/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12024815
delet this

Sounds healthy

>>12024815
Go on....

>>12024815
ok, so i'm really dumb. can this mean some cabal of people with very deep pockets vacuumed up all the eth with the intent to royally fuck the price up?

>>12024815
And those colored lines are the proof?

Bullshit until proof

>>12024815
>on december 1
>doesn't list the year

The kikes are at it again

>>12024857
No, they are a visualization of the findings on the left. The only proof you could get would be the addresses for you to check each one yourself.

idk what to make of it bros. to sum up the past few days

> $1 bln eth moved
> close to $1 bln btc moved
> 60% of entire ltc supply moved

the btc one I think it's close to $1 bln but too lazy to do all the calcs, maybe closer to $600 mln or so.
Anyway, I smell kiking.

ethereum insiders

>>12024912
And those addresses are?

It's probably some billionaire like Musk, Bezos, whoever will then announce their company is going to start accepting Eth

GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!
GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!
GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!
GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!
GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!
GIVE ME ADDRESSES!
GIVE ME TENDIES!

so most of the money moved around is rich people sending money to themselves and only about 1k users actually use ETH apps https://dapplist.biz/

dead coin walking

>>12024837
bitcoin and ethereum are the least concentrated cryptos, everything else is absolutely fucked

>>12025103
btc doesn't have any apps and only one token, your reasoning is fundamentally flawed

>>12025131
who gives a shit about BTC nowadays though. bitcoin (BSV) is money and that's all that matters, dapps are pretty stupid to begin with. bitcoins model of just publishing proof of results makes a lot more sense than ETH's "every computer repeats every calculation" approach

>>12025166
>bitcoins model of just publishing proof of results
that's called a zk-snark, eth has it (although an old version), btc doesn't.
Btc can't do anything beyond utterly trivial contracts at all.

https://etherscan.io/address/0x6aac5e7c12d3c9259cff8e10b5bbdb1064c382a5
here are when the txs originate from.

but where did this account get the ETH to begin with?

>>12025192
what the fuck

>>12025192
https://etherscan.io/address/0x281055afc982d96fab65b3a49cac8b878184cb16

from here

It was Coinbase you fucking LARP faggots.

>>12025174
what? in bitcoin you hash the code and the results and put it on the blockchain. anyone wanting to verify a calculation can do so.

>>12025226
you described data storage, not a contract.

>>12024861
>cant into basic math
>cant even watch the whole pic (datalight 2018)
so many brainlets lately

>>12025231
yes what im saying is "smart contracts" are stupid. its a buzz word. keep contracts off the chain and use the ledger to publish proof. if you want crypto kitties the proper way to do it is to keep the code out of the blockchain and just publish proof of ownership on the chain. pretending that it's something special just because everybody repeats the code all over the world isn't true, cryptokitties still owns the images and they even clearly states on the site that you have no right to claim any combination of appearance as yours and you may not publish them or use them in a video etc. they can freely change their contract anyway, there's literally no point to have the code directly involved in the crypto itself.

>>12025268
>yes what im saying is "smart contracts" are stupid

Nobody cares what you think retard. Stay in your lane. If I wanted to ask for McDonalds employee's opinion I would ask what sauce goes best with the mcnuggets, not their opinion on smart contracts

>>12025268
you're seriously out of touch.
the most obvious use case of smart contracts is a dex. You can't have a dex without code executing on-chain.

>>12025250
fuck off it's embarassing someone paid for this bullshit mspaint nothing to be copyrighted in the first place, although I doubt anyone did. it looks like shit.

>>12025285
oh yeah? you better stay away from McDonalds from now on, friend.

>>12025294
you're seriously in of touch.

>>12025328
Yeah anyways I'll have a double cheeseburger and large fries please

>>12025328
>you're seriously in of touch.
is that abortion of an argument supposed to convince anyone?

>>12025359
what argument? you say smart contract good, me say smart contract bad. we won't get anywhere, what's the point. enjoy your day anon.

>>12024815
Banks/hedgefunds accumulating possibly?

>>12025371
What exactly is bad about a smart contracts? It's a tool that a serves a purpose. When the plumber walks in to your McDonald's to order a diet Coke do you call his wrench 'bad' because you have no idea why anyone would use such a thing because you're a loser with no employable skills besides scrubbing friers?

As i said here before, the same happened on BTC, XRP, XLM

>>12025430