/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12394748
February will be huge. Screencap this.

>>12394748
>>12394751
I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.
>I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.
I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.
>I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.
I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.
>I would be extremely surprised if LINK is under $3 by May.

Hey there bud, according to the schedule you’re not on until 3pm PT tomorrow. It’s not fair for the other larpers. Go on home and get a little more practice in, looks like you need it.

>>12394748

How many insiders? How many people by your estimate know the date?

>>12394748
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA....

>>12394748
>Insiders finally given a date
>I haven'y been given a date

Back to the call center Pajeet

>trust me

>>12394748
This is why Chicano Cryptography is calling February 10th.

cringe.

have you not seen the rest of the shitcoin market? random alts are up 10% and others are back down again. thinking any price activity on chainlink was anything special is just desperation.

>>12394748
Who cares about mainnet the shit will dump anyways.

this is too much fun

>>12394748

>>12394748
I doubt it is next month. They are going through extensive security audits to ensure real establishments adopt. At the conference in NYC in dec someone had the balls to ask in a round about way when mainnet and Sergey said a matter of a few months. Granted everything is easier said than done, I estimate at 6-8 month release date from that loose answer. That would mean June ish

>>12394899
>I think it's happening next month fa sho.
This. It's definitely happening next month.

>>12394748
That honestly could have been it, over $8,000,000 in LINK was bought in a day which is record traffic.

>>12394909
>I have a gut feeling

>>12394913
No that’s stupid

>>12394748
>Do what you wish with this information
Thanks - I’m going to go with ‘dismiss it’

>>12394875
>>12394875

>>12394758
kek

>>12394805
6.5/10 fud
part about paying in eth is true, but the node isn't designed to do that
signing an api from the source can be done but you need a network to validate if it's been signed trustlessly, and the same network to agree to publish it to a blockchain
gtfo rajesh

>>12394875
Imagine being a larper.

>>12394756
May is still 5 months away, faggot. Assblaster never specified what year.

>>12395040
>Personally I believe May 2018 is when it will happen, for three reasons: a) Sergey is a workaholic and ironically always sets himself a huge amount of work but also always gets it done before people expect. b) A lot of firms want this done by the start of summer so they can spend summer prepping/deploying/announcing, thus having everything up and running by start of the fiscal year 2018. (I believe the last big pump and dip before price singularity will consequently be in April).

>>12394875
Well, well... The writing style is very similar too.
What I mean to say is: KYS OP. Subhuman mongoloid

>>12394748
>Do what you wish with this information.
The delusional ramblings of a bored NEET barely qualifies as information.

>>12395040
yes he did

>>12394866
you're right, just a coincidence that Link is the best performing crypto of the last 6 months

>>12395103
stawp

Bet you it wont be til summer

I’m waiting for a price drop to stack up more

except it's literally dumping right now
target: $0,15