/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12827252
Oh linkies. What would the world of cryptocurrencies be without you? What do, we owe the honour. The promise of Link seemed glimmering at first. The premise of 'rent free' was surely innovative and ahead of its time. But, as time showed us, this coin was nothing more than a pump and dump that inadvertently created the most deranged community of bag holders known to man. A community that incessantly screeches "rent free" whenever they feel threatened, which is very common. To be a linkie is to be deranged. Having lost everything, whether it be your house, marriage, wife's sons college money or life-savings surely takes a toll on the mental serenity of a linkie's mind. Slight threats critiquing the developers of Chainlink sets the common linkie into a state of neurosis that can only be cured by euthanasia or the eventual revaluing of this godforsaken currency. However, once the price reaches 10 cents, the value will continue falling. This crash will be catalyzed by the fact that thousands of wallets will be lost as a mass suicide of linkies, causing the price to dip faster than Sergey can yell "POP OFF ME LEGS" at the emergency room at the McHospital. Don't be deranged, don't be a linkie

>>12827252
Come on man don’t be so hard on sergey. Zoom out, he has given you plenty of sats if you hedl long enough

>Altseason here for the past month
>STILL bagholding Link

Dumped my bags at 14k sats ages ago fren. Been making gains ever since on pump and dumps. Will buy back in LINK at 7000 sats when BTC is at 6k.

>>12827260
This copy-pasta might be ironic, but it's true. The first time I saw a linkie shouting "rent free" I knew it's the beginning of the end for them. Once a group of bagholders goes from smug shitposting to being defensive, you know they are losing faith and reevaluating their choices.

t. I love to rustle the jimmies of linkies as punishment for shitting this board for so long with literally nothing to show for.

>hes still holding link
>hes still not all in ETH right before the hardfork
are you retarded? or do you just hate money? i cant tell which.

>>12827345
>Once a group of bagholders goes from smug shitposting to being defensive, you know they are losing faith and reevaluating their choices.
Thanks for confirming that we're going to pump [hard]

LINK
IS
SHIT

>>12827353
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>12827345
how do i buy chanelcoin?

>>12827338
Lol at 7000 sats