/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12054340
Fucking cringe. Goddamn it.

>>12054355
Have you seen the number of self-admitted INTJs and INTPs? The correlation is undeniable at this point. Do you have eyes to see?

Was well established long ago that INFPs have the biggest ratio of all-in-linkers.
Sorry to burst your mental masturbation

>>12054385
Proof? Even from the survey circulating around on the MB breakdown, I would find that difficult to believe.

>>12054395
Shame. Was in some major thread a couple of months ago. INT* weren't all-in-link the vast majority of times, if at all.
Literally all INFPs were all-in-link.

>understanding Chainlink in this day and age requires a multidisciplinary understanding of several fields.

I lol'd. I'm an INTJ and all-in, but I highly doubt I would be able to explain Link succinctly to others, let alone myself.

>>12054340
listen dude, /biz especially and online forums in general all have INTP INTJ types overrepresented its nothing link specific

>>12054418
That’s intuition you low tier int

Everyone feel extremely superior lately because of Chainlink? I know I will be rich, I know I will be a millionaire. All I see thes fucking normies everyday they have no idea, they cannot even fathom what chainlink is. The average human is so fucking stupid they invest in stocks they invest in stupid shit like gold, but they have no idea what the tech is going to be. 4th industrial revolution is going to come, robots will rule us and everything will be decentralized. it is not even a possibility that chainwilk will not succeed

>>12054418
Never had problems explaining link to people who never heard of blockchain. Did so to multiple people.

>>12054429
INTPs and INTJs self-congregate here. True. The over-representation is apparent. However, but explain the high correlation of this same subset of the Myers-Briggs taking up a large percentage of Chainlink early adopters?

>>12054434
99.99% link will be one of the thousand cryptos who will be worthless

it's actually very easy to understand you absolute mong

>>12054444
four fours
fucking nice bud

>>12054434
my friends mom has link

What about INFPs, op?

>>12054340
>linked
Hummmmmmm......

>>12054340

I am an INTP-T whats the T for?

INFP here. Link only confirmed.

>>12054453
I told my girlfriend's brother about Link. In fact, he inspired this thread actually. He's an INTJ and after I explained to him the role of Chainlink for the API/Blockchain economy his eyes lit up. I haven't seen that sort of reaction from people aren't in the two Myers-Briggs classifications I've described earlier.

Not saying that it's not possible, for others who don't have this strong desire to understand concepts and their relationship to their world, but there's an inherent element to this which I find requires further exploration.

>>12054434
Your post and this thread reek of nulinker plebbitors.

>>12054457
INFP is god tier

>>12054475
Same here. INFP, all-in-link.

>>12054484
If that's what you call decent grammar for the purposes of this discussion, go read some normie narrative book to keep you in your continued stupor.

Only people with an IQ above 110 should comment in this thread.

>>12054475
>>12054496
INFP masterrace with 90% Link

ENFP & Link lover

This is now INFP thread

>>12054340
the judging part of my brain doesn't like link it's a poo coin. i think it would have better success with the feels crowd

>>12054385
As an INTJ boyfriend to an INFP girlfriend, that's bullshit. She's too wrapped up in her feely bullshit to care about crypto, or money in general really.

>>12054340
I feel like there are a lot more intuition types (IRL with people who don't give a shit about typology, not on the internet where more "intellectual" sensation types type as intuition leaning) than what the official statistics say there are out there. The results of those personality tests make it so that when you get an intuition type are a lot more flattering than SJ/SP. So people who get an SJ/SP get some half-compliment while NP/NJ types get their dick sucked about how special they are. This creates a feedback loop of pure egotism until one dives deeper into the subject and realize that the whole point of this is realize that you're "type" is more a self delusion that you have about yourself than it is an actual representation of who you actually are.

>>12054460
Tit

>>12054340
why does this look like a sideways pyramid scheme?

>>12054535
nothing to do with INFP, she's just a dumb roastie.

>>12054483
the fuckng normie wont understand i tell chainlink to my friend he says it scam but i will be Mmilionare i will show them all i will thethe people who bullied mme saying i will be nothing

>>12054434
I don't understand how you can be so certain. Link is the only crypto i own, but only 5% or so of my investable assets are in it. The risk is simply too high that they're unable to deliver on their consensus promises or that someone else finds another solution that makes link obsolete.

That being said, i haven't seen anything else with near the potential of link, so I'm all-in crypto-wise. The rest of my money is in growing companies with historically low P/Es.

INTP here

>>12054537
>The results of those personality tests make it so that when you get an intuition type are a lot more flattering than SJ/SP.

I think you are right about that. I'm INTJ and work in IT alongside an ISTJ. We get along great; he carries out my ideas and does the less interesting "busy work."

He is interested in myers briggs too, but I felt a little bad when we read each other's personality descriptions. Mine painted the picture of an intellectual demigod, while his described a reliable but boring worker drone. Not entirely inaccurate, but still..

>>12054563
Because you're neither an INTJ nor an INTP. Hell, I doubt you'd even fit the other classifiers who have a tendency to "get" the big ideas before the crowd.

>tfw INFJ and all in chainlink
>tfw its impossible to find a compatible gf

>>12054444
Boom, checked

>>12054572
you are a normie go invest in your assets idiot you will see you will all see when link over $500 i will have 40million

I'm an INTJ who has been in the crypto space for years and have never touched LINK even once. Am I an outlier?

>>12054584
That'll be the autism, m8.

>>12054573
Idk what color pill the meme boys would call it, but you might just actually be superior to him. We all fall somewhere in a big hierarchy, it would not surprise me at all of the top of that chain were clustered with mostly NT types.

>>12054602
>Am I an outlier?
Probably.
Why not, anon? What is a better investment in crypto right now than chainlink in your opinion?

>>12054602
No, just a troll without a substantial contribution to the thread between the causal relationship of INTJ/INTP types and their ability to understand Chainlink generally faster than others.

A friend of mine is lurking the thread and made the comment that I may have potentially alienated some with this thread, and this is not the purpose of this at all.

Just the INTJ in me working to better understand the dynamics at play. There's also the curiosity to hear from fellow INTJs and our good friends, INTPs.

>>12054483
ENTP here. I’m basically a high IQ Chad. LINK will help usher in the next bullrun of smart contracts and simple dapps. 2021.

>>12054615
Idea guys are universally reviled. Don't know if the busy-drone college of the guy is inferior. He gets shit done.
Ideamongering can be more or less challenging than pure implementation. More so if the ideas are completely detached from reality or overly high-level.
Making shit work is hard.

>>12054664
Idea-people who are unwilling to implement their mental constructs, from my experience, are the most cancerous group of people around.

Op, this entire board is skewed towards intp and j. You should look else where to validate your hypothesis.

>>12054624
I'm INTP, my brother is INTJ. We both have a heavy investment in chainlink and both got it right away, like you described. It's something like...most of our free time is research and thinking about shit. Even at work I'm constantly thinking about concepts and running through a list of my assumptions etc. Decades of doing that will make people good at fitting concepts together. An understanding of chainlink and the Oracle problem, without the technical details, is a result of piecing different concepts together. So if someone understands
>block chain
>smart contracts
>oracles
>decentralization
>human nature (how business adoption of this twch will be driven by self interest)
And some other things, they can get it right away. But understanding of those things doesn't lend itself to most personality types because most people aren't interested in academic shit

>>12054340
I would like to agree on the possibility of INJTs / INTPs being over represented and thats because even getting to this point requires some "autism", if you will.

~95% of the world population, "normies", of which a very small portion is interested in crypto, only looks at the top "cryptocurrencies". For someone to go down to Chainlink at #47 on CMC, begin researching it and truly understanding it must be interested and able to logically think for themselves.

So they wont catch up on it before its too late, when its at the top of CMC.

It obviously makes sense that those personality types are overrepresented in cutting edge technology and new niche things like coins or tokens in general.

>>12054688
Fair enough, that is a weakness of the type for sure. But the best of the NY types, the ones who can overcome that lethargy and self doubt, are probably the people at the top. Many INTPs are probably degenerate sloths

>>12054621
In all fairness, I've barely looked at my crypto investments throughout this entire bear market. I've just been growing my BTC and XMR stack every month. The one thing that discourages me about LINK is how much the top holders have. Many of them own 50MM, 100MM, etc. How do you think the market will react if LINK reaches $10? Also, I'm just much busier with IRL business opportunities. I'll probably consider buying some LINK once I have more capital to throw around. If it hits $.10-15 though I'll probably market buy 50,000 or so.

>>12054624
I'm curious why do you want to make LINK "more accessible"? If you truly believe in the project, why not stay quiet & accumulate for a few more years and then work on marketing it to big money?

No. Im an istp
Mbti is fucking useless. Extrovert vs introvert is the only useful metric. Take it from someone who studied his shit for 6 years jungian theory

Huh

t. All in 50k link

>>12054746
"The one thing that discourages me about LINK is how much the top holders have. Many of them own 50MM, 100MM, etc. How do you think the market will react if LINK reaches $10?"

The Chainlink team has communicated on a number of occasions large token numbers are partners and early-stage investors of the platform. I'm sure these individuals and companies (like Zeppelin OS) have a long-term view on the project--since they are responsible for servicing 95% of Ethereum-based smart contracts.
>>12054624 (You)
"I'm curious why do you want to make LINK "more accessible"? If you truly believe in the project, why not stay quiet & accumulate for a few more years and then work on marketing it to big money?"

Imagine seeing people clearly misled on blatant misinfo on a topic which truly captures your intellectual curiosity? I'm sure there's other's like me who see people spouting fud and wondering, "i wonder who long will it take people to figure out this is a truly revolutionary project in every sense of the word?"

>>12054830
how*

>>12054746
>The one thing that discourages me about LINK is how much the top holders have. Many of them own 50MM, 100MM, etc. How do you think the market will react if LINK reaches $10?
That really depends. Remember, staking will be a huge thing in Chainlink, as the stake will prove reliability. A guarantee of getting the work done.

If smart contracts relying on Chainlink will be handling hundreds of millions of dollars, then the stakes will need to be high. 1 million LINK at $10 is still just $10m.

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>12054660
ENTP here too. Not all in on link but I have a comfty stack. This is the next layer of blochain. In layman terms Digitial Cash(bitcoin)—> Smart Contracts (Ethereum)—> Oracles( Chainlink). Once oracles get implemented we will see real world adoption due to real world data being put on the blockchain gg ez

Wow theres no link pajeet fud in this thread, wierd

>>12054817
Any punchy literature/papers that that? Or is it just speaking from experience with the stuff.

>>12054718
>degenerate sloths
He's got us pegged there boys.

Here's a link to the survey:
https://strawpoll.com/wryck6de

The more people who participate helps us achieve a fairly reliable representative sample.

>>12054340

Because INTP and INTJ realize it's a great idea on paper, but since they are autists they don't realize Sergey is just incapable of making that idea true with the team and the "partnerships" he has

INFP just go all in because they are the breeze and butter of victims on scams, it's just they hit a scam that is viable so it has INTJ and INTP into it too

Anyone with a E (im ENTJ) can see that Sergey has 0 partnerships with the big dogs since his body language as barely changed, he has no confidence on the project, and he barely changed what he says about it

>>12054858

I wish i did. But like most psychology it is wishy washy.

Myers brigs especially is a joke. Jungian theory which it comes from is semi legit though, but ppl get lost on it. These archetypes are just tiny glimpse into a person.

Faggots identifying with their type are brainlets. Me for example im 100% an ISTP and i did this for years. Most ppl would never class me as one. Gues what? My intuition is just stronger than most intps or intjs even though its not my primary function like theirs.

We are all a big bundle of functions.

>>12054880
>>12054340 (OP)

"Because INTP and INTJ realize it's a great idea on paper, but since they are autists they don't realize Sergey is just incapable of making that idea true with the team and the "partnerships" he has"

So you mean to tell me The Institute for the Future (one of the leading ThinkTanks in the U.S.) and the Department of Homeland Security's early stage coverage was a mere coincidence?

Its evidence of INTJs and INTPs understanding the true potential of the Chainlink project while so many were distracted by their shitcoins that dropped some 90% of their monetary value.

Right.

>>12054483
entp/j Were other huge categories for link.

I score either entj or entp.

>E/I TN J/P
Majority of link holders fit this

>>12054880
>Anyone with a E (im ENTJ) can see that Sergey has 0 partnerships with the big dogs since his body language as barely changed, he has no confidence on the project, and he barely changed what he says about it

He is good at controlling it. He let his guard down very briefly at that talk he did in Manhattan last week that was streamed on periscope.

At the very end, he was talking about settling contracts in derivatives markets, and his whole face lit up, and he got very excited, just for a moment. It sounds small, but it was really really apparent in his body language that something good was in the works. Did you watch this conference anon?

>>12054915

Faggot get a personality. These labels mean nothing. You are an individual.

Autism correlate with intp intj, that is all

>>12054915

That's what i mean when i say INTP and INTJ just lack any critical thought about social dynamics, coverage isn't the same as putting an image that someone took from google, you guys are literally dot-connecting the same way pajeets dot connect to bait people into their scam and you people don't even realize it

You guys don't even realize that those reports are just tentative about the future and don't mean anything, probably done by some ISTJ who didn't wanted to lose its job and don't even know how the internet works, it doesn't mean that the executive has decided to use anything at all

>>12054889
You're a big bundle of sticks.

>>12054962

Stay mad. Only faggots latch on to these lables

>>12054429
This is actually true, I still remember /b/ days when everybody did these tests.
Majority was INxx types.
Basically introverts looms these parts of internets.

>>12054942

I repeat, INTJ and INTP just can't read social cues, getting excited means he sees it as something that could be possible in the future, it's hope subjugated as joy, the same way INTJ and INTP get excited when they heard 1000 usd eoy or any big partnership

reality would be a mix of confidence, serenity and worried thoughts about all the implications, joy is always about the potential of fun meanwhile in reality you realize how much work you have to do

Sergey is still in the hopeful stage

>>12054962
Theoretically we're all made of cheese

>>12054971
This so called "label" is the only thing that got my through law school.

>>12054947
You cannot fud an INTJ who has studied this project for more than a year. Have you seen the people from the Department of Homeland Security who worked on the document?

Here's a refresher. Pic attached.

>>12054978

So based. The reason all these autistic intps and intjs are attracted to link is exactly because they have no grounding in reality. They are literally all in in link. Lol.

Look at the pajeet thread, its so telling about how they view things with absolutely no social context ability or reality.

>>12054340

autuistic introverts usually can't see the bigger picture
if they do, they'd realize that the ChainLink team can't execute

>>12055011
It's comical the poor ability to have with understanding that the Institute for the Future's report is a call-to-action among their stakeholder network. But then again, I doubt match the INTJ/INTP profile, so this comes as no surprise.

ISTP btw All in on XRP and Gold

>>12055033

For what it's worth, I'm an INTP, and I've been obsessively researching Chainlink + the oracle problem + EU regulations + ethereum developer updates for over a year now. I don't do much else with my day.
>wake up
>workout, eat, shower
>do some reading
>4-6 hours of crypto research and shitposting on /biz/ and twitter

I'm 100% INTP. I've taking like 6-7 courses on pure logic, just for fun. I also threw all my savings in ETH after 3 weeks of straight research (4-5 hours of sleep a night). Bought in at like $15-ish.

People who don't know me well just think I'm some loser lol. Still haven't finished college, because of my full-time focus on trading crypto. People who DO know me, absolutely respect me and my ideas. I'm just better to be around in smaller settings. Introverted life.

>>12054992

Lmfao, keep researching, i bet you don't even believe in Jesus Christ

>>12054434
Gold is not an investment it is real money and real actual savings... that's what you didn't learn in your shitty public govt school. Unironically if you don't put about 10-20% of your Link millions into gold and silver you will end up losing it after making it

INTP here and i have almost no idea why chainlink is good, but ill go all in once it dumps more.

My knowledge is basically

>smart contract=potential
>job losses
>more money for employers
>good investment

And i literally dgaf. If i am beeing memed on, its very funny

>>12055083
How is that relevant to the discussion? Again, these do not act out your psychological profile/low IQ level with an ad hominem-like response not germane to the discussion of the high correlation of INTJ/INTPs and their readiness to understand the oracle opportunity.

>>12055099
After the currency collapses

God you self pretentious fags are annoying. Sitting on your mighty high horse jerking each other off.
These personality tests are horse shit. The majority of it is your pre-determined view of yourself. "I'm really quite and shy but I did good in school and pretty smart" and your bias shows heavily when answering questions on the test.

These have no more merit then astrology. You cannot boil your personality to 20 questions. Get a fucking grip you socially awkward faggots. I really pray non of you children actually tell people about this in real life. I'm embarrassed reading through this thread knowing I'm invested into the same project as you. I can't even imagine what it would be like to know the half of you guys in real life. Absolutley-positively embarrassing.

>>12054434
>>12054434 #
Gold is not an investment it is real money and real actual savings... that's what you didn't learn in your shitty public govt school. Unironically if you don't put about 10-20% of your Link millions into gold and silver you will end up losing it after making it

>>12055131
t. someone who's mad he scored some fag personality

>>12055131
doing the test honestly changed my life you sorry fuck

>>12054978
You could be right, I don't have a link to that video and I'm not sure one exists, I would classify his body language there as "disbelief". Like he was so excited that he literally could not believe it. Your can call it projection if you want, but that's what I saw. And it came out of nowhere too. One minute stone face flat affectation, then that for a single sentence, then back to his usual demeanor. I doubt much good comes from such a discussion, there are many other reasons to suspect link is a good speculative gamble. Either way you've given me something to think about

>>12055148
this. kek

>>12054385
nope
https://strawpoll.com/wryck6de

>>12054340
CL is at the low point. I'm debating putting 2k to buy 10k. But I know HNS is coming, and I've been saving for that. My one friend who knows CL isn't a shit token, and works for a VC down the street from SM says, "they're alright"

>>12055159
That says a lot about you as a person.
Hint: It's not good.

Chainlink is the ENTP approved project. You autists may understand the tech, but real world implementation and use cases are beyond your level of constant introspection. The ENTP master race will be the ones to know how to leverage the platform to build generational wealth. Cash flow & business acumen are more valuable than a moon mission and NEETdom. That said, this whole thread is a datamining trap. Wait for the memes that will D&Q linkies by personality type, boomer/zoomer style. Malliable faggots. Discord niggers get gassed

>>12054460
buy high sell low

>>12055083
Please be bait

>>12055131
it's an art to make same person score same numbers every time he does the test on different platforms.
You can actually grab that 500 page book at your local library and read it yourself.
This is sudoku science, but it actually grabs shit by the balls hard.
Behaviorism, you can actually predict persons actions in the future, if you arrange some details and fail him/her so hard.
Do you have that poisonous person at work you can't get rid of?
Holy shit it's easy just because you know his type.

>>12055198
ENTP are the worst normies.

>>12054664
I was on a team of 6 who were all xNTx. We were great at architecting plans and coming up with solutions to really difficult problems, but when we hired a ISTJ and he started reliably knocking out the dull, routine day-to-day tasks, our overall effectiveness as a team benefited greatly.

>>12054444
I thought about this comment after reading this thread for further insights. Perhaps you may be a great communicator? Seems to be the case judging from your experiences.

Perhaps it would be useful for INTJs to better formulate concepts to help explain WHY they believe chainlink will be ground-breaking while allowing their more bright yet natural INTPs to illustrate the promise to others.

There seems to be several layers at play here. Judging from observing the varying quality levels related to Chainlink discussions.

>>12055269
My point exactly actually re d&q. But 3% of the population isnt a normie. I also test intp half the time. This test is heavily disregarded by psychologists for a reason

>>12055362
Heavily disregarded by psychologists for a reason? Again, let's frame our arguments from evidence provided to us in the real world, shall we?

The Myers-Briggs, while not exhaustive in its coverage, what framework at the moment is all-encompassing to begin with? Despite its potential flaws, the model is still widely used among behavioral scientist and organizational psychologists.

>>12055159
Wow. You sound like a loser.

INTP master race
get rekt INTJs

>>12055083
Jesus Christ guides my LINK purchases, can you say the same, heathen

>>12054408
As an INFP I can confirm that I am also one hundred percent in link.

>>12054718
>Many INTPs are probably degenerate sloths
That's like, your opinion man

>>12054340
Libra here. I've wondered why a lot of Libras and Virgos seem to "get" Chainlink a lot faster than many of our other peers among the Myers-Briggs breakdown.

Then the revelation hit me, a lot of the FUD is due to brainlets truly not getting it. I don't mean to offend anyone, but understanding Chainlink in this day and age requires a multidisciplinary understanding of several fields. Who other than Libras in their natural pursuit of knowledge and their diplomatic counterparts, Virgos?

How can we make it more "accessible"? Discuss below.

>>12055148
This lmao.

>>12055536

whoa haha epic troll

I’m an ENTP and I’ve convinced a lot of my friends to invest in LINK. They were all involved in crypto before but I linkpilled them. It helps that I went to school with all of them and they trust that I’m smart.

>>12055383
>>12055383
>Heavily disregarded by psychologists for a reason? Again, let's frame our arguments from evidence provided to us in the real world, shall we?
The two creators of the test had no psychology background whatsoever and based the test off of Carl Jung's book Psychology.
>The Myers-Briggs, while not exhaustive in its coverage, what framework at the moment is all-encompassing to begin with? Despite its potential flaws, the model is still widely used among behavioral scientist and organizational psychologists.
What is the utility of this framework or a better one anyway besides from dividing people into groups? Also organizational psych is absolute commie bullshit in most circumstances and behavioral psych is largely based around statistical methodologies now.

>>12055666
>What is the utility of this framework or a better one anyway besides from dividing people into groups?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits
>he doesn't understand the reductionist approach/scientific method
shut up faggot humans are pretty predictable. sorry that you're not as special as you thought

INTJ reporting in with 100k link

>>12054340
INTJ software engineer. Never held LINK and never will. If you think you "get it" but don't actually program then your opinion is irrelevant

>>12055752
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits
Experiments using the lexical hypothesis approach indeed demonstrated that the use of lexical material skews the resulting dimensionality according to a sociability bias of language and a negativity bias of emotionality, grouping all evaluations around these two dimensions. This means that the two largest dimensions in the Big Five model might be just an artifact of the lexical approach that this model employed
>>he doesn't understand the reductionist approach/scientific method
See above
>shut up faggot humans are pretty predictable. sorry that you're not as special as you thought
Nobody is special, but some are pathetic.

you don't make it more assessable you let everyone FOMO in and you dump your bags on them at $100, $500, $1000 and $2500 over the next 5 years. if you have iron hands LINK will be worth $15k+ by 2030.

>>12055785
have you reviewed their code?

Low iq autists seem more receptive to technobabble and rube goldeberg machines, and are therefore vulnerable to the methods of the scammers that hold 85% of all link tokens.
Let me give an example. Anyone understanding the real world would understand that big companies want "oracles" that are trusted parties with a strong reputation for providing correct data. Also, these companies have legal headquarters in countries with working legal systems, such that problems can be settled in court.

>>12055852
Of course he has. That's IF he is an INTJ (who are insatiably curious), and needs to make sense of the world.

>>12055785
Ok Adán Sánchez de Pedro thanks for your input I’ll take your opinion won’t the highest regard and hope others do the same

>>12055803
kek and the improvement is?????? drumroll please!!!
.
.
.
.
more categories!

>>12054340
>understanding Chainlink in this day and age requires a multidisciplinary understanding of several fields.
indeed. people here are just too dumb to understand. they don't have a PhD in computer science economics and distributed systems like me. pathetic.

Another example. People that actually invest for a living will never invest in a team of 2 nobodies with no relevant background, no working product, and no proven market.
Big exception is maybe ride a hype wave, get in early and dump when volume is high/mania phase.
That hasn't been the case for 9 months or so. You're all investing in a scam.

You morons actually fell for this shit?

t. INTP computer science master 130+ iq.

>>12055892
>what is a venture capitalist

>>12055913
Someone who got out before februari and would never, ever put up real money for something like chainlink except as a founder to dump on retards. You could watch shark tank to get an idea what is asked from companies before they even get 50k from a real venture capitalist and you retards gave these people millions. Top kek.

>>12054444
Nice quad quads

>>12055947
>yawn

>>12055947
you're a loser lmao. chainlink team are backed by venture capitalists

Ps. whether these ICOs fail or succeed, the (non-retards who cashed out) founders are multi millionaires. Think about basic psychology. They will cop out one by one.

>>12055976
Yes, like almost all ICOs duh....they got in for presale prices and dump during high volume spikes that you retards provide.

>>12055986
pretty poor reasoning for a computer scientist. or are you just a code monkey? sounds like the latter. either way stay poor, i guess

>>12055872
>>Horoscopes are wrong in their base methodology, lets make more birth signs to fix it
I do actually see what you mean, there is increased likelihood of accuracy with more categories. That said, this test is not a true psychological assessment built with proper scientific methods. Instead, the personality test is now a multimillion dollar industry fueled by cucked ceos that actually hire scamming organizational psychologists to classify their workers at the behest of their HR overlords.

>>12054718
shiiiieeet intp degenerate sloth here
>fap like 4 times a day and lay in bed majority of it

someone come up with a guide why an NPC should invest in LINK.

ill send 1k link to you

Hey, I want to put some money into link but I'm not sure how / where to have the wallet seeing as coinbase doesn't have support for it nor does my ledger. Any tips?

>>12055803
classic istj cope

I guarantee that anyone on this board who isn't all in at this point simply hasn't paid enough attention to all the research we've accumulated. My folder has at least 1000 pictures documenting insane dots and breadcrumbs, I keep written notes of all the relevant thoughts and intel. I have spent hundreds of hours searching the archives, have a full picture understanding of the tech, the business connections, the industries and use cases, reading endless enterprise reports on smart contracts, debating and fuding from every angle with fellow high IQ INT types and always come to the same conclusion. "This is surreal". I simply cannot understand what could go on in the mind of something who browses this board but remains a nolinker.

>>12056319
what doubts do you have/what are the weaknesses of the project?

>>12056319
ok but why did openlaw switch to rhombus?

>>12055198
entp masterrace checking in. true visionaries. we know what's coming and what to do to cement our place in it's future.

>>12054340
Why does this picture look like a pyramid scheme

>>12056319

OR they are not financially illiterate?

>>12056357
Your breath smells like a box of puppies.

>>12056341
openlaw is just a framework for legal contracts. use whatever oracle you want. also openlaw and rhombus is consensys

>>12054340
are you data mining /biz/?

>>12054340
ENTJ here, Keep up the good work little brother.

holy hell this thread is a great repository of cringe, thanks for this, the lack of self awareness contained within is just crazy

INTP here, shorting chainlink before and after I saw sirgay's reddit posts

>>12056613
LOL, says the non-INTJ. Don't worry, you won't feel so left out after your normie friends join you further down the adoption curve. Tesla, a fellow INTJ, would have developed 200 patents around the Chainlink techology (including AI to further develop patent-worthy inventions).

Anyone looking for a good read to help further understand Chainlink and so it's such a big deal would be Dave Asprey's latest book, Game Changers.

>>12054572
You're talking to children who want to get rich quick and never work.

Unironically like the chainlink whitepaper. I will invest most of my crypto portfolio in it and a few other positions.

There are a ton of these dumb kids that don't hold stock at all.

>>12055993
I find it pretty funny that you pride yourself on the whole INTJ label (no doubt because it flatters you as a logical thinker) and yet you're so quick to buy into the whole Myers-Briggs which has very little empirical or falsifiable evidence for its existence.

Seems like a bit of a contradiction that so-called INTJs would believe in Myers-Briggs so dogmatically.

>>12056558
>being ENTJ lawful neutral wagecuck
>not ENTP chaotic evil thought leader mustard race

This is an effective shilling technique.

>>12056801
He's just a narcissist.

>>12056906
For me, I would like to better understand the people I randomly discuss Chainlink with here on biz. But from the many high-IQ responses within this thread, the answer to my question has been +/- found today.

>>12056801
Meant for >>12056784 of course.

Myers-Briggs is complete pseudoscientific bullshit.

>>12056801
It's clearly based on big 5 traits which is well accepted in psychology breh, complete with empirical samples, normal distributions, and even some objective examinations that correlate to results (ex. Trait openness correlates to relations of intuitiveness and prospecting to other big 5 traits, which also correlates to IQ, with INTP being highest IQ tested group of the 16).

>>12056956
Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most well-respected and commonly used personality type assessment tools globally. Based on research by psychologist Carl Jung, MBTI is an easy to understand set of ideas which helps people build strong relationships at home and in the workplace. It helps us learn how we operate as individuals, develop under-utilized aspects of ourselves, and learn about different types of people we encounter.

MBTI helps us understand our own personality type so we can embark on self-development. It helps us view the world a little differently, thus fostering greater self-awareness and self-acceptance. You might want to consider taking the MBTI assessment if you are interested in learning how to:

Cultivate a targeted career development plan
Avoid and resolve conflicts
Create and maintain cohesive relationships
Promote your unique strengths
Become more self-aware
Identify and develop strengths and weaknesses
Create a personal development plan
Improve communication skills
Increase emotional intelligence
Choose the career that is right for you

>>12056969
>>12056969
>It's clearly based on big 5 traits
It is not. It is based on Carl Jung's theories, not big 5 which was developed independently.

>>12056924
Your grandiose, self-congratulatory tone is perfect for R*ddit. Return there.

>>12056983
It's not my fault you aren't an INTJ nor ENTP nor high-IQ, but at least you can post in this legendary thread.
-poopscoop

>>12056974
MBTI is bullshit. It always says INFP is compassionate and does best in social work, but I am an egotistical loner

>>12056974
>Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most well-respected and commonly used personality type assessment tools globally. Based on research by psychologist Carl Jung, MBTI is an easy to understand set of ideas which helps people build strong relationships at home and in the workplace. It helps us learn how we operate as individuals, develop under-utilized aspects of ourselves, and learn about different types of people we encounter.
All that and not a shred of falsifiable evidence for the existence of its typology :^)

Believe whatever pseudo-scientific nonsense you like. No skin off my back.

The MBTI assessment has provided an intuitive, relatable, easy-to-apply self-discovery and diversity awareness platform that enables our employees at all levels to better understand their own and others preferred styles of work, communication, and collaboration. This has made leaders better at leading, and all contributors more effective at being led and partnering for success.

>>12056980
Dude 2 of the big 5 are more or less explicitly stated as factors in the MBTI (intr/extr and turbulent/assertive = neuroticism) I know thinking independently is hard compared to copypasting wikipedia but try it sometime.

That test doesn't make any sense, a year ago I got INTJ, but now I'm INTP

>>12056956
>Myers-Briggs is complete pseudoscientific bullshit.

If that's true, why is /biz/ %90 INTx's? What type did you get?

The lot of you that fell for the psychology meme are going to stay poor forever

>>12057041
First of all, the two factors in MBTI don't really map that well to the big five, and certainly not in a measurable or falsifiable fashion.

Secondly, big five is largely bullshit as well but at least it attempts to be science, so what's your point? I should take something seriously because it's a watered down for-brainlets version of something else? That isn't a strong argument for MBTI.

>>12057064
you just matured...INTJ are mostly immature INTP

>>12057041
How can't you see that you're transparently pretending to be intellectual. Everyone can see it, but you.

>>12057095
Boo-hoo, he didn't like his MBTI results and now wants to FUD a statistically relevant psychological inventory.

>>12057069
INTP last time I took it, but before that I also got INTJ, ENTP and ENTJ. There's also nothing special that a bunch of self-important retards on /biz/ (myself included) answer self-administered personality tests in ways that flatter their self-perception as logical individuals.

See how bullshit it is? Seems pretty useless as a predictive tool.

>>12057112
MBTI is hardly relevant. Big five were chiseled using statistical results.
MBTI is just a theoretical construct.

Carl Jung believed in Gnosticism. I don’t really trust him tbqh

>>12057114
I'm reading a smart guy who happens to be an INTP and feels a since of empathy for a group of folks in this thread who FUD'd the MBTI results because they weren't satisfied with their assessment. I see what you did there, and it's something a self-aware INTP would do.

Normie here, you’re all faggots with your INFP LGBT whatever acronyms. I don’t even know what you’re talking about. Enjoy your useless letters and staying poor.

>>12057167
Says someone whose IQ has a lot in common with the mean room temperature of NY in the summer months.

>>12057144
this nigga still thinkin dem shadows on the wall are real animals lmao bruh look at this dood

>>12054340
ENTJ here holding since ICO fuck your theory and goodbye.

>>12057203
Based.

learn to read a fuckin balance sheet instead of patting yourselves on the back for the results of your horoscope ya fuckin finooks

>>12057203
Congrats on your “high iq” how’s your bank account look? That’s what I thought.

>>12057275
It's doing well enough that I study independent theories which interest me. Not sure what my bank account would have to do with the topic at hand. This is an exploration in understanding the psychology of early Chainlink adopters. You know, the types who understood how big of a deal this project BEFORE the big press hits.

My theory about the other 3 factors of MBTI is that it weighs the dominance of openness, agreeableness, and conscientousness against each other to better figure out what behavioural archetype is most likely.

INtuiting/Sensing = Openness vs Agreeableness
Thinking/Feeling = Conscientousness/Agreeableness
Prospecting/Judging = Openness/Conscientousness

Lmk why I'm wrong but that's my analysis.

>>12054915
>Being an INTP
>Didn't learn basics of coding to check the code base to see if project X is legit

Honestly after 100 projects i've read throught i found maybe 3 legit ones, I remember Link had a good start but was very far from finished product, i need to check it again i guess.

>>12057298
Study something of actual value and legitimacy.

>>12057362
It's not my burden for you not understanding the significance of why many historically analytical types and natural logicians took a strong interest in a project like Chainlink BEFORE the press hits?

Do you hear yourself? Or did me re-packaging your words help with pointing out the errors in your thinking?

>ITT me buy link, me smart

>>12057110
Classic projection lol

>>12057397
Exactly, it’s embarrassing at this point.

>>12057397
yeah, mega cringe but it is entertaining.

>>12057246
Same here bro. I always forget this place is unironically l 99% sperg.

>>12054590
Lol, i bet 5% of my investable assets makes my stack bigger than yours, kid. Even if you get super rich on Link, your attitude about money makes me think you'll be like most lottery winners -- broke in a decade.

>>12056792
Very true. But that's the internet for you, it's everything humanity is.

>>12054408
>>12054395
I've seen many of these threads that were majority INTJ based on individual claims. I'm also INTJ and am about 80% LINK. My other holding is long term and down so much there is no point selling it. I assume it will be worthless and generally act as if that money is gone and I'm essentially 100% LINK.

now that you put it this way it does feel eerie. Will linkmarines be the next freemasons?

95% of autistics are either INTJ or INTP.
And who do you think mostly uses this board that has maybe up to 1% relevance to crypto?
This website is a collection of autistic weirdos who like to hang out with pajeets, shills, and subhuman whites who like to think they have the genes in them to not be fat autistic neets.

ENTP here, there's your answer. Oh yeah, Link is a scam. Take it from the only MBTI type that can see the bigger picture. Link is an autistic persons excuse to be like an ENTP, to have multiple interests, but to also have all those interests crammed into one like a shit filled turducken.

TL;DR Link isn't money and it has no business model. It's autistic air.

>>12060544
We can still make some money out of it.
I made x2 with Link at least 4 times.

>>12055131

Thank God for this post. I thought I was the only one dying of cringe scrolling through this thread.

>>12054571
I hope you make it kid. I really do

intp all in link here

however I like astrology more, gemini here master race

that intp shit is stupider than astrology imo, unironically

>>12054340
Actual INTJ here, you're a brainlet if you buy ChainLink.

>>12054340
Ooga booga

>>12060544
This one's going in my screen capped folder. Lmao. I'm going to post this on the board in a few years for shits and giggles to use as an example for people who ate their words.

So whenever I want to shill something on here I'll be considered the guru of crypto for having been one of the "old fags" that bought link at the ground floor.

>>12054515
god damn, the quality of these link memes
fukken saved

>>12060756
Link has 100% more to fall. Good luck.

Hi INTJ and INTPs

Looking for SPECIFICALLY INTJs here.
I am an ENTP. I got the ideas. You got the execution. Lets be frens!

>>12060783
No, because you won't shut up and it's fucking annoying.
>t. INTJ with an ENTP boss

>>12055485
based

>>12054340
>>12054355
>>12054373
>>12055182

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCELhS3lbQQ8GVa2UeoVXAkQ/featured

Best resource for MBTI shit i have found so far enjoy anons

>>12057308
intuition is what is going to happen in the future
sensing is what is happening right now or what other people are doing right now

judging is like planning and making lists and shit
perceiving is kinda the the absence of that idk really

>>12055083
INTP here. Jesus Christ is the way and the truth. Anyone with any brain at all should have a sizable Link stack. I’ll be giving the necessary percentage of my gains to God and a sizable portion of the rest will go towards countering Jewish influence on all possible fronts.
t. in top 1k wallets.

>>12054340
>INTJ and INTP
Do you suffer from Dunning–Kruger effect, OP? They are probably the most common types of personality on 4chan. It has nothing to do with Chainlink you absolute moron.

t. INTJ who would never touch the LINK shitcoin

>>12054483
>He's an INTJ and after I explained to him the role of Chainlink for the API/Blockchain economy his eyes lit up. I haven't seen that sort of reaction from people aren't in the two Myers-Briggs classifications I've described earlier.

ENXP here, when I top my friends about it, they're all confused as to why I sound so excited about project. And only 3 of my friends decided to invest in it. The first because he decided to do his own research and he's genius in his own right, the 2nd mostly out of trusting me in how crazy I am about Chainlink and FOMO, and the 3rd, he's incarcerated so he didn't have much of a choice when I told him what I demanded I invest his rent money.

>>12054340
intp here
im the only intp in my social circles, i am the only one that is all in on link.

>>12061409
>sharing profits with god
>countering god's chosen people
You christers are fascinating

>>12054340
where can i find a nice INTP gf to match my personality

>>12062438
Read the Bible, dipshit. It's clear the jews are despised by God. I mean actually read and not just cherry pick like a faggit.

Intp here. This is a fucking funny post op. Good on ya

Member of the only real masterrrace - INFJ here.
LINK is accesible if you don't explain the concept like an autist but show actual use cases.

>>12062998
What bible have you been reading? God only despises Jews who lack faith or misuse the gifts that he gives to them. Read the final chapter of Ezekial, he clearly explains this idea. You're probably one of these deceived people who think 'the synagogue of satan' is a statement about all of jewry instead of only bad faith (that is, secular) 'jews'. It's obvious in the bible that God punishes jews specifically because of the actions of fakers. Jesus also specifically rebukes secular jews, people who are only jewish by association, not practice.

>>12054355
Cringed so hard I became INTJ

>>12064483
>t. Jew

>>12064483
They all lack faith lmao, all Jews who had faith followed Christ and became the first Christians.

>>12054340
unironically, the creation of threads such as this being made apparent will help to illicit interest in chainlink
the focus should be making it be known that WE know that there is an obvious correlation between the architect-types and the logician-types, as opposed to the other personality types, and a fascination with (or, at least, a high amount of confidence in a financial investment in) chainlink

>>12057397
>>12057433
>>12057442
$0.02 has been forwarded to your payment queue
if you keep it up, you might be able to send some money to your family later this week

>>12059504
this, desu
i'm a poorfag and technically am only ~90% LINK, but everything else that i have i only have out of a reluctance to sell after its significant devaluation
whenever i get more of something, it has consistently been LINK, every paycheque, for the past 7 months
at $1000, i plan on using some of my LINK gains to start a biopeptide and general smart drug distribution business
fOr ReSeArCh PuRpOsEs OnLy, of course
INTJ, by the way

>>12060544
ENTP here
All in link suck my hairy goyim nuts

>tfw league is only 2 days in and you already have 6 auras and 2 curses
>already have prism guardian
who /auraslut/ here

>>12054340
yea

>>12061512
I'm sorry you have to back.
t. Person who doesn't do Plebbit spacing.

$0.15 by EOW

Gather around INTJ and INTP pajeets, I have FUD for your coin that will wreck your little brains. The inherent value of LINK is immensely limited by its outdated payment system that operates on the Ethereum blockchain using the LINK ERC20 token. No reasonable person will want to participate in a network that does late payments and has large fees for its transactions. The cryptokitty game exposed the flaws of the Ethereum network. How can a project that seeks worldwide adoption possibly operate on a network that can't even handle people sending virtual cats to one another for fun? The answer is that it can't. No platform currently exists that can handle what LINK wants to do. It'll forever remain an experimental piece of technology until an infrastructure is developed for it. This may be years in the future, up to even a decade. Its like trying to invest in social media, before the world wide web was even born.

Also "muh LINK is blockchain agnostic" means that it can do CONTRACT payments in a different currency, but node operators will still be getting payed in ERC20 LINK tokens on the Ethereum network.

>>12055813
You aren't taking into account the political and economic climates when you are hoping for 15k Link price.

Things in the economy are not swimming along just fine where you can wait 5-10 years for a super high Link price.

This is why it is so important to have gold and silver before you have crypto

imagine losing all your money in LINK and then going into hell because you thought of yourself of a mystic researching about demons and magick for the ultimate JUSTing