/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12111517
you just missed the dip at 230k
CSW already pumped it back to 240k.
As reaction to Jihans flash dump.

CSW is going to buy the 1 mil SV jihan will dump.

>>12111517
You listened to /biz/ what do you expect. Seriously. The pajeet memes are clearly a ruse to get Craigfags irritated enough to dump.

only need believe sir open third eye to sacred godeln bull runs sir have very stiff big pump sir csw do needful for you're rupee sir buy bags now or miss out sir

>>12111517
Sirs we no fud trust the vision of creg

>>12111517
Why are you even gambling on astronomically overvalued shitcoins in a brutal bear market.

>>12111517
It's clearly a scam made by a know con artist. Did you actually put your real MONEY into this?

>>12111537
>>12111541
this was a little funny the first day but now it's kinda dragging on

STIFF BICKIES.

>>12111557
yeah uhm you bunch of brainlets and pajeet shills need to stop. BSV is locking the protocol like it was described in the wallpaper and recently achieved 1500tx/second in private benchmarks.

>>12111517
Early states of a scam

FOMO in next stop 30k

>>12111573
Why do you Indians always fall for this shit? It's a worthless coin that most people got for free

>>12111517

>buying scams

Whew

>>12111573

>democratic currency is supposed to remain static

Exit cryptocurrency please

>buying counterfeits of counterfeit Bitcoin
>EVERY. FUCKING.TIME. I DECIDE TO TRUST YOU CLOWNS I LOSE OUT ON CHANCES
Some of you are just so stupid there's no helping you.

I like how Craig is hiding. Hitler did the same thing. When Hitler was winning, he was making bold pronouncements and acting like an alpha male. When he was losing, he quietly disappeared and stopped making public appearances. Literally the Fuhrer of Shitcoin SV.

BTW, I was right again.
>>12093802

>>12111674
no you should brainlet, if you can't understand what a protocol is and why it should be locked
>>12111657
I researched well and concluded BSV will have the most value in ~5 years from now if they succeed with massive blocks.


have fun with your second/cheat layers on your cones ;)

>>12111674
Bitcoin isn't democratic. It's incentive based capitalism. Fuck your upvote counts you core cuck.

SV will become more profitable to mine than BTC at the next pump and the hashpower will ease in from there. SV is backed by billionaires and the big blocks will be stacked with fees.

Inb4 muh decentralisation.
Miners will mine what's profitable and the Nakamoto consensus achieves sufficient security with shitloads less miners than are currently on the network. Anything excess is just fat which needs to be trimmed. Fuck your orange 3.144, we don't need it and we're not gonna subsidise it either.

>>12112053
yes indeed sirs csw real genuinen staoshity very crypto terminators sir all fake coins go hasta la vista babies buy now do not miss out stiff pump big dildos

>>12112053
its funny how you never hear an argument from any of these people who dislike the better forks of core.

>>12112094
I kek'd.

>>12111573
>recently achieved 1500tx/second in private benchmarks.
Proof?

>>12112094
Imagine spending this much time forcing this meme. Or hopefully you're getting paid for it and buy sv with your shill salary as you realise how desperate your bosses are.

>>12112277
They're private ;^)

>>12112277
Calven Ayre or however he's called says it in a youtube interview about BSV.

they also achieved 64mb blocks while BCHABC devs only managed to mine at max a 22mb block.

so you can see where the talent is, who is making the improvement

> him saying it isn't proof
no, but I he doesn't have reasons to lie.

>>12112388
> he doesn't have reasons to lie.
hahahahahahaa is this the average level of understanding that SV holders have about "incentives"?

You honestly believe someone who holds a significant portion of a coins supply has no reason to lie about its technical capabilities?

That's a BIG yikers from me.

>>12112388
Obviously he has a reason to lie, they want to flippen BTC. I mean it doesn't surprise me that dishonest people are employed by dishonest people. You are not making your shitcoin look any better

>>12112106
What is an argument? I just say what the people on coindesk say.

>>12112403
>>12112465
well then just wait until they release their improvement in the coming months, unlike blockstream coin where they promise working stable lighting is ready in a year while its going to take atleast 5 but probably wont ever be used cause routing problem.
BSV is going to scale to 2GB blocks in 2 years time.

>> but neckbeards cant run that on their computer in the basment!! its not decentralized!!!


the current global internet infrastructure is absolute shit and centralized too.

they r working on a new way to route light through fiber allowing for a potential 100x bandwith increase. coming in about 5 years
sending over 2GB blocks will be piss easy.

so thats ~10Gbit x 100. I don't know but I think you can pull a 1024gb block over that in ~ 1 second.

then a few months ago scientist also revealed a new method of storing data chemically instead of electromagnetically. like how DNA has data about your system. They managed to read out a QR code stored in a few grains of sand.

the scientist said that in 10 years it will probably be possible to store the entire contents of the internet in something the size of a coffee cup.

>>12112613
>talking about theoretical research techs that don't even have working prototypes yet as a feasible solution
OH NONONONONONO

>>12111517
Pls buy Sanjay’s Vision sir do not miss out on the real bitcoin please sirs moon is coming see you there sir

>>12111556
this is actual good advice sirs but you should trust creg and Sanjay’s Vision shall rise us to moon pls

>>12112694

> what's MOORES LAW.

they have working prototypes you tarderino
it will come, fiber for sure and probably faster than in 5 years as its not a heavy science, its just the same fiber but with a new led/signaling technique allowing paralell light messages hence the 100x. this will be ready long before BSV needs it

Chemical storage of data is already a prototype it was on the national television here, almost no one knows about it. you'll probably hear about it when they bring out a better prototype in a few years thats actually cool, not just a QR code in some sand.


anyway take these info with the fact hey already claim / can do 1500tx/sec and mine 64mb blocks, allowing for ????? millions of transactions per day. right now. , or in a few months.

k bai thnx.

>>12112613
As someone who sells fiber for a living, literally, we are well beyond sending multiple “modes” down the same line of fiber (around 182 consecutive signals, 10-100gig/sec. Idk where you got this mong idea that we would need 5 years when that tech is nearly 10 years old.

>>12112743
>>12112717
>>12112713
>>12112694
>>12112613
I just wanted to make one last thing clear.
if BSV succeeds with their plan of Massive massive blocks, it will be the most valuable chain.

no coin with second layer will be able to compete with it. cause second layers are cheating / fractional.

like when you buy gold but you actually only buy it on paper and the actual paper gold to real gold is now a factor 200 : 1.

see how they destroy/supress/control the gold price with selling paper gold?

that's what will happen with second layer IOU/TOKENS.

and smart people know that's shitty and not as valuable as BASE LAYER SETTLEMENT. cause no cheating printing paper gold rite.

>>12112743
>moore's law
HAHAHAHAHA HE DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT MOORE'S LAW

NOBODY TELL HIM BROS OH NONONONONONO *breathes in*

I think the market has hit peak stupidity. Nothing is being bought or sold based on fundamentals

>>12112743
Chemical storage of data is a retarded idea when light through glass is literally the best thing to use, because of the laws of physics. i really don’t know where you got these mongoloid ideas about data transfer rates but have no understanding of speed of light transfer of data, or how these systems operate.

>>12112778
well its going to get even faster than that is what I meant, 100x that

>>12112813
i have enough of an idea to know the tech in 10 years will allow huge blocks.

k bai

>>12112820
>reddit clickbait screenshot
You have to go back.

>>12112813
the chemical storage of data is whats going to help with storing the blocks, not transfering you plebian.

>>12112829
>gets btfo
>k-k bai
This is what happens when you get all your technical information from a 50-year-old boomer conman instead of actually being a technical person: You still think Moore's law is a thing and you talk bullshit about chemical HDDs.

>>12112820
You’re an actual idiot. Buy Sanjay’s Vision though sir

>>12112813
>>12112807
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/30/belgian-research-could-replace-usb-sticks-data-stored-powder/

>>12112845
>This is what happens when you get all your technical information from a 50-year-old boomer conman instead of actually being a technical person: You still think Moore's law is a thing and you talk bullshit about chemical HDDs.

MOORES LAW will always be a thing. but tech will advance other ways, not shrinking transistors. soon we store data chemically no moving parts, no transitors, if you don't think this will happen I think you are a fool.

>>12112871
Bro you’ve got to go back. Storing data is only as good as how quickly it can be retrieved. You’re talking nonsense and its not worth saving you. You have to go back.

But pls sir buy Sanjay’s Vision sir the moon will come shortly bear market sleep soon plz we found bottom 3250 sir pls moon

>>12112903
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2013/05/22/can-data-storage-ever-reach-an-absolute-limit/#7597f500163d

they'll manage to retrieve it faster and faster when the tech advances.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2013/05/22/can-data-storage-ever-reach-an-absolute-limit/#7597f500163d

if you think we are highly technological and advanced race you r pretty dumb man.

you'll see in 100 years big datacentres like we have now wont be a thing anymore because of technological breakthrough in storage and transfer / fiber / wireless tech

and you know whats going to push those breakthrough? Bitcoin. Cause its a race to make the best computers/asics/tech in order to build the best miners/nodes/infra to support the, massive massive blocks.

>>12112903
>Storing data is only as good as how quickly it can be retrieved
this also isn't true either.

look at AMAZON glacier services.

oh, right you never used a cloud, or rented a vps did you?

>>12112954
Very good sir mind on future sir. You should trust one true Bitcoin: Sanjay’s Vision sir.

company many people all rush to build for Sanjay’s Vision massive block sir moon required for so many block

honestly not buying just 1 BSV would be foolish, even as a just-in-case. nChain is a multi-national company with over 100 patents and they have the backing of an actual billionaire who probably prints more casino money per day than he is burning as a miner. just that news about Squire Mining to Acquire CoinGeek made my ears tingle, what if soon they really do blow Bitmain's ASICs out of the water?

BSV's plan is short as well. within two years they plan to have blocks supporting, what, a million tx/s? you can't fake that shit and it will become painstakingly obvious if they won't be able to reach their goal during 2019. and if they do reach it and actually manage to do just 10% of what they set out to be doing, that 1 BSV will easily 100x within 5 years

i mean call him faketoshi all you want and post your indian meme images but aren't we all here to gamble? BSV seems like a bet nobody should miss at just 80 bucks.

>>12113021
I don't really like csw either, but hey, he's flushing the turds. that billonaire dude isn't going to let this project fail and with what ive heard they r already making great progresses so yeah.

the thing that made me move from BCHABC to BCHSV is basically because checkpoints plus DATASIG_VERIFY thing, they wanted to add that OPCODE into the protocol but it was a HUGE piece of script and well my opinino is that it shouldn't be in there.


BSV is the most lightweight, clean base protocol , and thats what you need. no added slack.

>>12111517
Loool recovering? like the fuck this bitch is red red redddd enjoy your bags.

>>12113127
>HUGE piece of script
It's 50 lines of code that are mostly copypasta from OP_CHECKSIG.

Look it up in bitcoin ABC source: src/script/interpreter.cpp line 914

>>12113175
dunno I don't think it should be in the base...
I also don't really like the idea of wormhole.
When I bought Bitcoin Cash ( BCH ) I just wanted the original bitcoin with big blocks and no blockstream guys and retards in the team holding it back

I think BSV is this.

80$ and dropping
your buy order will soon process

>>12113127
from what I've read BSV will support 512 MB blocks this summer, and 2 GB blocks around this time next year. will be really interesting to see if they can pull it off.

will also be interesting to see if nChain will get exclusivity of SPV wallets due to this new patent
https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-sv-bsvs-dr-craig-s-wright-says-spv-is-being-patented-and-licensed-to-sv-exclusively/
though craig wright says Electrum isn't actually a SPV wallet since it uses servers so maybe it won't affect any current bitcoin wallets?

Sir, we have biggest blocks. 10 GB blocks no problem, we will do the needful and provide.

>>12113228
I don't like how csw and the guys are making patents and threats to the rest of the crypto community but if they pull of their plan, this will be the most valuable bitcoin version.

thats the only reason I'm in.

Sv trading volume is 1/8th of Bcash.

And Bcash is a second rate shitcoin.

>>12113315
Duno where youre getting that from, SV is trading at a higher volume right now than BCH

>>12113295
I asked him about Oracles before and he said neutral smart contracts. Does SV need LINK or no? Chainlink has been supporting BTC for years but I have no idea. I sold 20% of my LINK for BSV. Want to know if I should sell more.

>>12113389
if I'm correct BSV will not focus on smart contracts or dapps.

they just want to build a lightweight scalable base protocol and lock it, then scale it with bigger blocks. so they cut out all the bloatware obviously.

>>12113389
Dude it's not gonna be using fucking chainlink.

>>12113418
>>12113452

BSV still needs oracles. He talks about it. It doesn’t have to use Chainlink, I’m asking about what kind of Oracles they will use. What is better than a consensus protocol anyways ?

>>12111562
Yeah pajs have nothing to do with SV, buy signal if anything

>>12113418
Read the roadmap retard smart contracts are coming in Q1 2019. Bitcoin never needed Ethereum, it just needed smart devs

>>12111531
Sure, setting 100k worth of buy orders