/biz/ - Business & Finance

Rip req

Fuck you REQ

>>12624478
Request Network: Endgame

>>12624478
i wish brainlet bagholders of this shitcoin would shut the fuck up

no one on biz wants to see req posts

lawsuit fucking when

I am sorry for your loss Req hodlers. Another promissing idea that French work ethic destroyed.

>>12624478
Coming up next, RLC

>>12624478
post a link OP

>>12626455
explain

Id like too request money back xD

>>12625117
I enjoy them

>>12626543
im convinced req shilling was paid for
no way they brainwashed so many here into thinking it was a good project

>>12626555
Checked. Proper use case, it actually makes a lot of sense for invoicing to move to blockchain. Tokenomics were always a little sketch but there was also always public talks of potentially moving to PoS which would have made the tokenomics very valid. I'm no fool and I put a lot of money into REQ. A LOT of money. Nevertheless, at some point it became obvious the team was too amateur despite having a perfectly valid product concept on their hands, and I sold everything at an extreme loss and moved into other assets. It wasn't a bad project on the surface, it was a bad project at the heart. The problem with ICO's and early stage crypto in general is you usually just get the surface to make an investing decision.

>>12626599
>Nevertheless, at some point it became obvious the team was too amateur despite having a perfectly valid product concept on their hands
this was finally obvious after wikimedia called them unprofessional and canceled their partnership. I think REQ was still .25 then.
also remember when they listed ING as a partner during ICO then conveniently removed their logo after they raised $30m?
this was always a conjob

>>12624478
How many phases are there?

POST LINK TO FUD

BUMP

REQ ABOUT TO MOON

ITS HAPPENING THIS WEEK

>>12626705
nah

This is basically your last chance to get out of crypto. Yesterday the biggest Canadian exchange exit scammed. Today is the REQium. Who knows what tomorrow will be.

>>12626599
>I'm no fool and I put a lot of money into REQ. A LOT of money.
Anon, I...

>>12626776
Haha no

TO THE FUCKIN MOON ON THE 7TH

GIVE ALL YOUR MONIES BOYS

I think you guys are getting the wrong read on their recent actions. From what I can tell, they are moving in a direction with their new protocol that makes it seem somebody is ready to start invoicing on the blockchain very soon, likely actual firms (PwC). Why do I believe this?

1. Moving away from decentralization. They are not dogmatic about decentralization and sitting on their thumbs waiting for Ethereum to scale. They decided to centralize some of their network right now to make it function well for the user. If they didn’t have anyone waiting to use it, why centralize right now?

2. They are abstracting all of the “crypto” related bullshit (private keys, gas fees etc.) which is all the stuff that keeps everyday normal people from using crypto. Venmo is press and pay, no weird gas fees or private keys or entering weird addresses.

Being dogmatic about this stuff right now is a huge red flag, if you’ve got money in a project that is dogmatic about “decentralization” I suggest you reevaluate because decentralization isn’t viable for any use case that involves more than a few thousand people.

>>12626776
the buy signals are loud and clear

>>12627006
I like you

>>12627006
stop using logic faggot we want to post mozzarella memes

>>12627006
Pretty sweet insight

>>12627006
>I suggest you reevaluate because decentralization isn’t viable for any use case that involves more than a few thousand people.
My good man. If your "request network" is not decentralised, then pray tell -- what is the fucking point of it? How does it have ANY advantage over paypal, which works fine right now. I *request* an explanation.

>>12624478
Pure plebbit

>>12627419
This. Lmao why is there a token for a centralized network? REQ keeps getting stupider every development.