[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 352 KB, 810x1331, (((everytime))).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11929108 No.11929108 [Reply] [Original]

What did he mean by (((this)))?

>> No.11929136

>>11929108
the nose knows.

>> No.11929368

He says after Ethereum switches to POS, if you fail to pay your eth tax, you will lose it to (((them))).

>> No.11929403

fuck this pedocommiejew
he has never developed anything worthwhile

>> No.11929499

>>11929403
>Markets and private property are two ideas that are often considered together, and it is difficult in modern discourse to imagine one without (or even with much less of) the other. In the 19th century, however, many economists in Europe were both libertarian and egalitarian, and it was quite common to appreciate markets while maintaining skepticism toward the excesses of private property. A rather interesting example of this is the Bastiat-Proudhon debate from 1849-1850 where the two dispute the legitimacy of charging interest on loans, with one side focusing on the mutual gains from voluntary contracts and the other focusing on their suspicion of the potential for people with capital to get even richer without working, leading to unbalanced capital accumulation.
>As it turns out, it is absolutely possible to have a system that contains markets but not property rights: at the end of every year, collect every piece of property, and at the start of the next year have the government auction every piece out to the highest bidder. This kind of system is intuitively quite unrealistic and impractical, but it has the benefit that it achieves perfect allocative efficiency: every year, every object goes to the person who can derive the most value from it (ie. the highest bidder). It also gives the government a large amount of revenue that could be used to completely substitute income and sales taxes or fund a basic income.
https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/04/20/radical_markets.html

What did he mean by this?
>reddit spacing

>> No.11929520

>>11929499
god, what a fucking shitstain. owning property is a human right

>> No.11929558

fuck this weird commie pedo and his centralized shitcoin

>> No.11929559

>>11929499
>it turns out it is possible to give the government complete control over your property
this kid is an absolute moron who talks in autistic jargon to trick normies into investing in his schemes
quantum computing scam, world computer scam, what's next?

>> No.11929817

>>11929499
What the actual fuck, did V-tec really write this shit? I can hardly believe it.

>> No.11929858

>>11929499
Oh no no no...

>> No.11930438
File: 12 KB, 300x300, th.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11930438

GO GO GO break 4050

>> No.11930497
File: 55 KB, 670x755, glen weyl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11930497

Vitalik wants to become an academic. He thinks Glen Weyl could help him with that.

>> No.11930514

>>11930497
>help.....him.