/biz/ - Business & Finance

v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l

cute

>>13268312
forgot link
https://mobile.twitter.com/CloudExpo/status/1115262387907629057

>>13268312
Wait, wtf, it's real?

>>13268403
read the tweet retard
https://mobile.twitter.com/CloudExpo/status/1115262387907629057

>>13268409
>>13268406
well...YEAH?

>>13268422
Read the tweet from the guy that is actually presenting you retard. It’s just a side project of his and has nothing to do with the CL team

Is this what that larp meant when he said "things are a out to get cloudy"?

>>13268409
You just might be sucking the nigger dick yet, huh?

>>13268529
ummm I'm gonna need a link to that larp... /unzips

>>13268530
Well crap, that post might not have aged well. What terrible timing

>march 19
>Oracle doesnt use Chainlink «YET»
>april 19
>Oracle corp presents...!

>>13268557
Lmao I thought you just wanted to have fun with that post and wasn’t serious. You can’t bet Against link. Was you serious?

Too bad chainlink has no product and the oracle question has already been solved by Kleros

>>13268591
Pitiful

>>13268538
https://yuki.la/biz/12582910 this riddle anon posted https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=pllRW9wETzw this video, its all i can remember about clouds in link threads kek.

>>13268538
>>13149534

>>13268312
Oracle has literally NOTHING to do with link, NOTHING.

>>13268557

Just suck nigger dick regardless of what happens with Link. It's quite obvious to everyone here that you are one of those homosexual chaps that I keep reading about.

>>13268312
PRICED IN

>>13268484
Which tweet came out first? Oh, that's what I thought, retard.

>>13268403
>for now

>>13268591
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ITTTSSSS REAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLL
I SAW IN TEREGLAM !!!!!!!!!!!
WTTTTTTTTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
KLEEEROOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSS
WWWHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY???????
AAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>13268312
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

bump

>>13268591
>imagine being this deluded

>>13268484
>>13268403
WHOOPS

>>13268312
lets go boys

Bump

>>13270310
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons as i work for Oracle. This guy runs a startup incubator thats nested inside of oracle corporation itself, the team this man is a part of plays with emerging tech and demos interesting POC's in OCI (oracle cloud, like aws) however, Oracles Blockchain as a service or BaaS does NOT use chainlink, yet.

>>13271288
They will never use CL directly. They will use kaleido like aws and azure

>>13271288
im more qualified than you
i clean Larrys g650 boat weekly for 300k a year

i also live on it btw

SAGE

>>13271335
nice larp basedboi.

>>13268591
Oracalize said the same thing and was talkin all that crap. They use Chainlink now.

They will all use Chainlink. simple

>>13268312
I like to think this is because I've had McDonald's the last two days in a row. Let's see what happens when I make it three. Praise Sergey.

>>13271413
Bend
The
Knee

Listen I really care about anons financial well-being and this is just some hobby project by an employee of a sort of big organization. Actually I think he can't code either which is why he feels a connection to Serger.