/biz/ - Business & Finance

Bsv

>>12676036
reversals are quick and dramatic so i'm inclined to agree.

>>12676044
https://www.tradingview.com/x/zTHUUjyI/
mean reversion pivots not crossed, quad cci says trend continuation to the downside is likely. Stay away.
>>12676066
Short term, sure. However the end of a crash pattern is marked by an extended period of reduced volume and price volatility.

>>12676036
Could you make a TA for Tomochain?

LINK LINK LINK

>>12676075
oh yeah i didnt express myself correctly. but essentially this. every one who doesnt believe in crypto is out of crypto.... i dont see why this shit would drop below 3k

>>12676075
can you do NULS and Ark?

Sounds good to me OP. Another year to accumulate? Okay. Some sideways action will be nice to day trade and build stacks at the same time.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/KrPAlhuZ-Bitcoin-will-revert-EXACTLY-to-the-200-15m-MA/
new bitcoin idea is in. 90% chance this trade here will pan out if you want to trade it.

>>12676086
Link's trend is no longer defined and is currently shedding mass to restore its potential energy. The continuation of trend is highly improbable.

>>12676036
salt and mtl please fren

Hey OP do ETC

>>12676087
>i dont see why this shit would drop below 3k
Nobody thinks 3k BTC is a good deal.

>>12676036
qnt

chx

>>12676036
WAX/BTC
ETH/BTC

Please and thanks, have been following your threads/tradeview.

>>12676036
>Pics two random candles
>Declares bottom
>Says he can do TA on anything
>Dumb fucks on /biz unironically fall for this shit
The absolute fucking state of this place lately......

>>12676091
https://www.tradingview.com/x/Lv6evNM4/
Lateral trading is anticipated. Define the range and try to scalp it on NULS.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/xcp4hH51/
You can enter a long on ark when it enters the 1h 400 period 1.25 standard deviation.
>>12676124
Hehey, nice pick. I have longs on both SALT and MTL, great charts. Salt is in a defined range for scalping and MTL is showing strong signs of trend continuation. I highly recommend them both.
>>12676144
https://www.tradingview.com/x/p0n8Inmh/
strong short entry. I like it.

>>12676180
we are going to make it

>>12676170
>Posts spreadsheet of over 100 previous timestamped trades to provide rapport.
You forgot one. Also... two random candles? Do you even know what candles are? Do you mean tickers? Tagging an institutional benchmark repeatedly, at the end of a crash pattern followed by reducing volatility and volume makes for a bottom. Read a book.
>>12676156
Can't do quant, not enough history. Cant do chx, no tv chart. Don't trade coins you can't do TA on.
>>12676163
https://www.tradingview.com/x/QqJX7dOV/
Also a low risk short entry here. Use a tight stop however.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/5YwhZ3Jw/
I'm not really a believer of static support levels, but the profit ratio is there for a long term long position. Use a small position size if you plan on doing that.
>>12676098
Buying whenever we hit the 200 Weekly MA will be very profitable.

>>12676180
>when it enters the 1h 400 period 1.25 standard deviation.
u fucking wut m8? do i have to solve calculus here?

do waves, zec, xzc
ly anon

>>12676036
Cool stuff, OP. Prediction on Nano?

>>12676309
Just load a bb with those settings.
>>12676312
https://www.tradingview.com/x/7mGXlIfI/
it's a downtrend. Don't do that.
>>12676330
https://www.tradingview.com/x/I9PQseY6/
not too confident about this, next expansion to the downside despite being on that "support."

hey OP, how about RVN and Storm?

>>12676360
https://www.tradingview.com/x/JhDaMwYK/
Don't play with downtrends in a bear market unless you're shorting.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/LwSzkPKE/
a lot of these coins look the same. a period of reduced volume and volatility build up a lot of potential energy. Your best bet is to wait for that potential energy to be released and see a significant break, then trade the remainder of that trend.

>>12676354
Thanks, anon

>>12676066
there was nothing quick an dramatic. the bottom is not in. it will take a long time until the next bull market.

>>12676399
Why will it take a long time and why is this not the bottom? What signals a market bottom?

LTO lol, btc and usdt pairs on bitmax

>>12676242
So when we go lower, and we will, and all these anons lose their ass what then? You have declared a bottom in a market that has not bottomed yet just on your say so.

>>12676428
God forbid someone else is responsible for their own risk management.
>>12676419
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45dueVtbHns Excuse my Barry White voice but I talk about btc in depth here today.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/KrPAlhuZ-Bitcoin-will-revert-EXACTLY-to-the-200-15m-MA/
this is what will happen in the next 24 hours.

op is a fucking retard. bottom is sub 2k

aint all coins in a downtrend in this bear market?0_o

>>12676460
How did you determine where to draw those trend lines? is it just where you wanted to? ON YOUR OWN FUCKING CHART, the last downtrend ended on the red line. WE ARE ON THE RED LINE.

Great TA, keep up the good work.

>>12676479
Kek

>>12676473
Trend can be defined by any period of expansion or compression, which can be seen universally as the same section of mass from any timeframe. If the longest overexpanded period is weighted to the downside, downtrend. Then there can be sub expansions that define shorter trends. Its a mess. I know.

>>12676479
this must be bait. kys you pleb.

>>12676414
okay, I can't know if that wasn't the bottom until we take it out. but I'd try to identify the bottom by several ways. it is common that a bottom is a violent reversal with a lot of volume. In that case, I'd expect a long wick and massive returns for a few days. a wick down a few hundred or a thousand usd and then a rise to 5k would've been convincing. however, we've got no wick, several days at the bottom, a 30% pump and less volume than when we broke down from 6k. not convincing.
besides a violent bottom, I'd be convinced by a trend reversal. that is, we would have higher lows and higher highs on the daily or weekly time frame. 50 and 200 ma cross would also be convincing. none of that is happening right now.
it's more likely that the bottom is not in yet.
I think that it will take a long time as the last bear market took a long time and it seems like it's progressing even slower this time. makes sense, the market cap is higher and the market is more mature now.

>>12676460
looks good. wouldn't be surprised by a 1k bottom.

>>12676479
Some Russian faggot said it will drop to the 800 ma because reasons.

ICX Please

>>12676566
>
https://www.tradingview.com/x/3IJeHfOa/
wait for an 11 period cci roll up on that tf.
Good potential mean reversion, really high probability if that signal fires.

>>12676460
You don't actually believe institutions apply buying pressure on broken trend lines do you? Why would they determine performance on values that even a child could draw?

>>12676036
eoy for Holotoken?

>>12676536
If we get new downward expansion on the macro timeframes anything is possible. But with the nature of the extended compression directly on top of the weekly 200 it does bode well. If it keeps going down, oh no. I'll stop out.
>>12676600
Not my style of TA, sorry bud. There's no way to accurately draw long term projections, just current market condition and signals to properly entry that condition.

>>12676621
Can you also do short term BTT, anon?

>>12676671
https://www.tradingview.com/x/QIhnLnGz/
Nothing down here is really usable, sorry anon

>>12676695
Figures, but thanks anyway

so what do you recommend lel

>>12676087
you need buying pressure to maintain price
if all the buy pressure from early adopters is gone
you need the majority to come in which can only come from use

What are some good books or authors to read? You mentioned Mark Whistler in a previous thread and I'm reading Volatility Illuminated right now.

Thanks, love these threads.

>>12676865
You can never go wrong with bollinger on bollinger bands.

Also, join my discord channel if you haven't already to ask me or my students questions

>>12676948
Cool, what's the link to the discord?

>>12677016
You can find it in either one of the two links at the top.

>doing TA in a manipulated market
Seems legit

>>12676036
Do holo/eth am I right to see 750 vits as target

>>12676455
Thank you for that, but I meant LTO/BTC or LTO/USDT lol

>>12677076
>Doing TA to gain a statistical edge in a market based on blind speculation where fundamental news is only used herd the masses

Seems legit. Counter trading moves is far more effective due to the nature of generated mass.

>>12677101
https://www.tradingview.com/x/VqvdN7kq/
oh wow, quad cci strategy implies a really low risk long. I like it a lot.
stop around 1015 would be good
>>12677114
can't do coins I can't load on TV. My proprietary indicators won't load anywhere else.

>>12677076
That’s what TA is for, dummy. It’s to understand how the insiders are moving their capital.

If people don’t think it be like it is, but it do? Get btfo’d
>>12677076

>>12676036
Youre talking a lot about the bottom, but how high do you think the next bubble will go and during what time period?

>>12677369
see
>>12676621

>>12677166
Gotcha, thanks anyway m8

Please do TA on REQ

>>12677448
https://www.tradingview.com/x/oPwrcuri/
The beginning of a downtrend is implied, even though we're directly on top of "support." One of the cool things using mass readings. Everything is completely compressed and on the quad cci, every period is weighted to the downside and beginning to expand in unison.

>>12676036
Let me explain you something about price action Mr.bottom.

When you reach a level, and you dont bounce from it hard (ie not let buyers to buy, force sellers to cover) aka create upwards momentum youre most likely going to crash.

You think those charts are identical to btc, but theyre not, the cluster of resistance that we are currently facing in btc its already been tested, on the other charrts they bounced hard from an untested level.

We, most likely, are going to test 2600-2000 area again in the upcoming months.

>>12677495
That's a common misconception but I'm afraid you are incorrect. We already saw the automatic rally in phase 1 of accumulation as a 28% gain of defined trend.
You can't begin a sustainable trend after a downward move generating this much mass.

As an empirical constant, if you are outside the 1.25 stdev every single stdev will expand for that period. The moment you return inside the 1.25 stdev all the stdevs will get closer together. Again, shorter periods will always be more reactive. Comparing short term and long term distributions on multiple periods will let you define the short and long term alignment of expectations of market participants.

Everyone seems particularly occupied with how fast price is moving, not stopping to consider the other variables that actually determine speed.

Force = Mass x Acceleration

The more mass you have the more force is required to continue pushing something, yes?

Force is volume , literal buying and selling pushes the price.

Mass is the variable no one was taught to talk about. Mass is how wide the bellcurve around price is, the size of the distribution relative to that period. The longer you have been in a state of trend (the expansion of a distribution,) the more mass that distribution is carrying. The more mass you have the more force you need to continue expansion.

So let's say you're pushing a snowball up a hill and the snowball gets too large for you to reasonably continue to push it without an unrealistic amount of force. The more you push the snowball the bigger it gets. You have two options. Add more force, or come back to the snowball later after the sun has come out and melted the snowball, shedding its mass. Obviously the snowball hasn't moved much since you left it there yesterday. Once mass is lower a breakout occurs! The snowball begins to roll again and mass is added to the distribution once more, since force was once again able to be higher than mass which caused the trend in the first place.

>>12676153
Who’s dumber, the guy who buys @ 3k or the guy who sells @ 3k?

>>12677569
what a load of crap

>>12677495
In this scenario, the 200 period distribution has excessive mass. Once reentered, price is forced to trade laterally as defined by that period as it would require an unrealistic amount of force to create new upward expansion.
>>12677611
If it's crap how do you explain my trade history. Checkmate atheists

>>12676036
>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1za4qMVl7PKaWOZb_jfev5BhroOt3KNpkDYO0vPnky4w/edit?usp=sharing
>Only 44 of 94 trades were profitable
>Median return of -2% per trade
>Less than 1 year of history
It looks like you were taking random positions and happened to get super lucky a few times.

This thread seems a bit like someone walking up to a roulette table, successfully going all in on red 4 times in a row, bragging about it online, and basking in the attention of retards.

>>12677611
Sure buddy, you can use the "golden standard" of price action and volume technical analysis like everyone else. Ever wonder why 95% of traders lose money despite all of them using the "best available TA that's a proven standard and common knowledge?"

>>12677631
Does a roulette table have a 5 to 1 profit ratio?
Bottom line is more important than winrate.
It's common sense.

If I had a 10 to 1 profit ratio I would only need to win 10% of my trades.

>>12677569
B.S.

Comparing btc to the dji is like farting in a jar and then microwaving it.

>>12677664
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/6SIl2X3f-The-Holy-Grail-of-Trading-Advanced-Volatility-Theory/
Here's a more complete write up of the concept. If you'd like to get even more documentation on the theory, read Macro to Micro by Mark Whistler. If you really think it's bullshit, educate yourself about it and explain why it is wrong.
>>12677677
Given the fact that it's not even the DJI on the chart you should reconsider the validity of your opinion.

>>12677624
>>12677635
just because you've had some good trades doesn't mean that your wacky theories makes any sense. the reason why most traders lose money is not because there is nothing in price action TA that does work.
you conveniently also ignored my other post. probably because you know that I'm right.

>>12677701
Ah, I see now. You’re one of those “I can teach you to get rich for a small fee” faggots.

>>12677755
If you'd like 600 pages of documentation on the basics of volatility theory I'd be happy to oblige if you DM me, I'll send you the pdfs.
Alternatively if you'd like to support the author and buy the books I recommend Mark Whistler's Macro to Micro and Volatility Illuminated. Most of what I do can be adapted from those books and I very much encourage people read them before even considering my services. If anyone else is reading through this I'll be happy to send the books to anyone who messages me.
>>12677713
Pick related. I'm here to give away information for free and introduce people to the strategy. All that matters for you is your bottom line. If I'm wrong, I'll stop out of my trade and move on.

>>12677647
>>Does a roulette table have a 5 to 1 profit ratio?
>Go to roulette table
>Bet on 7, get lucky
>Bet on black, get rekt
>Brag online about muh 35:1 profit ratio.
I still think you got lucky. A mindless chimp easily could have accomplished the same feat. I might take you seriously if your luck persists for a couple more years.

>>12677811
you conveniently ignored my second post (it wasn't the first which I thought when I wrote my last one) again. read the first sentence of it. I'm not claiming that I know with certainty what is going to happen. my opinion is just that your explanations are a load of crap. your system might be profitable if you have your risk management on point. and it probably is profitable, judging by your trade history.

>>12677875
If you think it's crap, read the books, tell me why it doesn't work. Something isn't crap if you don't understand it and are unwilling to understand to learn.

>>12677873
Then go to a different thread and make money somehow else.
His TA is solid, better than >>12677875
This chimps trend lines. Maybe he ignored you because your TA is the same swill that stinks up the rest of this shithole board

>>12677979
I didn't draw a single trend line you chimp. trend lines are pretty useless anyway. I wasn't talking about my TA, at least the part where I differ from him, you brown nosed faggot.

>>12677569
Trading its way simplier than that, in all this bear market we did not broke not even a single lower high than we been creating on the way down from 20k

There is only 2 places in btc to trade, 3200 and 4000, either one of those its going to get broken, you just make your guess based on what you tought to be rational thinking, its not.

>>12676036
on y-day's live stream you said MTL was a buy. but then it went down. what happened?
trying to learn here.

>>12677166
>stop around 1015 would be good
what would be the profit taking point here?
when it touches the stdev boundary or above?

>>12677631
This is the mark of a good trader, retard. 2 stop losses for 5 pct loss for every 1 trade you ride for 50 pct game. Small loss, small loss, big gain, small loss, small loss, big gain.

>>12677811
>Mark Whistler's Macro to Micro and Volatility Illuminated.
what is your 3d wave pm indicator based on?
still bollinger bands?
also, volatility illuminated mentions the WVAV indicator. how come you dont use that one?

>>12678359
>>12678359
Convincing the masses that trading is simple was the greatest success of institutional investors. If you create a majority of traders who all believe in predictable simplicity, you're going to get predictable moves generated by their herd like stamping based on the obvious breakouts, default setting indicators, and static "support/resistance" levels. Predictable moves make for a predictable market. A predictable market is a profitable market, for those who are holding the right cards.
>>12678439
Lateral moves are the most likely scenario at this time. Have a small take profit at 1175, but the profit ratio of betting on trend continuation is too sweet to pass up.
>>12678113
Oh, static support and resistance levels count as trend lines.
>>12678449
Thanks brother. Little loss, little loss, big win. I used to trade on a 10-20 to 1 profit ratio, I lost almost all of my trades but the times I did win set off all of my losses.
>>12678461
There is not a single indicator on my chart that isn't a derivative of a bollinger band.
The chart is,
3 bollinger bands

4 cci periods (which is just an mean absolute deviation representation of a bollinger band)

4 Wave PM periods (which is just an oscillator representation of the distributional width of each cci period)

and 3D wave pm (which is 32 periods of wave pm represented as a heatmap with the same scale as regular wave pm)

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/KrPAlhuZ-Bitcoin-will-revert-EXACTLY-to-the-200-15m-MA/
Also are you guys watching my idea from earlier in this thread? we'll have hit take profit by the morning.

>>12678625
>4 Wave PM periods (which is just an oscillator representation of the distributional width of each cci period)
i was trying to understand more about this from Volatility Illuminated. Is this basically just a "bollinger band cut in a half where you see only the top half"?

Whats your opinion of Mark Whistler's WVAV indicator?

thanks a lot!

>>12678663
Since tradingview doesn't support adjustable tick lengths I can't commission WVAV's creation, as such I have no opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-N92FZATs8&list=PLhWytUyCG_WGGpXI8KEBd5pT8sGgX1Vhk&index=3
Here's a 20 minute video of my developer talking about it.

>>12678718
Is this developer you, because he has a sexy comforting daddy voice.
I want you to dm me that 600 page documentation

>>12676121
how does this prove a market bottom?

XRP?

Do quant, duh.

>>12679210
"prove" and "provide a probable trade with a good profit ratio" are two entirely different things. The signs are there.
>>12679223
On the 1h chart there was converse expansion which is pretty rare. Makes for shit trading, I'd stay away from it.

except it is literally a couple of weeks away from dropping to 2.4k and about 4 months from dropping to 1.3k.
keep falling for pajeet TA "experts" and hodl all the way down, bulltards

>>12679521
Why?

>>12679530
too many shitcoin scams still around. the bottom will happen once many of these scams finally exit scam. ripplefags need to lose all their money first before this market goes anywhere. the bottom will be at the 300 week moving average

>>12679586
The scams arent going to all just pack up and leave. If we have a year of sideways as op suggested I see most of the trash coins just quietly fading into nothing like omg is doing now. Others may actually say they're done with development but to avoid anger they may not. A year or sideways will flush out a lot of trash.

Unfortunately ripple can keep dumping a billion every month at any price and make good money to keep going.

This shit is going sub-$1000

Thank you palm reader. The wrinkle in the middle of my finger looks like a bullish crossover

>>12679493
ok, show me how its "probable" to find a market cycle bottom on 15m charts

>>12680296
Identify macro level pivots and trend and identify short term bullish mean reversion pivots for high probability entry into short term positions that can be held open for the long term. Multi timeframe confluence.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/KrPAlhuZ-Bitcoin-will-revert-EXACTLY-to-the-200-15m-MA/
Like this trade today. If we get the same signal 100 dollars lower directly on top of the weekly 200 that will signify a bottom.
Mean reversions hit with around 90% accuracy.

>>12679586
So, in a market based on blind speculation, the performance of microcap coins will affect bitcoin's price negatively? Do you know how someone sells a shitcoin? They... buy bitcoin using their shitcoin. Altcoin failure leads to a rise in bitcoin dominance.

>>12676036
what's this BB you are using?

>>12680390
Heya! I use the 1.25 standard deviation as it's the empirical constant for the expansion and compression of a distribution. I go in depth on it's application here.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/6SIl2X3f-The-Holy-Grail-of-Trading-Advanced-Volatility-Theory/

>>12680400
can I adjust my BBs like you or do I have to pay you money to use yours and this thread is just advertising? I would want it to keep track of your call.

>>12680433
I don't recommend you look into any of my products until you read Macro to Micro and Volatility Illuminated by Mark Whistler. If you dm me on tradingview, I can send you them for free.

I don't need your shekels for you to do what I do.

>>12680451
sure, nvm, figured it out. thx anyway.

>>12676036
We are not at the bottom

>>12676036
NIMIQ POR FAVOR

>>12680459
Who knows, maybe you're right. But since the profit ratio of entering here is around 50 to 1, why not attempt a long here, stop out, and try again on the next benchmark?
>>12680490
https://www.tradingview.com/x/7UTIVgAn/
looks good

>>12680505
>looks good
kek

whats your take on XEM for today?

>>12680338
>Either price action will trend upward to meet price, or the mean will travel down to meet price through a lateral move.
So doesnt the 2nd outcome mean its not a confirmed bottom?

>>12680459
Imagine how fun it will be when Bitcoin reaches $10k again and the greedy bears are crying that they didn't buy in the low $3000s.

Is there anyway to do TA on dragonchain drgn please dadsharkanon?

>>12676036
You're full of shit. Capitulation hasn't started yet.

>>12681764
famous last words

>>12676087
>every one who doesnt believe in crypto is out of crypto.... i dont see why this shit would drop below 3k
do not neglect the incentive for those "out of crypto" to still tank prices and ruin public perception.
kraken just launched futures. look into futures and why warren buffet calls them "weapons of financial mass destruction".
TL;DR futures allow for price discovery to happen outside of the underlying asset's binding metrics.

>>12676036
thoughts on monero?

hash-rate and volume have doubled in the past two months.

>>12682138
thats what they said at 6k

>>12682230
i think you misread my comment.... because yes, they said that atg 6k and here we are sub 4k now.

my comment was bearish not bullish.

Everyone and their grandma is looking at the chart and expecting it to go lower. There is nothing to lose if people buy back in after confirmation that the bottom is in. There is a fucking lot more to lose if you buy in now before it dumps lower.

>>12682397
already bottomed

>>12681719
Or if you buy now you can watch yourself lose 40%-50% of your money thinking that you knew this would happen and then btc doesn't stop falling and it turns out you were wrong, and that CSW really was satoshi and csw is now dumping his 1100000 btc on the open market that he gains access to at the start of 2020 and buying BSV with it.

>>12681719
And if im wrong i will just be buying at 6k. Not 10k. If we pass 6k bullrun is starting.

S&P 500

>>12680505
KNC

>>12683366
So why not buy now with a hedge to the downside? You will miss out on a 90 pct gain if you wait until 6k.

That is investor thinking not trader thinking. Anyone that watches themselves lose that that high a percentage of value has no conception of capital preservation and has no one to blame but themselves for not practicing better risk management. In crypto I wouldn't allow a trade to drop more than 3% before stopping out and moving on to a new trade.

>>12683331

That is investor thinking not trader thinking. Anyone that watches themselves lose that that high a percentage of value has no conception of capital preservation and has no one to blame but themselves for not practicing better risk management. In crypto I wouldn't allow a trade to drop more than 3% before stopping out and moving on to a new trade.

Woah, I woke up and my thread isn't pruned. How nice. I'll fish through these questions shortly

watch out. this guys says he makes 50x on a bear market but is a poor fuck in reality wanting you to subscribe to his TA services. That's right, he is selling his own goldmine. KEK
Go back to discord fag

>>12677474
Do you still think so with that pump?

>>12677448

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG0QK69HowU
I made a video summarizing my thoughts on this thread. Excuse my Barry White voice and shit microphone, I used the wrong settings.

>>12676036
this

>>12677166
nice going faggot. reminder to the rest of you...

>>12676036
We're going below $3,000

Any thoughts on Bitcoin SV anon?

funny right
Heavy volume but price barely moved.
Hmm what could that be?
Maybe accumulation.

>>12676036

>op is a newfag
joined less than a year ago on tradingview
>First publication 6 June 2018

He wasn't even here when oldfags were shilling bitcoin at $200 a piece.

Look, some of us are OG if you want us to take you seriously post your bitmex-ID so we can verify your claims.

>>12676036
Can we get some TA on NTS token on the Nauticus Exchange?

You're here to sell courses.

>>12687440
I won't let you take my courses if you don't read the damn books on the framework first. >>12686583
I stop out of more than half of my positions. It's the profit ratio that matters. Expectations on hot now appear to be aligned for short term decay.
>>12686794
If it does I'll be there shorting it with you
>>12681752
https://www.tradingview.com/x/qXV4ZVXd/
don't do it. There are things to live for
>>12680775
https://www.tradingview.com/x/7gElwGlV/
quad cci implies short entry. Lateral trading is most likely for the remainder of the week while short term distributions cool off. Mean reversion pivots not crossed, expectations aligned for decay.
>>12681862
heh
>>12682148
https://www.tradingview.com/x/BsW9UBVA/
Nice compression, plenty of potential energy. But the direction that energy will unleash in has not been implied. This chart will be ok to trade a breakout on.

>>12687426
>Look, some of us are OG if you want us to take you seriously post your bitmex-ID so we can verify your claims.
The IRS... it's... it's evolving...

Meanwhile, QNT doesnt even give a shit.

Holo

>>12688960
I liked this so much when I first saw it I shaved my mohawk thinner to match it.
>>12688497
It appears short term bearish, though I may be wrong.
>>12688330
I laughed