/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12557147
Oi m8, 10$ usd eoy possuble?

>>12557155
Yes. I think a 100x is possible if crypto doesn't die. I also think RLC might be a top 10-20 coin too based on what I know about it, but I haven't done a ton of research

It's pretty obvious that RLC is the typical biz coin. Very fundamentally strong and ranked way lower than it should. I remember buying LINK and HOT when they were around 120 in mcap and RLC sits around 140 now.

>>12557175
>Very fundamentally strong and ranked way lower than it should
definitely
>I remember buying LINK and HOT when they were around 120 in mcap and RLC sits around 140 now.
Yep. I bought link around that time and made a nice little amount, now RLC is the most obvious one IMO
i also dont understand hjow a coin partnered with intel and IBM is below so many shitcoins

Rlc is shit

>>12557175
>Very fundamentally strong and ranked way lower than it should
i think you're all faggotjeets and i'm paranoid. but this unironically. those are the qualities of true biz coins

>>12557199
you are shit dont buy it then and see what happens by spring
>>12557215
im white as fuck breh

>>12557215
I mean rank 140... this coin should be about 100 spots higher whether you think it will succeed long term or not. Everything is speculative and this project has stronger fundamentals than most of the coins in the market and it seems like there is real exploratory interest from big companies. Fog computing makes sense from tech perspective too. Plus the tokenomics are not just about utility but staking which is very appealing for its growth in value.

This can just dumps too hard whenever it tries to move up. Doesn't make sense. Expect it to go back to at least 6k sats.

>>12557275
You're right, it could, but at some point it's not coming down. It has had no real marketing up to this point. It seems biz is taking notice recently so guerilla marketing is starting.

>>12557147
Stop fucking with this coin please.

>>12557275
yeah it dumps until it doesn't, which id guess is soon

>>12557283
no, buy it it's below ico price nigger

>>12557302
I hold more than anyone on this board for fundamental reasons. If you faggots keep pumping this coin artificially, I will dump.

>>12557313
You have to take into account that shills will come to fundamental coins. Overall though, it will pick up the technical discussions of it which is good. You have any insight into fog computing?

i'm trying to learn more. Was reading this https://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-fog-computing

>>12557313
Do it. I have plenty of money on the side waiting for a stupid nigger like you to do something dumb.

>>12557329
A premature dump does nothing but take profit from you.

Sure, keep expending resources pumping so greater fools will continue the momentum. No skin off my back. I'll dump before you can get out every time.

>>12557313
based

>>12557340
>A premature dump does nothing but take profit from you.
Not if my sell period isn't in the short term.
It would work more in my favor if you dumped because i'd just support the next floor.

You don't seem to understand how trading works, so I doubt you even have enough RLC to cause any real movement.

>>12557344
Nigger, don't pretend I don't know what you're doing. At least I'm not peddling for pennies hijacking legitimate projects leaving naive investors out to dry. My ML platform probably makes your shill commission daily.

>>12557302

Nope, the dump will continue over the next month as hype and delusion disappear.

>>12557356
So then cause some movement in RLC, flash your sell wall on binance at 6000sat so i can laugh

>>12557147
how much RLC for making it in 2021?

>>12557364
sorry, meant 7000 sat

>>12557367
prob 10k

>>12557367
yea 10k is what you should aim for
5k is suicide insurance

Trying to buy some RLC rn, for the first time people don't seem to want to get rid of their bags, I'm having trouble filling orders.

I'm no expert, but thats a good sign right?

Anyway when this order gets filled I'll be holding 1.7k, plan to accumulate a bit more.

>>12557396
>>12557405

ok sounds doable, ty frens

>>12557367
You'll sell as soon as it hits $1
No one holds on this board
We're all gamblers

>>12557495
RLC def will warrant some long term investors.

>>12557495
I have a sell stack and a investment stack
always trying to increase both
am holding investment stack until 2021 or later

>>12557244
The only thing I don't understand is how can you be a fanboy of HOT when it's a competitor... I always tought HOT was shit

What's this new around? HOT now is valuable?
>No consensus
>gazillion supply
>femminism team
>feet

Not trying to fud HOT, I just wanto to know if I would need to buy also HOT or I could avoid it.

Any help please?

I cant believe how stupid someone must be to be buying this shitcoin now. Next news wont come out till may and this shitcoin is very likely to dump back below 5k

>>12557626
Possibly, but it's so undervalued for its fundamentals that it might not matter. Very little liquidity on the exchange too so won't take alot to move the price.

>>12557626
>He isn't buying the next ETH under ICO price

The only thing I don't understand is how can you be a fanboy of HOT when it's a competitor... I always tought HOT was shit

What's this new around? HOT now is valuable?
>No consensus
>gazillion supply
>femminism team
>feet

Not trying to fud HOT, I just wanto to know if I would need to buy also HOT or I could avoid it.

Any help please?


ANYONE COULD HELP?

>>12557679
Buy RLC because it's way undervalued and HOT has been up so much the last 2 weeks

>>12557687
>Buy RLC because it's way undervalued and HOT has been up so much the last 2 weeks

I am talking about long term fundamentals, I don't care of a x2

Get a life instead of swing trading coins like an autist, you will never always time the market perfectley

>>12557750
RLC has considerably better long term potential.

>>12557679
>No consensus
Holo is not a blockchain. Consensus is built on the hApp level according to need.

>>12557779
>Holo is not a blockchain. Consensus is built on the hApp level according to need.

Is there any vulnerability with this kind of thing? Why the coin should appreciate, beside speculation?

>>12557750
> I am talking about long term fundamentals, I don't care of a x2
thats where you sell all your HOT and go all in on QNT

>>12557679
I hold both. I think HOT will outperform RLC up to April when the accumulation for v3 will start

>>12558080
That's possible, however holo is at 160m mcap right now after 100% growth this week and rlc is sitting at 19m with both good fundamentals. From a risk-reward perspective I would choose RLC. But hey, the crypto market is irrational so you might be right.

Will it go back down? Sold it a couple days ago. Damn dont know what to do

Just wait a few days it will come back down to 5k like always

>>12558870
I dunno this time seems different...

>>12558943
this, it's preparing to pump another little before falling again

>>12559320
>>12558943
that's my feeling. initially i sold, but bought back in today. rlc shill were relentless and we might see a nice pump before going down

Personally I unironically sold half my link stack for rlc.

>>12559526
oof, too much.

RLC isn't moving lmao
sahgayroo

>>12559596
Why? It’s got a lot of room to grow.

>>12559614
Never have less than 75% of your folio in LINK.

Just sold my HOT. Wondering if I should put it back into HOT or go deeper in RLC. It's kinda dampeeeing right now and might be a good time to buy when its this low.

>>12559711
cofused here. Wasn't HOT scam with no consensus?

What's their Tokenomics?

>>12559711
im 50/50 and gonna keep that way. from normie aspect HOT is definitely top 5 material, so why not keep it till at least 2b mcap?

OK biz. I unironically missed out on both link and fucking hot. I will now listen to you as I've learnt my lesson. Nobody on biz would lie about this opportunity, right? I trust you, my frens. All in RLC!

>>12560551
Nothing is guaranteed fren, but like other anons here I do believe RLC has strong fundamentals and is undervalued considering its current mcap. Gilles has done a lot of work in fog computing (https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&hl=en)) and RLC has ties with Intel (https://medium.com/iex-ec/intel-and-iexec-collaboration-privacy-preserving-offchain-computing-198bd6799c36)), Ubisoft(https://twitter.com/iex_ec/status/987000845911953409?lang=en)) and IBM (https://medium.com/iex-ec/ibm-cloud-joins-blockchain-startup-iexec-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing-72e6ee8f8d3a))

Wasn't HOT scam with no consensus?

Can anyone answer to this question?

>>12560704
it always was just fud from deluded linkies. linkfags are becoming the laughing stock of all crypto space now

>>12560704
Bring your own consensus fag. Holo doesn't enclose itself in a single consensus, hApp users decide it.

>>12560715
Isn't link up 400% in btc value the past few months? I'd say it's doing okay

>>12560607
name 1 dapp people will actually use on day 1 of mainnet
the concept is great but iexec is ahead of its time as it solves a problem no one has (yet)

>>12561323
dApps will take time to develop but I imagine some amazing creations coming out in the next 2 years as people realize the insane amount of potential

>>12561323
yeh but why would you buy when the killer usecase comes out dipshit.

Thats the whole point of buying now while its cheap and sitting on it.

This the issue with most fags in crypto - non of you have any P A T I E N C E

>>12560715
>it always was just fud from deluded linkies. linkfags are becoming the laughing stock of all crypto space now

Holochain is not a link competitor

>>12561544
>implying anyone on biz has patience
it's their true downfall, it's why they'll never make it

going to sleep. put in a buy order at 65. should that be lower or higher?

>>12558209
also holo is not on binance

>>12561630
you're betting against the trend
idk if itll step down again to touch 6500

>>12561650
yeah i am noob, so you saying i should buy at market price now and set a sell order at 80 before going to bed?

>>12561666
>666
possibly do what you said, might work.

Am I just the only one to hold this until 2020 and never selling?
It seems you fags are out money, desperatley needing to swing...
You'll miss some moonshot acting in this way. It's sufficient ONE DAY you are not too carful and you could miss so much, because crypto is still a wild beast, and things like Ethereum 2017 will defintley happen again to some coin. It may be Holo, LINK or RLC
I think that RLC will moon violently in the next bull run. (The next bull run will be when the first dapps will commmence to appear) reaching 200$ minimum
Link 50$ or so. Also LINK and and RLC are brothers because RLC would need somenthing like link

>>12561829
no I always hodl minimum a year for tax reasons. here in krautland it is taxfree if you hodl for > a year :]

>>12561829
Yep. Holding 30k until at least 2020.
I just want to ride the wild ride. No stress, just all fun and laughter. Eventually the market will understand iExec and start to price speculate a bit and I imagine it could even go to 100-400$ like litecoin did.

When you think about it, RLC has more use cases than most of the cryptos out there.

>>12561891
Ja, Finanzamt BTFO

>>12557167
>I think a 100x is possible
>I haven't done a ton of research

The absolute state of /biz/

>>12557454
just do the chad thing and market buy

>>12562095
I can think a 1000x is possible and not do a -ton- of research, just enough to understand the project at its bare minimum

>>12561984
>I just want to ride the wild ride. No stress, just all fun and laughter. Eventually the market will understand iExec and start to price speculate a bit and I imagine it could even go to 100-400$ like litecoin did.
It will do like monero, I see it doing like monero