/biz/ - Business & Finance

Why did he sign with numbers? Why not just sign it "SELL" or something to that effect

>>11772917
Craig Satoshi Wright

>>11772935
Literally a larp, this entire playtime

>>11772917
>50 btc transaction from when that was less than 50 cents
So what? Does this prove anything other than the guy made a transaction back then?

>>11772960
the absolute state

>>11772960
this is before the first bitcoin transaction. only satoshi has access to those keys. first bitcoin tx to hal finney was a few days later

>>11772976
that is a signature from the 9th block to ever be mined in bitcoin...

>>11772988
>>11772976
so these are diretimes lads? a big happening for us?

Craig Wright is satoshi /biz/ on suicide watch

>>11772917
>>11772976
As if we needed proof... well, now we have it.

Craig (aka Cassandra) Wright *is* Satoshi Nakamoto. That's the main reason why he's so incredibly attacked.

>>11773020
how do we know its craig

>>11773010
its not craig wright. craig wright doesnt care about segwit lol. i think its wei dai

cum penisf

>>11772917
Szabo getting ready to do away with the 'BitGold' prototype and get started running 'The God Protocol'

Apparently it says this

CASE CLOSED. CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI. FUCKING KNEW IT.

>>11772917
Larping faggots, the twitter was created months ago and spammed on 31 oct.

So that’s it...it’s literally ogre...

you told me sergey was satoshi so what the fuck

>>11773057
>has only made a twitter account in may 2018
>likely when craig started planning the takeover

>>11772917
10/10 larp but you need to try harder

PANIC IM SELLING ALL MY LINKS RIGHT NOW

>>11773057
how did satoshi know about segwit in 2009

>>11773086
imagine that these people that desperate that they need to larp at 4chan

>>11773052
That's the only valid answer, /biz/raelis are brainlets.

>>11773086
are fucking dumb nigger? its a signature of the address that recieved the coinbase tx.

>get pub key from address
>get message
>get private key
>sign message
>get rx
>get s
>get m

what the fuck is going on in this thread? eli5 and retarded

>>11773123
This isn't reddit. Go gas yourself.

who knew all you have to do to decode messages is put it in wolframalpha kek

>>11773057
Well Craig has been talking about this issue with Segwit lately, in at least 2 separate interviews. He said it's a flaw that cannot be fixed, and he'll reveal what it is in 2019

>>11772917
By careful analysis, I can see that there are no "stiff" or "fucking" in the message.

>>11773064
Who says this is Craig Wright though?

>>11773145
fuck off tell me

STIFF

>>11773025
The only person that account is following is craig
It also tweeted the genesis block as bch on the anniversary

>>11773174
I don't know why people are saying it's this Craig Wright, but I think it means the twitter account is from Satoshi himself.

>>11772917
this shit is just a distraction for the plebs

STIFFED

someone better explain this to me or I will dump my link bags

>>11773189
The only person it follows is Hal Finney. What the fuck are you talking about?

>>11773030

Why would the real Satoshi give a shit about segwit? He didn't come up with it.

>>11773222
Didn't you know, craig paid a bunch of pajeets to shill for him during the hashwar.

>>11773174
It’s CRAIG WRIGHT. How many fucking times do we have to tell you? It’s him. What more proof do you want? Jfc idiot. CSW is satoshi.

>>11773229
https://mobile.twitter.com/satoshi/status/1051501743501205505

>>11773175
ask reddit, if u give someone gold maybe they'll answer

>>11773086

>>11773235
What does that have to do with anything?

>>11773229
Exactly

>>11773229
It fixes a bug in his code. I think he would care.

>>11773123
get the fuck out

>>11772976
This

That's a very interesting development.
SegShit getting blasted on by Satoshi.

You guys remember that BCH forked away from BTC just because SegWit was just about to activate.

Anyways..

Wtf I don't get it.
Is there something signed by an old BTC private key from 2009... Now..in 2018...or what the fuck is this about?

https://twitter.com/checksum0/status/1063495918970970114
So far, all this nonsense has proven is that someone out there is retarded and desperate. Was truly hoping to learn who Satoshi is though.

>>11773284

>>11772917
Can you guys think of anything that was hyped on biz but nowhere else, and that WASNT a scam? Don't say ETH because reddit and twitter were all over that.
Makes my LINKIES feel heavy t b h

>>11773020
>>11773237
>>11773239

>>11773295

https://twitter.com/cryptosperger/status/1063530455847354369

https://twitter.com/cryptosperger/status/1063530455847354369


https://twitter.com/cryptosperger/status/1063530455847354369


https://twitter.com/cryptosperger/status/1063530455847354369


https://twitter.com/cryptosperger/status/1063530455847354369

>>11773077
Honestly really amazing that @satoshi was still available in May 2018.

>>11773324
Maybe it was already taken but the account was (by the owner) put into "deactivated" mode?

>>11773324
It wasn't.
Think about what that means.

it's hal's.

>>11773305
link is the next reddit+twitter fad
it all starts here

>>11773324
He(they) either bought it from someone or Twitter gave it to him(them)

>>11773342
Hal's dead.
It ain't his family either.
They have their own coins.

>>11773324
This. How can it be possible?

>>11773339
OK I guess I don't know how twitter works; it says account created in May 2018.

>>11773324
>>11773349
>>11773355
If the @satoshi handle was for sale, blockstream would have bought it by now.
It would be spouting core garbage.

The fact that @satoshi is pro BCH should tell you something.
But these are just coincidences.
If you guys were able to understand coincidences you would already know that satoshi is back by now.

Sigh.
Moo.
Baaaaaaa.

>>11773314
Why not just use a satoshi address? Like Vitalik stated that if there is a messy way and an clean way to try and prove something, then one should always use the latter. It's pretty much Occam's razor.

And what is why is SegWit broken suddenly?

>>11773349
remember that dorsey is a big holder of btc. wonder where he got it.

>>11773352
>https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/0437cd7f8525ceed2324359c2d0ba26006d92d856a9c20fa0241106ee5a597c9

>https://twitter.com/halfin/status/1110302988

have a think

>>11773237
Craig Wright is like the Wizard of Oz, booming, larger than life. Now keep paying no attention to the Szabo behind the curtain.

>>11773401
it isn't. but this is all coordinated fud to make it appear that way. faketoshi, chinkwu, and vergen have deep enough pockets to bankroll this shit

>>11773405

>>11773401
What if Satoshi is multiple people, and this is one of a few different people that worked on Bitcoin early on?

This is how I imagine Craig:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRd_Gv90Y4Q

https://twitter.com/checksum0/status/1063495918970970114

>>11773405
Not sure what I'm supposed to be seeing here.

>>11773462
Or here.

Maybe I just don't get what you're thinking...
It's an address that generated coins via mining before Hal even started using Bitcoin

ummm guys
if he has access to the pkey
why hasnt he drained the address?
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/12cbQLTFMXRnSzktFkuoG3eHoMeFtpTu3S

>>11773497
what in the name of FUCK is going on right now?

>>11773497
That is a more brutish move,
would crash markets.
He will do it at some point, I assume.

>>11773497

50 btc isn't a whole lot of money to the game these guys are playing, there is more to be made with the international fuckery going on

>>11773324
>>11773370
>"it says it was created in May 2018"
That's true. Odd indeed. I'm not exactly sure myself how twitter works.

PERHAPS this is what happened:

>Account existed many years ago
>then it was put into "deactivated" status
>then it was re-activated
>then it was deleted (so it 100% disappeared)
>then it was re-created

Why would someone do that? Maybe because: after deleting it, he changed his mind, or maybe he thought he had only deactivated, and deleting was a mistake. It's also possible that accounts which are deactivated eventually automatically are deleted after some period of time.

LARP.io

This is so dumb.

CSW = satoshi =>BCH becomes dominant => Oracles/tokenization are built into BCH => Chainlink becomes pointless => 1000k suicides

>>11773445
In the event that Satoshi was multiple people, my argument would still remain exactly the same though. The number of people doesn't matter.

And also, what is wrong with SegWit then?

>>11773522
Dubs dont lie

>>11773516
>with the international fuckery going on
what fuckery

i've been living under a rock for the past year, pls answer

>>11773481
Hal's tweet proves he was running bitcoin already.

>>11773010
Imagine unironically believing this

>>11773522
>>11773533
checked, Satoshi is Cassandra.

>>11773538
Are u seriously retarded?

>>11773123
Kill yourself faggot

>>11773537
also satoshi isn't about to use a flaw in segwit to market a fork having hidden for years

>>11773531
I'm misunderstanding something probably. Couldn't one of them have access to this key, but not the main satoshi address?

>>11773426
Based

That's not Satoshi.

Satoshi would've signed the genesis block, leaving no doubt that it's him.

>>11773558
He already did
Bch is bitcoin, straight from the horses mouth
https://mobile.twitter.com/satoshi/status/1051501743501205505

>>11773551
Brainlet. Go dump more minimum wage checks into BCH faggot

>>11773324
>>11773371
Even the real Satoshi Nakamoto could never have that handle without buying it or Twitter's interference. You all realize that Satoshi is literally the most popular name for boys in Japan, right?

>>11773586
you're not following

>>11773237
yeah and im clark kent

>>11773560
The satoshi wallet is probably a multi-sig address shared by all the creators.

>>11773590

This, it is almost like having access to @Mohammed how they got this handle is beyond me

CSW yanking everyone's chain again. Here's the evidence:

1. To provably sign a message, you only need the private key.
2. Go to https://anders.com/blockchain/public-private-keys/signatures.html - it has a fake key preloaded - and type your message.
3. Click "sign"
4. Notice the single "signature" line that comes up. Thats ALL you need to prove yourself.

Adding "Sig (Rx, S) for Message H(m)" is blinding with science.
Adding "Rx: 97921318692748166969765893503724782362221860890089306445657980140065784098104" is doubling it down.
Adding "S: 17870770544568028453805091504963125490615703388985597936947183001452377396233" is tripling it down.
Adding "H(m): 90774958364900180671716888080665726921328827653065727390791155349203800699667" is quadrupling it down.

Why all this extra effort? To hide the fact that HE DOESN'T HAVE THE PRIVATE KEY.

Fuck you CSW, I don't care about your shitty Bitcoin. I just want to make money ffs. Fuck off, leave my shitcoins alone! They have been trough enough!

>>11773636
Fake news

this is the last ditch attempt by a gangster, using one of hal finney's mined blocks, to market their failing fork, having been totally and utterly humiliated 24 hours earlier.

>>11773161
>He said it's a flaw that cannot be fixed, and he'll reveal what it is in 2019
It's vague stuff like this that convinces me Wright is absolutely full of shit. If it turns out there is any problem with SegWit until December 31 2019 he gets to say "Oh yeah that is what I was talking about" and if things go well for segwit he just brushes it under the rug or moves the date forward or pulls some other vague insinuation like "Oh the problem has already come to pass just no one notices it yet but me" further kicking the can down the field.
Basically >>11773401 the dude has even claimed in the past to have a clean way to prove all this but bullshitted his way out of that, he definitely was involved early in this all as that whole court case thing proved but it blows my mind with all the snake oil salesman fuckery that anyone bothers to listen to him.

>>11773636
your retarded. an ecdsa signature has three elements. the r value, s value and then the message value you need to verify.

>>11773647
Agreed 100%

>>11773020
lmao

>>11773426
It's got to be szabo.

>>11773675
Hi Craig. Did you my post above alarm you and thats why you deleted the tweet?

>>11772917
WHAT THE FUCK THE SIGNATURE WAS JUST DELETED

I REPEAT IT WAS JUST DELETED. SAVE THE SCREENSHOT OF THIS THREAD IN CASE MODS PRUNE IT

what the fuck is going on
https://twitter.com/satoshi

>>11773724
Keked ass. 4chan knows cryptography better than larp ass Craig

>>11773522
Oracles wont be built into BCH because that would make it illegal (bucket shops / illegal markets)

>>11773258
biz is full of faketoshi pajeets actively spreading disinformation anon

>>11773735
wtf is going on

>>11773735
Sig (Rx, S) for Message H(m)
Rx: 97921318692748166969765893503724782362221860890089306445657980140065784098104
S: 17870770544568028453805091504963125490615703388985597936947183001452377396233
H(m): 90774958364900180671716888080665726921328827653065727390791155349203800699667

>>11773052
BitGold ==> BitGod?

I'll just leave this here

https://twitter.com/andyrowe/status/1013618469995204608?s=19

>>11773735
very extravagant trick by craig "faketoshi" wright, yet so predictable

>>11773065
Regardless the transaction was signed though. Somebody around since block 9 made that message.

fucking brainlets satoshi would sign the genesis block not some pajeet tier block

>>11773735

>>11773776
And then there's this: https://twitter.com/andyrowe/status/1063502381583872000

What did he mean by this? Is he not in control of the account anymore?

fuckken saved
Sig (Rx, S) for Message H(m)
Rx: 97921318692748166969765893503724782362221860890089306445657980140065784098104
S: 17870770544568028453805091504963125490615703388985597936947183001452377396233
H(m): 90774958364900180671716888080665726921328827653065727390791155349203800699667

WHATS
IS
HAPPENING !!!!!

Have you guys ever stopped and thought about how amazing Bitcoin in reality is? From 2009 to today it changed so much and changed the world with it. Can you even comprehend the journey it had to go through to become this widespread? It's just amazing. I swear Bitcoin is going nowhere.

>>11773811
>Imagine paid shills acting like they are having a real debate where nobody cares.
This is desperation at peak bcash trash

>>11773777
100% wasted

>>11773811
He's pro BCHSV, he likely got ahold of @satoshi handle somehow and then sold it to Craig Wright the larper. Pretty sad.

>>11773216
this but unironically

>>11773777
Checked

Another one:

https://twitter.com/satoshi/status/1063544670230327296

Signature: (0x99cc0d1f4ed3f1e6d18c130df22fece489b4ab016c33ed53db1ce45880bf4e99, 0x6633f2e0b12c0e192e73ecf20dd0131a30fa31e54314b2e7e4b57a344f76f2a8)

Hash - e: 0xd0f756e2d96f49b32579bd9365fde07674629dcab236fd9af8c01085a0cf9201

>>11773806

>>11773874
What does this say

New tweet:

>Signature: (0x99cc0d1f4ed3f1e6d18c130df22fece489b4ab016c33ed53db1ce45880bf4e99, >0x6633f2e0b12c0e192e73ecf20dd0131a30fa31e54314b2e7e4b57a344f76f2a8) Hash - e: >0xd0f756e2d96f49b32579bd9365fde07674629dcab236fd9af8c01085a0cf9201

If it's not the genesis block, I don't give a fuck about this larp 2bh

>>11773841
this.

>>11773614
Multi Sig didn't exist in 2009

>>11773887
"The pleasure of being cummed inside."

>>11773874
How do you interprete that thing?

>>11773887
I hate being a brainlet, but really. What does it say?

Whatever they posted appears to be a valid signature for Satoshi's key in block 9, but it's absolutely meaningless unless they reveal the actual preimage for the message hash.

Anyone can mutate a hash for a valid ecdsa signature to produce a seemingly "new" signature/message

>>11773874

Satoshi Nakamoto


@satoshi
1m1 minute ago
The message will be clear in Dec 2019

The gangster is more a cult member, place a date for the end of the world for your followers, your fork fucks up, move it with a hacked twitter address. He fucked up the previous signed message so that tells you all you need to know.

satoshi living in Bali, google this.

He is involved in a crypto swiss stable coin (E-elysium) ELSM with a pair 1 ELSM = 50 chf

dyor fags

>>11773945
what the fuck man

>>11773945
forgot:
https://twitter.com/satoshi/status/1063545567597481994

>>11772917
itt: 4chan retards trying to anonymously convince eachother they're smart when nobody knows wtf they're looking at and whether any of it is valid

regardless, what he says isn't against segwit at all. in fact, to anyone with reading comprehension it suggests he things the fixed version of segwit is the only thing that can make bitcoin survive

>>11773953
its just craig shitposting

>>11773986
this

>>11773963
Really does sound like craig bought that handle from the guy that had it before.

>>11773945
lol the fucking brainlet. now we know the account belongs to CSW

>>11773986
Anyone know what that particular personality disorder is called?

>>11773920
This. CSW was known to perform this exact "provide mutated version of existing hash" trick before, he gried it once in 2015 and wthat was thoroughly debunked. Now hes got a nice @satoshi handle to put some distance between him and the chicanery, but it still stinks.

>>11773952

https://news.bitcoin.com/next-satoshi-nakamoto-revealed-himself-bali/

Sauce here, doesn't look very convincing?

>>11773123

kys nigger

>>11773123
Go back and never come to biz again

>>11773823
Tbh this feels like GoT real life and we are peasants on the background, feels good.

>>11774002
Narcissistic personality disorder
Sociopathy

>>11774032
>the next satoshi nakamoto

>>11774002
Classic blockstreamer trademark, calling people retarded/insane/nutcases etc etc et.

>>11773790
As long as Satoshi signs something new, such as a statement containing the word Segwit, and a news title from today, we know its him and that he's speaking now.

Otherwise, we would only know that he said and signed something in the past.

>>11773790
block 9 was the first tx

>>11773945
Oh wow he already moved back the date hahaha.

>>11773030
>craig wright doesnt care about segwit lol
the absolute state

>>11774101
He didn't sign anything dude. You're falling for old tricks again.

CSW is a very dedicated larper.

https://www.ccn.com/technical-proof-craig-wright-not-satoshi-nakamoto/

He's using the same tricks he used 2 years ago. Sad!

>>11773305
>Don't say ETH because reddit and twitter were all over that.
Reddit was in full "Its a scam mode" before it passed $10 when /biz/ was at least 50/50 on it, similar to the state of LINK.

>>11774149
>Implying LINK is not a scam.

>>11774175
can't wait till the exit scam and all nigger linkers kill themselves

>>11774062
>biz
>tripfag
>when you try to fit in so hard you proof that you haven't been here before 2016

>>11772917
I just sold my only Bitcoin, I’m out until this shitshow is over.

>>11774032
dive deep anon, you will find something more.

>>11773516
Its not the amount of BTC in that address that would spark a sell off, its the fact that the old coins thought to be lost aren't lost after all.

>>11774138
why is crypto so full of emotionally immature people? the guy acts like a spoiled brat

angel versetti is satoshi

>>11774147
Just read the article. Wow... This guy is just crazy.

>>11772917
tight bridge

You may execute without delay

Fake and gay
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9xppoy/new_csw_block_9_scam_hal_finneys_old_privkey/

>>11772917
Why did you delete the tweet Craig?Ron Rivest is crying.

Lmao it baffles to me how literally NO ONE in this thread knows how cryptography works. I keep forgetting how 99% of you are pump&dump chasers and not know a thing of what Bitcoin actually is. It's just brainlet after brainlet begging to be spoonfed what this means and what it does. My God you guys are pathetic.

>>11774438
this is /biz/, not /g/ or /sci/, what did you expect

>>11774438
Biz is utterly useless.
Really truly brainlets, not even a few smart anons larping as brainlets, actual idiots.
Sometimes idiots larping as bigger idiots. The worst information source on the internet,
CT Tron gang has about 30 IQ points on biz.

>>11774273
Totally insane. By sheer narcissism he still gets quite some people behind him... Should be /ourguy/ tbdesu.

>>11774438
Hey you dirty faggot, how dare you not know how to do a thing!? That's why i'm sure you can fix your own car, build your own house, grow your own food or fix your own broken leg, right?

You dirty cock sucking bitch.

>>11772998
>>11773065
>>11773077
>>11773086
>>11773123
>>11773220
>>11773887

too all you brainlets its explained here: >>11774620

>>11774438
You don't have to understand something to pump and dump it from heaven to hell.

>>11774650
but they're retarded, they don't address the reused hash issue and their facts are wrong. we know hal finney was running bitcoin from the 10th or before

>>11772917
This doesn't prove shit. Why does he not sign the genesis block? What not move a single btc from satoshis wallet and announce it before hand?
If anything this proves that CW is full of shit.

>>11774241
this

>>11774273
>blockstreamer detected

>>11772960
Jesus christ. Just when you think /biz/ couldn't possibly be more retarded.

>>11774704
except for that they are not reused..
those signatures posted on twitter are brand new

>>11774779
https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification
signature =/= hash

>>11774147
LOL

>believing that faggot is actually Satoshi
Kill yourself fucking shillers

>>11774028
why would he want to spoil the fun so soon?

>>11772917
>>11773065
>>11773082
>>11773520
https://switter.at/users/BetterEthics/statuses/100689456244472387
https://cryptoyum.com/discussions/for-a-laugh-on-mobile-find-the-satoshi-account-on-twitter-and-click-on-following/

>>11774925
>https://cryptoyum.com/discussions/for-a-laugh-on-mobile-find-the-satoshi-account-on-twitter-and-click-on-following/
>@satoshi is Roger
LOL Roger hates CSW why would Roger be tweeting proof the CSW is satoshi on the @satoshi twitter

Doesn't proof he is satoshi. But using this twitter.

>>11774949
Good to have some proof it was fairly onvious

>>11772917
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9xpivk/satoshi_i_do_not_want_to_be_public_but_there_is/e9u9kqb/

>i do not want to be public
>hey guys it's me craig aka satoshi

pick one

>>11773401
the bcash camp are also known for purchasing Bitcoin-related domains and usernames to cause FUD

>>11774241

yes

>>11773030
Wei showed emails with satoshi. Szabo is the only one that didn’t? Why? Why would szabo just not know what was going on. Why was he not on bitcointalk?

>>11773324
This. If it wasn’t available there has to be a trail of who bought it. Can’t twitter figure out who’s behind that account?

>>11774949
Good spot. I mean, they're both talking about SegWit issues, and both being hush about any details, so it's pretty clear that it's just CSW larping.

>>11773123
>eli5
What are you trying to say

>>11775652
explain like im 5

>>11773945
>BitCoin CASH buys BitCoin.com
>BitCoin CASH buys @Bitcoin
>Suddenly @satoshi comes up and shills BitCoin CASH
Anyone falling for this deserves what they get.

>>11773718
Szabo supports segwit/lightning? Or is that a front to convince people he’s not satoshi? I’m playing reverse psychology idk what to think

>>11773945
So now we know it’s CSW how obvious was he trying to make it?

>>11773973
This is kind of correct. He’s saying it needs to be fixed and not that he’s against it.