/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12136556
very good.
the normie attraction factor is huge for this one
also it works pretty well, fastest coin i've tested.

NANO moves very fast during runs. definitely a good coin to have. it will be top 5 in 2019.

>>12136729
fuck off pajeet

>>12136790
hahahhahahhahahha, fag

>>12136729
you need to go back

>>12136822
>t. miner who knows his days are numbered

>tfw ride nano from 50 cent to $32
>tfw still holding the same nano
kill me

Should be good, has only gotten better since the last bull run.

>called Nano
>costs about a dollar
100% moon if a new bullrun starts

>>12136996
Hodlgang 4ever

couldt be worth a shot if you bought a few 1000 cheap

>>12136996
You're not the only one fren, but I hodled from 20 cents

Literally over 100x return and didn't sell a penny

I wish to god I was LARPing

Ripple is just as fast, actually is seeing adoption, and does something nano doesn't, it shows up every time it's sent

>>12136816
I fuck your mom pajeet

>>12137359
never had problems , all my nano alsways showed up.

also xrp still has 60 bil not in circulation
nano is fully in circulation, much more moon potential.

>>12137359
>and does something IOTA doesn't, it shows up every time it's sent
fixed

>>12137591
You obviously haven't used IOTA.
Works every time and the new wallet is one of the best crypto wallets out there.

Keep using old fud though.

>>12137683
Except iota has a back door they coded into it....look it up dumbass

>>12137683
>muh best wallet
>muh coordinator
literal vaporware skynet 1984 coin

>>12136556
>reddit coin
kys.

>>12137683
Tell that to my deposits and withdrawals of IOTA to/from binance being stuck in limbo for MONTHS, my balance randomly disappearing until arbitrarily completing PoW, etc

>>12137337
Me too but I have no doubts it will see new highs.
There is no miner sell pressure. Venezuelans were forced to dump. Now it's over.

>>12137978
Literally have done both deposits and withdrawals in the past few weeks with Binance.

How have you had issues?
Sounds like user error.

I didn't even have problems using the light wallet.
With trinity I've been getting confirmed withdrawals within about 10 minutes from Binance.

Again, sounds like user error.

>>12138134
>How have you had issues?
>Sounds like user error.
You realise the IOTA subreddit still celebrates "95% confirmation rate"?

>>12138164
You realize I don't give a shit.
You realize I do my own deep diving research on a project and come up with my own conclusions.
You realize there are a lot of reasons to buy IOTA, but I'll give you just one.

Look into ID2020.

>>12138202
Transferring IOTA didn't work for me either so fuck your own research. IOTA is for the technically illiterate.

>>12138164
Fuck I thought we hit bottom, now after seeing a brainlet like this still around we have further to go.

>>12136556
Transactions taks like 10 seconds and they are free. Every wallet gets its own blockchain making the whole network of blockchains form a block-lattice so its super decentralized. Node operators have zero financial incentive to secure the network or validate transactions because zero fees so its super insecure. No smart contract functionality. If even ethereum scales nano gets btfo'd

>>12138230
....you realize the irony in your statement right?

You say it's for technically illiterate people, yet you couldn't get it to work. LMAO

And frankly, if we're looking for something with global adoption that would increase a tokens value, something being FOR the technically illiterate would actually be beneficial.

Holy shit this board is fucking dumb.

>>12138245
>making the whole network of blockchains form a block-lattice
No, block lattice is the tech of Nano. IOTA's shit is called "Tangle" and doesn't work without a central coordinator, you spaz.

>>12138245
>>12138264
Sorry I thought this was a IOTA thread.

>>12138279
It is now little guy.
Because remember when nano exit scammed in collaboration with Bitgrail and people are still thinking its a reputable crypto.
I remember.

>>12138344
Digits don't lie.

Also, I'm sorry. That was RAIBLOCKS. my bad.
Completely different.
Wait. A. Second.

>>12138134
I'm talking about months ago (maybe even a year, cant remember), when it was a well documented issue that literally everyone was experiencing

It's ridiculous and unacceptable that a currency can be stalled and unusable for weeks/months until the developers get around to fixing their shit, soured me on IOTA for good

>>12138344
>>12138372
When people from camp (a) attack people from camp (b), it often times means that those from camp (a) are threatened by camp (b).

>>12138380
>>12138397
By all means, please, don't buy IOTA.

My help was for others in this thread that actually have some critical thinking skills and don't mind actually looking down a small trail of breadcrumbs that I provided.

Which I will do once more.
Look into ID2020 and who funded them.
Now look into its founder John Edge and his ties with IOTA.

You're welcome.