/biz/ - Business & Finance

F U T U R E
B I L L I O N A I R E S

>>12281203
Nobody will believe me but i am telling the truth so idgaf
Thats my OC- I tried to get on cnbc and fox business to shill CL. Literally none of their business experts could even grasp the concept of smart contracts much less oracles
Meanwhile all the derivatives algo trader fags get it instantly.
Gettting those autists to make a value bet is a big fucking deal.
And they all did.
Niggers we are all gonna spend the next 5 years watching ourselves get retarded rich.
Good times ahead frens

Stop guys! Some of us aren't finished accumulating!

>>12281226
Thanks for your work anon. How much you holding?

Last time I took advice from you faggots I bought dbc. I’m down 99.66%

>>12281222
1 billion Venezuelan bolivars, maybe.

>>12281203

Im a NEET right now but legit my first paycheck of my next job will be going straight into 50% LINK and 50% Holo.

>>12281226
I don’t believe you

Let me summarize it for you:
>ERC token
>no actual product
>linked to ETH because see point above.
>650MM tokens are not in supply yet
>team can't spell
>Russian philosepher runs the show
>he owns 30% of all the tokens
>the tokes are basically useless. Because no product, and they've could've used ETH or BTC
>No sight of mainnet coming anytime soon.
>testnet is actually empty
>99% of ERC tokens turned out fake or absolute shit

>>12281255
;)

>>12281289
Not enough

>>12281298
Read the link and follow your heart

>>12281316
Wtf, holo? 100% link

>>12281226
Based

is..is this enough to make it? i just dont wnat to fucking work for 10 hours a day and then commute for 3

>>12281436
That's enough to be disappointed

>>12281298
I told you back then that ai was a meme

>>12281448
what do you mean? i always thought it was 30k to make it

>>12281340
>ERC token
Not sure why this is significant.
>no actual product
Demonstrable white-label partnerships. See the recent AWS Reinvent as reference.
>linked to ETH because see point above.
As a dev platform yes, but blockchain agnostic. I could go deeper, but I don’t think you’re serious.
>650MM tokens are not in supply yet
Will likely used to Incent network usage from the worlds largest companies.
>team can't spell
‘philosepher’
>Russian philosepher runs the show
Absurd argument if you’ve spent any time watching Sergay’s tech presentations. Check out game theory if you want to understand the benefit of a philosophy background.
>he owns 30% of all the tokens
Like many founders of countless companies.
>the tokes are basically useless. Because no product, and they've could've used ETH or BTC
See multiple white label product demos.
>No sight of mainnet coming anytime soon.
>testnet is actually empty
Does not likely reflect activity occurring under NDA. See recent SWIFT announcements, etc.
>99% of ERC tokens turned out fake or absolute shit
Agree, but irrelevant in the case of $LINK.

This was a half-hearted response, but I didn’t want to dignify this ignorance too much.

>>12281289
250k in 14 wallets
>>12281326
No worries fren youll have the same fat green dildo fucking your nw for the next decade
>>12281405
Fuck literally everyone. If you cant take a joke you deserve to be raped with a knife. Here is the last bastion of free speech which is air

This girl bought LINK. Doesn't she look pleased?

>>12281203
i told a friend who's a coder about chainlink a couple months ago (he knows v. little about crypto stuff, but knows abt smart contracts), and when i mentioned sergay's philosophy degree he just laughed. he thought i was shitting him. sold my stack right after that.

>>12281586
her ahegaoface pleased me at least

>>12281226

Thanks mane. I hold 7000 LINK. In your personal estimates of its growth do you think that's enough? Very tight on funds these days so buying more means sacrificing in other areas.

https://twitter.com/chainlinkmarket/status/1079178480766439424

>>12281718
>Global Legal Evangelist

This is why nobody takes crypto seriously. Or at least LINK.

>>12281733
its a DocuSign position, you mong.

>>12281718
>Lord Crypto
Who is this jungle bunny?

>>12281750
According to your fellow paid shills, we're supposed to be excited about them. Make up your mind, idiot.

Just a friendly reminder that this is very unhealthy

>>12281485
>>12281485
>Not sure why this is significant.
Because they're 99% shit. With no product. Just like LINK, no product. 99% chance of being useless in 3 years.
>Demonstrable white-label partnerships. See the recent AWS Reinvent as reference.
What people say aren't facts. VEN works with BMW, did you know that? What do you actually know, what they tell you. Why so naive?
>As a dev platform yes, but blockchain agnostic. I could go deeper, but I don’t think you’re serious.
Yeah, but there's no product. So it isn't blockchain agnostic
>Will likely used to Incent network usage from the worlds largest companies.
keyword is likely here. No crypto is being used after 10 years. Chainlink won't be either.
>‘philosepher’
I'm not worth 100MM$. When i release something for work it's 100% correct. Not 2 blatant spelling errors. Also i'm mainland european, so i have to do a spellcheck when i actually release something in english. Absolutly retarded.
>Absurd argument if you’ve spent any time watching Sergay’s tech presentations. Check out game theory if you want to understand the benefit of a philosophy background.
Clever marketing, you fell for it.
>Like many founders of countless companies.
Solid point.
>See multiple white label product demos.
No idea.
>Does not likely reflect activity occurring under NDA. See recent SWIFT announcements, etc.
SWIFT will not use it, wake up. It can't scale.
>Agree, but irrelevant in the case of $LINK.
There's a 99% chance it isn't.

>>12281817
>When i release something for work it's 100% correct.
>t. Never worked in software

>>12281765
>doesn't know what DocuSign is or why its significant.
Nigger confirmed.

>>12281831
I'm talking about a written text on a fucking pamflet. This is basic stuff lad

>>12281817
The reason eth has a chance at scaling is because of LINK. If you dont know why youd better learn.

Swift is already working with chainlink and its oracles is the only ISO20022 compliant system. They e cornered the market kn decentralized oracles.

Vechain is a scam. 100/1 splits are now not only for penny stock scams but cryptoscams too. Thank vescam.

>>12281203
because its overpriced. it is 100% not worth 100 million dollars (not even 1/3 of that) in its current state. maybe i'll buy some when it goes down to 10 cents

sage and /thread

>>12281226

So you convinced some derivative trading autists to buy LINK?

>>12281226
did you also tell them that the fat man printed 350 million tokens for himself, which is unironically the same amount of tokens as the entire circulating supply?

>>12281898
>the fat man
He has a name, you sonofa bitch!

>>12281586
Based kuroinu poster

>>12281203
>https://imgur.com/a/szBYE1f
i HAVE 1000 CHINLINK

>>12282140

>>12282272

>>12281476
The amount to retire is between 10k and 100k. Noone really knows.

Love breadcrumbs but more concerning is the apparent lack of progress in the pivotal tracker regarding the service agreement epic.

>>12282272
Sauce?

>>12281632
nice

>>12281632
screencapped btw

>>12281203
I won’t buy any link because it’s shilled as fuck

>>12282568
https://hanime.tv/hentai-videos/kuroinu-2

vaporware

Pound that tight Millennial portfoliopucci with your big red dildos Sergey. Their financial futures are getting raw

>>12282668
>ChainLink
>8 commits
At least be believable. They have over 3,000 commits and anyone can go there to see it.

>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink

>>12281226
>>12281528
Okay tell me this, if LINK isn't a fucking scam then why are these not the same ID? Because either these are separate people and the last one is LARPing as the first, or they've gotten so fucking used to switching their IPs that they can't even keep a straight identity for five minutes.

>>12282528
More like between 1k and 10k.
100k is Rothschild-level rich.

>>12281847
Is this b8 m8?
>pamflet
>pamphlet

>>12282893

Not two but 3 ids apparently.

>>12281222
checked
imagine being a no linker

>>12281203

More breadcrumbs:

https://imgur.com/a/HS9hIfr

>>12281340
>oracle is not a product
you don't know how payments work do you
chainlink can fail but you are fucking retarded if you don't understand what an oracle is, so there is a product
the actual question is: will anyone use it?
will swift use chainlink?
will the nodes get actual action?
those are smart questions, your little greentext isn't smart, it just sounds like butthurt from investing into ERC20 shitcoins that were failed projects

motivate:
https://youtu.be/sucvlo-5KAI

>>12284725
wonderful

thaks for this op and for the guy that actually made this; I am trying to impress this girl because her boyfriend is a douche bag

am happy in a 2 yr relationship, but this guy made me out to be a fool infront of an entire party. He made fun of me for losing money. He would throw out how stupid I was and go on about how dumb it is and that I've lost money on it. was trying to talk to his autist friend about the brave browser, figured he could give me an opinion on how successful BAT would be.

his girl was giving me this I want to fuck you eyes. and I am being serious about that; 4 people came up to me to ask about the look she was giving me. it was literally insane.
I told her I would send her an email about chainlink;

she told me that she has 4 million dollars shes currently holding.
I need to send this chick an email about why she should invest in chainlink; What do I say? someone who is better at english; or someone that has an easier time convincing normies, she works at vanguard.

guy is a total ass; I have a friend thats a girl that came to this party and he was being a dick to her, telling her what to do all night and shit

happy in a relationship btw, plus I hear this girl is kinda bitchy; but 4 million dollars, even an investment of .5% is a ton of link

its fucking insane how perfect this coin is even to say it for the 1,000thn time you cant overstate how incredible this shit is

>>12284800
Just let her know we are trying to put Big Macs on the blockchain for the 4th industrial revolution

mainnet when

>>12285356
tonight
strap in

>>12284800
>trying to impress girls
that aint how it works, stop trying so hard

>>12284800
Lmao inb4 you email her, she cucks you and tells her chad bf about it, and he makes even more money than you on link. If you want to impress her just show off after you made it, don't shill it to her

>>12285552
partially this
trying to get girls with showing off money is just a bad idea because she'll just see you as a beta provider with no game

>>12285586
Yeah I agree, i wouldnt do that myself, but it's definitely better than what he was trying. There is really no way to know why that woman is behaving that way. Decent chance she is manipulating him.

>>12285697
let me rephrase that, she wanted to know more, met me in the kitchen; kissed my hand stood 2 inches from my face while her chad bf was in the other room. i told her about this shit and she was turned on. if i make her rich i would get a kickback for sure. He doesnt have money, all recent grads.

he acted like he was so much smarter than me

>>12281226
God bless your work anon !

>>12286103
imo you want to steer clear of women like this, if they behave like this with their man, they would probably behave the same with you

>>12286103
Isn't this bitch already rich with that 4 million?
Don't tell her about link or any of those grad fags, just keep accumulating and show off you billions later.

At the root of nearly every piece of Link FUD is one base sentiment:

"You loser NEETs and your NEET software will never amount to anything. The system will chug along just fine without you, go die in a hole."

People are threatened by Link because they're threatened by the prospect of NEETs gaining wealth and status over them.

>>12286694
Oh yeah pajeet? Well I'm going to come poop on your street. Let's see how you like it!

>>12286480
>>12286684

You know what, you guys are right. She’s a total bitch,
She doesn’t deserve chainlink; I can’t wait to show up at future party’s that these two will be at and just show off my gains.

Would you consider getting a $3,000 loan to get more chainlink at this point in the game?

Where should i hodl link? what exchange is the safest? And i can i put it into cold wallet?

>>12284800
>investing into chainlink to impress a women
never going to make it anon

>>12287185
never gonna make it

>>12287342
If you feel comfortable enough holding it in an exchange, then by all means do it. I have been around this market long enough to see with my own eyes people getting fucked over by exchanges so do AT LEAST the bare minimum and hold your LINK in My Ether Wallet using meta mask.

>>12287185
>Would you consider getting a $3,000 loan to get more chainlink at this point in the game?

Absoultley not. Do not get me wrong, this investment is the surest thing in this space, but simple statistics show that making a lot of money from an investment in a short amount of time is an improbability of itself.

Work your ass off friend. After food/rent/gas throw every free dollar into LINK. No more money shall be spent on drugs/alcohol/partying. Get a decent stack for mainnet and start staking your tokens then.

>>12287185
Yes I would. If you’re really risk adverse, pay it off after the first 2x. If you can handle the monthly repayment of $60 or whatever then let it ride.

>>12287185
Good call. Don’t shill this thing to anyone irl. Remember those are the sort of people we want to buy in once there’s an established global market and link is at least $50-100

>>12288375
>this investment is the surest thing in this space
Even more than btc and eth?

>>12288899
combined

>>12288899
Pretty much, yeah. BTC is a store of value that doesn’t really do anything useful. ETH is one of many competing smart contract solutions. Chainlink Will work with any blockchain, and it’s emerging as the middleware solution for whatever ends up being the supreme chain. Furthermore, smart contract functionality can be taken offchain via trusted hardware, taking the “global computer” thunder from Ethereum. Literally all you need a blockchain for is a ledger of shared consensus of what chainlink said happened. All this is quietly happening while the world is still fixated on blockchains and digital money

Off-topic, but does anyone have the pepe image with the delphi imprint in his eyes?

>>12288899
bitcoin is a very archaic form of this technology. Ethereum will simply exists as a means to trigger smart contracts. All of the data will be flowing through chainlink.
Do you want to believe?

>>12289077
I get what you're saying; however, I consider btc and eth to be "blue chips" as I see them still alive 10 years from now, so btc and eth can act as a hedge, while link is a riskier moonshot.

>>12289069

>>12289239
Yeah, everybody should have some btc and eth at this point. Prices are cheap. By the time the next halvening hits in 2020 prices will be flying

>>12281226
Amen brother. See you at the linkies yacht

>>12281203
If you want stock to increase, there needs to be more investment in the structure around the stock, not just the stock itself.
Crypto is so hard to invest in because everyone is focused on when/how the currency is going to rise, but no one is looking into what makes the currency worth my money.
Crypto gets called a scam I think because there is no known infrastructure to it. It's a mystery stock.
I think when we get a better understanding of crypto in the next few years, stocks will go through the roof, though not like how BTC did.

ATM there are coins worth more than others yes, but none of them i think are better than there other just yet.
We will see with time.

>>12289346
That's a big boat.

>>12289482
For you.