/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11773009
you're right nobody is literally talking about this, I'm tracking these posts

You niggers would rather be chasing after Pajeet's pump and dumps instead of looking into shit that's about to pop bigly in the next bull run. GET IN HERE FAGGOTS.

>>11773280
What's the quick redpill then OP? Why do we need blockchain on satellites?

>>11773335
Just imagine the speculation and the hype that would be brought about from space related projects. We saw what one rumor did with the autists in Digibyte and their Minecraft server, it went from that to gaymers using Digibyte as a payment method for donations all the way to games using a reward system to pay exclusively in Digibyte. I know it sounds ridiculous but the hype was real.

>>11773374
So are you saying it's just a gimmick? This is not good shilling. Is there any reason it needs to be in space? And what is actually in space? A raspberry pi running a node ductaped to some 3rd world satellite?

>>11773009
butwhy.gif

>>11773009
Nobody gives a fuck about "smart contracts" and crypto in general

>>11773477
You guys are slow on the uptake, no wonder yall work at McDonald's

>>11773477
If there's a blockchain in space we have an alternative infrastructure which may attract lots of attention. Take for instance Amazon web service's partnership, this isn't coincidence or some random conglomerate wanting to get in on the Blockchain bandwagon this is real technology being developed here and we're witnessing its infant stages.

How is this not just a gimmick? What is the advantage to having some disposable blockchain satellite in space?

Blockchain in SPACE

This sounds like some 2017 ICO hype shit

Someone tell them the ICO craze ended in January

>>11773580
>Having a raspberry PI node flying around in the sky makes it a different infrastructure compared to when it's sitting on my table.
Shoo shoo pajeet, come back to me when its the same but using LIFI.

>>11773995
>Just ask Blockstream, they were the first to use this gimmick and send satellite nodes in space for Bitcoin transactions. OH NO NO NO NO

>>11774061
Didn't mean to quote

>>11774060
Not an argument.

>>11774061
OK, and that's a gimmick too. It's cute, but satellites are not immutable and permanent. So what is the point except to make basedboys get all excited about space?

>>11774086
see
>>11773580
moreover, it would provide an extra security measure in case of a total shutdown but I know what you're going to say it wouldn't matter when all hell breaks loose but to conglomerates looking into promising blockchain technology with the most reliable and secure platform it does.

>>11773009
>launched blockchain node into space
wat? why?

>>11774086
Oh so AWS in space. Now I get it!

>>11773567
Haha says fucking literally Buzz 'word' Aldrin. Kys.

>SPACE! HYPE!
kys

>>11774728
Stay poor.

>>11773009

>Nobody is talking about this.

Ya let's keep it that way.

>>11773009
Those weird web bot ai asymmetrical language reports mentioned this back on December that we would see the rise of space based business with crypto leading the way.
Interesante