/biz/ - Business & Finance

Fudders are basically low IQ Tier kind of people. They never read something bigger than 3 pages. All the information they get are contained in simple and short posts.

They are simple not smart enough to read a medium article about the possibilities and details of Bitcoin. They never read a patent and don't understand Bitcoin at all. Because of this, they can't participate in discussion about Bitcoin.

All they can do is ad hominem attacks. I explain it for the low IQ people. An ad hominem argument isnt really an argument, but an attack on a person, to avoid the subject.

They don't know, that Bitcoin never changed and that the economics were clear from day one.
Still, they fud, cause the truth is, they want to get spoonfeeded by higher IQ Tier people.

> Bitcoin is about miners paying money to verify transactions to earn more money than they spent.
This way, there is competition.
This leads to innovation.
They invest to strengthen their market share.
It would be nonsense to attack the network because they would loose their immens investment.

> Miners wants to process as much data as possible because every bit is money for them. They will push for the highest possible blocksize and compete with other miners to be faster, to earn more.
All this secures the network more and more.

>This is Bitcoin and it always was like this.

A "home node" isn't adding any more security to the network. They are bullshit propaganda instruments.

But this is only the backend.
The frontend is beeing build by everyone.
> There are no limits, every problem can be solved with Bitcoin.

But if you take away the miners, all what is left is a network which is based on the rich elite (proof of stake) doing nothing to get even richer

>>12713293
*BLOCKS YOUR PATH*

>>12713520
moar sir

>>12713324
>Sminem
topkek

>>12713332
This

>>12715148
1. where is metanet mentioned in the whitepaper

2. why doesn't this faggot just sign his keys ffs you are retarded

>>12715171
he has worked on metanet since the 90s, called it blacknet. but he couldn't solve it then so was put on ice. as for your second question:

1. That would enable Dave Kleiman's family to resume legal action.
2. That would make every government in the world know that he is Satoshi. Right now there is doubt.
3. That would make every criminal in the world know that he is Satoshi.
4. That would make every retard in the world know that he is Satoshi (in their mind they might blame him for their losses).
5. If he does a public signing people will just shift the narrative to "that only proves that he has the private keys, not that he is Satoshi". So it wouldn't benefit him. However courts can use it against him to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is Satoshi.
6. Craig doesn't want BSV to be "proof of authority", as some might see it if he did prove that he is what's left of Satoshi.

>>12715202
If he doesn't want to be known as Satoshi, why is he waving his fucking fanny 24/7 claiming he is? Are you dense, mate?

>>12715171
Metanet is to have more transaction

Where is decentralized in the WP?

Dont have to all in just have some for suicide insurance

>>12715223
he was blackmailed and then outed.

>>12715252
Is that jerry

>>12715252
no he fucking wasn't

>>12715293
ok

>>12713337
the only risk in an eth investment is that vitalik forgets to eat for 21 days and dies of starvation

>>12715250
no, there is no mention of metanet in WP, the entire raison d'etre of BSV is that it follows the WP, which it fails to do. The coin fails its own mission statement.

Also, what about muh hashwar, ABC still exists, you mongs couldn't follow through, this faggot is 100% untrustworthy, yet you still shill. kys.

>>12715319
metanet is outside bitcoin... metanet is built on top of bitcoin. this is basics anon.
hashwar would have succeeded if bitcoin.com had not picked a side all of a sudden. in a way it succeeded since abc implemented checkpoints

>>12715779
no, it didn't succeed, abc still exists. just sweep it under the rug with everything else

>>12715797
Sure ABC exists but they implemented centralized checkpoints with no discussion and no proper testing. BCH was bitcoin but lost the title to BSV. It doesn't matter that they still exist, they aren't bitcoin.

If winning the battle means losing the only thing that makes life worth living then, after the victory is forgotten, the sorrow will endure.

>>12713293
Immutable cp. Truly Satoshi's vision.


creg unironically=satoj