/biz/ - Business & Finance

once the updates are finished and brainblocks announces their paypal integration; triple digits, easy

Nano was my best /biz/ investment. Went for 3k to $200. That's how it's done

If this shit gets above 25 dollars it'll immediately get dumped on by all the redditors desperate to unload their bags

>>11948746
>announces their paypal integration;
Delusional.

>>11948766
>Went for 3k to $200. That's how it's done
Pump and dump of a shitcoin discovered and pushed by Italian scammers. Stay the hell away from that garbage. The team is the worst and most amateurish in whole in crypto. Pic related.

>>11949137
How’s the weather in Norway you fucking cunt?

>>11949162
Are you on medication, asshole? Nice advocacy of your failed shitcoin Nano, psycho

>>11949183
Come on, post the pic of the lawyer who‘s dick you wanna suck so desperately.

>>11949113
>Delusional.
says the Bitgrail Autist

NANO will be top 3 before April

>>11949215
>Come on, post the pic of the lawyer who‘s dick you wanna suck so desperately.
Thanks for once again showing the world that Nanoids are the worst asshole community in crypto. Nobody likes you.

>>11949216
This, $100 is all but guaranteed.

>>11949245
You lost your money to an Italian retard, faggot, which makes you an even bigger retard.

Go back to whining on Discord.

>>11949216
You must take A TON of drugs to be so delusional that Nano will be integrated with paypal and a top three coin. You of course have zero documentation, just the usual insane bitconnect style vile hopes and retardation. Pic relates. No wonder since most of your vile supporters are ex-Bitconnecters. Delusional psychos. Nasty people.

>>11949265
You know nothing about me, Nano trash.

>>11949286
>he has no idea and expects documentation for everything
fucking kek
stay mad, bro

>>11949286
How does it feel being your mother‘s biggest disappointment since she first saw your daddy’s dick?

>>11949249
Sure, feels like stealing, ryte? Moron.

>>11948421
50 cents short term, 0 long term.

>>11949317
Still no answer how much you lost. Sad.

>>11949383
Back to plebbit, boomer. You nanoids are too stupid for biz.

>>11949113
>>11949137
>>11949183
>>11949245
>>11949286
>>11949300
>>11949317
>>11949870
Well, well. Look who it is. Months later, still at it.

>>11949870

>>11949896
>>11949910
Desperate nanoids trying to defend their incomplete shitcoin. All you have is childish ad hominem. Sad and tragic. Pic, nano hodler getting assraped since Jan 2018, buying some more while screaming "2 daa moooOOooon!!"

>>11949941
>All you have is childish ad hominem
the irony

here comes the pasta

>>11948873
>he thinks their desperation won't immediately turn back into the greed that got them to present-day in the first place
>laughing_girls.png

>>11949941
Oh my sweet autism, he is always here. For every Nano thread, how is this possible?

>>11948421
>Nano has 756 TPS [1][2]. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [3]. Competitors work on 1 million TPS solutions [4]. Nano’s aim to be global currency is either delusional or a fraud.
>7,000 TPS was falsely boosted and promoted, causing the Nano price to skyrocket 97.7x in December 2016 alone. Real transactions per second (TPS) for Nano, however, was a meagre and pathetic 100-200 TPS [5].
>Nano falsely claim theoretical unlimited scalability, only constrained by hardware and bandwidth limitation [6]. This is as absurd as claiming that a car has unlimited speed theoretically, and the goal is to drive so fast that the car escapes earth’s gravitational field and park on the moon. Nano’s technical updates don’t bring it closer to the goal. It’s like saying the improvements on the engine of the car has brought us closer to driving to the moon.
>Nano advocates like to use average demand as benchmark for needed TPS. This is false. Who will use a currency that will crash at every emergency, at Christmas and other holidays?
>Nano (Raiblocks) was a dead amateur coin, worth less than 10 cents less than a year ago, until it was discovered and pumped hard by Italian scammers. Only after the pump did Nano full time dev. This amateur project has had a full-time dev for less than a year, with a horrific team and management picked among incompetent friends and supporters.
>Lead devs are leaving Nano. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.
>Devs are dumping Nano on the market [7]. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.

>>11950030
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. All exchanges down not long time ago ago [8]. Kucoin recently [9]. Another failed update and node crash [10][11]. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency.
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [8] [9] [10] [11]. Coinbase will also stay away from a coin riddled with legal problems [7] [12]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, if at all, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost [13] [14]. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Having the problem highlighted to them, admitting to it, their response has been the usual -to promise and deflect -without providing any real technical solution. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. This also scares the Coinbase experts; a total crash in Nano, via spam vulnerability and insane node issues, will reflect badly on Coinbase.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography. A disaster in waiting.

>>11949963
>here comes the pasta
>>11950030
...and...here...we...go
big news coming out. Bitgrail Autist FUDS to keep the price low while accumulating

>>11950047
>Former head of engineering at Facebook, Bryan Veloso: Nano "just a hype...no real use case" [16]. Currently NANO is only processing 0.15 transactions per second. Transactions have gone down in the last months. Extreme low usage combined with a very speculative 90x pump in just one month, causing a flash crash, are all indicators of a coin with pure hype and speculation, without any real value. Bryan Veloso’s claim that Nano is just hype with no real use cases is validated by empirical data.
>Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin: “Nano will have a hard time being decentralized... It won't be as uncensorable as Bitcoin or Litecoin” [17]. “Nano is not without faults...it has a LONG way to go” [18].
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately, at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that devs are dumping Nano in a fire sale [15].
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy.
>Nano’s essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon, eBay, etc. will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through it in a matter of 1-3 years [15]. Also, multiple pending and coming lawsuits against the Nano foundation.
>100 addresses hold 65% of all 133 million Nano. Initial distribution to friends of developers, nontransparent distribution method. Who solved the captchas? Where is the audit? Extreme centralization that only got worse with BitGrail, where large holders of Nano (including devs/friends of devs) managed illegally and unethically to get out of the insolvent exchange, leaving normal investors behind to take an 80% loss.

>>11950060
> 51.27% voting weight, held in 6 addresses, opens vulnerability to devastating 51% attacks.
>Flawed structure, currently insane 92% of the voting power in the top 1% of the nodes only [19].
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilizing high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model that will most likely crash the network. Even if it worked, no matter how unlikely, with full adaption the cost of running a node would be astronomical, leading to extreme centralization. Having again the elites controlling our money must be avoided. No financial incentives for DPOS representatives to keep securing the network.
>You were warned: Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH), pumped again. Failing to pump further, will result in a dump again, very soon. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>70% centralization of all Nano, due to Nano original developers setting default node to their own.
>The code hasn't even been audited by an established software security company.
>Nano is permissioned and non-trustless [20]
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [21]
>90% of github commits by only one person (Colin) in the whole “team”.
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.

>>11950030
>>11950047
>>11950060
>>11950075
price is up since you started. keep going brah

>>11950075
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with, it’s just an empty logo. Unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Nano has post Bitgrail probably the worst community in crypto [22][23], much of it due to the Nano teams catastrophic handling of the Bitgrail crash.
>There are many other coins that are far better than Nano, with instant transactions, zero fees, near infinite scalability, near infinite decentralization, permissionlessness and trustlessness, 1 millionth the energy usage of Bitcoin [24][25][26]. Nano is an extremely risky investment [27]
>Posted some of the above questions on Nano subreddit. Got banned.
>Multiple coming lawsuits against Nano devs personally and Nano foundation. Ugly truths about the Nano team, Nano devs and Bitgrail will come out [12][7]. It could lead to bankruptcy and a total shut down of the project.
>Anyone investing in this documented shitcoin deserves to lose their money. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

FOOTNOTES:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/982bq9/stress_test_beta_network_v15_results_in_here/
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/98alqy/why_isnt_stress_test_result_published_as_5700_tps/
[3] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car
[4] https://www.ccn.com/vitalik-buterin-ethereum-will-eventually-achieve-1-million-transactions-per-second/
[5] http://archive.is/iq9fP
[6] https://nano.org/en/whitepaper
[7] http://archive.is/lDoCW
[8] http://archive.fo/v2noA
[9] https://news.kucoin.com/en/nano-deposits-and-withdrawals-are-now-enabled/
[10] https://medium.com/nanocurrency/weekly-nano-update-9-17-18-834f3a493994
[11] https://www.reddit.com/r/BinanceExchange/comments/9flnx5/is_nano_deposit_broken_someone_also_having/
[12] http://archive.is/dOMVA
[13] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/7vwl86/what_are_the_faults_of_nano/dtvpymd/

>>11950060
>>11950047
>>11950030
wait just curious, i see citation marks but where the fuck the are the links, lebowski?

>>11950094
[14] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/90wu2v/what_are_the_negative_things_with_nano/e2tskr8/
[15] https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_1ipx847tk8o46pwxt5qjdbncjqcbwcc1rrmqnkztrfjy5k7z4imsrata9est
[16] https://www.quora.com/Is-the-NANO-crypto-coin-a-working-product-If-so-what-advantage-does-it-have-over-on-other-crypto-coins
[17] http://archive.is/e7oVV
[18] http://archive.is/GvyPd
[19] https://www.nanode.co/representatives
[20] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/92b1at/how_does_nanos_dpos_compare_to_other_dpos_such_as/
[21] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/8kt2ed/universal_block_canary_has_been_released/dzakb0a/
[22] http://archive.is/GGWIG
[23] http://archive.is/DlNyk
[24] https://www.quora.com/What-are-crypto-currencies-you-are-bullish-on-for-the-next-bull-run/answer/Marius-Kramer
[25] https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-best-crypto-currency-to-buy-in-September-2018/answer/Marius-Kramer
[26] https://www.quora.com/What-makes-a-bad-crypto-currency/answer/Marius-Kramer
[27] https://youtu.be/JS9tJgbFTUA?t=27m27s

>>11950094
i responded too early and now im gay

>>11950096
you gotta wait for it >>11950094 he'll post a lot more

>>11950059
>FUDS to keep the price low while accumulating
This is how insane and truly delusional you crazy nanoids are. Read my comments, idiot, and then say I would invest anything in your utter shitcoin.

>>11950111
>and now im gay
trips confirm
>>11950126
HAHAHHAHA, everytime you go on one of the rampages, NANO pumps. say whatever you wish, but this is the pattern i've noticed since July

>>11949137
Godamn...and they are shilling it to poor venezuelans
No wonder theres no crypto adoption anywhere...just drama after drama on every fucking coin

>>11950132
>HAHAHHAHA, everytime you go on one of the rampages, NANO pumps.
Fail. It always crashes as least 15%. Just wait and see stupid nanoid.

>>11950174
>Fail. It always crashes as least 15%
HAHAHAHHA, it's still up. thanks for posting

>>11950030

At least be creative moron.

Potential Nano investors, please pay attention. The fanatic Nano supporters are here on /biz/ 24/7 to create as much smoke they can around legitimate criticism of their failed shitcoin, discovered and pushed by Italian scammer and a completely inept and unprofessional management team. However, they will never address any of the points in the criticism with facts and logic. Instead they will use ad hominem, smear, doxing and spamming. Not once will they even attempt to debunk the criticism, because they can't and they don't care.

Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

>>11948421
Nano’s relationship with BitGrail, their main trading platform, was incestuous and dirty from the very beginning. However, after “Bomber”, CEO of BitGrail found out that his exchange had been hacked for 80% of their Nano assets in October 2017, close to 10% of total supply of Nano, the relationship between Nano devs and BitGrail became criminal.

BITGRAIL PROBLEMS KNOWN BY NANO DEV TEAM PRIOR TO BITGRAIL CRASH
>Insolvency of BitGrail and missing 10 million nano, discovered and made public by the Nano community [1][2]
>Missing transactions on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [2][3]
>Single transactions replicated multiple times on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [4][3][5][6].
>Millions of Nanos moving out from BitGrail, when the exchange was closed for withdrawals, discovered and made public by the Nano community [7].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to alleged ‘maintenance’.
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to ‘KYC’ excuse [8] [9]. Hundreds of thousands remained unverified [10].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks, due to alleged ‘pending withdrawals’, which were never processed [11].
>Nano withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to node problems.
>Customer support ignores tickets - not just for days but for weeks [12]
>Bomber increasingly unhinged and psychotic. Insults his customers on social media for asking legitimate questions [12]. Nano community expressed concern to the Nano devs.

>>11950271
why do you put so much effort into this?? not that many people read biz anymore and nearly everyone is aware of nano

>>11950271
>legitimate criticism
old ass FUD that has been responded to plenty of times, you just don't accept the answers.
>Not once will they even attempt to debunk the criticism, because they can't and they don't care.
this has been done, you just do not accept it and continue to spam your pasta

>>11950276
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (1 of 2)

>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano, do arbitrage between exchanges. [13][7][14].
>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano move assets to safety. Just one of these accounts handled 50million USD [13][7][14][15].
>Insider trading on BitGrail done via accounts connected to Nano Devs. Traded tens of millions of dollars [15].
>Nano dev team used incestuous relationship with Bomber to get instant KYC verification [16], impossible for standard Nano investors.
>Ordinary Nano investors accounts blocked from doing arbitrage, moving assets to safety or doing insider trading, unlike Nano dev team. Stuck with coming 80% loss [17].
>Zack Shapiro (Nano dev): Everything under control. Just too much work with KYC. Not insolvent. (statement made 4 days before BitGrail insolvent) [18].
>Zack Shapiro: No reason to worry, BitGrail doing normal KYC, “scams don’t do that” [19]
>Zack Shapiro: “Yes, you can [trust BitGrail]. I talk to Bomber every day and he’s a good guy. We’ll get it all sorted next week. Just hang in there” [20] [21]
>Zack Shapiro: Confirms BitGrail is a serious business. “Opposite of an exit scam actually” [22]
>Zack Shapiro: BitGrail is “Legitimate. Complying with the laws of their contry” [23]
>Zack Shapiro: “Funds are safe on Bitgrail…Again, funds are safe” [24][25]
>Mica Busch (Nano dev): ‘‘funds are safe, [BitGrails] representative account does not show any suspicious activity’’ [26]
>Nano: “Be assured that your funds are safe” [27][28]

>>11950292
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (2 of 2)

>Person who discovered and exposed 50million USD account being connected to Nano Dev team, got later banned from Nano subreddit [13].
>Nano community member who discovered/reported that nearly all nano on BitGrail was missing, was forced to delete initial post titled; ‘10 Million XRB Possibly Missing XRB From BitGrail’ [2] and repost under different headline ‘I need some help with tracing funds’ [1].
>Nano team systematically deleted threads of investors’ concerns and the sharing of new information regarding BitGrail [4].
>Nano dev team confirmed knowing about all BitGrail problems, told investors to relax, and promised a thorough investigation [29][30][28]. ‘Developers are taking care of that’ [31].

>>11950306
NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITEIS POST-BIGRAIL CRASH

>Nano Dev team claimed to do all they could to investigate and find missing Nano. No update since. Nothing done. [32]
>Nano community did all the work, themselves researching/investigating. [33][34][35] [32][41].
>BitGrail victim group representative, Espen Enger met with Nano lawyer Josh Kleiman in Italy [36]. Details of the deal made with the Nano team is not made known to the BitGrail victims.
>After meeting between Enger and Kleiman all criticism of Nano Dev team became banned on BitGrail victim discord [37].
>Change in BitGrail victim group management. Protection of Nano Dev team and suddenly non BitGrail victims used as hostile mods on BitGrail victim group discord [38].
>Don’t be surprised if Enger gets millions, and/or cushy job at Nano when all this is over. As a big thank you from the shady Nano team.
>Multiple coming lawsuits against Nano foundation and Nano team members.

>>11950292
This man left his money on an exchange and lost money to bitgrail.
He will get tired eventually.

>>11950310
Footnotes – part 2 of 2

[21] https://imgur.com/a/urpgzwv
[22] https://imgur.com/a/G7fgqWV
[23] https://imgur.com/a/4YcVEji
[24] https://imgur.com/a/IWP2thd
[25] https://imgur.com/a/rFV6BJy
[26] https://archive.is/bfd0Y
[27] https://imgur.com/a/ql0cjLP
[28] https://archive.is/dykfh
[29] https://i.imgur.com/ddzQlVw.jpg
[30] https://i.imgur.com/7xwM1Lx.jpg
[31] https://i.imgur.com/e8n7fWo.jpg
[32] https://archive.is/lTCkP
[33] https://archive.is/o1BmU
[34] https://archive.is/8Md3N
[35] https://archive.is/f4Q8E
[36] https://youtu.be/40aufi9oJno?t=10m16s [Embed] [Embed]
[37] https://imgur.com/a/gQmoQv0
[38] https://imgur.com/a/d8xG4QL

>>11950315
hes trying to accumulate

>>11950286
>this has been done, you just do not accept it and continue to spam your pasta
Absolute bullshit.

>>11950315
>He will get tired eventually.
he's been doing it since July, anon.

>>11950292
Zack Shapiro

>>11950336
>Absolute bullshit.
one of the devs was on here answering your questions, then you got BTFO by him and started to spam your pasta instead to derail the thread.

>>11950337
and biz thinks nano is a reddit coin as a result lmao. i found out about raiblocks through biz

>>11950310
Josh Kleiman

Damn this anon totally destoyed nano.

I'm out of this cancer.

>>11950355
checked

>>11950310
Espen Enger

>>11950366
checked

Bitcoin and all of it's forks will fail because it's blockchain cannot scale. LN will fail, teranodes, bigger blocks, etc, will all fail.

Only Nano has a viable solution to the scalability problem and as soon as Bitcoin fails to scale, Nano will take the 1st place on coinmarketcap.

>>11950397
based and redpilled

ive been wagecucking for the past 6 months to buy more nano feelsgoodman

>>11950351
One of the devs was here and he gave insane annswers and had to run away. He said that Nano's meager 756 TPS was no problem as it was better than paypal average TPS. Too stupid to understand that paypal does not deal with micropayments, are not a global currency and average is completely meaningless, as every currency must have the capacity to deal with peaks. If you can't use the currency at peaks, Christmas shopping, emergency etc, then the currency just a complete real life failure. After that he just ran away, and I continued with my criticism of Nano, never to hear from him again. The rest of you nanoid idiots are too stupid to even try to answer the criticism.

>>11950438
>he gave insane annswers and had to run away
he gave answers that went against your narrative, and when you decided to spam your pasta, he left because no one can respond to that shit fast enough and all of it is outdated and baseless. keep going, bro

>>11950397
Nano has 756 TPS. There is no way in hell they will ever be a global currency with that number, no matter how much they are trying to "improve" their failed currency that is totally unable to adapt to real life use due to inherent and fundamental design flaws. Ethereum, must one example, are working on solutions that can take one million TPS. That are the numbers a global currency must have.

>>11948421
Disgusting scam, also one of the most popular reddit coins together with Vechain and Tron. Fuck this garbage.

>>11950461
its not limited to 756 lol...
the protocol isnt even done yet

>>11950453
>he gave answers that went against your narrative
He compared to paypal and believed average TPS is good enough, ignoring micro payments and peak usage. Insane and unprofessional assessment.

https://twitter.com/IcarusGlider/status/1067550196014419973

>>11950461
>That are the numbers a global currency must have.
wrong. VISA has peak transactions of 4000 tps; and NANO can get up to 7K already. it's more than enough for now. the dev explained this to you in that other thread and you didn't like the answer, so you ignored it and then began your spam posting

>>11948421
While both Nano and Bitgrail leaders told nano investors that Bitgrail was safe and not compromised, http://archive.is/dOMVA, they themselves took all their assets, over $100 million, and moved it as fast as hell away from Bitgrail, hiding their assets, while telling everyone that Bitgrail was OK and perfectly safe. This is why neither Nano dev team, nor Bitgrail, have done any kind of investigation who stole the money, where are stolen Nanos now, where are the thief. Firstly they just don't care, they are now rich, secondly there is too much criminal activity from both sides that none of them want to be investigated and exposed. They prefer darkness, secrecy and that all their crimes will just fade away. This will not happen. Multiple lawsuits are pending and coming. Nano tech is flawed and does not function under pressure, http://archive.is/Vva8Z, Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

>>11950503
Colin dumped millions of xrb in May from private wallets when there was Nano Binance Competition (100kk+ USD VOL.)
He chose a good moment for send to Binance. Who gives a dam about Nano and Bitgrail's victims who suffered a stolen.
Guess they had some special developer donation account before actual one which exists now.
I'll explain you so maybe you'll figure out.

Old developer donation account:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3wm37qz19zhei7nzscjcopbrbnnachs4p1gnwo5oroi3qonw6inwgoeuufdp

The first address that recieved a nano from Old Developer Donation was this:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account)

https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account connected to the old developer donation account)

2. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_11iaqa1oppdxzawrbuzh4m5y78i9zngnhwp8urpup97fsf7k8e84gf61ei75
(Colin's private wallet)

3. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_31kxdcjafw5k5w4u3h9uo7yctkawcjkegnwaqjr1jqq3tanu8bp6m4obru7a
(Colin's private wallet)

2. and 3. are connected to the 1.

https://www.nanode.co/block/BE548A457F28A42119FB22373303690DAB5F40811E4E87643A15267827D6C138
This is the first transaction when old developer donation account sent to this account back in 2016.

Picture is from 02.12.2017
https://i.imgur.com/KEwsZsY.jpg

>>11950482
they are going to put in dynamic pow to mitigate spam. the only limit to the network is bandwidth.

>>11950438
Charlie Lee exited last year. He dumped his bags at $300 on LTC bagholders. LTC has no purpose to exist at all...

>>11950497
>wrong. VISA has peak transactions of 4000 tps
VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [3]
3] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car

>NANO can get up to 7K already
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/98alqy/why_isnt_stress_test_result_published_as_5700_tps/

>>11950557
>transactions VISA has and can handle are the same thing
being this much of a fucking brainlet. no wonder you can't understand when people answer your questions. fucking kek

>>11950557
visa is centralized lol. easy to have high tps in that case

>>11950557
None of the attractive ones there are exposing their breasts.

/biz/ I want an anthropological explanation for that.

>>11950572
You are just too fucking stupid. No wonder you love nano.

>>11950600
epic
pls explain why he is stupid?

>>11950600
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA. he has no idea. nice digits, though

>>11950573
>visa is centralized lol. easy to have high tps in that case
VISA is real life benchmark for minimum TPS. Nano with 756 TPS is a joke and can never ever be a global coin with that shit technology and constant node crashes. Elastos, Ethereum et al. will soon have million TPS, Nano is then worth nothing.

Nano will reach $1000 and I will have 4 million dollars
Screencap this

>>11950632
>Elastos
LMFAO

>>11950642
lmaooo

>muh sharting

>>11950618
What VISA has is irrelevant, as they do not do micropayments, nor do they seek to be a global currency. However, that they are dimensioned for 56 000 TPS despite not doing micropayments etc, only illuminate that the 576 TPS dimension of Nano is insane. There is no way in hell this shitcoin will be a global currency ever. Fundamental flaws in their structural design.

>>11950659
he literally doesn't get that 1million TPS is not even necessary right now. that's what the dev was telling him and he got butthurt and started spamming. VISA, right now, has about 4K tps on average. 7K tps is more than enough. this retard can't understand this and thinks 1 million tps is necessary right now, lmao

>>11950638
Nanoids are so stupid.

>>11950688
wait you actually think nano is shit? You're right visa is irrelevant so stop comparing it to nano. If there are fundamental flaws in nano then why do you bother fudding it? seriously lmao

>>11950701
You still didn't tell us when you bought nano dude. Must have been pretty high.

>>11950729
Miners are scared. DPOS is stronger than ever. NANO and IOTA promise a minerless future. Instead of bringing forth POW privacy coins as a solution, or even POS masternode coins, they choose to throw fits and temper tantrums.
Fire the POW miners. We will then move forward without the nonsense baggage.
Miners can still exist on fog compute platforms like SONM, but provide actual utility instead of being useless leeches.

>>11950729
>If there are fundamental flaws in nano then why do you bother fudding it? seriously lmao
exactly. he's either retarded or FUDDing to accumulate

>>11950776
>Miners are scared
>they choose to throw fits and temper tantrums.
this. the hash wars are driving more users to NANO

>>11950701
>37 posts by this ID
Never change, anon. Never change

>>11950945
I agree, Satoshi's vision was p2p cash, not a fracture into three communities all trying to out whale fight each other while all profits go to governments and energy companies.
Time for these miners to admit defeat. The sooner they capitulate, the sooner we can move the field forward.

This is really annoying. Looking at the Nano 'community', what a joke.
Unable to answer any questions about Nano or debunk criticism, and also just disregarding everything as FUD. You guys look retarded. I was thinking of investing and wanted to look into Nano, but after seeing the Nano community level of retardation I have changed my mind.
The behaviour here has confirmed every criticism said about the Nano community.

>>11951485
stay poor

hundreds/thousands of random alts just like nano, theres a reason none of them have ever succeeded at being better money than bitcoin, because to be useful as cash you have to have some, any, staying power.

nano, being a generic alt with no real users and no more speculators than any other lesser known alt has effectively zero staying power. like hundreds of "better bitcoins" before it, it has and will continue fading away into obscurity at the expense of those that think technology is the driving force behind bitcoin.

>>11948421
Crashing down

>>11951485
>>11951527
You are right, the power behind bitcoin is fractured into hundreds of alts. This creates a learning system where currencies compete for our time and attention.
NANO is the first currency able to be used worldwide, with almost zero energy costs and was fully distributed to the poorest in global society.
Others can compete, and should. That's how the system learns.

>>11951562
>NANO is the first currency able to be used worldwide
but it isn't, it isn't even close to being one of the first.

nano is just another alt, like hundreds of others. there's a reason bitcoin is still the driver of this entire market with tech that is almost unchanged in 7 years. if you think tech matters for me-too coins like nano, you're going to get burnt.

>>11951591
in what way is it similar to other coins?

>>11951591
I meant the first feeless currency. Glad you highlighted my error and didn't respond to anything else.

>>11950701
>august

>>11951527
There actually arent any substantial pcryptocurrencies trying to compete with NANO 's platform right now. Nano is #1 instant and feeless and as of right now it looks like it always will be

>>11951527
>>11951821
Plus Nano has better scaling than literally everything

Hahaha, I grew up with Colin, guy is the definition of stoner brainlet, enjoy your bags hahhahaha

>>11948421
>>11950397
>>11950692
>>11950729
>>11950776
>>11950876
>>11951562
>>11951821
>>11951833
Marius Kramer has completely ditched the shitcoin Nano with good reasons.

https://www.quora.com/Which-Crypto-s-have-the-potential-for-1000-or-more-gains-by-the-EOY/answer/Marius-Kramer

>>11951821
>>11951833
>#1 in the most worthless, overhyped bullshit aspects of crypto
gj guys. you fucking killed it. I bet people are gonna stop using paypal and start using nano any day now.

>>11951840
Pathetic
>>11952155
You can't trust anyone who's word could affect prices
>>11952177
You mean the only real aspect of a cryptocurrency that matters, functionality? Yea NANO takes the cake

>>11952155
>38 posts by this ID
Pathetic.