[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 47 KB, 1229x192, getfuckednpc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11783311 No.11783311 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgNh43veB3Q&t=1604s
"Bigger blocks will never work, ever". <- 32mb blocks in production are no big deal now.
Richard Heart is the most pretentious and stupid person in the entire Bitcoin space, period. He is unironically running a shit scam fork that is trying to bribe miners by stealing Satoshi's coins.

>> No.11783346

>>11783311
at least core has no infighting

>> No.11783355

>>11783346
>which is a good thing

>> No.11783390

>>11783311
Nobody advocates regular bitcoin. It is entirely Bcash fuckstupid enthusiasts who think there's even a conflict over it. There are so many coins that fulfill Bitcoins purpose far much more already, yet Bcashies fight the strawman that anyone actually gives a fuck.
Shitcoins like Tron, Dash, Digibyte, Ripple and even Nano do the job far greater already, yet we're supposed to fall prey to Bcashies marketing ploy, as if anyone ever actually gave a fuck that the "currency of the future" MUST have the 'bitcoin' label.

I'll continue to speculate on and use bitcoin over bitcoin cash for two reasons:

1. Other people do
2. Cashies, Ver and Wright are some of the shittiest people I have ever had the displeasure of paying witness to.

>> No.11783407
File: 8 KB, 213x237, sigh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11783407

>>11783346
Because everyone that can see you're all idiots either left, or got kicked out and censored for pointing it out.

>> No.11783421

Bitcoin is 50 gb bigger than either of the shitcash forks.
Muh 5 32mb blocks per yearXD

>> No.11783435
File: 4 KB, 215x235, brianlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11783435

>>11783346
>core has no infighting

>> No.11783451

>>11783346
>no infighting
Why do you think BCH was created?

>> No.11783459
File: 91 KB, 500x272, vizzini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11783459

>>11783421
> muh big blocks are impossible
btfo
> err, muh small blocks are necessary to restrict chain growth
but your chain is bigger than larger block chains
> REEEEEEE
baka
Just accept your stupidity and move on and the cashlets will eventually get tired of beating you.

>> No.11783681

>>11783311
Larger block sizes cause centralization. Sounds like a parrot repeating from someone else but I did my research. Craig wants to have 12gb average block size with topological transaction order. Now you have to imagine a miner finding the hash for the block and broadcasting the block AND the hash to the network. Miners have the incentive to broadcast it to as many nodes as possible. So you aren’t passing 1x12gb / block but many many more times. And they have to broadcast this further as well. The amount of data needs to be broadcasted is surreal due to bandwidth limitations. This needs to happen every 10 minutes. With canonical transaction order (solution from ABC side) the amount of data needs to be broadcasted is 80% less and nodes build the block (transactions and order of them) themselves. It is a much cleaner solution but even if we are talking about 2.4gb data needed to be broadcasted to the network and among nodes every 10 minutes, it’s a pretty dead end. That’s where the centralization comes in: since it’s almost impossible to broadcast that amount of information on time, there is a great risk your block will be an orphan block. That’s why this scenario would create mining pool monopoly between 70-100% of the hash power. Fuck that. I can continue using visa or PayPal.

Cores are cucked because LN is an incredibly hard solution. They are basically creating internet all over again but only for bitcoin transactions. This comes with centralization (lightning hubs, analog to internet service providers) but the routing problem is exponentially harder because not only a route needs to be available, it needs to have enough funds available as well.

Tl;dr: both are fucked. I’m all in on eth and monero. They have a great future

>> No.11783910

>>11783681
what's the point of monero when you can just use an online mixer?

>> No.11784989

>>11783311
Autistwitz plays candy crush while explaing why bitcoin should destroy itself.
>>11783346
all of the damn forks come from infighting.

>> No.11785009

>>11783910
You have no idea how sophisticated blockchain analysis is now do you?

>> No.11785018

>>11783459
Cmon faggot BTC is 10 years old of course the chain is bigger

>> No.11785041

>>11783681
>That’s why this scenario would create mining pool monopoly between 70-100% of the hash power.
maybe briefly, but that monopoly would be making so much money that large corps or nation states will step in to compete

>> No.11785113

>>11785009
Yeah, seriously. The CIA and NSA have nothing better to do than map out every transaction on the zcash / monero blockchain all day.

And yes, I'm being serious.

>> No.11785130

>>11785113
My point was these turds, with the help of coinbase and circle (before they pivoted to stablecoin issuance) breddy much have transcribed and routed 80% of btc transactions.