/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12671283
Hi pajeet, remind me again when you graduated from Mumbai Municipal Potty Training Academy of the Arts.

>>12671283
Seriously, just hold 10k CHX and stake it at Q1 release and you'll literally be set for life

>>12671311
About to buy 2-5K more.
Can you tell me where I can learn more about staking?

>>12671311
i have 50,000 chx. i'm staking it at mainnet and holding until it's $100 billion marketcap in 2-5 years at the top of the sto bubble.

>>12671283
I've been hold chx since November with my QNT gains and I still don't understand what they're going to do.
While I don't regret my gains, I just wish I was just smart enough to swing trading my link.

>>12671283
Oh wow a blockchain IPO that is only special b/c its uses blockchain tech...
Would you guys buy this shit if it was just a IPO?

>>12671319
staking chx is so easy. after mainnet, you just keep your chx in your chx wallet. your wallet doesn't even need to be online.

>>12671325
>>12671319
I think you guys made the right decision, now is the best time to buy especially since theres some selling going on. And you can find more about staking on the telegram or on OWNs blog here: https://weown.com/blog/

This is the dumbest scam since bitconnect. To do an STO you have to do all kinds of legal shit like file a reg d or a with the sec and lots of compliance work that only lawyers can do. The idea that some retarded Slavic con artists can do all that for you is just cartoonishly stupid. All they could help with is the technical aspect of the token which any real project can handle themselves easily and they certainly wouldn’t outsource it to a bunch of tracksuit wearing weasels.

>>12671403
Exactly. Nobody understands how this shit even works. Listen to this anon guys. It’s quite the process to get a green light from the sec.

>>12671403
> does no research whatsoever on the team, AMAs or Telegram
> claims 'scam'
> remains poor and holds LINK to 0

>>12671403
>This is the dumbest scam since bitconnect. To do an STO you have to do all kinds of legal shit like file a reg d or a with the sec and lots of compliance work that only lawyers can do. The idea that some retarded Slavic con artists can do all that for you is just cartoonishly stupid. All they could help with is the technical aspect of the token which any real project can handle themselves easily and they certainly wouldn’t outsource it to a bunch of tracksuit wearing weasels.
>>12671348
>Oh wow a blockchain IPO that is only special b/c its uses blockchain tech...
>Would you guys buy this shit if it was just a IPO?

>>12671348
I don't think you understand the current IPO market. Only mega huge tech companies IPO anymore because small and medium sized businesses have been pushed out. this industry has long been ripe for disruption.

>>12671388
>>12671340
thank you frens

>>12671403
T H I S
H
I
S

>>12671403
>To do an STO you have to do all kinds of legal shit like file a reg d or a with the sec and lots of compliance work that only lawyers can do.
yeah, no shit. this isn't fud, this is reality. they're not trying to sell themselves as a non-compliant STO issuer so I'm not understanding your hangup. I don't think you understand the niche they are targeting at all.

>>12671403
Man you're dense. The legal work and Reg filing still needs to be done. They provide a technology platform to accomplish that by having the security (equity, debt, asset...) issued as a token.

They make their platform available to banks and broker dealers, who can now issue securities in token format instead of traditional way. None of the legal requirements have changed, it's that security tokens are made to meet current regulations

The CEO was CIO of computershare. You would understand the relevance if you did a few seconds of googling.

>>12671403
I'm pretty sure it's been mentioned in a previous AMA that they have a legal team they're working with.

>>12671433
>>12671451
this

>>12671283
Nah ill pass

>>12671456
You poor stupid brainlet. The legal part 99.9% of doing securities, the part these clowns do is 0.000000001% of it. The scam is entirely based on taking advantage of hype around tokenization and STOs but they were too incompetent to even come up with a story that stands up to 5 seconds of scrutiny which is why they had to hire paneets to spam it on /biz/.

>>12671459
Their legal team can’t help people who want to securitize assets. That has to be soon by the projects themselves and it not only involved legal work but in some cases personal relationships with regulators. This is a SCAM.

>>12671648

>>12671667
Yes, the ex-CIO of the largest share registrar in the world has no idea how the IPO process works and is completely ignoring regulations on every front. In fact, he's actually willing to risk is 30+ year professional reputation on a crypto scam! Seriously, can you get any more retarded?

>>12671648
do you have any idea how much money it costs to run and maintain an IPO? why do you think we've seen a steep, steep fucking decline of companies going public over the last two decades? Private investment money has stepped in to fill the void, but this has not been good for the middle class or general health of the economy. There is a real need being filled here, and they are doing it in a way that insulates tokenizing companies from CHX as a cryptocurrency. adoption in crypto has always been a meme up to now because nobody wants to deal with private keys and the irrational market. this is the only project I've seen that I think might actually break the adoption meme.

>>12671380
does chx have a wallet+

Does anyone know the actual firm who takes care of their legal work?

>>12671283
>jointherevolution
>by using regulated financial tools that previously existed.

>>12671849

This.

It’s funny because the crypto fanboys seem to be the ones who don’t like this project. They are probably the same ones who think TRX, XVG, and all the other scams are going to change the world.