/biz/ - Business & Finance

One day Request Network crypto currency will be $50000 a token

>>12456325
How can you crash further to the ground? you mean into earth's core? I have been thinking about buying this coin if only because of how much it has dropped

>>12456325

I remember back in 2017 when I discovered Link and everyone was saying Link & Req are brothers. teeheehee...

I thank Jesus every day that I went all in Link and didn't touch that shit.

>>12456381

Also forgot to mention this is coming from a CPA. Req is one of those things that is a great idea on paper, but I absolutely PROMISE you that adoption will NOT happen in the next 10 years.

Maybe something like it will come along in 10-20 years and it will start to take hold, but it is just too soon...

Let me explain. Boomers. Like most things, the accounting world is run by old fuckers and this is way too drastic of a change.

10+ years before anything like this even has a chance of being adopted. Probably 20 years.

>>12456325
How are they going to rebrand REQ? Add a T to the end?

>>12456381
Link needs REQ in order to work faggot nice fud

>>12456414
So you're saying with have a 10 year head start? time to hibernate

>>12456441
kek, thanks anon this is reddit tier

I hope they don't rebrand too hard, i dig the color scheme

>>12456976
will be subtle

Request - the future of shrimp tracking

>>12456325
>Will we crash down into the ground?
You already did you retard. You're -98% from a year ago.

wait, theres a rebrand coming?

>>12457066
this is a creepy and dead coin i guess

>>12457066
Yes, about in two weeks

Srs potential for x100

>>12456325
> will we crash into the ground?

You ready did you mongoloid. There aren't any survivors

According to the laws of memetics I see req surviving and reaching $75 EOY 2020

>>12457330
digimarines unite!

>>12457108
People are taking their time to make fud posts on a daily basis. If it were a dead coin, this wouldn’t be the case. Think whatever you want about REQ, but I’m loading my bags. Easiest 100x.

>>12457630
>Easiest 100x.

>>12457639
That’s the easiest 1000x fellow marine.

>>12457630
Legitimately see request as a top 10 coin or are you LARPing

why should they rebrand?

>>12458004
While in the cryptocurrency industry the word rebranding is sometimes associated with an event that is done to directly impact token price, rebranding in itself serves a much different purpose for Request. We’re rebranding to:

Have a brand system which we can use to differentiate Request products, while still feeling like a Request brand. The original brand design is not flexible enough to answer to this need.
Speak to the right audience, as our target audience focus has become more clear. The original brand looks, feels and speaks to the past.
Have a future-proof brand identity. The current brand is too restricted to use over a longer period of time.

this should be below a penny and you reqtards know it
literally nothing delivered except for some donation plugin a reddit mod made after an entire year... remember the crowdfunding failure? team is clueless

>>12457330
i'd be rich im m country not happening
i just need $15 - $20

>>12456426
I got me some massive bags o'rek, but this made me audibly kek. wp n1

>>12456325

I'm unironically going to buy 20k reqlets and ride the pump

>>12458691
I have 2 mil req

>>12458695

Well you'll do nice when it pamps

>>12458703
Req will be $3 per token EOY

i've read their github commits, the rebrand is not going to do shit. they are literally renaming from "Request Network" to "Request" (nothing is happening to the token, it's still the same old REQ, only available on binance) and have made an app that quickly creates a 1-page donation page for you that includes their payment button.

their entire rebranding idea is to get their users to beg others for money and they'll get a cut of it with their payment button fee.

this is not a larp, no joke, anyone can see for themselves here:

https://github.com/RequestNetwork/request2

https://github.com/RequestNetwork/donations.request.network

stay far away from this

When will the team announce the Amazon partnership?

bamb

>>12458794
Right after the spanish government involvement.

Why do you retards hold this shitcoin

>>12456325

>>12460035
wtf where did you hear this or was that just lucky guess?

>>12456325
Shouldn't it be the sunrise?

>>12458172
This is such sleazy marketing talk. my god I fucking hate it sometimes
>the current brand is too restricted
ugh... fucking hell
>brand system which we can use to differentiate Request products
jeez... i'm really getting sick
>the original brand desing is not flexible enough
...about to puke
Oh god! Why does a field such as "Branding" exist? It is populated by utter absurdities, vultures, know-it-all gurus that lack complete self-awareness and understanding of business, and snake-oil salesman that barely do any work and need to justify their existence with absolutely god-awful dumbed-down jargon.
Sorry for the rant

>>12460153
It wasn't a guess. But I don't have the details. Spill the beans, Robbin.

>>12460208
I know too that there is something going on. Hopefully something big.

>>12457066
>>12457119
shills were saying this months ago

>>12460205
You sir should die screaming in a fire.

>>12460267
And why is that, exactly?

what do you guys think? are my meme lines fine?

>>12460332
I think you're a fggt