/biz/ - Business & Finance

This is the shit that gets me hard.
>Click Services
>Click add Chainlink
>Bam your node is communicating trustlessly off-chain
User friendly interfaces like these existing before main net is even out are awesome. My only concern with Chainlink is honestly that it has too much volume at launch.

>>11686793
delete this thread
NOW

>>11686793
>29 views
Thanks OP gonna watch now.

>>11686793
2 seconds in, and already ok this is epic.

>>11686793

So when they use OpenLaw are they also using LINK oracle? In this example are they not using off-chain data?
Or would you create a smart contract with OpenLaw and add Chainlink to the workspace to integrate the offchain triggers?

This is really cool. We really are at the start of something totally new. Hopefully smart contracts save so much money like they promise to. Then they will be adopted en masse for sure.

>>11687016
See https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhansen/2018/11/08/consensys-kaleido-launches-full-stack-marketplace-platform-for-enterprise-blockchains/#309fd7e32ad8

Chainlink will be offered within Kaleido for general smart contracts, and OpenLaw will be used for legal contracts.

Funny thing: OpenLaw legal contracts also use Chainlink lol.

Kaleido is a low-threshold portal offered via AWS that will offer normies easy access to a suite of blockchain solutions, btw.
And Chainlink is the smart contract solution.

>>11687040
>Funny thing: OpenLaw legal contracts also use Chainlink lol.
That’s what I thought since they announced a partnership a while ago.

There’s a reason they aren’t offering Oraclize as part of Kaleido lol.

Also don’t forget that Clovyr.io (Amber Bladet of JP morgan) is offering something similar with TownCrier, pic related. Clovyr will be similar to Kaleido, as far as I understand it. It’s also a normie friendly plug and play tool

>>11687064
Chainlink is also partnered with Polkadot, next to the Town Crier box, lol.

>>11686814
>My only concern with Chainlink is honestly that it has too much volume at launch.
This would be great new fud

>>11687086
TownCrier = Chainlink since they bought it

>>11686793
Fuck, I'm gonna need to drop another $10k on this aren't I.

>>11687129
I know.
And Polkadot (the box next to the Town Crier box in that image) is also partnered with Chainlink.
https://medium.com/web3foundation/web3-foundation-and-chainlink-announce-partnership-df55ed462a3a

>>11686793
I can’t believe how easy this is! That’s really like the early stages of the Internet! It’s getting easier and easier until every idiot can use Blockchain Services. Holy shit, the future is bright marines!

Very cool seeing this in action. Seems poised to be very powerful. Thanks for sharing.

>reinvent json parser
>LOL THIS IS HUGE, THIS IS NEW PARADIGM WE ARE GONNA RICH

>>11687283
Bitcoin is also "just" a json parser.

>>11687116
Adoption will be the DOWNFALL of Chainlink. Once the amount of collateral needed in USD value exceeds that available across all nodes, the network won’t fucking work anymore.
>Chainlink mcap is $500 million
>smart contract asks for node with $550 million in collateral
>oh shit! The node can’t provide sufficient collateral, EVEN IF they buy 100% of the supply
>mainnet screeches to a halt
>crashes
>unironically ogre
OH NO NO NO NO NO HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

>>11687318
is this new FUD? It's great

>>11687331
New pasta, very delicious.

>>11687331
Doesn't work as fud, since he's explaining why Link tokens have to have very high prices for the system to work.

On the other hand, it does work as hype through reverse psychology.

>>11687318
If a company needs to put up $550million in collateral to buy link then the mcap of Chainlink is going to obviously be far greater than $500 million
>How do markets work?

>>11687331
This is dumbest fucking pasta FUD ever.

>>11686793
More visibility for Link that will drive favorable speculation. As this continues, so will demand and increased price. Seriously comfy here, this beast is going to pop significantly in the weeks and months ahead.

>>11687040
Clause and Viant will also use CL

>>11687331
Thanks anon, I wrote it just for you. enjoy.

>>11687359
>If a company needs to put up $550million in collateral to buy link then the mcap of Chainlink is going to obviously be far greater than $500 million
The mcap limits the amount of collateral available, it’s not gonna magically rise to provision actual use

>>11687443
kek ofc it will, if a company needs that amount of collateral then they need to buy LINK on the open market
> markets, how do they work?

https://youtu.be/lHCC5w3ksi0?t=36

I feel this will be another epic thread.

>>11687492
There won’t be enough LINK to cover it so they can’t buy enough

Does this mean mainnet is this month

Is there another chance of staking? I missed LinkPool and dont have the time & skills to setup a node

IIt will dump hard after mainnet

>>11687696
How will that happen? Mainnet will be dropped out of nowhere

>>11687318
That’s when price increases and 1k EOY happens. Thanks for playing

>>11687696
We have a fucking Mystic Meg here

>>11687696
This.
This is going to be one of the hardest dumps on main-net and the project will basically fail because people will never use it for anything other than to PnD, which will completely fuck the tokenomics and make the whole thing useless. Sergey will realize this and just disappear along with the rest of the team. SWIFT and co will realize this, and begin to quietly remove any references they have to this embarrassing experiment which - who knows, might have succeeded if it wasn't for the retards who infest this place and run painfully obvious shill and fud campaigns. Many of you will experience the kind of hopium crash which actually kills people, and I suppose suicide is a fitting reward for some of the more smug retards who clutter up this board, but I hope it isn't all of you.

There will be no more memes, no more dreams of lambos or whatever NPC tier 'rich person's car' you've picked out in your imagination as you're left in the dirt holding a bunch of link bags. Even a fraction of the money some of you invested in link could have helped you make it during the next bull-run in a legitimate project. Imagine that. THAT is what you should be visualizing. Not your stupid fucking holiday home, not your imaginary future "faithful" gf / wife, nor an early retirement where you don't need to toil away at menial tasks for your betters from inside your 9-5 existential prison cell - you should instead be visualizing yourself scraping together what little money you have left in the wake of your devastation to try and ride something like BAT or Holo up, and your dream of MILLIONS OF DOLLARS suddenly becomes a much more realistic 100k-200k at most. I mean it's not bad - more than you intellectual runts probably deserve. You'll all see I was right. I always am.

>>11687661
>Kaleido Chainlink Node 0.5.0
Probably soon.

>>11687318
Joke's on you, no one on his right mind would use ChainLink to do anything at all

>>11687623
What the fuck do you think makes the price of link increase? It's the lack of supply that drives up price. Simple 101 level economics of markets you fucking spastic

>>11686913
Chainlink doesn't have the coming soon label on it. That must mean mainnet right? Has anyone asked the team about this? Those digital legal agreements look sexy.

>>11687318
who posts these

>>11686793
Better buy soon, it is at the new low and more good news expected soon in comfy November. Load the bags.

>>11687695
I’m sure there will be other pools, but LP is the first one.

>>11687331
>>11687345

Uma delicia

>>11687359
what do you get out of pretending to be someone else?

>>11688171
Linkies having a laff

too many buttons to click, just sold 100k

>>11688136
No, more likely the coming soon services just have not been migrated to the one click aws install.

>>11688322
linkpool btfo

>>11686793
Are the nodes deployed by the Kaleido platform using ethereum mainnet LINK tokens?

>>11687040
>>11687064
>>11687086
>>11687129
>>11687138
What the fuck. It's going to be easier to list off who ISN'T partnered with chainlink. So far most of these confirmed partnerships have been found as breadcrumbs by anons, imagine if all of the breadcrumbs we've found come together in the end (Microsoft, U.S Department of Defense, ASX, IBM etc).

>>11688171
People who are actually reverse-fudding. The only conclusion for this >>11687318 argument is that the mcap of link will rise to meet the total amount of money required to be staked on the network. Supply and demand. It is genius counterfud, really.

>>11687945
ayo nigga i aint tryna to fud but I got beef n shiet wit Chainlink. bruh Chainlink been on dat Ropsten for months n erryone finna expectin deez potential partners 2 test on dat test net. Sergey and his niggas even told yall to keep an eye on dat Ropsten to see dem customerz usin the network. Nigga it finna been 3 welfare payments n the only transactions on Ropsten been deadass average peeps takin the hunnit Ropsten link from tha faucet shiet. They aint no requests fo data. shiet, as a matter of fact homie some nigga aksed Thomas why and then Thomas got scurred n made a fake ass run to show it works. Homeslice, I see Tommy's request nigga but it be da only muthafuckin one.

Why aint no niggas testing on Ropsten? Where all these niggas at dat post to be creaming they underwear at the potenshul of Chainlink huh? Deadass tha lack of sergey n his niggas talkin, no updates and no fukkin worldstar presence, increasing competition from mobius niggas all red flags up in this bitch.

>>11687283
jason parser cannot keep getting away with it

>>11686793

There's another crypto project that will be added to Kaleido's product suite in a few months.

It's received a lot of FUD on biz, and will marketed towards bookkeeping, of which Sage is already a user in beta.

that's my nugget, take it or leave it

>>11688731
just drop it. Nobody believes you guys most of the time anyway until you get proven to be correct