[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 218 KB, 1229x1160, papa honkcisco.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13092241 No.13092241 [Reply] [Original]

honkfess

>> No.13092269

I use shaving cream instead of whipped cream in my face pies. It's not that it's cheaper, I just think it's funnier since the person getting pied won't even get to eat the cream after it's all over.

>> No.13092592

>>13092269
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>> No.13092611
File: 287 KB, 757x615, 1552274383404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13092611

>>13092269

>> No.13092683
File: 86 KB, 1024x652, peepeepoopoo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13092683

>>13092241
When a daddy loves a mommy very much, he goes pee pee inside her butt hole.
And then the mommy goes poo poo in the loo and flushes the pee pee in her poo poo into the ocean.
A stork eats the poo poo with the pee pee and barfs a baby on mommy and daddy's doorstep.

>> No.13092703

>>13092611
This is a rare honkpepe. Do I have permission to save a copy or no

>> No.13092714
File: 43 KB, 460x434, 1552942200728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13092714

>>13092241
I trust bitcoin more than the government

>> No.13092880

i created the honk meme and was the first anon to shill holochain, ravencoin, own and fantom on biz. i still get called a pajeet

>> No.13092895

>>13092880
Apu