/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13324221
the exposure of timo revealed to the world that link is full of scams.

>>13324221
Oh right it's almost 6 AM. Guess you shills are starting to clock in for your shitstainchink spam shift

>>13324221
nothing left to really talk about.

>>13324222
How is Timo promoting a scam? It's a legitimately quality service given the general ambiguity in all things link.

It was Timo shilling the CLG strategy, i.e. not worth our time. They literally released a medium post which made the exact same points as the 'anon' in that thread. You guys just hold onto your crypto, work on improving yourselves and wait 'til 2024. I promise you will have made it by then.

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>13324221
Unironically yes. I think iexec will be useful before chainlink.

the thrill is gone, i just wanted to be rich

>>13324221
it was disproven? how?

>>13324221
Honestly not trying to fud but I have a big concern with Chainlink. Chainlink has been on Ropsten for a year and everyone was expecting all these potential partners to test on the test net. The team even told people to keep an eye on Ropsten to see the customers using the network. Well for 55 weeks the only transactions on Ropsten have been regular peeps taking the 100 Ropsten link from the faucet. There has been absolutely no requests for data. In fact, someone asked Thomas why and then Thomas made a run to show it works. Well I see Thomas's request for data but it is the only one.

Why is there no testing on Ropsten? Where are all these customers/partners/devs that are supposed to be creaming their pants at the potential of Chainlink? I know the lack of communication, lack of updates from Sergey, lack of social media presence, increasing competition from Mobius are all red flags but this may be the largest.

Does anyone actually want to use Chainlink?

>>13324267
You are a MANIAC

>>13324269
>Unironically yes. I think iexec will be useful before chainlink.

Research rentcpu.com

It is all a chinese scam.

>>13324324
Dude so are YOU. You are in EVERY THREAD saying the EXACT SAME THING.
>the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results

>>13324340
>he thinks it's the same 2 people
That's cute.

>>13324335
Thought that same about REQ at the start of 2018. Glad I changed my mind.

I wish I could leave this board and have peace of mind instead of your autistic scriches at every chart move.

Why am I still here?

>>13324360
this. I have fucking work to do, yet I'm glued.

>>13324360
>>13324379
This is purgatory

>>13324351
this is pasta newfag, some link shills just spam shit for fun. get lost to whatever board u came from

>>13324555
Ha ha ha. Newfag exposes himself.

>>13324322
If we take the Ropsten testnet at face value the answer is no.
Then again, if you are a company that is figuring out if they are gonna use Chainlink you would have a private testnet. Nobody wants to announce they are using a service that may flop horribly in the long run.

>>13324360
It's the worst board on the site. I can't stand to be here for more than about ten minutes to check for updates before I'm so disgusted I have to leave.

>>13324555
He litchurally sent all of the pasta by himself, haha you're dumbb

>>13324324
>>13324340
>>13324351
You blew it kiddo

links done, sold the top for the bottom of bsv

>>13324653
but bsv is a very very long hold. No point in buying in now. have to wait a couple of years

>>13324221

>>13324221
The premium api problem only concerns the "I'm so tech savvy reddit onions node operator"s.
We all know the big Gs have their links ready to stake, thus making link moon to oblivion.
Also we are waiting for 16th, could be juicy yo.

>>13324221
where's your buy order son? if you really thought LINK was shit, you wouldn't waste your time, writing this low effort FUD, filling out captchas, etc. You are here to buy in cheaper - actions speak louder than words anon you can't hide your intentions. I don't waste my time shitting on Chainlink even though I think it's garbage - why would I? I couldn't care less about the project and filter everything related to LINK. People only FUD if they are interested. But what you don't realize is that 4chan doesn't affect the price. This isn't a tradeogre shitcoin with zero volume

>>13324653
>>13324666
Shut up retards

>>13324221
The discord trannies got salty because Sergey wouldn't endorse their scam. That's why their lead fag dumped his coins.

>>13324763
That means centralized nodes

>>13324222
Timo and the discord trannies only THOUGHT they were doing a coordinated pump and dump. LINKs market cap and trading volume is waaaaay too high to be controlled by the NEETs on 4chan. In reality they were just following the market with their shill/FUD campaigns. They had no real effect, but they liked to pretend they did.

>>13324360
screeches

>>13324267
>>13324324
>>13324340
>>13324351
>>13324555
>>13324601
>>13324630
How is this funny? Do you guys really laugh at it, or just want to fit in? (How 99% of memes are created.)

>>13324910
>memes are about fitting in
That's just how you use it sweety

>>13324257
y-y-you promise?

>>13324910
Funny? Those retards just trying to bump their own thread. They just do it for bumps. It's honestly pathetic.

Oooh, reply to my own post so people will bump even more. Just like you. Bumping again.

>>13324932
You don't find a bad joke repeated 100000x funny, unless autistic. 99% of memes are fads.

>>13324967
>I don't find it funny, therefore it isn't
Autism confirmed

>>13324221
it was some potent shit but not really FUD

>>13325157
> what is this? FUD for ANTS?
sry

>>13325157
As potent as a street in Mumbai during Monsoon Curry Festival no.9.

>>13325157
This post is based because of the size of the image and the knowledge of the pajeet who posted it. Thanks ranjesh

>>13325166
Who is Steak House Anon? Is that WagyuAnon?

>>13325166
>says chainlink is a good investment and you will probably make a lot of money holding it
This is the "strongest fud" huh?

>>13325364
Yeah I guess people think it's FUD because they're realizing that a no-work neet node isn't gonna cut it.

But like. We're still early adopters in the most promising asset since bitcoin. Just work to get to the highest tier you can

>>13325166
Does anyone have the original post I'd to this thread?

>>13324221
I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

>>13325418
>posts copy pasted bullshit everyones seen a hundred times already
>no one reads it. no one cares
>probably doesn't even check to see if it gets any replies
>mindlessly moves on to the next thread to post another
>maybe pregnant sergey this time
LINK has done serious damage to the minds of people on this board.

>>13325401

>>13308478

>>13325401
>>/biz/thread/S13308478#p13308524

>>13324770
>I don't waste my time shitting on Chainlink even though I think it's garbage

you incels always miss the point.

>>13324221
they could exit scam and im still not selling, kiss my nuts niggas!!!

>>13324222
Checked ducks in a row trips.


Reminder that Timo means literally scam in Spanish.

>>13324782
no, it doesn't

>>13324221
There is no premium API problem for node operators. Its only a problem for wholesale API providers that wants to sell the services.

>>13324910

This pasta thread is the gift that keeps on giving anon. No matter how many times it's reposted, it catches a newfag. Also, this thread is a bad example because one guy is samefagging. It's much better when separate people post each one. It's like distributed pasta, holographic, each piece living in a different anon. It's beautiful. I'm fully erect right now.

>>13325866
You do realize that people deliberately respond in that way in order to look like a newfag, right?

>>13325896

Then it just grows another layer. Soon everything will be part of the pasta. Even me. Even you. Just let it happen.

>>13325853
I don't understand your distinction between premium and wholesale here.

Most useful data that smart contracts will need are expensive and have sheisty pricing structures. That's the "premium API" problem.

What do you mean by wholesale data, and why do they have a problem?

>>13324340
I hate this stupid quote. How about
>The definition of insanity is eating a homeless guy's face off in South Florida.

>>13325959
The "premium API problem" is a pajeetism for "I'm poor".

>>13326033
This actually. If you treat setting up a link mode properly ie seriously, you have to treat it like a business. I might set up a company to out behind it. You need capital to invest in venture when you start, and paying for premium API access has to be just one of those costs

>>13326068
The point is, how long will it take for a node to become profitable, & to generate more money than it costs to run. That's another huge unknown and nothing to take lightly. I still think with links ambitions alone, the history of the company, and connections to Ari Jules, Cornell & owning town crier, it's still the best gamble in crypto
t. All in with 80k€ worth stack at current prices

>>13325166
>tfw you dont understand one word you just read
I guess I am retarded... will I still make it? :(

>>13324221
Well, what is the refutation to the premium API FUD?

I follow most stinky threads and have seen most stinky FUD but that one hit home

>>13326033
> oh anon you have to have $10k linkies to run a node, you do want to run a node and become a millionaire right?
> oh anon you don't know how to negotiate with big businesses and API providers? How are you going to run a node?

a few years back I payed ~50 bitcoin for some [redacted]

>>13327194
>Titus, preheat the oven.

>>13327167
Everyone will end up using clc
So it should actually be worth a worth 3 years from now

>>13327799
Thanks just a bought a bought 100k