/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13288430
>With the Chainlink mainnet fast approaching
Ruh roh, someone wasn't supposed to say that

Is it true CLC sold 90% of their chainlink tokens?Selling 90% of your holdings doesn’t exactly exude confidence in chainlink or CLC. This is someone who is R&D for CLC and know what’s going on behind the scenes better than anyone else.

Why? Everybody knows mainnet is immediat

>>13288499
checked and true but it's dumping rn reeeee

BTFO HAHAHAHA STINKIE LINKIES

>>13288495
this, if I was involved with clc, i'd fire timo, very unprofessional

timo is a fucking faggot

>>13288557
Yeah I do agree. It's poor form and I'm not really sure why he would need to announce that publicily? Either for ego if his trade is good or to create negativity in an attempt to drive the price downwards? He can trade privately all he likes but yeah... not a good look at all.

>>13288430
potential brainlet moment, but it seems like this is more about profit sharing in a company with its own stakes. Do they offer to pool your link and run oracle's on your behalf somewhere?

>mainnet soon

Oooooooooooooooooooooo

>>13288430
Well it'll go 2-3x so might as well double my LINK stack. LP did 5x, but CLC Group is raising more so going to keep the expectations lower.

>>13288684
No, this is purely about receiving a portion of the 25% share of profits they will release to shareholders. No service is offered here (as far as they have mentioned at this time)

My bet is they get shut down confido style.

>no burgers
kys eurokikes

>>13288558
not gonna buy this because he is involved
looks like a scammer and reminds me of plushtard

>>13288789
As so they’re assholes then - no staking for the community, no say in the business, and just 25% of profits

Token distribution is also awful

Only bullish thing is their api partners - can someone ask some of those partners if theyre exclusive with clc?

>>13288797
Booty bothered

>>13288872
you're buying equity in the company, not a revenue share token, not just 25% of profits. CLC Group could literally come up with a competing LINK pooling service tomorrow and you'd own a part of that too. God knows they have the high value APIs on board to do it.

>>13288913
Meanwhile they have nothing to show, no tech demos on test net, no exclusive high value data feeds, team members selling their link.

>>13288872
You'd have to be a retard and a sucker to buy this. No mention of unsold share allocation and based on their obvious greed at 60% reserved for the team probably means they're going to the team as well when the inevitably raise more like 500 ETH (Linkpool only raised about 700).

They're selling at a valuation of $1.8mil. Step outside of the echochamber that is crypto for a minute as they are offer you equity in a company NOT a cryptocurrency. Imagine making a website that hosted a few apis and thinking it is worth $1.8mil. Any other day in the real world of building a business, what they have made is barely worth $50k. Probably not even that as they have no revenue model at the moment other than "when the chainlink mainnet goes online (anytime between now and the end of time) and isn't a complete failure (probably 50/50), people MIGHT use our service enough that we make some money"

What they've done here is decided they want some money, a shitload of it actually. And it just so happens that there's a bunch of retards who follow this coin religiously (myself included) which are more than happy to throw their money into the toilet on ICOs. So we will do an ICO to take their money, but not actually offer them anything other than a share in the so far completely non-existent profits in our api hosting website which we value at 1.8 MILLION FUCKING DOLLARS.

To answer your last point, I'd say it's incredibly unlikely that those apis are exclusive. Read back over my second paragraph and try to think of any scenario in which a company would want to offer their apis exclusively to a company like that.

>>13288913
They’re selling less than 1/3 of voting ‘shares’ if you want to call them that and have no appreciable assets besides their partners.

Where does the rest of their profits go? To the founders - who are already collecting their portion of the 25% allocated to shareholders?

Honestly I think it could be more attractive if they don’t offer staking - but also shitty towards the community.

>>13288495
Who is this fag? anyone important?

>>13289019
KEK MY MATHS WAS WAY OFF, VALUATION ACTUALLY AT $7MIL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>13289019
I'd argue that their model is potentially more profitable than linkpool in the short to medium term. Right now there isn't any source for flight data except through them or through signing up for the API as a single user. Some for sports, sentiment analysis, multiple crypto price feeds, and whatever the fuck else they have.

>>13288931
Exclusive API agreements runs contrary to the whole point of the network. But, what they do have is favorable per-call pricing because they negotiated as a business/group entity as opposed to a single user. Compare the prices for single users compared to businesses on some of the APIs. The advantage is clear.

>>13288430
>To put this into words that have recently echoed within the ecosystem, it has been a shared effort to “put our ducks in a row” in preparation for what is to come.

Very unprofessional

Linkpool has always been a scam to enrich that fat fuck johnny.
CLC share sale is also a fucking scam.
They keep 70% including salaries for new hires. What the fuck.
How stupid do you fucking faggots have to be to fund either scam.

>>13288495
If you follow a trade because of that faggot or that tweet you are incapable of thinking for yourself.
He's a fucking idiot.

>>13289184
You can make a ton of money on literal scams.
Linkpool was a 20x in ETH and CLC will also moon.

>>13288430
I like what they intend to do but the valuation is preposterous and timo dumping 90% is complete shambles.

>>13289211
Also this. Even just ignoring all the potential profits and utility, think ABOUT THE MOON MISSION.

This is the FIRST ROUND OF FUNDING. There will be a second one in 2020 when they have revenue and the product is working. Linkpool did a 20x on NOTHING.

Think about how much more expensive CLC tokens will be come second round.

Fuck you people are dumb

>>13289211
It's a plebbit tier way of going through all this.
You could have made tons of money buying deepbrainshit and selling the top.
Good luck gambling your children's birthrate with a literal outright scam moneygrab.
This is a terrible risk/reward profile, its a literal scam proposition.

>>13289239
Should I sell some Links to get into this?

>>13289249
> your children's birthrate
CLC group confirmed eugenicists illegally sterilizing NEETs

>>13289273
Tough Q. If you have other crypto laying around I'd do that first, but Link is a different story.

I'd say yes, and think of it as diversifying your holdings in the project.

>>13289273
Yes, give your money to a greedy whale who has 0 faith in Chainlink and is using it as a literal pump and dump vehicle to increase his own wealth on your behalf. Couple that with the fact that this shit is made up of a team of 100% bizraelites who obviously have no fucking clue how to value a literal who startup company. Go for it man, what could go wrong.

>>13289394
> swings onces
> greedy whale
Like I get the 'I wanna see swinglinkers swing' joke, but fuck me you guys couldn't spot an opportunity if it was facefucking your eyesockets

>>13289394
>Timo
>Whale

Top kek

>>13288495
Who the fuck cares what the image seekers say. The shadows are where the money is made they will never make it.

>>13289441
He Tweeted about his trade to influence his followers. Like all faggots on Twitter, they're attempting to manipulate you to their benefit, not yours.

>>13289239
Not buying your trash timo.

>>13289604
Love it how suddenly CLC Group is Timo's project because his face happens to be in the team list. There are literally 20 guys working on the project and Timo isn't even in the top 50% most active. There are guys literally putting full hours into CLC Group but Timo isn't one of them. Timo just happened to tweet at the wrong time.

>>13289697
this desu. get real Timo doesn't need to work on CLC Group, he's making too much money swinging his Linkies

>>13289697
>t. Timo
First he shilled 100k sats imminent while he was selling his bags.

>>13289239
You realize you are buying “token shares” of a startup banking on a startup banking on a startup right?

>>13289769
The thing is that they target regular normies as investors, they can't convince real smart money investment guys to invest in their start up

OH NO NO NO NO NO

>>13289769
As opposed to what you were buying with LP?

Make sure to save this faggots tweet dumping at .59 so we can post when LINK is $1000 so maybe he’ll anhero if we spam it enough.

>>13289820
I didn’t buy LP as for the same reasons. Startup literally banking on the success of a startup. You have no contract from CLC, no guarantees of future success. Buying chainlink and running your own node makes fucking sense from a ROI standpoint and is still a fucking Hail Mary

>>13289760
What would it matter for my point if I was Timo and confessing to not working on the project as much as half the other people? Are you literally this logic-ridden of an individual?

Jesus the types of mongrels that populate this board...

>>13289913
When CLC can’t afford their operating costs will they give back 66% to their investors when they split the pot. My guess is no. Not because they are bad people but because there’s nothing holding them accountable

>>13289940
The Lord will hold them to account.

>>13289940
I mean... if you have shareholders in your company you sort of have to... it's sort of in the law you know. The whole point of offering securities is to reassure the investors of this and their legal share of any future profits.

>>13289997
Eternal
Hellfire

>>13288495
>RIP Todd or Tom or whatever your name is.
t. Sergey

>>13289940

>what is a smart contract giving dividends

>To put this into words that have recently echoed within the ecosystem, it has been a shared effort to “put our ducks in a row” in preparation for what is to come.

Guys this kind of makes me sad. My dick is diamonds for this year, but seeing these guys take our memes into the real world and twitter...idk, the quotes here are just too much, it's too obvious. Our baby isn't ours anymore. It'll never be the same but I guess it's what we always wanted. :'( Thanks to frens who digged up info.

>>13288557
We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink.

>>13290523
It's still your project, anon.

CLC will be mandatory best practices for node operators. They're helping guide our baby to the next stage of development.

>>13290553
This

>>13290523
agree. finding breadcrumbs has officially jumped the shark. now we just hope for massive normie attention after mainnet.

>>13290523
>these guys take our memes
This is actually a project made by biztards. It's cringe, just like twitter shills using memes

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink.

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink.

>>13290557
hes a pokemon trainer in real life

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink..

Bump

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink..

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink..

>>13290557
I'm all for it. It just feels like your favorite underground band blowing up, you want the best for them, but normies will never truly appreciate them for the genius they are, just for the fame they already receive. They'll never know they're investing in one of the most profound computer science advances ever, but it's ok I guess because I can dump on their heads for years and years to come.

>>13289913
the market disagrees with you. link is a 3x and linkpool is a 20x. eager to see where clc goes

That has nothing to do with his long term confidence in Chainlink. He sold because he expects Bitcoin to dip and is probably trying to swing trade. He is confident enough that it was his only hold and the only thing that changed according to him is his Bitcoin TA.

>>13290638
meant for
>>13288495

>>13288430

No prior business experience

No guaranteed income (smartcontract)

No legal liability (Estonia)

No proof of having done anything technological with Chainlink exept buying API access and having a website

And now your promoting your funding on biz while kicking down linkpool. Your just a bunch of BIZlets with a money grab idea .

FU

>>13289940
what operating costs you dummy
part of the joy of their model is that there arent any

>>13290604
Yep

they are getting roasted on r/lt
I imagine it's you faggots

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink..

>>13290677

>>13290658
check the resumes of the folks on the site. plenty of business experience

neither chainlink or linkpool have any proof of income

the api are not bought, theyre negotiated as per call rates

nobody is kicking anything

We should start a 4chan campaign to get timo fired from CLC group. He is a bad image for chainlink..

>>13290677 #

>>13290673
thats a lot of money for a piece of code that connects notepad to a json parser. what ever happened to ctrl+C ctrl+V

We are now starting a 4chan campagin to get Timo Harring kicked out of the CLC scam group because of his unprofessional swing trading against chainlink. Very unprofessional.

>>13290677 #

>>13290583
Top kek underrated post

>>13289239
Linkpool does something really difficult, running an enterprise grade link node with guaranteed uptime and huge (insured) stakes for big contracts.
These guys are just banging out a few adaptors, which take maybe a few hours each to do. It's a business that could be comfortably run by two people with minimum funding. Where the fuck are they getting their figures from.

>>13288789
this

>>13290658
what this guy said

>>13290108
kek

>>13288588
COPE HAHAHAHAHAHA

TIM > TOM BWAHAHAHAHA

>>13291058
You can run the best node in the world with all the uptime anyone could ever want, but without high quality APIs it's a piece of shit. So, if you don't sign up for CLC, what's your alternative? Buy the APIs.

What's one of Sergey's go-to smart contract examples? Flight insurance. At the highest tier, that's $499/mo for data on Aviation Edge. What about gambling contracts? Fastest Live Scores is $799. Crypto derivatives? Brave New Coin and CoinMarketCap combine to over $1000. Suddenly a node operator is paying over $2k for the privilege of ~maybe~ feeding a few contracts. Node operators are going to be making profit with FRACTIONS OF A CENT margins. How do individual node operators handle that?

CLC is helping the chainlink ecosystem get off the ground by negotiating these per-call deals. Without them, node operators wouldn't know/wouldn't bother signing up for the highest-value and most important APIs. The folks CLC have signed ALREADY represent some of the biggest and most important use cases for the fourth industrial revolution. Their work is making your Link more valuable, and will get the network to scale faster. AND, on top of all that, they're giving you a chance to get some ownership!

You're right about it being low-overhead and high-margin, though. Don't miss the next 20x.

>>13291524
literally all of this is not true

They are deleting Timo haring scam threads

jannies literally being paid by chainkshit to scam people

abandon all stations, the ponzi is over

>>13291561
A node with no API is shit. Only way to get high quality APIs is to buy them or sign up for a service like CLC group. APIs are expensive. That cost will/would lead to problems with the ecosystem, were it not for services like CLC. They are now offering you ownership, and a comparable project (linkpool) did 20x on nothing. Their model is low-overhead and h-margin.

These are facts; deal with it you genetic failure

>>13291588
Thank god we have an archive

>>13291591
clc is literally not needed
pointless scam

>>13291624
APIs are expensive and could lead to supply/demand issues as per the cobweb theorem. CLC negotiates per-call pricing and lowers technical barriers to entry.

What part of these two things don't add up for you? Did you choke on your own umbilical as a fetus? Did your mother drink during pregnancy? Does your father beat you too hard?

>>13291588

doxxing is a no go, in 4chan too.

>>13291624

good argument sir

>>13291641
those APIs will not be needed anyway
clc is a scam you scamming faggot

>>13291648
deleting the posts and threads won't stop us from reporting this scam to authorities.

>>13291591
>and a comparable project (linkpool)
dont compare Linkpool to this clc scam

Why do you all love being poor so much? You literally despise someone who knows how to make money. If you faggots can’t tell: the market isn’t moving organically. People like Timo aren’t trading based on TA you dumb fucks. The market IS going to dump. You can screen cap this if you want and make threads like “how he know?!”

You faggots will always be poor because you don’t network with the right people.

>link is legit
>linkpool is scam
>clc is /biz/ pajeet-tier scam
Now fuck off

>>13291658
> no one wants to gamble
> no one wants crypto derivatives
> no one wants flight insurance, literally one of the ones sergey talks about all the time

what the fuck is wrong with you

>>13291737
Linkpool is at least recognized by Sergey
its more legit than the clc scam

>>13291641
None of the idiots left here understand how anything works. You need to just give up and let them call each other “subhuman low IQ nigger.” Biz is kill.

>>13291745
all the APIs you need all the adapters you need will be free
only think you need is more real Link tokens not biz pajeet tier scam tokens that do nothing but steal from you.

>>13291757
>pls stop exposing my scam

Ok, i can understand LINK autism, the breadcrumbs, the schizophrenia, it's ok, fine

But buying the project that is speculating OVER the other autistic project... Is either fucking delusional or just beyond autism, like extra chromosome tier, dude, chill, just buy more link, wait for the first project to be a success before trying to "plan ahead" your entire life

Discord trannies are having a meltdown right now trying to cover up what’s going on

>>13291748
THE TEAM REVIEWED CLCS WHITEPAPER WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU FOR REAL

>>13291762
>>13291762

Go ahead try to resell data without paying for it. I can't wait for the influx of retards realizing they need to purchase API keys and create external adapters to have their node do any meaningful shit.

>>13289285
I sold some of my Link to buy Linkpool shares when dozens of phaggots where fudding it hard everyday and the returns have been astounding. I am thinking about repeating the move now...hard call indeed, mainnet is close

>>13288430
fuck this scam and those normie cucks, I understand linkpool but those motherfuckers try to be another middlemen
why would you even buy this scam, not only do you need CL to succeed you also need some amateur bullshit artist to do well, good chances to get rekt on this scam

>>13291826
5% of people here will run nodes. The rest think it’ll be akin to signing up for gmail and getting free money for doing it.

I’m telling you, 70% of the linkfags here don’t even know what ChainLink does or what a Smart Contract can be used for.

>>13291796
We need to fight the clc scam or else more of them will show up here soon

>>13291821
Funny how they try to make us think
>forget timo the scammer

>>13291823
No they did not
Show me where exactly sergey said The clc scam is needed to run a node. I‘m waiting.

>>13291826
All you need for your node is the Link, adapters and APIs will be made available for free anyway all you need is Link staked to get contracts.
but go on and defend this stupid moneygrab

>>13291821
>>13291830

Threads about timo have been deleted.
CLC group members are now endorsing his behaviour while trying to raise a million bucks so they can swing trade and steal our linkies .

So glad this scam is being exposed.

>>13289019
Fun fact related to what you commented. Their business model is pretty similar to dropshipping but with APIs. The APIs they include in their marketplace are not exclusive. They just reach out API providers that offer a monthly subscription access model and negotiate a per-call pricing with them to offer less API calls for a small additional charge...

It's a literal scam.

>>13291849
it says on the first page good god you're dumb
dont trow your back out moving those goalposts

>>13291524
>So, if you don't sign up for CLC, what's your alternative?
I am signed up for CLC. If another service comes along I'll sign up for that too. It's a useful service, but it has very little in the way of moat, and I cannot see how they're valuing it at 7 million. I'm not exaggerating when I say an adaptor is a few hours work, the chainlink team has themselves said as much. This is not a service that needs a 20 man team.

>>13291876
We don‘t need a middleman like clc trash
go scam with this garbage somewhere else
Maybe try reddit

>>13291884
HAHAHA 7 million dollars
what retard is gonna pay for this?
and they hold what? 60 plus percent?
they gonna dump this shit on everyone the first chance they will get
This timo is a scammer and scammers usually hang out with other scammers.

be careful anons those guys are out there to get your linkies

>>13291838
I'm on the same boat, I went all in during the LP crowdsale. I was one of the main fudders though, the "unsold shares will be distributed among contributors" was really tempting to ignore it. This is different though, their valuation, their shares, something is odd with these guys valuing theirselves as 7 million USD

>>13291849

>spewing random bullshit as valid argument

It was cool at the first few posts but now you just sound like a retard.

>>13288430
this shit is so unprofessional. Their website looks like it was made by a 5 dollar pajeet and all these articles must be written by a fucking mongoloid lol. 0/10 scam attempt and I would literally never invest my money into some horseshit like this.
>guy guise we use /biz/ memes too! we're le linkmarines heh. Anyways FRENS give us some of your linkies so we can swing trade them and take a cut off any node payments (which you will LITERALLY be able to run from a smartphone).
Frankly, it's embarrassing that these scammers are even willing to put their faces on the website.

>>13289274
>neets
>requiring sterilisation

>>13291916
Linkpool is a lot more legit than clc
a NaaS makes more sense than a new API middleman that steals your money

>>13291926
Oh look the scammer has still not produced any evidence that sergey said this will be even needed
aint fooling me pajeet

christ, this just gets worse and worse
>there's like 40 team members to make a simple fucking chainlink adaptor
>they need SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS FOR THIS
>based in Europe, home of scamming Europoors and rapist niggers
>random "team member" is swing trading their whole stack
can it get any worse?

>>13291826
It's going to be beautiful. It's also going to be the moment people realize they missed out on the first round STO.

By second round, with Link and CLC both generating real revenue, it's going to be an absolute launch pad

CLC is an outright scam.
I would check competitors, CLC is already BTFOd

Bedataready.io

FRAMEO IS ABSOLUTELY SEETHING

>>13292009
>Linkpool is a lot more legit than clc, a NaaS makes more sense than a new API middleman that steals your money
Agreed

>>13292026
> services
> 3 pictures

Compare this to the team who had their whitepaper reviewed by Chainlink, who has signed 15 API providers, has more than 2 members and doesn't call themselves 'evangelists,' and who are trying to make node running cheaper for everybody

>>13292016
Please show us where sergey himself endorsed this scam or that it is even needed for chainlink
Come on we will wait

STUPID ASSHOLES ARE RATTTHHHHHEERRRRRRRR COPEY IRL RN LELELELELEL NIGGERS 2 CENTS EOY@@!@ CHEGGGGUM TIMO-------->

FAP GAME TIM TIMO EJACULATING ALL OVER STINKY ASSHOLES LOOLOO

>>13292076
Please Timo, stop embarrassing yourself. Thomas and Jonny, both used to call themselves "smartcontracts evangelists" because they were firm believers in the tech since years ago before almost nobody else was able to see the actual value on this industry. Jonny and Thomas gave you their free time to review your project, so at least respect them as they deserve, faggot.

Is it blatantly obvious to anyone else that most of the posts in this thread are not coming from true /biz marines? The overall verbiage and embarrassingly poor fud seems foreign to this board. There are reasonable doubts one could have about this project and there are constructive conversations to be had regarding them. I guess some weak willed failures prefer their vpns & tantrums instead.

>>13292081
They literally thank Thomas and Johnny (post him joining the team) for reviewing the whitepaper. ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE WHITEPAPER.

When I said that the team reviewed the whitepaper, I meant that the team reviewed the whitepaper, and if you'd stop nibbling on your own goddamn anal polyps maybe you'd learn to FUCKING READ

Even the goddamn FREE API SITES don't offer as many APIs as CLC. They're bootstrapping the whole goddamn network you fucking fool

>>13292113
> call themselves "smartcontracts evangelists" because they were firm believers in the tech since years ago
> some rando on a scam site calls themselves one now
One's a tool and one's not I don't see the problem

Is anyone actually investing in this shit? I mean, I could understand if they had a reasonable value. But they are trying to claim a 7 million dollar value for just providing some APIs? It's honestly comical. I guess they saw that people still throw millions of dollars into anything related to crypto and wanted their piece of the pie

CLC team cant even tell their investors how much they will be making. "For legal reasons" aka, scam.jpg

They are providing a "service" not a cryptocurrency but they are trying to fool you guys that they csnt talk about it, but linkpool did.

>>13292213
It's a fucking shame, seriously, I really liked their project, but the greed has reached them. I've seen several great business startups because of it. Also there is just TOO MANY people working there and wanting to go full-time. The money is literally going to be sucked by their sallaries, with no operative costs.

>>13292330
scam confirmed

and also have to repeat this:

>the scammer has still not produced any evidence that sergey said this CLC scam will be even needed

Dudes, the existence of chainlink scams is actually bullish. It means relevance

>>13292397
>>13292376
Nobody offered it you lumbering halfwit.

You have a weird, simmering grudge against CLC, and you're also genuinely and deeply dumb. The combo is an absolute mess

>>13292444
> 13 posts by this butthurt shill

>>13292444
>ad hominem and no argument let alone answer to my question

come on scammer tell us where sergey said a service like CLC is absolutely needed.
I'll wait.

>You have a weird, simmering grudge against CLC
I can see your scam and this trash won't fly here we are not as stupid as reddit
go scam them if you want to scam so badly

>>13292468
For the second time, nobody ever said sergey did anything. I genuinely don't know how much of this is sophist shit-bile and how much of it is stupid shit-bile, but either way it's irrelevant! You're an idiot!

>>13291648
Thomas doxxed the shitposters by offering them all free t-shirts. Now he has a list.

>>13292124
This desu

>>13289019
this, based and scampilled
a bunch of greedy nobodies fancied thheir way into the riches n the back of deluded link neets desperate enough to buy anything that says it's related to CL

>>13292502
>sergey reviewed their paper!!!
>no sergey never did anything!!!

give up already rakesh nobody will give you 7 million dollars for your scam

>>13292468
I'm fairly certain we've picked beans together in Guatemala. Do you have a mole on the left side of your mouth?

I've just read that CLC is selling 3% of their business share for $720k. They are hiding it as "10% of the compay" but they break that down with 70% of tokens going to the team. Therefore 3% for 720k. They tried to justify this by lying and saying linkpool sold 6% for 600k. (It was really 25%).

May 1st make sure you're ready to be scammed guys.

>>13292542
back to the discord with you tranny

>>13292551
Source on this. Sounds like you're telling porky pies, son.

>>13292515
> the team reviewed their whitepaper
> anything to do with Sergey

Christ you just can't stop drooling huh

>>13292557
>19 posts by this ID
I remember people like you fudding Linkpool to death. I guess you all now love Linkpool, right? I am filling my presale.

>>13292571

>>13292574
so sergey never said anything about that clc is needed for chainlink to work?
wow totally not a scam now. fuck how dumb you think we are here that we fall for this?

>>13292580
>"p-please s-stop posting uncomfortable questions! t.thats FUD!"

We are early adopters, we already won. Just play safe and hold tight.
There can be infinitely more companies like Linkpool & CLC which build on top of Chainlink, and there's many more to come. Why would you give up your future stake in the Chainlink network to make a risky bet in a company that could be easily surpassed and replaced?

Remember, LINK is one and only, these companies are not.

>>13292612
Chainlink's team reviewed clc's white paper.

>>13292608
Hahaha WHAT. That's a valuation of 24 million.

>>13292608
wait, so the real valuation is way higher than 7mm? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>13292636
Yeah and 70% of raised funds is given to the team as shares when they already have the other 90%. Tou couldn't make this shit up.

They should be honest and sell 3% if that's what they want to give up. The 7million evaluation is actually a lie and yours is more accurate.

>>13292612
You're fudding CLC the same way you fudded LinkPool and you're only doing it to keep people out so you can buy more.

>>13292639
Yeah...its all unravelling now. 10000% scam project. Secretly evaluating at 24million and not giving ROE figures for "legal reasons" please spread this far and wide.

>>13292654
>>13292669
There will be 1 million shares in total. They are selling 100k now in the presale.
How are they only selling 3%? Does that mean that of those 100k token the team gets 70k?
Doesn't make sense though. The medium article said that you get 25 shares per ETH and they try to raise 4k ETH, so 4000*25 = 100k token = 10% of the company

>>13292705
70k gets given back to the team. You cant pretend to "sell" 100k and give back 70k to the team when they already have 900ķ. They are selling 30k tokens for $720k.

It's really fucking simple math. 24million for a piece of shit.

>>13292705
Even if it was that. $7million for an indexing service is so fucking laughable and pure greed scam scum.

>>13292705
This makes sense. Where is this 3% shit coming from.

>>13292705
Yeah 100k CLCG = 10%. Some people in this thread were dropped on their heads as children so they are incapable of reading. We should feel bad for them, not mock them.

>>13292766
From some salty discord faggots who wanted to build their own 3rd party projects but got btfo'd by CLC Group. Pay them no mind.

>>13292766
>>13292790
> still being triggered by 'buidl'

yoooooo

I'm launching the witnet group, which I value at least 10 billions dollars, who wants to join me

>>13288760
>LP did 5x
What are you smoking nigga lol

>>13292766
>>13292767
>>13292790
From the team themselves dumbfuck.
See::>>13292608

70k tokens go back to the team. Thanks for confirming you have been dropped on the head and csnt do simple math. This discord tranny even managed to do it and the CLC Team tried to justify the 3% with a lie about linkpool.

>>13292608
>they're literally trying to sell 2% of the company for 7 million dollars
this is just getting ridiculous. no way in hell this chainlink adapter is worth 45 million USD. It's an obvious cash grab

>>13292627
that doesnt mean the business is profitable or even needed. and is there even proof they really reviewed it? anyone can claim this

>>13292666
I never fudded linkpool because linkpool actually makes sense and jonny behaved professional
clc and their apis that nobody will need anyway wont be needed or important to the network and their scammers dont need or deserve 7 million dollars for scratching their asses

just look how mad and insulting the pajeets here get when you point out their scam.
pathetic

>>13292835
This.jpg

Linkpool has a clear purpose, clear vision, clear investment. They act professional unlike this group of ex mod discord tranny pajeets that are trying to pull a scam.

Can't believe what I'm reading.
I seriously hope the future of API's doesn't transform into agencies like Honeycomb buying exclusive rights to grab off of a provider.

Honestly we should just make an Anon DAO and buy data off of these sights as a collective where everyone votes on what happens with their money. Can't believe the greed of these Honeycomb cocksuckers (if the 3% for 720k information is legit)

>>13292875
and they didn't even distance from their "alleged" scammer
if they were legit they would do this since they are not they are protecting their scammer which means they are also scammer

>>13292958
Timo needs to be fired and they need to seriously re-evaluate their valuation and provide a clear vision of what they will provide.

Currently CLC is how not to start a business.

Triggered thread.

>>13293032
they are not interested in running or starting a real business
this is a cashgrab thats why its so sloppy
they took their stance to the issue by saying their timo scammer did nothing wrong

>>13292942
Quality post fren

>>13293032
Yeah combine this with Dave's "legal reasons" for not giving ROE info like linkpool did = we're to lazy to try convince you of our scam so were just gonna trick you and say we cant tell you it's a secret shhhh.jpg

>>13293128
Meant to reply to this: >>13293048

i had a bad feeling about these faggots from the start. When your buisness plan is to shill to /biz/ you know its a rip off

>>13293128
"legal reasons" is a funny one too
how legal is even their company?

>>13292942
absolutely agree

>>13292942
>if the 3% for 720k information is legit
Pro tip: It's not. But you could have just read that from the announcement instead of referring to some obvious fud.

>>13293264
spotted the shill.

>>13293279
>Promotes reading comprehension
>Shill
What does this make you?

>>13292330
Ask the SmartContract team to give projected earnings and post what they say, you fucking idiot

Americans getting cucked again.

>>13293300
Are you incapable of reading yourself?
The team confirmed the 3% and tried to justify it against linkpool.

>>13293345
Chainlink sold utility tokens.
CLC is selling a share disguised as a token that literally does nothing other than represent a 0.00001% share.
CLC is providing a service like any other business would therefore they should be disclosing ROE info to their investors. Even fucking linkpool gave this info tou fucking fat fuck timo.

>>13293300
nice double dubs

>>13293407
You don’t get that info when you complete a form to be whitelisted, you get it when you make an actual sizeable investment. If you show me where LinkPool disclosed projected revenue amounts, ill gladly shut the fuck up. That’s just not how business is done in the venture cap world.

Seven million is too high, but only because they’re trying to raise money too early. A seed round after CL mainnet launch would have been a much better idea, but they’re clearly desperate for runway, which means it might be a better deal than I thought with a high valuation, especially if it has the blessing of Thomas, Jonny, and Sergey. Potentially a substantial discount to the eventual STO.

I’d rather just hold LINK because I’m running a niche node with my own adapters, but I wouldn’t count these guys out. You’re foolish if you think these guys don’t have the CL team’s full blessing.

>>13293801
>blessing of Thomas, Jonny, and Sergey.
yeah idk if i believe that.

>>13293801
Chainlink is brutally quiet about even literal scams. Their blessing is never implied, only directly stated through official channels.

>>13293801
Any sources how to setup my own node and adapters?

>>13293890
chainlink docs

>>13292506
How can one man be so based?

>>13293852
Not when Thomas and Jonny are credited reviewing the whitepaper.

I’m not saying these guys are a game changer, or that they won’t be outpaced by competition, but I AM saying this is bullish for the ecosystem. We need more adapters, easy access, and verifications, and we need to signal to entrepreneurs and developers that this is a HUGE opportunity and the CL team will acknowledge and work with you. Tokens like CLCG or whatever they’re calling their ERC20 is a rare opportunity to actually get EQUITY in a fledgling company and capture value appreciation and dividend payouts. If it were cheaper I’d be more tempted but I think it’s dumb to write this off as a scam when we all want companies like this to ultimately flourish for chainlink

>>13292617
Based

>>13293953
They're being weirdly shady for how straightforward this should be. Why will they not caddress the 3% issue clearly? I went and read that discord exchange and you know what? It was a bunch of fucking gobbledygook! Either confirm or deny, stop dodging questions. Also, why are they fucking around with sto/token bullshit? If it's equity, why are they talking like they think it's an ICO?

>>13293953
so do you think its oks for them too scam the community? cause thats what they are doi ng right now

>>13289019
Read their post on /r/linktrader
They got totally shit on and your point was made as well.

Literally non of the APIs they're offering are exclusive.
These people are fucking retarded.
They're trying to scam people, but they're dumber than the people they're trying to scam.

>>13294013
They've explicitly said that they're not minting tokens for the devs.

The only tokens that will be minted are the ones that are bought.

They are selling (up to) 10% of their company at a set price. The only tokens being minted at this stage are for people who buy at that price.

They have been clear about this.

You are being purposefully obtuse.

>>13294045

>>13294079
Learn to read.

>>13293048
They want more cash flow to buy linkies before singularity. Whatever return they promise pales in comparison to what they will get from link itself. Tbh I thought of doing the same thing to people but couldn't do it with a clean conscious for obvious reasons.

>>13294013
Discord is such a cesspool. I saw a screenshot saying it was a red flag to choose Estonia over Malta, too funny

Jesus Christ. Imagine actually sending your money to all of those Twitter fags and Discord trannies that are running CLC. That is precisely what you're doing if you're dumb enough to buy into this shit. They're so terrible that they almost make Linkpool look legit.

If you believe in Chainlink, buy Chainlink. This isn't difficult.

>>13294339
>make Linkpool look legit
this is unironically, the best feature of this crowdsale

>>13293801
>runway
The same terminology used in their medium article. You are 100% a clcg shill.
Why are you trying to disguise an equity share as an ICO if you're not scamming people dumb fuck? Your tokens have no utility and no purpose other than a represented share. You are not exempt from sharing ROE to potential investors which is what all public sharesales fucking do you retard. Your team has fucked this project before it has even begun.

>>13294045
This is more of it. What the fuck are you talking about minting tokens for the devs? So the equity is going to be sold as etc 20 tokens? What legal rights do these tokens grant?

>>13288495
>ttimoofuvkingnobody knows what’s happening behind the scenes
Are you forgetting this shit coin company recruited shitnibs off biz right ? Who gives a fucking duck about time clc or their honeycomb bullshit. Chainlink was going to succeed or fail without them FUCK EM

>>13294426
The tokens represent shares. They aren't selling shares because then they have to apply to shares laws. They've covered a turd in glitter and wrapped this share up as an ICO to avoid the legal shit down the line. HUGE RED FLAG

>>13289019
Fucking facts

> 210 Replies
> 20 Images

Yeah that's a buy signal :^)

>>13294339
Facts again. Thank fucking green earths there’s some people with IQs above a flatline pulse

>>13289019
They are keeping any unsold shares for themselves and have even bragged about it. I guarantee they don't raise 100 ETH

The arrogance of these cash grab mother fuckers for a low grade listing website is a fucking joke. And they want 7 fucking million dollars for it with nothing to show for it!!!!!

>>13294605
Everyone should read the last 2 lines from this cunt. Total scam. Stay safe linkie frens

>>13294422
You fucking idiot, if you don’t know the term “runway” with respect to a startup, I don’t know why I’m surprised you expect to get projected RoE guidance from a private seed stage company. Kudos to finding LINK despite your shit tier IQ.

How much of thhis chain shit shd i buy boys???

>>13294670
Looks like we hooked one of these CLC brainlets.
Pretty easy to hook due to them breathing out their mouths.
The only way your shit project is going to end on a high note is if you spend your investor's $10 on a plastic trumpet.

>>13293801
"I'm running a niche node myself, but don't count these guys out" ole reverse psychology shill

>>13294670
>>13294670
Linguistics is a very easy thing to pickup on when you have online chats with people from multiple countries. You are 100% a CLCG team member which is why you are so defensive. You guys are fucking done. This project needs to hit the road, not the "runway".

>>13294670
Congrats, just sold 100k CLC limited edition tokens, all my CLC merchandise and told my neighbour you guys are SHIT.

>>13294705
The fucking reading comprehension on this board Jesus Christ. $7mil valuation is FAR too expensive to invest in these fucks right now I already said that. But anytime an ecosystem startup pops up with their business centered around chainlink, it’s a good sign, and not necessarily some malevolent scam. GodDAMN

>>13294705
>The only way your shit project is going to end on a high note is if you spend your investor's $10 on a plastic trumpet.

I cant stop laughing at this. So fucked based hahahaha

>>13294741
If they think they are worth 7mm, they should be getting legitimate VC funding
They are scamming NEETs with a faux ICO because they know they're not worth their self valuation

>>13294741
It's a listing service you dumb fuck. It's not even worth 10k right now. If you cant spot an obvious cash grab then you're a stupid fuck but stop trying to pretend like you don't work for these guys you stupid cuntm that fat fuck timo isn't getting our money.

>>13294705
Fucking facts and kekked

>>13294741
>Ecosystem startup
Fucking lol.

Tell me what this 'ecosystem' is you donkey.
All they've don't is build a website, change some CL images and some phrasing from ChainLinks website and call it a white paper.
Then the found some pointless APIs (the geoIP on is stupid; there's many that are much cheaper and far superior --maxmind).

You and your stupid, good for nothing, wannabe-programmer, honeycomb sucking, $7mil dreaming faggots can go beg on the streets for money. Keep your shit away from ChainLink.
Try the TRX subreddit, next time.

Has CLC members ever watched an episode of shark tank in their fucking lives lmfao If I knew NOTHING AT ALL and watched 2 episodes of shark tank I’d know not to value a website made from a template on wix should be worth SEVEN FUCKING MILLLION HOLY FUCK IM DEAD

NEW FAGS DO NOT BUY THIS SHIT IT IS A FUCKING SCAM!!!!!’n

>>13294805
The absolute state of these morons makes me want to invest in Velcro shoes.

What worries me is there are genuine retards who will think we are fudding this like we do with link.
The difference is that CLCG is ACTUALLY a scam. It breaks my heart to see this so closely associated with chainlink.

Even fucking reddit is exposing these guys and ripping them to shreds.
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/bboa0h/announcing_the_clc_group_shares_presale/

>>13294865
We're good.
LINK filters out the morons dumb enough to fall for shit-tier projects like this (and dentacoin).
If someone understands what an API is, then looks at these eurotrash morons' business plan, they'll laugh and walk away.
These guys are literally claiming that their idea to resell API access is worth $7mil+.

There is 84 posters in this thread. Only 3 of them have been pro -clcg or shilling. Most likely all clcg members. This project is so dead.

>>13295043
Here's hoping!

>>13295056
Lmao has this guy hung himself yet? Maybe he can buy some clcg to make up for his customers losses.

>>13295122
I still have no idea how he lost all their money!!
>Pic related
Come to think of it I might buy some of these CLC shares!

>>13292617
>Remember, LINK is one and only, these companies are not.
This, run your own node bois

Thankyou so much for steering me away from this scam frens. I didn't know I had so many bizbros looking out for me.

>>13295438

>>13289800
Unironically this. There is absolutely no need for a token here except they are too incompetent to get VC funding. Jesus Christ look at their fucking CEOs resume on LinkedIn, he was a marketing associate for a bunch of no name Finnish companies that couldn’t hold down a job for even a year. 95% of neets on this board are more accomplished. Don’t give your money to this easy to spot scam.

>>13288495

>the guys running LINK nodes are the ones swing trading and making money off of stinky linkies

That... actually makes sense. This dude clearly has either some sort of information or has enough LINK to impact the price - he sold the top and now he'll buy back in as LINK dips.

>>13295682
can't fault an average joe off the street for trying to manipulate bots to their advantage.
but doing it publicly, when you are part of an organisation tied in some way to what you are manipulating is questionable behavior

what would everyone have said if Jonny was flipping his stack and tweeting about it?

Way too much discord tryhard fudding. Thinking of dropping couple eth to this.

>>13295644
>Finnish
Bullish

>>13295823
Unironically the Alabama of Scamdinavia

>>13295952
Finns have a long history of being very ahead tech-wise. When it's dark almost all the time you don't have anything else to do but drink and think. And make melancholic metal music too.

>>13294631
>Been in development for 2.5 months
>Want 7 million dollars
Need I say more?

I'm dropping 2 ETH just for the luls
Thx trannies

4000 x 170 = 7m?

this thread is a disaster. Plenty of anons like >>13291658 who just blatantly disregard reasonable arguments and spew shit like a bot
>24 posts by this ID
jej

Most of the FUD ITT are flat out lies and bullying. Their only mistake is announcing a valuation higher than LP without providing a convincing pitch. Overall what they're doing is necessary to make premium APIs accessible for linklets (think of it as buying wholesale from factory vs buying from grocery store)

>>13296585
Nice damage control discord tranny

>>13292617
This.
t.100k

>>13288430
OH NONONONONO HAHA

Bought my 10 k link for the memes, not going to sell it to buy this

>>13294741
They recruited off biz and then you had to dox yourself to be allowed “in” for vetting.

>>13288430

hahaha, imagine putting money into a node thats going to be immediately blacklisted from all non-hobby use. what a waste of money

>>13294741
or you coulds just buy link and wait for sergey to make it retard proof. I have a feeling thats why they are taking so long with mainnet.

>>13297178
Haha, imagine reselling data with approval
They have signed multiple feeds for per call, without it you will have to pay monthly subscription fee. Good luck running a node from free api sources im sure that will be profitable

>>13297414
CLC cuck

>>13288913
Kek you wouldn't own shit. Kek your post just shows people here have no clue about tokens. There is no legal implication for the token issuer to the token holders, you not just deluded you are fucking 60 Nigger IQ Tier for thinking such. If they wanted they could drop their shitty project tomorrow (ofc without telling you) and start a new project with new ico and you would be bagholding your funny Internet meme tokens forever.

>>13297562
The scammers would never do such thing!

>>13288495
This guy is a genius.
Also lol @damage control from linkpool shills. They thought nobody was going to compete with them? Get fucked. This is only the start.

>>13297723
kek you discord shills reek of desperation

>>13297778
>>13297723
competition is good

kek, the reddit boys have really shot themselves in the foot with their self overvaluation

>>13297781
what competition? theyre not doing any pool so why do they compete?
all these biz neets are doing is centralising chainlink anyway

Live fast
Die young
Bad girls do it well

>>13292617
Facts

I'm what some would consider a whale in terms of my link holdings on here, I have a proffessional interest in link succedding. My company doesn't have a dedicated IT department or staff with high knowledge about blockchain. We do understand the value of smart contracts to our business needs so we are trying to get our foot in the door ready for when we can use chainlink. For the above mentioned reasons we took a keen interest in linkpool which will be of a great help in achieving readiness for mainnet, and hold a large enough share in LP to do so.

The CLC group proposed an idea on paper which looked like something that could be good for us to transition to once we have established running our own bode sometime in the future.

However, the recent business acumen that has been displayed by a number of their team members is not something my company would have confidence in dealing with.

Some words of advice:
Post a clear message from your CLC Twitter that separates you from your activities with Timo Harrings, or fire him altogether.

Devalue the absurdity of your $7million valuation or at least try to justify it.

Explain the real legal reasons why you cant give financial projections for investors like any normal company can.

Explain why you chose to attack Linkpool and use them as justification for your valuation.

I hope a CLC group team member decides to make a statement on behalf of CLC group and not themselves. A serious change of direction in how you operate is needed if you wish to survive in such a fast moving and brutal industry.

LINK 1000 EOY
Screencap and checkem

>>13298886
>So close

>>13298860
is that like a voodoo doll?

>>13298880
This

>>13298880
they cant do that. I have a pretty good feeling all they have is a website. They are probably doing this to raise money to pay someone to actually do some work

>>13299048
They can not ask for investments and claim they cant give projections for legal reasons. This is a lie and raises a big red flag. They are offering a share for a company that provides a service, this NOT an ICO.

>>13299088
im agree with you but worded my self wrong. again i think at this moment in time they are faking it till they make it

CLC is vapor. They recruited from biz and now going in for the cash grab. There’s some good people that can’t see the writing on the wall and mean well. These are the people they recruited.

CLCG $1000000 eoy, checkem

Bump for scammers awareness

>>13292608
>600k for 6.25% of linkpool
is he dishonest or clueless?

>>13298880

How did they attack Linkpool?

>>13288557
>>13289047
>>13289200
>>13289531
>>13290108
>>13294439

Uh oh pissed stinkers detected

>>13300107
See >>13299970
another CLc team member called Dave tried to justify their wild valuation and compare themselves to link and then intentionally lied about how much equity linkpool gave away as a means to back themselves up. This guy is "researcher" for the clc team. Fantastic research he did to pull the figures out of his ass.

Trying to drag linkpool down into their questionable means of fund raising is not cool. Linkpool is far superior in class and professionalism than these ex discord tranny mods.

>>13291524
Take your meds Timo.

>>13300197
Facts. Thankful biz isn’t as low IQ as discord yet

>>13299970
SEETHING
E
E
T
H
I
N
G

300 post thread.

HAHHAHA faking rekt

>>13300197
link pool is the same shit.

Linktrader mod Fergly also the chainlink discord Mod is helping his ex-discord mod CLCG pals clean up some inconvenient truths.

They are deleting stuff which is exposing their scam. save this image and spread it please, I dont want see this scam make link look bad when they exit scam.

They are leaving certain comments about their scam up, but the hard hitting ones are being removed. Timo comments have also been removed. These guys are all pals. Discord mods are cancer.

>>13301578
>Doesn't like a discord
>Complains but doesn't leave
>Has to go back

>>13301645
You're clearly incapable of reading. I said the discord mods are cancer. Not the members themselves.

This is a narcissistic discord mod with an inflated ego who thinks the mods=the group.

Get fucked

>>13301832
>Has a reddit account
>Wears shoes at night
>Has to go back

Is it any wonder that this guy would try trick you all about CLCG when he also looks like this and would try pass off a picture from 5 years ago as his twitter profile. This guy is fatter than Sergey kek

>>13301949
Kek

>>13301949
JUST

>>13301949

Timo you're a big guy

>>13291821
CLC is a Trojan horse to bring down chainlink from the inside

never liked that Timo fag don't fall for this scam

>>13302482
Post 300 checking in just saying hi

>>13302420
Frameo is a psyop