[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 23 KB, 247x300, 1513030901340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839506 No.11839506 [Reply] [Original]

https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/9319444/90504

>> No.11839522
File: 430 KB, 800x532, 1542426077429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839522

>>11839506
It will most likely be known as Bitcoin SV from the near future on. I guess the "Bitcoin CASH" threads are coming to an end. I'm unironically the original shiller of the Bitcoin CASH threads, it's been an amazing journey but I can no longer support Bitcoin CASH if Bitcoin CASH is ABC. From now on I will be shilling Dr Satoshi.

>> No.11839555
File: 694 KB, 644x659, 1529161836968.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839555

>>11839522

How many SV's do you have?

The past six months or so have been pure kino. Bitcoin CASH threads were better than most LINK threads even. I shall do all I can to continue the CSW shilling as we descend into the void of economic warfare and utter capitulation.

You should get on the IRC channel sometime, #greenpill on freenode server.

>> No.11839595
File: 59 KB, 775x973, ancapfrog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839595

*forks and checkpoints your blockchain*

>> No.11839633

>>11839555
50, I unironically dumped most of my LINK stack a few days ago, and half of it is in SV now. Waiting for more BTC turbulence before I go all in. Coingeek conference in 1 week, they want the BSV ticker, so exciting times ahead.

>> No.11839650

>>11839633
BSV is a better ticker than BCH but they should have just use CASH as the ticker from the beginning

>> No.11839685

He's not Satoshi, he's not intelligent, he is a conman, and most critically of all Bitcoin SòyVirgin is a steaming pile of shit.

>> No.11839869
File: 91 KB, 901x715, cswlol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839869

>>11839685

>> No.11839871
File: 40 KB, 800x676, 1539705247485.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839871

>>11839685

It's funny how he's a billionaire then.

>> No.11839879
File: 12 KB, 240x240, Rk0v7fcc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839879

>>11839685

STIFF

>> No.11839919

>>11839871
> conmen are never billionaires
> a guy who took a bailout for bankruptcy protection in 2015 is a billionaire
Anon... I..

>> No.11839930
File: 824 KB, 719x586, 1542368973967.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839930

>>11839879
COME TO THE DARK STIFF

>> No.11839996

>>11839506
Imagine having the opportunity to buy the real bitcoin under $100 and you blow it because you hear things like “faketoshi” and “shitcoin” kek you have literal second chance at actually making it but you’re too lazy to dyor to understand why bitcoin works. Instead you follow the herd of npc moonboys

>> No.11840023
File: 445 KB, 2778x1521, fZJeIG6.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840023

>>11839996
imagine investing in a chain based on your false perception of the reputation of a conman who professes to be someone else, when back in reality if you look at the numbers said chain just doesn't actually function, period.

>> No.11840069
File: 141 KB, 378x270, 1542586826681.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840069

>>11839919

You know he's sold actual patents, right? Apart from his Bitcoin fortune, he's made hundreds of millions from his deals with nChain.

Also, name a SINGLE billionaire con artist besides Bernie Madoff.

You can't. Keep coping, this drunk asshole is Satoshi and you haven't done your due diligence.

>> No.11840085

>>11840069
he may be a satoshi but you are 100% a faggot

>> No.11840087

OH LOOK, ANOTHER ONE

>Sir, buy my new bitcoins coin sir, it is the real btc sir you make many monies u will not regret!

Fuck off Ranjeesh.

>> No.11840097
File: 99 KB, 543x500, 1512497302323.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840097

>>11840085

I don't think about you.

>> No.11840103

>>11840069
Hes not even the one who abc needs to worry about. Calvin has deeper pockets than anyone

>> No.11840106
File: 739 KB, 1280x528, commentary.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840106

>>11839522
I've helped making Bitcoin CASH threads while you slept. It's been a pleasure.

Bitcoin SATOSHI VISION doesn't have the same ring to it but it is more similar to Bitcoin CASH than ABC.

>> No.11840124
File: 71 KB, 634x636, 1541060248131.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840124

>>11840106

What if we just did "Peer to peer CASH"

Too contrived?

I still like to type out CASH in all caps.

>> No.11840131

>>11840106
BTCABCSVLGBTBBQ IS THE REAL BITCOINS, SIR. Please sir, buy the shitcoins sir

>> No.11840140

>>11840106
Bitcoin SV will simply become Bitcoin when the dust clears.
You know, I own more SV than BABCASH but I'm going to miss the CASH brand.

I'm still not confident that SV is going to be the winner either.
I'm glad that people are working their asses off to scale Bitcoin though.
Good luck nons.

>> No.11840147
File: 324 KB, 618x425, IMG_1503.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840147

>> No.11840161
File: 94 KB, 314x211, IMG_1504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840161

>> No.11840179

>>11840069
Patent trolls make a lot of money also .
https://www.businessinsider.com/the-woz-slams-paul-allen-as-a-patent-troll-2011-5
> his bitcoin fortune
Isn't. It's all bullshit, those were mtgox coins. He's not Satoshi.
> he's made hundreds of millions from his deals with nChain.
Through cons and patent trolling (which are basically the same thing)
> Also, name a SINGLE billionaire con artist besides Bernie Madoff.
Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Paul Allen, Michael Bloomberg (by his own admission, check out how he got established), Kenneth Lay, And on and on and on. I'd argue there's a reasonable case to be made that most billionaires are conmen given the way that the traditional financial system works at any rate, but these are the most obvious examples.
> You can't. Keep coping, this drunk asshole is Satoshi and you haven't done your due diligence.
He's not Satoshi. There is no conceivable explanation for why Satoshi can't code hello world and doesn't know what a checksum is, period, you're wrong. In context of just having championed a blockchain that isn't even functioning at all with threats to burn the rest of the ecosystem to the ground it's even less believable.
You've been had.

>> No.11840221
File: 15 KB, 1024x576, ripple-xrp-coinsph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840221

>>11839506

These times are good times. The lolberturrian fucktards Ver and Wright killing each other while XRP is about to take the lead.

CSW tweeting in impotent rage that he could take something down that is already bigger than him and Roger Ver altogether.

I seriously don´t give a shit about Chinkamoto Satoshinara, his whitepaper, his vision and who he is.

Blockchain technology grows mature. The times of lolberturrian dreams are over.

>> No.11840232

>>11839522
Based and Satoshi-pilled

>> No.11840258
File: 113 KB, 634x422, IMG_1505.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840258

>> No.11840287
File: 151 KB, 800x535, IMG_1506.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840287

>> No.11840294
File: 335 KB, 745x640, satoshi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840294

>>11840140
i'm not sure SV will be the winner either but at this point i think they have a larger shot at becoming world money than ABC

ABC and Roger Ver = tolerance and hand-holding; "hope things work out and let's feed some chickens with crypto!"

SV and Craig Wright = business all the way; "we'll get walmart to use crypto and let's rape and murder every other blockchain while we do it"

i respect everything roger has done but i really, really wish he and craig had remained on the same side. craig probably felt really betrayed when bitcoin.com suddenly announced how they were going to split coins from day 1. nchain really does have a point in that it's time for bitcoin to grow up, time is running out. we can't still get excited about feeding chickens on twitch when bitcoin has existed 10 years already. things are moving far too slow.

>> No.11840300
File: 47 KB, 1229x192, getfuckednpc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840300

>>11840087
fuck off coretard pleb

>> No.11840314
File: 74 KB, 1057x767, DhkgCYnW0AAgTob.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840314

>>11839996
anon, the entire reason why people like you and I will make it hard by buying SV today is because idiot NPCs believe the faketoshi propaganda. Not everybody can make it. The cream must rise to the top. Those who can process all available information and take the risk to act on it accordingly are the ones who make it. I made it by ignoring 99% of everyone saying Bitcoin was a scam back in 2011, doing my own research, and buying accordingly. History is repeating itself today, and 99% of the market will ignore what is right in front of them. It is what it is, you won't be able to convince them.

>> No.11840316
File: 709 KB, 1277x850, IMG_1507.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840316

>>11840300
Kek, get fucked pajeet. Btc is shit. Your shitcoins are even worse.

>SIR I WILL SHILL MY BTCABCSVLGBT SHITCOIN SIR IF YPI DONT LIKE IT KORE KORE KORE

>> No.11840326

>>11840294
I might even be on side with that vision if they actually won in the rivalrous process of the hash war they initiated.
But the truth is they lost, and not by a little, not like, it was a hard fought thing but ABC just pulled through, but like, they fucked up so hard they couldn't even keep their own chain running and the only re-org that happened was in their fucking chain, and now they have *absolutely no hope* of any kind of attack on the BCH chain as it's checkpointed every ten blocks and they're outhashed to boot. There is literally nothing they can do.
No split? Well that was bullshit
We'll attack? Nope, failure too, own goal even.
We'll bankrupt you? No, they're costing themselves more money than the opposition, and the opposition will spend whatever it needs to because they have over 1m BCH on the line, they're not going to let SV fuck them over, end of story.
The truth is BCH works properly, ABC BU and XT are all actually doing the necessary work to bring the maximum possible scale to the chain and aren't utterly incompetent. They want to be peer to peer electronic cash for the world, and unlike S'oyVirgins they're actually accomplishing that goal, and they're accomplishing it in an extremely hostile environment.
*THAT* is what open for business really means. It means more than a personality disorder, conning a rich guy to stage an ineffective attack, and sperging out on twitter constantly until you look like a complete fucking idiot.

>> No.11840327

>>11840294
Everything is about Bitcoin (BTC).
This whole thing was about retaking the crown.
The Bitcoin name. It is up for grabs. Segwit killed BTC.

CASH was always an intermediate step.
A temporary refuge.
A place to consolidate.

BITCOIN was the goal.
SV will become BITCOIN.
Bitcoin BTC is dead. Long live BITCOIN.

Everything I do is with the assumption that Ver and CSW are on the same team still, working to take down BTC.
That is why I say "who will win".
Or, "what will win".

The end result is clear: Bitcoin will win.

>> No.11840345

>>11840326
This is a valid argument DESU.
It's a big strike against SV.

They have made villains of themselves.
And came off as incompetent.

Of course it could all be for show.
In service of: >>11840327
But I stand by what I said earlier.

Due to the steps they have taken.
And the energy they have injected:
If SV wins, Bitcoin dies. Forever.

>> No.11840354

>>11840294
If I was Satoshi, I'd be livid with the current state of things. CSW looks absolutely livid.

>> No.11840361
File: 82 KB, 777x736, cashies btfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840361

>>11839522
it must suck being so autistic to think your spam will pump your bags

>> No.11840366
File: 26 KB, 423x233, IMG_1508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840366

Why stop here let's just for the forks 100 times. And each one will have some faggy e-celeb wannabe backing it as the real btc. Normies will never buy these alts and btc clones. Anyone buying these is giving liquidity to the scammers offloading their bags.

>> No.11840370

>>11840361
>trusting something someone tweeted as if it's gospel

>> No.11840380

>>11840294
>bitcoin must be used by niggers in walmarts to succeed
imagine

>> No.11840383
File: 26 KB, 349x642, db0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840383

>>11840366
> normies are important listen to me pay attention to me
fuck off stupid pleb.

>> No.11840409

>>11840383
>fork bitcoin and ruin it centralizing it with hugo blocksize so normies can use it on kfc wallmart and wherever the fuck
>"normies don't matter!"

>> No.11840416
File: 240 KB, 1920x1040, afraid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840416

>>11840326
hashwar is still going on my man. tho i cant help but wonder if this "early loss" outcome was planned for as well. forcing movement of hashpower from BTC. forcing checkpoints. i think nChain was fine with either way. if nothing else it shows just how little jihan cares, in the end it was bitcoin.com who did all the work.

i kinda doubt people would have admitted that SV was BCH even if they had dominated with hashpower early on. maybe nChain just wanted to show exactly how little bitmain/exchanges care about the way bitcoin is supposed to work.

>>11840327
yeah eventually people will just call bitcoin at scale "bitcoin". most will forget that it ever had the BTC ticker.

>>11840354
craig have looked pretty cheerful in every video i've seen him in since last week

>> No.11840417

>>11840409
> normies are the only thing that matter
> normies don't matter
Yep, totally the same thing.

>> No.11840422
File: 37 KB, 375x255, IMG_1509.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840422

>>11840370
Unlike these faggots and the pajeet army shilling these queer middle aged nobodies every time they post on twitter? Get fucked Ranjeesh, stop spamming biz.

>> No.11840441

>>11840409
normies at walmart are less than 1% of 1% of the transaction potential of bitcoin. Bitcoin at scale means every IPv6 packet encoded in a tx. Every derivitive trade on every market as a bitcoin tx. Everyone storing all data encrypted directly on the blockchain. Petabye and exabyte blocks. One global chain. For everything. This is what Bitcoin can do.

>> No.11840442
File: 311 KB, 768x768, altcorns.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840442

>>11840417
>

>> No.11840452
File: 84 KB, 600x399, IMG_1510.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840452

>>11840383
The this world shitskin horses, your brothers, will never use this shit as MUH CASH. Btc is useless outside of normie speculative fomo, which you desperately hope happens to your forks (altcoins). Never gonna happen Ranjeesh

>> No.11840453

>>11840416
In what sense is it "going on" ? There are no more attacks SV can even theoretically mount. They don't have hashpower dominance and even if they did that would still be true. They lost, it's over. They're banging on titanium doors with spears.
As for Jihan not caring, I find that difficult to believe, it would be Bitmain's 1M BCH on the line if the incompetents at SV took over.
Also in terms of "How bitcoin is supposed to work" that doesn't hold up. By no interpretation did SV win, period. They were outhashed, and they also had rollback proof checkpoints inserted against their subversion. Bitcoin is "supposed to work" by the ledger securing itself according to the incentives of the participants. That's exactly what happened. BCH got hashpower dominance and SV failed. BCH has the most accumulated proof of work and SV doesn't. SV's ruleset was empirically proven not to actually work, and SV's threats were empirically proven to be hollow.
This could not possibly have gone better for ABC or worse for SV, and that's the fact of the matter.

>> No.11840455
File: 2.29 MB, 2168x1390, blocks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840455

>>11840441
>one global chain hosted by governments
go to bed, craig

>> No.11840463

>>11840452
tldr, blow me.

>> No.11840511
File: 592 KB, 999x988, let go.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840511

>>11840453
they are mining on a "dead chain", forcing bitcoin.com to keep mining on the ABC chain at a loss. if SV ever get over 50% of the hashpower they will start to close the gap in terms of total accumulated proof of work and eventually the SV chain will surpass the ABC chain.

at that point exchanges and EVERYBODY should see the SV chain as the valid BCH chain. however i doubt people will honor the way bitcoin is supposed to work, in which case nChain will have shown that exchanges/though leaders don't really care about the bitcoin way.

>This could not possibly have gone better for ABC or worse for SV, and that's the fact of the matter.
ABC could have gotten the promised help from jihan and they could have not felt the need to put in checkpoints.

>> No.11840525

>>11840455
block size have nothing to do with security

>> No.11840555

>>11840511
> they are mining on a "dead chain", forcing bitcoin.com to keep mining on the ABC chain at a loss. if SV ever get over 50% of the hashpower they will start to close the gap in terms of total accumulated proof of work and eventually the SV chain will surpass the ABC chain.
That doesn't actually make sense, because as you pointed out yourself, that's not how the ecosystem actually designates what the chain is, if it was we'd all be on Segwit2x as of last year. This is not new.
> nChain will have shown that exchanges/though leaders don't really care about the bitcoin way.
nChain have shown nothing new at all, they've just re-emphasized the precedent from last years initial split. BCH adherents followed BCH not because majority hashpower, which it doesn't have, but because it's peer to peer electronic cash, not subverted bank settlement layer to re-impose total financial control to the central banks of the world, which is what BTC is all about.

>> No.11840560

More like bitcoin crash lmao

>> No.11840562

>>11840511
And last of all, the checkpoints aren't even needed given the hashpower distribution presently, BCH has hashpower dominance and SV doesn't. The checkpoints simply push it over the edge from a rivalrous battle to an exercise in futility on SV's side, no matter what they do, they've lost.

>> No.11840622
File: 790 KB, 1500x1000, its_simple.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840622

>>11840555
>if it was we'd all be on Segwit2x as of last year. This is not new.
it's not the same thing. BTC and BCH are 2 chains on 2 cryptos (2 networks). ABC and SV are 2 chains on 1 crypto (1 network).

>nChain have shown nothing new at all
which is fine, BCH was about removing limits, not experimenting. im just fine with how BCH worked a month ago.

>>11840562
if checkpoints are added regularly you might as well use proof of stake since whoever decides the checkpoints says that proof of work doesn't matter. satoshi added them in 2010 to secure the network against bugs and the network was way smaller back then. he also made sure it was 200 blocks back all in a straight line with no splits.

i assume you've seen andreas brekken's comment about centralized checkpointing on november 15:th
https://youtu.be/b8aj2KHZluU?t=10592
timestamp 3:03:52

timestamp 2:56:32 is also a little funny because he was 100% sure ryan x charles would pick ABC over SV, which he didn't

>> No.11840635

>>11839650
Agree

>> No.11840690

>>11840622
> it's not the same thing. BTC and BCH
It is the same thing, because you'll note I said Segwit2x. If your narrative was correct, miners could simply have forced the issue by mining exactly what they'd signalled and organised according to the NY agreement.
But they couldn't, because just like this time, the ecosystem didn't define "whatever the miners say is x" as equal to "x". Now you can complain about that as much as you like, and you could even potentially make a case that in isolation it goes strictly against a certain part of the whitepaper, but since BTC itself goes against the fucking *TITLE* of the whitepaper, I'd be hardpressed to give a fuck at this stage. The only thing that matter is what can be enforced in a rivalrous environment. And in both cases, that was BTC and BCH.
> which is fine, BCH was about removing limits,
BCH is about peer to peer electronic cash, and to get that you need to scale on chain, and to scale on chain past 22mb blocks, you need to optimise propagation, and that's what ABC did, and that's why they haven't got the same problems SV shot themselves in the foot with on their version that is supposed to be able to do 128mb blocks. This is the problem, SV Is technically incompetent, they are uniroincally and legitimately guilty of all the things coretards accuse BCH'ers of being guilty of. What both SV and Core fail to grasp though is that BCH'ers are *not* guilty of those things, hence, CTOR, graphene, etc.

>> No.11840700

>>11840622
> if checkpoints are added regularly you might as well use proof of stake since whoever decides the checkpoints says that proof of work doesn't matter.
The proof of work does matter, to establish the ordering of the past 100 minutes of transactions. The proof of stake is there to defend against attackers trying to subvert the ruleset, it's a nice bonus that you can show those attackers wanting to impose their own ruleset don't have a fucking clue how the ruleset should work, because their ruleset can't even break 20% of their own block limit with any degree of constant throughput, thus proving that the use of checkpoints to insulate oneself from their attacks is in fact perfectly rational and in fact required.
> i assume you've seen andreas brekken's comment about centralized checkpointing
I have, and for the above reason I think he's provably incorrect.

>> No.11840795

>>11840525
>100000 TB blocksize hosted by NSA as safe as 10000 nodes scattered around the globe

lol

>> No.11840821
File: 79 KB, 768x770, altcorns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840821

>>11840562
>my centralized hardforked shitcoin is the real bcash which is the real bitcoin

imagine having to defend this narrative

>> No.11840839
File: 81 KB, 500x1026, ru5jevls8az01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840839

>>11840795
> 10,000 nodes scattered across the globe all centrally reporting to 10 opaque lightning hubs that report everything to the NSA is as secure as whatever the market selects for in terms of security and decentralisation for nodes absent a centrally planned artificially set block limit issued by a pack of six incompetent neckbeards
lol

>> No.11840848

Idk if this is all ABC shills or if what’s going on just completely flies over all your heads. Watch some videos of Ver this week he is absolutely terrified, feels comfy AF to be in SV.

>> No.11840863
File: 328 KB, 960x1227, IIGabmfYY7Z7-iDccVF2TatyCca_KAso0tWW9O0o51o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840863

>>11840821
well, since your centralised softforked shitcoin is supposedly the real bitcoin, re, peer to peer electronic cash, re, disqualifies itself in the fucking title of its founding document, I imagine you can imagine it just fine, you blathering shitcock.

>> No.11840864
File: 598 KB, 848x1200, lain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840864

>>11840690
miners and that little jihan guy chickened out to contest BTC back then. and yes miner signalling is broken because it's not actually voting, its opinion polling and no decisions should be made from it. releasing a new client and check which fork survives is the way miners should vote, with hashpower. just like now with ABC vs SV

>optimise propagation
CTOR only makes graphine marginally better, maybe 10% at most

>SV Is technically incompetent
don't underestimate them. a 64 mb block was mined just the other day. we don't know how that would have played out if the network was less centralized but i'll probably be just fine. there'll be quite some time before that big blocks are actually needed.

>>11840700
abc latest client to auto-create checkpoints every 10 blocks seems overkill to me

>>11840795
aren't you clever thinking it matters

>> No.11840906
File: 43 KB, 632x410, satoshi on bcash.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840906

>>11840839
>let's centralize at layer 0 because corecucks centralize at layer 1

>> No.11840914

>>11840864
> miners and that little jihan guy chickened out to contest BTC back then.
I sympathise with this position because I used to hold it exactly, but this episode has taught me that they literally had no choice. The question isn't what was the original design or what is correct, the question is what actually works in a hostile rivalrous environment that doesn't care about playing fair or what's correct. They could've split off and mined exactly what they said, and the other chain would simply have decimated them because it was what the exchanges, ecosystem, and market demanded, as idiotic as those demands were, as subversive as those demands were, that was the fact of the issue.
This time the shoe is on the other foot only in the sense that the demands were reasonable this time, the market was correct, and it was the bulk of hashpower that was idiotically signalling for the wrong ruleset, and we have empirical evidence that that's a fact because of how badly SV fucked up.
That's just the way it is, sorry.
> CTOR only makes graphine marginally better, maybe 10% at most
10% of a 1gb block is 100mb. It matters at scale, and as we all agree we want the protocol locked down, it's important to get the optimal consensus ruleset in there ASAP.
> don't underestimate them. a 64 mb block was mined just the other day.
And it took 40 minutes to propagate, actually destroying their total transaction throughput with a stunt. I'm not underestimating them, I was neutral before they outright showed themselves to be incompetent, that is how I am now estimating them, and that is the truth of the issue.
> abc latest client to auto-create checkpoints every 10 blocks seems overkill to me
The war is over and it must be made clear there is no continuing to dispute it, now we have stability with this mechanism.

>> No.11840919 [DELETED] 
File: 1.27 MB, 1098x1086, bcash propaganda.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840919

>>11840863
>derp

>>11840864
>derp

>> No.11840925
File: 109 KB, 1856x848, bcorecentralisedmining.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840925

>>11840906
Fuck off coretard, the SV guys are honestly smarter than you.

>> No.11840938
File: 244 KB, 1529x830, bcashisnotbitcoin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840938

>>11840863
>derp
>>11840864
>derp

>> No.11840946
File: 25 KB, 640x481, funny10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840946

>>11840938
derp right back at you, posting the wrong image in >>11840919

>> No.11841014
File: 2.11 MB, 2160x2567, Screenshot_20180529-110050~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841014

>>11840938
> coretard literally trying to make a hashpower dominance argument
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh you fucking shithead kill yourself, put yourself out of all of our misery, you sad cock chugging thundercunt, ahhh, so fucking hilarious.
Miners fucking *hate* you and want you to die in a fire. Read the description of what happened with segwit2x in >>11840914 and realise you can never go back. It's fucking ogre for you kid. the very *nanosecond* that miners can torpedo BTC, they will fucking do it.

>> No.11841123

>>11839871
Fuck that's a nice trip you got

>> No.11841477
File: 28 KB, 502x310, jihan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841477

>>11841014
>jihan cucked into segwit
>"miners can torpedo BTC any time!" (and kill crypto, thus going bankrupt)
imagine the IQ

>> No.11841493
File: 541 KB, 780x408, ross-u.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841493

>>11839506
papa, its that you!? get me out of here papaaaaa

>> No.11841515
File: 972 KB, 2875x2584, boomer pp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841515

>>11840925
>51%+ of the hashrate owned by csw and calvin
>hugo blocks hosted by them
>patentcucked into oblivion to use it
>"my coin is more decentralized than you"

>> No.11841522

>>11841477
> the very nanosecond miners can torpedo BTC
> implying that's not now
Imagine the idiocy.

>> No.11841587

I bet you can find plagiarism there if you bother looking for it.

>> No.11841784
File: 935 KB, 1280x4752, Who watches the Watchtowers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841784

>>11841515
yes SV hashing is pretty centralized right now but so was BTC in the beginning as well

>> No.11841960
File: 21 KB, 427x427, 1496904034685.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11841960

>>11839871
>>11840069
how do you know really?
prove he's even close to a billionaire
>>11840622
what the fuck even is that meme?
is that how you actually think it works?

>> No.11842023
File: 150 KB, 1090x790, lightning wallet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842023

>>11841960
what you didn't understand it? lightning can't be explained simpler than that

>> No.11842068
File: 78 KB, 765x769, altcorn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842068

>>11841784
Except Bitcoin grew organically in a way that cannot be reproduced ever again which makes all altcoins centralized fucktarded scams by default

>> No.11842081

>>11841960
He's not a billionaire, not even Calvin is. Everyone claims to be a billionaire these days, even Richard Hearth, these trolls are no different. CSW is cucked bigly by australian taxmen.

>> No.11842109

>>11842068
>he thinks bitcoin had an immaculate conception
>he doesn't realize that he is just religious zealot that got scammed

There was a fucking rollback and there is a small group of people running core that you faggots don't want to admit to.

>> No.11842170

>>11842109
Yes, there was a rollback and other things we could afford because NOBODY gave a fuck and it was real experimentation with real pioneers with no twitter spammers, ICO spammers, reddit, and other marketing bullshit. Only a developer mailing list and no promises of anything, just experimenting, and we got this far.

You cannot reproduce these conditions, that is why the capital B blockchain will always be above all of your shitcoins. You are too low IQ to see this, so you are another tool that will give actual Bitcoin to me along the way as you go bankrupt.

>> No.11842231
File: 836 KB, 149x181, 1538084997050.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842231

>>11842023
somehow i get the feeling you're not kidding.
whats it like being such a massive brainlet?
try the eclair mobile ln wallet btw.

>> No.11842280
File: 43 KB, 700x699, working the angle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842280

>>11842231
wouldn't you already know? :)

>> No.11842333
File: 37 KB, 399x385, 1ewdzs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842333

>>11842280
My sides

>> No.11842415

>>11840179

Keep crying, you're wrong

>> No.11842458

>>11842170
loltastic sad fuck, there are those of us who were experimenting with this shit since Linux 0.99f and hacking timeshares wardialing University vms boxes before you were a glimmer in your fuckin dads nuts. And we were there in the beginnings of bitcoin when cpu mining was a thing and gpu mining was far out ck insane. And we look back on it and see now you got your shit irreversibly corrupted along the way by useless cunts like blockstream and mp. And so we moved the fuck on, to projects that aren't do malevolently retarded and high on their own flatulence. And those projects are better. Because we are better than you. And we always fucking will be, because we're actually self aware and analyze things rather than assuming exceptionalism and that everything we do is always right. So fuck yourself. Nothing you do matters or ever will. You're just a self impressed blowhard who thinks the world has finally discovered your genius. The world is too stupid to know what the fuck is going on.

>> No.11842512
File: 34 KB, 600x600, 1300044776986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842512

>>11840124
That fucking picture

>> No.11842531
File: 1.08 MB, 320x240, 1494973911022.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11842531

>>11842280
>no you!

>> No.11843299
File: 83 KB, 600x750, 4chan2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11843299

>>11842531

>> No.11844075
File: 779 KB, 1051x805, 1529568352883.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11844075

>>11841493

>he knows the truth

Based

>> No.11844153
File: 195 KB, 640x360, 1503673836917.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11844153

>>11843299
are you saying you're a black female?
tits or gtfo.
also checked

>> No.11844263

>>11839506

>charles sturt university
>26th best university... within Australia
>683rd best university in the world

jesus christ what a joke hahahahaha. implying the fucking MIT-PhD-level genius(es) behind bitcoin known as satoshi would get their PhD at the 26th "best" university within fucking Australia.

what a conman.

>> No.11844271
File: 315 KB, 500x450, curves.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11844271

>>11844153
check my curves

>> No.11844348

>>11839506
hey cashies... how does it feel to see every fucking day the price movement of your shitcoin is completely tidal locked to btc?

>> No.11844764

imagine tweeting #bchsv in the hope it will grab more attention than #btc. JUST