/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12284889
so sorry to hear that anon
pls post address for proof
i might send some vishnu into your blockchain
t.whalefag that /madeit/ in the bullrun

>>12284889
duh

>>12284889
No way man !

>>12284889
Lost $15k on this piece of shit. Finally sold my stack yesterday. For $1k.

>>12284962
Buy high, sell low. ONE OF US

>>12284992
It’ll go lower. It already has. I could buy back in and get more than I had. But why would I when I could just hold BTC or ETH or any other number of shitcoins and actually make $ long run?

>>12284898
everyone has heard of the Rothschilds pretty much, c'mon mane

>>12284889
> fell for erc 20 scams
just kys already or go all in bitcoin you make by investing in bitcoin not shitcoins

I like REQ. I think the developers are genuinely trying to create a real use case. Please die in a fire morons.

>>12285324
i'd loke to requst my money bach, christophe

>>12285346
>like, request, back
FUCK

>>12284962

You made the best of bad circumstances in all fairness, this shit is going nowhere

REQ could unironically be huge for a crypto invoice solution. Reminder, yes they way overshot their goals for the first year but they're still balls deep with PWC France. If you don't have a small suicide bag at these prices you need to go back to r/investing

REQ will have it's day, in a very dramatic way.

But don't expect anything until April, so just sit back, load bags at 2 cents, and have fun with the creative FUD.

>>12285525
>>12285567
Unironically these

the token doesnt do anything you dummies

>>12286201

It serves to perform work on the blockchain you brainlet. It represents cost.

>>12284889
REQ annihilated my sphincter

I can't believe this was pumped to such levels to begin with there must have been literally zero sellers and no resistance

>>12286259
Koreans. They were pumping every shitcoin back then.

>>12284889
no one cares about req.. we all know it's a scam/shitcoin... no one cares about you op.. or that you lost money on it because you are low iq.... no one wants to see your cry baby posts... you are worthless.. deal with it.. keep it to yourself

>>12286276
y so mean

>>12286226
its only purpose is to get burned
in V2 eth will be used to pay for storing the "request" via IPFS and that eth will buy req to be burned

its honestly retarded

>>12286512

That's how it always was. The investment value is in the hope of wider adoption and scarcity.

>>12284889
https://request-network.homerun.co/communication-pr-manager

>More about us
>As young and small as Request Network may be, we believe in the calm of a master. We look at the essence of what we do and what we want to achieve. We need to manage our energy because we want to bring change. Big change. We waste no calories on building castles in the air or shiny headquarters on earth. We create the open network for all financial transactions.

>As dynamic and thrilling the developing universe of blockchain may be, we stay true to our ambition and drive. We pivot and change when needed. But we don’t chase every attractive opportunity. Only when it contributes to our main goal.

>As seductive as the attraction of fame, fortune and a metropolitan life may be (and the blockchain world is full of that) we are happy to see that it adds to our attraction as a foundation. But doesn’t create a distraction from our mission. It can be a result, but it is certainly not our purpose.

>To summarise it in simple words: we are here to create the ecosystem of the future, not to hang around in the egosystem of the past.

>This calm, perhaps serious attitude is not less powerful. Or less joyful. On the contrary. It’s just more authentic.

>People are smart enough to see the difference. And what counts is not who we are, but what we bring forward.

Holy shit, is REQ full of unironic incels?

>>12286276
This so much

>>12287505
HOLY FUCK DID A PAJEET WRITE THIS LMAOOOOOOOOOO

>>12287505
They're just begging for visitation

>>12287505
A Chad wrote this. RN basically called out all the scammers in the blockchain world.

>>12287505
Wait
They waited a year before looking into PR?
...

>>12287505

>>12284898
>this is now an anti-establishment thread