/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12730239
Holy shit, it's getting close! Fuck the FUD, my hands are iron tight, and good luck to anyone that thinks their buy orders will get filled at this point because this is taking off today.

Will 100k make it?

>>12730239
OWW MY BALLS !!!

>>12730763
Yeah ten times over maybe, if you can wait a few years. Might as well ask if your 10 inch dick is big enough too.

>>12730763
i got 100k as well

>>12731260
Fuck this shit, I only have 40K!

>>12730797
Oof... Got bad news for you, sweetie...

>>12731382
Found the size queen (male).

This countdown shilling makes CHX and their coin dumping team look like even more of a scam than it already does.

I only have 200 because I'm poor

Can someone explain CHX to me?

>>12731894
people bought eth to buy ico's

people will buy chx for sto's

>>12731973
Okay so it'll be another bubble?
Where the ETH from ICO's flooded the market once the market dropped?

>>12731973
Kek this is getting ridiculous. Ethereum is a giant multi-billion dollar project led by literal geniuses and early Bitcoin devs whereas Weown is a fly by night carnie show that has to pay their Ukrainian devs with non-circulating tokens and is competing with VC funded Silicon Valley companies doing the same thing that already beat them to market.

Oww my balls!

>>12731894
Companies who tokenize their assets have to pay WeOwn 1% of the value of the assets, and WeOwn then uses that money to marketbuy CHX and lock it up

>>12732298
Pretty much everything you just said was a straight up lie that has been disproved already. Fuck off.

>>12732597
Every single thing I just said can be confirmed with 30 seconds of googling. If you want to see a real tokenization partnership run by real players instead of listening to pajeets screech about making it or listening to the team make fake partnership promises while they are selling coins, look at this - and note how different and better everything about it is than the garbage you're pumping right now -

https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2019/02/144347-securitize-and-elevated-returns-to-use-tezos-to-tokenize-1-billion-of-real-estate/

>>12732733
So you're a securitize bagholder (which can't even be bought yet)?

>>12732733
you can't invest in securitize retard... and there will be multiple winners in the sto space.. it's a 500+ trillion dollar industry... and you are spreading baseless fud

>>12732733
>>12732298

>>12733148
What the fuck does a peasant retail investor like you not being able to invest in it have to do with anything? The point is that a real tokenization project looks like what Securitize et al are doing, where they have Stanford alumni leading it and are backed by VCs and are doing all the hard compliance work. Whereas a fake one looks like what Weown is doing, where they did zero compliance work, are paying Ukrainian code monkeys with their own (non-circulating) tokens, and have pejeets shilling their bags on 4chan to hide the dilution.

>>12733248
im a millionaire.. i'm only invested in chx right now because chx is going to increase in price faster than securitize... you're not even in my league when it comes to investing.. i invested in btc 10 years ago? you probably werent even born then.

so now we know why you are fudding chx. because u are invested in a competitor and you feel threatened. and u should be

you only need 10,000 chx to make it

10,000 chx is $1 million at $10 billion marketcap

>>12730239


Idk if this shits a scam or not but thanks for the 3x I got. I'm staying out until a real partnership is confirmed. There's some giant bagholders that can dump this 50 percent in ten minutes and they are autistic. The people shilling this every day are the same people fudding it everyday to swing trade on weak hands. Then there's evidence of the dev team dumping on idex. Yes it's small amounts but even 20k USD worth can tank the price in half

>>12734113
>Then there's evidence of the dev team dumping on idex

>>12733148
Actually you can, if you research hard enough. But not gonna spoon-feed you. Securitize / Harbor has much much higher credibility compared to Own.

>>12733286
Prove it. Irrespective of whatever your past success may ave been, CHX is low-tier scam.

>>12734326
>But not gonna spoon-feed you

>>12733286
> im a millionaire
This is pajeet style writing.

>>12733248
This.

>>12734326
when is securitizes sto. what's the total marketcap? when chx is 10 billion marketcap i'll move some profits into it

>>12734554
you are "this"ing your own post. you aren't fooling anyone. you are the only person fudding chx ebcause you hold a competitor

>>12734350
tell me another crypto that will increase in price faster than chx and ill sell my chx for it. pro tip. you can't. everything else is shit

>>12734584
That’s not my post, retard. I don’t want to change my IP just for a discussion. I do hold a tiny suicide bag for chx but my money doesn’t have any allegiance. Whoever plays the STO game, it’ll flow to that.

>>12734618
If Sasha can prove regulatory filings / proceedings / broker-dealer (ATS license) partnerships, money will flow to chx organically. Till then it’s a possible scam.

>>12734572
Securitize Ian privately funded by institutional money and will not have any ICO as its illegal. They will not have an STO either. But yet as a retail investor you can invest into Securtize a bit indirectly, but you can tap into its growth.

>>12734667
it is blatently obvious you are the only person fudding chx all in in every chx thread ebcause you hold securitize and you are scared of chx

>>12734727
so you bought splice on ofn

whats the total marketcap of spice? what other things have they invested in? what percentage have they invested in securitize?

>>12734572
CHX need to “cross the chasm”. Show traction and organic growth first till 150M. Till then it’s a matter of time to become Unicorn. But it has a long way to go. BTW, Sasha with his Conputershare background should befriend with a Realestate company called https://www.brickx.com.. Looks like an ideal candidate to offer real-estate tokenisation. Although Aussi market is due for a correction but it’s an ideal partnership. As I have told earlier, whoever gets to tokenise a mid-tier realestate (ideally commercial) or PE fund, will win the battle of STO. Issuance platform will demonstrate “network effect”, as more adopted a platform becomes it becomes more valuable to exchanges for liquidity.

>>12734748
Funny. I do have a tiny bag of chx. But it’s good to be critical to any investments. After all we are not HNIs. We don’t want to see another Confido.

>>12734778
Yes. SPiCE. It’s great play on tokenisation.

>>12734944
spice

max supply is 130,000,000
token price is $1.38
marketcap: $179,400,000

assets under managment is $15,609,762

so investors are valuing it at just under 10x the value of the assets under managment?

is that right?

>>12735389
Says a lot when CHX has already tokenized $66 million.

>>12735435
They don’t even have a live product yet. This is how you know this one is a scam - the pajeets have to resort to completely making shit up.

>>12735555
>>12734944
>>12733248
it's the same guy fudding. he changes his ip.

>>12735555
>This is how you know this one is a scam
you sound like a broken record

>>12735389
Usually PE/VC investments boasts of such premium valuations because of due-diligence. It’s not a “value trap”

>>12735555
chx price keeps going up despite your relentless fudding

>>12735435
Prove it.

>>12735555
Even if they have a live product, they are oversimplifying the whole process. Real assets need to be tokenised, not just a handful of SMEs raising funding via the platform (which I believe majority of the companies will be). If they are able to tokenise PE/RE/Debts, I will buy tons more. But unless they show such growth/adoption, it’s anybody’s guess. And to all retards, I’m not FUDing (a tiny bag holder). Just being sceptic and looking at all STO options instead of being blindfolded by “WOW Own”.

>>12735596
yeah i understand. i think it should 10 - 1,000x in 10-20 years. chx is a better hold right now, but ill take profits out later this year and put them into tzero, spice, etc

>>12735700


>>12735700
>a tiny bagholder
gtfo poorfag

>>12734727
how can i buy Spice?

>>12735751
Excellent arguments. You should be so proud of yourself. Look at my previous comments and compare to your brilliant arguments.

>>12735605
Not selling a single fucking ownie faggot.
Actually you can buy them for $1000 each.

>>12735747
Smart. STO will be big. We just have to pick better candidates positioned to reap most benefits. However one caution: stock market in general is due for a correction and that will not go well with digital securities. So somehow we have to withstand the equity market dip without our hard earned money getting wiped out. Good luck !

>>12735700
>If they are able to tokenise PE/RE/Debts

Bro... have you done any DD or paid any attention to the AMAs and interviews??

>>12735897
I did. They “promised” that they will tokenise debt. But like any good investment, we need to see outcomes, not promises. I will rather buy with a premium when they would have debt tokenised. Tons of startups with better teams (ex. Dharma Protocol) are working on it. I believe we will see specialised token issuance platforms for RE / Debt etc leveraging from their pre-existing experience.

>>12735969
Promising that “we will tokenise everything - small stocks / debts / realestates” is making it tougher for me to not to consider this a pajeet-tier scam.

>>12735996
Then you're a fucking idiot. Please sell you pajeet-level bag and never comment in another ownie thread again.

>>12735700
You've made good points, but this isnt the place for clear and concise concerns. So fuck u fag .
But good points nonetheless, hopefully the prove to tokenize real assets. I'm sure we will al find out soon

Can someone list all the projects in the STO space?id like to do some research.
Tzero, Securitize, DUSK, SLT, poly, RVN, Harbor, SPiCE. Any others?

>>12736178
openfinance network (ofn)

NEW ATH BOIS

>>12736836
It hit $0.273 yesterday

>>12734025
Check your math.
$10,000,000,000 MC ÷ 169,000,000 supply = $57.17 per token × 10K tokens = $591,700
Did I miss anything there?

>>12734667
Dude, you're nuttier than squirrel shit.

>>12736940
Yeah I don't get this 10K CHX, $1 million meme... It's obviously wrong. It's a $16.9B mc

>>12736940
*$59.17 per token. Typo.

>>12734113
>There's some giant bagholders that can dump this 50 percent in ten minutes and they are autistic.
This is true and my only concern now with holding CHX. One dumps and this goes down to 0.15, after which people get scared and goes down to 0.05 in matter of an hour. This project can be gold, but our money is essentially held hostage by these the top bagholders. Just look at how much that anon dropped the price a few nights ago with a fud.

>>12736940
Yeah tokens locked up.

>>12737096
Those unlock in April. The team has so far been pretty conservative about selling, but they will eventually enter the supply.

>>12737040
To be fair, he did time that FUD to coincide with a correction that started taking place. RIP, panic sellers though...

>>12737040
the bagholders are insiders with information you wouldn't believe. they won't dump anywhere near these prices.

>>12737327
This kind of speculation both titillates and scares me at the same time. Spill some beans so we can check if it actually leads somewhere.

>>12737327
>information you wouldn't believe
This is pathetic shilling even for an Ownlet. You'd have to be a less than 15 years old or have Down's Syndrome to fall for something this pathetic and desperate.

>>12737327

It isn't inside information, it's obvious as hell if you paid any sort of attention during the AMAs or interviews.

>>12737563
Yeah this is the kind of vague jibberjabber hype I always look for in a high quality investment, not pump and dump looking at all.

priced
in

>>12737563

I personally wouldn't tell you or anyone to buy anything that you're not informed about.

>>12736178
Tezos. They are doing the part that Weown claims to do (the tech part) but instead of being broke and having to pay coders with coins they have hundreds of millions of dollars and some of the best minds in the business working there. They also launched their mainnet last year and it’s on a completely different level than Weown’s amateur hour spaghetti code, it’s actually up there with stuff like Ethereum but arguably better. And unlike CHX who make the absurd fraudulent claim that they are “talking with regulators” they are partnering with top tier deep pocketed companies for the compliance component who actually are working with regulators and have already tokenized millions in assets (for real, not make believe like CHX’s test net).

>>12737782
Seems great for all the rich dudes who were allow to invest in it.

>>12737782
Sounds great for all the rich dudes who were allowed to invest in it. I cant wait to buy some when it hits the market at a 1 billion marketcap.

>>12737782
We are talking about a guy whose job was managing a team responsible for developing and maintain the world leading share registry. Building an STO platform that records on a blockchain isn't fucking rocket science. OWN allows their broker dealer partners to issue using the tech platform they built. That is how they tackle the compliance aspect.

Start ups often struggle with funding, true but how is that a knock on them? They've pretty much funded the whole platform with ICO proceeds in the middle of a terrible bear market and have had to pay contractors with minimal amount of tokens.

>>12737327
>the bagholders are insiders with information you wouldn't believe. they won't dump anywhere near these prices.
We'll see in 72 hours. If they reveal one household name, I believe. Otherwise I'm ready for them to drop out as soon as it reaches $0.75~$1.00 per CHX.

>>12737860
>OWN allows their broker dealer partners to issue using the tech platform they built. That is how they tackle the compliance aspect.
Come on man that makes no sense at all. It's just complete and utter gibberish divorced from the realities of securities laws and common sense. The compliance aspect is enormously difficult and CHX has no answer for it, just magical thinking and hand waving like your post. Some people are going to make money on this scam in the short term but then a lot of people after that (probably in April when the dev coins unlock but possibly sooner) are going to get FUCKED over this pure unadulterated scamming faggotry).

>>12738095
The law regulating securities already exists. It is simply a matter of coding the tokens to meet certain legal requirements. A broker dealer has a license to emit securities and using OWNs platform can create tokens which meet the regulatory requirements.

Special laws don't need to be created for security tokens, authorities don't need to "allow" or "legalize" security tokens. Security tokens will be created and will either be found to meet existing securities regulations or not. The broker dealer issuing STs through OWNs platform certainly knows and understands the legal requirement for a security and will simply apply it to a token form factor.

>>12738145
>It is simply a matter of coding the tokens to meet certain legal requirements.
If it were that simple (it's not, not by a long shot - you still have to either register your security or file an exemption, which makes OWN's "end to end" claim hilariously dumb) you could do this with any smart contract.

>>12738207
That is why many are doing it on ethereum.

And yes you do still have to register the security or file an exemption. That is understood. The provide the full software infrastructure for issuers and B/Ds to accomplish what they always have but in a token form.

>>12738095
>The compliance aspect is enormously difficult and CHX has no answer for it, just magical thinking and hand waving like your post
One of the biggest benefits of is the fact that you have to KYC to own assets on their blockchain as far as I know... It's why I think any other platform for STOs are a meme at this point. There is nothing stopping anyone from transferring a security token on Ethereum to any random Ethereum address. That's going to be tough for compliance long term

To participate on OWN's shit you have to be an acredited investor also. This is real shit, not some amateur crypto project. Yeah, we can't participate but that's how we got fucked like this in the first place, with every high school kid buying coins on overseas unregulated exchanges.

>>12739329
Do you really have to be an accredited investor though? I thought you just had to do regular KYC.

hold for 2-5 years. ignore the 1 fudder who spends all day spreading baseless fud in every chx thread. ignore the pumps and dips. sell when chx is 100 billion marketcap

20m marketcap is tiny compared to what it will be in 2-5 years