just aint so"

>>13333089
Clause has decided to replace chainlink with witnet. I'm an insider do not doubt me.

>>13333089
No it's not happening. 1) My birthday is today and it would be too good to be true. 2) Sergey said he will tell us weeks in advance before he presses the button so we can turn up our neet nodes and grab the 350 million basic income linkies by providing random numbers to minesweeper dapps.

>>13333188
>minesweeper dapps
kek

>>13333183
>no dubs
yike

>>13333188
Happy Birthday Marine. Kek wills you to have a good one.

>>13333114
It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times... You stupid monkey!

>>13333188
Yeah I'd thought they'd said something similar in telegram to say the would give people a heads up.

Let's get deluded.
>$10 per user per month
>$120 per user per year
>Assume 7 billion people
>$840 billion per year
>Assume 5% interest
>$16.8 trillion
>1 LINK = $48k

>>13333138
Nobody said anything about mainnet.

>>13333755
Mainnet is necessary for the announcement to make sense

>>13333170
>>13333188
>>13333755
>>13333774
Its going to catch you all off guard, why do you think the fud was cranked up hardcore the last few days?

>>13333794
Pajeet always goes ham on prior to the first week of monsoon season.

>>13333089
I work at McDonald's.
Can confirm, being replaced by blockchain agnostic tamperproof Smartcontracts tomorrow.

clause is not partnered with link you absolute retards

>>13333089
it's going to dump again isn't it?

>>13333949
Anon is right. It is built on the Accord project.

Who is partnered with Accord? That's right

>>13334041
>>13333949

>>13333949
Absolutely BASED brainlet sticking his empty head into a thread to say a bunch of dumb shit without even caring if he's wrong..

>>13333158
Underrated

>>13333794
Stop giving people here credit as if they’re organized and have some kind of elaborate plan. If they feel like fudding today, they fud, if they feel like poo poo pee pee or schlop, they do that. Just stop making ChainLink into something bigger and deeper than it is. It is a tech start up that has caught the attention of a few interesting people like Tom Gonser. It is literally nothing more than that.

>>13334041
>link is partnered with accord and accord is partnered with clause therefore link is partnered with clause

>>13333089
It's literally dumping

>>13334102
>a few interesting people

>>13334256
Larry Ellison has shown no interest in ChainLink. Oracle is a big fucking company and if Ellison wanted in on ChainLink, it would be known. He isn’t known for doing things quietly. Just be realistic. The Oracle guy even said that Oracle doesn’t use ChainLink...and thinking that Sergey could call shots over someone like Ellison is hilarious.

Be realistic.

>>13334165
Accord isn’t “partnered” with Clause you idiot. Clause created Accord.

>>13334332
>be realistic
Unironically never gonna make it

I know it's hard not to sperg your humongous spergs out on the Internet but let's just see how it goes.

Could be big, could be a flop

>>13334463

>>13334458
I’ve already made it

>>13334332
>t. knows exactly what Larry Ellison is thinking
Sure, anon.

I’m all in

>>13334552
I don’t know what he’s thinking (and neither do you), but I’ve studied his career and company in depth and know it is EXTREMELY unlikely that he’d have interest in an unproven product like ChainLink at this point.

Ellison started off by recognizing a valuable piece of tech created by IBM and marketed it to the CIA. He has been very vocal in regards to ventures and acquisitions since then and became a billionaire off of M&A.

If Larry Ellison were interested in ChainLink, it’d be known and some guy that works for Oracle (for now) wouldn’t be distancing oracle from ChainLink. furthermore; try to understand how Oracle has made Ellison rich off of centralization.

>>13334601
>he’d have interest in an unproven product like ChainLink at this point
That's why Oracle had been gobbling up startups that show even a modicum of promise?

>>13334692
No...Oracle gobbled up proven competitors, not “unproven startups.” So much so to the point that the government sued him...

>>13334713
Have you seen Oracles product offering besides the database? It's full of shit built by literal who startups later purchased by Oracle.

>>13334332
>The Oracle guy even said that Oracle doesn’t use Chainlink
stopped reading there, he said Oracle doesn't use link FOR NOW. fuck off to discord pajeet

The Oracle employee literally said Oracle has no plans on using ChainLink. And why would they? The entire business model long term could be threatening. Just be realistic. The probability that Larry Ellison has put much mental bandwidth toward ChainLink is unlikely. They are just starting to explore blockchain iterations for their cloud shit. ChainLink is interesting, but be realistic. I know it’s not going to net me a huge return for a few years (if ever). They have an incredible amount of work to do.

>>13334792
>no plans on using ChainLink
for now

>>13334824
This is exactly my point.

If they have no plans...such plans will take A LONG TIME to enact (if they ever even manifest).

ChainLink has much, MUCH bigger obstacles to overcome before someone like Ellison will look at them seriously.

Sorry to give you a dose of reality, but none of you are making a lot of money off of ChainLink this year. I wouldn’t sell it. Just be realistic.

>>13334885
What you say is all conjecture. The other side has concrete facts under belt.
Wake up and smell the bigmac

>link already under 10k sats
REPEAT AFTER ME LINKIES
"WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT?"

>>13335814
Nice black id, nigger.
Buying few hundred more just in case tomorrow is big.

>>13333333