/biz/ - Business & Finance

What's he talking about, they can both easily survive. Bitcoin Cash Cash will be the real Bitcoin Cash.

Can someone tldr me on this?

What's the point

Satoshi is mad. If the hash war goes badly, and his original satoshi vision is not preserved, he will sell all his coin for 2 years. Then finally sign a message and come out as satoshi, publicly stating the project has failed.

You heard it here first.

nothing will habben

>>11617344
>Crypto dies
>it is it failed.

is he drunk?

>>11617344
Kek this guy is a true megalomaniac

Holy shit, Craig Wright kino incoming

>>11617344
lel no one believes this shit

>>11617374

#bitcoincash on synirc for those who want to discuss

If you guys knew the deepest lore, you’d see this means BCH already won.
CSW is very much pro BCH on the backend.

>>11617333
Craig Steven Wright (CSW), part of the original satoshi team, has tried to fight hard to keep the original bitcoin vision alive, fighting blockstream first. Now on bitcoin cash, Bitmain (ABC) is proposing another incompatible fork in November 15 and wants to work on a second layer protocol, fueled by burning bitcoin cash. Craig is mad, seeing his project being bastardized and companies that keep trying to take over it.
From nov 15. miners will wage a hash war on which side, ABC or SV (satoshi vision), they believe in. Either bitcoin will prove to be resilient to companies (blockstream, bitmain..) taking over it, or the project is dead.
Craig is saying this is the end of it all, either SV wins, or crypto is dead. If sv doesnt win, he will sell all satoshi coins, and officially come out as satoshi.

This is the end, it was fun while it lasted guys. You heard it here first.

>>11617314
Can you faggots quit being so cryptic and explain wtf is going on?

>>11617314
hes drunk as fuck

>>11617418

>>11617418
why is nchain any different than any other company?

What the fuck is SV? Is he forking bitcoin cash and what does this have to do with Btc?

Why wouldn't he come out as Satoshi first by simply using the same proof that he's willing to use after he loses ??

Everyone would instantly side with him.. dude is retarded

>>11617481
yeah im getting more and more certain that satoshi is in fact a moron

>>11617479
It may take hashpower away from btc as the chinese miners oppose coingeek, bmg, sv pool

>>11617481
Because craig believes the value of bitcoin is in competition not argument from authority

>>11617471
It's not. Though their mission is more to preserve and restore the original bitcoin from the white paper, whereas both blockstream and bitmain want to build their own second layer solutions (really moving people away from using bitcoin directly, into using their second layer solutions).

>>11617479
SV is a response fork from nchain since ABC is introducing breaking changes on November 15th, so the two versione will fork off. There is no replay protection this time and an all out war has been called, double spending the other chain, reorging, mining empty blocks... Etc

Roger Ver has sided with ABC today. Bitcoin.com will use ABC client on nov 15, and use the new OP_CHECKDATASIG in all their transactions to make them incompatible with SV.

Satoshi is not happy.

>>11617772
did not expect roger to fall for ABC

I have the suspicion that the new coin will have a lot value in US $$.$$$. This would make sense because the flippenning would be instantly accomplished and the core cucks will have to admit their defeat and abandon the sinking ship. This will result in even a bigger growth for the new coin that will be forked off BCH because people will begin to sell their BTC to buy the new coin. I expect a rapid growth in BCH from today on.

it is war

>>11617934
why do you think it would have a lot of $ value with all the uncertainty?

Though it does seem from Craig messages, that it could be possible that his SV pool will offer free money to miners joining, thus making it consistently more valuable to mine than ABC or BTC... Maybe that's what he means with the 1 million a week, he will basically gift 1 million a week to miners joining his pool, so SV will be more profitable to mine than both ABC and core... That would be a ballsy but very expensive move.. unless it drives the price of BCH (SV) through the moon....

>>11617314
This sounds like the stuff I post an hour before I dump bags

>>11618019
no it means Craig is going to mine at a loss i.e he will pay money to attack the other node implementations

Who gives a fuck about a dead coin

there was an anon maybe 2-3 months ago who wrote about this wtf

>>11618129
It wasn't me... but you had been warned. This will be big. Plan accordingly.

So they're trying to choose between the guy that claims to be satoshi and the flatearther religious fanatic?

>>11618178
no, the flatearther religious fanatic was lukejr, he sided with core/blockstream/segwit/btc.

Now its between csw vs jihan. And roger just sided with jihan

>newfags dont know this is what CSW does
He’s bluffing. Nothing will happen. After it’s over he will say how it all went according to plan because he caused XYZ to happen

>>11617314
>>11617418
>>11617457
>>11617772

WAIT. is bitmain building it's own second layer? I dn't want no stinking second layer.

what do :(

lmao being a linky is literally the best thing ever. Gonna watch this shitshow from the sidelines. If Bitcoin fails as a crypto currency, that means smart contracts will be the main focus. Which means LINK $1000.

Are my linkies safe???

>>11618262
>>11618226

>>11618253
yes, bitmain is building their own second layer.
It's called "wormhole cash" and its sort of an ethereum clone (a smart contract platform), all they did really was fork the omni project and make minor changes so it can be put on top of bitcoin cash.

Now, wormhole cash is generated with proof of burn of bitcoin cash. That is, you send 1 bitcoin cash to a burn address, and you get 1 whormhole. That 1 bitcoin cash, is made unusable forever. Now in the long term, this means that if Jihan's wormhole is successfull.. first you will have a few bch being burned in exchange for wormhole.. then more and more, until almost all of BCH is burned forever, and people use wormhole as a coin instead.

He's basically creating his own alt, and to get one, you need to burn one bch, so he says that gives it value, but in reality it destroys bch, moving value from bitcoin to his wormhole project...

>>11618322
Crypto is such a fucking joke... wtf are we even meant to do. Fuck off with second layer solutions, just make blocks bigger ffs.

Lil Windex - Bitcoin Ca$h (OFFICIAL VIDEO)

https://bit.tube/play?hash=QmQavCBhFDCKqcxoUmU5xZXXkyF19o3HTcfTQwMMFLk6Co&channel=39140

>>11617418
>he will sell all satoshi coins, and officially come out as satoshi.
the state of bcashies.

>>11618322
im really confused now. maybe I'll just move into XMR until this shitshow is over.

>>11618019
Say I'm a brainlet and have never given a shit about BCH to boot. Which of these BCH guys is which coin? Will SV be "BCH" on the exchanges? What will these ABC guys be?

>>11618546
there wont be different tickers brainlet

>>11617552
if he in fact believes in competition then after he looses he should just admit defeat and move on. either he wins or looses but its still fair in competitive terms. no point invoking his supposed satoshisness either way if he's such a believer in competition.

>>11618609
why did he claim he was satoshi in the first place?

>>11618586
Then how are they forking? Aren't more than 50% of BCH already mined? Whatever that is, that's what BCH permanently is. Why would you fork something and not make a new ticker if it'll never be the majority of your coins?

>>11618625
they'll fight for the ticker symbol, one gets to keep it and the other dies a slow, nameless death

>>11618625
they just get mined

>>11618546
That is the problem, it wont be easy like the btc bch fork, because there is no replay protection this time, so they are not really splitting into two different coins, any transaction on one chain is replayed as a transaction on the other chain too.

So basically, both of them (ABC and SV) will be "BCH", but the two versions will fight to build the longest chain, and longest of the two will be "BCH". The alternative is that after some fighting one of the two implements some replay protection, so both coins survive with different tickers. But for the time being, the plan is a war in which only one of the two ends up surviving. A total shitshow making bch unusable for a while.

>>11618514
Yes, i would suggest getting out of bch until the war is over. You might profit by staying in but it's quite a messy scenario..

>>11618322
Dual scarcity

>>11617314
>>11618322
this isso stuppid. I just want to sell my BCH now.

I was so fucking proud to finally have the real bitcoin. now they go fuck it up with second layer solutions and 2 year "wars" fuck this shit.

>>11618625
>ID always
nice.

this is hash war between BCH and SV won't effect loss in any other coins/tokens. he's larping as Satoshi, he says he'll dump satoshis wallet if all else fails.

>>11618650
>any transaction on one chain is replayed as a transaction on the other chain too.
except when they use one of the opcodes only support on the one chain, like bitcoin.com does for every transaction

>>11618623

he said he was blackmailed in his first interview. he had to to protect friends family and employees, according to the man himself.

>>11618623
a bunch of conjunctures, he was under investigation by the australian tax office, his home got raided, some satoshi accounts got hacked, and the brother of Dave Kleiman (one of the other people being the satoshi group) sued him for misappropriation of Dave's bitcoins.
So the word was gonna get out and he tried to limit the damage coming out "his way"... not sure how much that helped really, everyone seems to hate him.

"Satoshi" was a group of at least three people including Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright. Everyone who has been involved from the start knows this now, many don't like to admit it cause Craig is a total arrogant jerk and an asshole, very hard to deal with, so may would rather have him out of the ecosystem.

>>11618663
it is truly upsetting. Hopeffuly this crap is over soon, and we can buy back some real bitcoin. Stable shit. No fucking changes and wars every month.
Either that, or the crypto project has failed, and shown that decentralization is not possible.

>>11618663
>>11618714
Satoshi's original vision can only be attained through eternal conflict, with superior Satoshi-avatars continously superseding the inferior ones in a life or death trial for ultimate domination over mankind

>>11618262
>If Bitcoin fails as a crypto currency, that means smart contracts will be the main focus
Exactly. All this fucking BTC shit has just been delaying the inevitable flippening of MUH STORE OF VALUE to smart contracts. But I think Monero holders will probably also make it

>>11618841
I really see no other coin I can put it in that seems a good safe coin right now except for XMR.

I dont like BTC at all cause fuck blockstream
I don't like BCH right now cause fucking wars and confusion and shit.

I sold half my BCH and moved into XMR.
I'll keep half just incase. Just don't want to take full risk here.

>>11618926
>what is Ethereum?
Hate vitalik butter all you want but ETH is objectively a better store of value by decentralization right now

XMR is solid though I hold equal amounts of XMR and ETH. Got the fuck out of BTC since the bullrun and haven't looked back been too comfy

So what’s the downside in buying BCH prior to Nov 15 is they aren’t splitting into separate tickets? Other than the risk of the coin imploding

>>11617314
So theyre tryong to solve the inherent problems of a proof of work coin/chain with A FUCKING FORK of it? Another pow chain? Really?

>>11617673
Please explain what is safest option? What do you think CSW will do if SV lose?

>>11618173
What is your plan?

>>11619082
There's a good chance both of them will tank hard until this is sorted out. And then it's a big MAYBE if one of them will recover.

>>11619128
You should want SV to lose.
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/1058432545245655040

>>11619156
What does he mean by DSV and “no sale”?

>>11617314
Nothing will happen, he isn't satoshi, fuck him, love roger tho, check em
Who gives a fuck every version of btc sucks

I hope both sides kill bcash and Craig scatman wright makes up more excuses why he can't actually prove he is satoshi.

>>11619203
This. Civil war ruined crypto. Although I do believe we should have everything on chain, second layer solutions defeat the point of blockchain.

>>11617329
kek

>>11619300
Yup it's the only way it stays secure and IMMUTABLE which is the only reason why people are ready to pay that price

>>11619063
Meh, I'd go with ETH/XRP split for safety instead of XMR. Combined market caps of both is around 40% of BTC right now ... If he really is Satoshi and dumps killing the price of BTC people are going to flee to the shit with the highest market cap/safety

>>11617314
He is such an impossible cunt. He is the single biggest risk to BCH succeeding in its goals. Someone needs to let that fraud socially die already.

>>11619348
So it basically sounds like SV really is the legitimate Bitcoin. I'm willing to hear arguments against it.

>>11617314
Based Satoshi 4D moves even Jihan's psychology degree can't match

fuck man i got 50 bch and dont know what to do

>>11619168
>What does he mean by DSV and “no sale”?

DSV = DataSigVerify
no sale = not able to move coins to exchange i assume.

>>11619402
can someone tell me what to do?

>>11619432
Cash out or cold storage

>>11619432
>no sale = not able to move coins to exchange i assume.
oh because of the lack of replay protection, i'm guessing

>>11619437
Only invest what you can afford to lose.

>>11619367
I've been debating it within my brain for months now and here's the redpill that my brain pooped out.

Let's not debate what is and what is not bitcoin, every fork is bitcoin just let's think about which one is legitimate and the best one. BTC restricted itself from scaling on-chain which makes it long-term unusable. The LN defeats the purpose of Bitcoin (security risk, not immutable, not universal consensus). BTC is a bad Bitcoin.

BCH is obviously what Satoshi envisioned BTC was gonna be and the basic idea is right and good. Ver's economic and ideological arguments are correct and he is on the right side. The problem: the fork was corrupted from the start, premined and basically centralized bullshit. The community is a horrible cult with good intentions tho.

Both versions won't survive if governed like they are right now, so there will be probably another fork or takeover. The problem: Craig Wright the lying fraud is the last person to make it right.

>>11619450
i did but i want to protect my investment and not sure what to do. sell into tether until shitstorm is over? sell into btc? IDFK

>>11619454
There are literally no good options. Fuck bro. If you hold BCH do you at least get both versions of the fork, or is there additional fuckery to contend with.

>>11619462
In all honesty, you should think about moving half out if there's some kind of pump. Even today's. If it goes up, great, if it goes down, increase the stash. Never go all in. Always have fiat.

>>11619454
you're retarded and don't understand how any of this works lol

>>11619447
?? no that has nothing to do with replay protection. no replay protection means a TX can be broadcast to both chains.

>>11619476
ok ive got 50 bch 0.46 btc and 9 eth. tell me what you would do

>>11619499
put it all in bitcoin faggot
or don't and keep losing value I don't care

for those wondering what to do with your bch

https://satoshigame.org/#/homePage

tons of money will flood in after the fork. you will make more by putting in here and then keeping the forked dividends. two weeks.

hurry. seriously.

>>11619480
Damn I might have to think about that one, good argument

>>11619507
ive already lost so much value by holding so ha!

xmr is the true sv

>>11619519
Wait you've actually held this whole time?!

>>11619514
well you coming to those conclusions you've already proven yourself retarded
there's no saving you hahaha

>>11617418
I can't imagine how deluded you are and how the whole disease that is Craig has turned you and so many others into giant dramatic pussies. All Craig does is cause drama to hide the fact he is an asshat with shitty attitude and work.

Let Bitmain pop his ego wide open. About fucking time

>>11619546
ive been holding since sept 2017

Craig is fucking delusional.

why is the lack of replay protection important, i don't understand?

From the lack of a dump on BTC it looks like the markets estimate the probability of him being satoshi as 0%

Live by the fork, die by the fork.

>>11619594
because it means every transaction may or may not end up on the other chain too, and until this whole thing is settled nobody knows which transactions are real in the end

>>11619622
but there won't be separate tickers so basically for the foreseeable future owning BCH will be like having a stake in both chains until consensus emerges.... so, so what? i don't see the potential here for accidentally getting ripped off.

>>11619632
If the war causes the price of both to collapse it will fuck you I guess

>>11617418
>>11617772
>>11617973
>>11618019
>>11618173
>>11618245
>>11618322
>>11618650
These posts reek of absolute retardation. Here's a couple of facts:
1. CSW has never invented anything
2. He lied about his academic success
3. He plagiarized (literal copy+paste) every paper he ever claimed he wrote
4. He was outed by actual BCH devs as too incompetent to be Satoshi (failed basic statistics)
5. He never built any software. His team did build a wallet client which was Bitcoin ABC + a few lines of code. Those lines of code contained a bug per line on average.
6. He's been too while trying to convince retards that he's satoshi. He started saying "bloody" after people started talking about how Satoshi does it, he edited old posts of his, only to get humiliated when called out for it.
7. He's promised tons of stuff these past 3-4 years, never delivered on ANYTHING AT ALL.
8. He has around 30% of current BCH hash power, which is around 2% of total SHA256, His opponents own the rest of it, yet he's flexing muscles... He looks like a pathetic puddle barking at a german shepherd while peeing itself.
9. Your basic grasp of Wormhole is embarrassing
>>11617442
Only true post in this thread.
>>11618663
You're about to dump a lottery ticket with a huge chance of winning, because an irrelevant faggot is doing his drunken big boy talk, just lol. BCH is going nowhere, Roger, Haipo and Jihan are too balls deep not to invest further billions into the currency, which is something no other coin can claim. Even if BCH fails to regain its throne, it's gonna be worth way more than $400 at some point in the near future.
>tldr
There's gonna be a hash war, this faggot is gonna get assblasted by the Chinese and Roger, and then he'll claim that he did his posturing on purpose to "strengthen the community" - in his last resort pathetic attempt to stay relevant. His trolls will continue to spam biz, but we'll all laugh at them, showing them this post. Feel free to screencap it yourselves.

>>11619639
that's the only risk afaict

>>11619588
that will be impossible at 100k with the current system
at $100k a 1 sat per byte tx will cost 23 cents or so kek.
assuming my math isnt all retarded

It's called bcash, who the fuck are you idiots trying to fool us on your petty shit

>>11619647
6. He's been too tryhard while * ...

>>11619655

>>11619655
Good bot

Has CSW accomplished anything? It's like every week he does something extremely stupid and yet he shows no shame. The Unwarranted self-importance is through the roof.

When his fork fails I guarantee you he runs his mouth until N-Chain boots him off. Then he'll keep shitposting until he is summarily ignored

>>11619651
exactly lol but bcash fags aren't good at math
what it's dependent upon is the tx size in bytes
a conservative estimate is 11 cents at 100k up to 30 cents or more at 100k
if bcash ever got to 1 million it would be AT LEAST A DOLLAR TO 3+ DOLLARS PER TRANSACTION
all while sacrificing node decentralization it simply isn't sustainable long term
while bcash retards look 2 days into the future like goldfish they can't look 2 decades into the future

i'll just look at this pic and pray nothing gay happens

Craig is a mentally ill, middle aged larper trying to live out his fantasy of being Satoshi. It’s sad.

>>11619647
this anon tried to warn you guys

>>11619713
>1 post by this ID

>>11619690

10 b/sat txs are already a thing

>>11619690
>>11619651
BU already accepts sub 1sat/byte transactions you illiterate faggots.
>As for the CSW retards here, claiming he's gonna dump his "Satoshi coins"...
Even in his drunken blabberings about being Satoshi, CSW claimed that he sold his coins at $10 to pay for electricity, leaving him with less than 100k bitcoins.
Jihan, Roger, Haipo, Emil Oldenburg and at least 5 Chinese dudes own way more than that.

>>11619499
>BCH and ETH

Lol how has that been working out for you.

>>11619647
Holy fuck this is so based I finally feel calm about all this bullshit.

>>11619738
As you should be.
Blockstream are faggots, but they were strong opponents and they successfully fucked us by stealing the Bitcoin brand, I admit that. They won, we lost.
CSW on the other hand is an irrelevant faggot who is doing his clown business to weaken Jihan by crashing the BCH price (this destroys Jihan's hopes of getting $16 billion USD in his IPO). Jihan might suffer a bit, but BCH will recover.
But he can't do shit to the currency long term.

>>11619728
then why isn't everyone using "10 byte transactions" lol
>>11619732
see >>11619588
we'll see how many nodes can forward at least 40 tb of transactions a day

>>11619799
>nodes mean non-miners, and non-miners matter

>>11617471Blockchain pioneer nChain acquired by High Tech Private Equity Fund SICAV plc


nchain sold out earlier this year

>>11619767
Man I just wanted to trade some bch before this fork shit hits the fan then I read this thread and got all iffy

>>11619767
your developers are trash
your coin is trash
EDA abuse was trash
you're a minority chain competing with the best coin and are about to be split even further
I hope someone destroys it now that the security is at all time low and vulnerability is at an all time high

>>11619806
miners control the future when no one can keep them in check
b...but CORE IS CENTRALIZED REEEE
you don't understand game theory kid

>>11619767
Apt description. Even when he was raided, it was suspected it was all an elaborate fraud.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/09/bitcoin-founder-craig-wrights-home-raided-by-australian-police
I won't deny that he wasn't involved at all - but most of his behaviour recently indicates that he's a (((bought))) man, just like Blockstream.

>>11617329
>bitcoin cash cash
How bow dah? LOL

>>11619799
1sat/b > 10b/sat

>what is algebra?

>>11619845
you guys are stupid faggots and will lose all your money
lol

Any "coin" that has a figurehead, a leader will fail utterly in the future.

test

>>11619829
>your developers are trash
If it weren't for them BTC would be dead due to its bugs. You're lucky they're nice guys and disclose bugs instead of abusing them.
>your coin is trash
It's useable unlike BTC, it's useable as cash unlike ETH, and it has a huge community unlike DASH. I fail to see a better coin.
>EDA abuse was trash
EDA abuse was fixed by BCH devs in a timely batter, BTC is the only abuse-able SHA256 right now
>you're a minority chain
Can't disagree
>competing with the best coin
competing with a trash coin that inherited all the good marketing that the people behind BCH did for it.
>and are about to be split even further
nah, we're about to get rid of the only faggot in the community, that's all
>I hope someone destroys it now that the security is at all time low and vulnerability is at an all time high
You can hope all you want, but despite the lower hashrate, all the miners are on BCH's side. BTC is at a higher risk of getting destroyed, kek (although of course this won't happen).

anyone read this article examining possibility that csw might be satoshi? want to hear opinions on it
http://archive.is/kjuLi

>>11619858

current setting in most implementations is 1 satoshi = 1 byte

BU allows any fee per byte. holy shit.

Miners just have to mine them. its a market based solution.

>>11619879
Did you really just forget about the BCH Chain-Splitting bug back in August. No one even uses BCH and has very little volume.

Listen up anons. CSW is full of shit. The BTC/BCH fork happened because of Amaury and bitcoinabc. CSW didn't do shit to help BCH besides convincing Calvin Ayre to buy a shitton of asics. Look at all of his previous empty threats. Even his own mom has said he exaggerates. Fuck this guy.

>>11619926
> Did you really just forget about the BCH Chain-Splitting bug back in August
I haven't but we aren't afraid of hard forks and it wasn't a big deal. Bugs happen, but they tend to happen in core's code more frequently, despite their more conservative approach.
> No one even uses BCH and has very little volume.
Not nearly enough people use it for now, but the numbers are growing, merchant adoption is expanding (thank you Roger), charity on BCH is saving lives, social networks are being built on top, ICO's are getting sold out on the BCH chain in seconds, the money button has just now been released, and we're just now receiving the attention of world renowned programmers/hackers like George Hotz. Gemini listing is set in stone, the price hike from it will drive new interest in the currency, not to mention the magical effects of a few new successful ICO-s on top. The latter 3 would have already been true if it wasn't for CSW's clown antics, once we get rid of him we'll make up for not only the value lost (price dropped because of him) but the time we lost, too.

>>11620003
>CSW didn't do shit to help BCH
He actively worked against BCH by reassuring people that he's so powerful that he'd never let SegWit on his watch. For those who weren't here 15 months ago - he was just as irrelevant back then as he is right now.
Except now he's milking Ayre and posing in front of rental cars, pretending they're his own.

>>11617418
>Craig is saying this is the end of it all, either SV wins, or crypto is dead
so craig is an ignorant primadonna, much like the entire bcash cult.

>>11619799
>then why isn't everyone using "10 byte transactions" lol
Because bitcoin cash development is not centralized like bcore, and ABC nodes do not accept these transactions yet, only BU ones do.
I believe they said they'll start supporting 10 byte transactions after the hard fork.

>>11618173
>This will be big.
this will be a popcorn fest as bcash self destructs and nothing happens other than the end of all bcash threads. meanwhile crypto thrives without the bcash retards.

>>11620090
check the >>11620080 pic

>>11618714

>>11620130
>t. 2017 newfag, proud owner of 0.21 BTC

>>11620080
>10 byte transaction

the state of biz

>>11618650
this will finally kill bch, thank god

>>11620149
>t. cashie cultist
>everything is either BTC or BCH

>>11619692
>>11619711

This just effects bcash right? The real bitcoin (BTC) is not forking and will be fine correct?

>>11620225
If you believe CSW then BTC is dead in 2 years.

>>11620248
Are you telling me chainlink might be the smarter hold. What the fuck do I do with my bitcoin now

>>11620200
>t. 2017 newfag who believes DAGs and other garbage matters
Name a coin that's better as digital cash, faggot. Utility/security ICO-s with working products are fine, but all those bitcoin replacement coins are absolute shit
>>11620155
I meant 10 sat, obviously
>>11620248
If you believe CSW, BTC dying is the least of your problems, your IQ is a much bigger issue (I know you don't believe CSW, I'm talking in general)

If I own BCH and I support Craig Wright what should I do?

>>11620566

mine on SVpool?

>>11620566
Evaluate life choices.

Name a coin better than BCH? It's called FLO.
BCH lets you store 256kb data per transaction
FLO lets you store 1024kb! 4x more! LOL! Fucking Pajeets!

Did you guys see the violent + epic rise of RVN from 30 million to over $150 million market valuation in the last weeks???
I'm here to tell you that FLO is the sister of RVN. FLO is only $5 million marketcap.
The the rise of RVN was due Overstock and Tzero using RVN for their platform. Well... they're also using FLO! It's on the down low. Nobody knows. But now you do!

Proof of Overstock using Flo
https://medium.com/@valueprop/florincoin-the-tzero-connection-66697c81c873

Oh, and by the way, If you think that the next bull run will pump your alt coins like BCH that are sitting in the hundreds of millions or billions in market capitalizations, prepare to be FUBAR'd

There are a ton of blockchain with high potential that are sitting under 10M in market cap because of the recent bitcoin bear run. Those will be the ones who will replace most of the shit you see in the top 200
And with that... I present you pajeets with the one and only Angelina FLOlie

Check out the thread.
>>11618110

>>11620566
Get out of crypto until the war is over. You risk losing everything. If you believe Craig is satoshi, which he may or may not be, he has the ability to crash any and all chains and leave the entire market with no survivors if he doesn't get his way. He won't allow Bitcoin to be subverted a 2nd time, he would rather the entire ship sinks. He may also be bluffing. Choose wisely, not much time left to position yourself.

>>11620959
Which proves he isn't satoshi.

>>11620639
your pic is stupid, that bitch looked good for awhile but turned out to be an overly opinionated psycho and chopped off her tits

>>11619063
What is rsk net

>>11617314
should'ive fucking sold at 3.5k

>>11617481
uhh, cuz he aint fucking satoshi maybe?

>>11619063
>ETH is objectively a better store of value by decentralization right now
this wins most retarded comment in the thread

>>11620369
>Name a coin that's better as digital cash
Objectively, both ETH and XMR are better but, admittedly XMR is much better due to fungibility.

Go on, though, tell me how fungibility doesn't matter at all for cash because you're a bitcoin cuck

>>11621282
every dollar bill has a unique serial number and is tracked every time it is deposited to a bank

>>11621306
Yes, we know fiat is shit, hence why we're on an anonymous crypto forum

>>11621317
>tell me how fungibility doesn't matter at all for cash

>>11621356
>what is attacking a straw man

>>11620959
If he could prove he's Satoshi there would be no war and bitcoin would die. If he loses and shows, he's Satoshi bitcoin dies. Is he a fucking idiot I thought he had money on the line here

another leak from wechat

>>11621401
You forgot the third option. He wins, thus proving he has more power and influence than any other figure in crypto by far, even with every other faction going against him.

Priced in. That's why I'm 100% in alts

>>11621499
>proving he has more power and influence than any other figure in crypto
Nah, it'll just prove bitcoin and all its forks are finally done and everyone still with a vested interest in crypto will look to hold in other projects

>>11621449
Based satoshi

>>11621449
Sounds like a little bitch, desu

>>11621356

He meant bitcoin cash brainlet. BCash doesn't have fungibility, yet cashies say it doesn't matter when it really does.

>BCRASH divides and conquers itself with no survivors
Truly the best timeline.

>>11621645
I think he was trying to argue against fungibility for cash since fiat isn't technically fungible even though, hilariously, by law it's supposed to be

Take the redpill.

>>11621821
cringe

>>11621449
source of this image and is there more?

>>11617418
>Craig Steven Wright (CSW), part of the original satoshi team

Bitcoin CASH

too much stego in his tweet
im not even going to bother

>>11617673
then why does nchain want to put patents on everything?

>>11619719
That was me. Some of us experience more of the world than our parents' basements & therefore post from multiple IPs over the course of a thread. What is the implication anyway? That someone can't make one post & it still contain a valid point?

>SV - satoshis vision
I swear they took that name from biz memes during operation dragonslayer

>>11619300
>>11619348
Tis is true, all the second layer solutions sound like shortcuts to me.

>>11622873
Thanks for sharing you fucking minibrain

>>11617772
damn son. this is gonna be nasty.

only if bch was about user profit & general betterness

>>11622947
>about user profit
crypto isn't about profit at all

>>11617314
Wright is such an edgy teenager tier faggot, it is hard to understand why would someone ever think he is Satoshi.
Fucking embarrassing

>>11619332
He sounds quite unmature for a doctor always thought satoshi be some old wise guy. just sold 100k and bought gold

>>11623170
This is how a disruptive innovator behaves

This guy is bat crazy. He’s not Satoshi obviously and cannot do shit to the cryptospace.

>>11617360
Yeah he was pissdrunk when writing this.

>>11617314
HABEDIN!

>>11621449
>I didnt get my way
>gonna crash entire system
Comments like this are why no one believes him to be satoshi. Satoshi has yet to take action against the system. Its probably because it was hal finney and he is dead.

>>11623322
This is exactly how an innovator of satoshis rank would behave. Why do you think otherwise?

>>11617329
Not without replay protection. One majority miner can just replay attack the other chain.

>>11621449
He has 1.05 mil btc? Holy fuck, I hope this fool dumps it all

>>11617314
So am i going to get airdropped(SV / ABC) coins by holding BCH on binance ? or nah ?

>>11619879
>all the miners are on BCH's side
???

>>11619402
go back in the past and not make that mistake?

>>11623357
He's pretending to be satoshi, which is known to have around 1 million BTC.
He's not satoshi.

>>11623613
Funny part is, when he claimed he was Satoshi he also said that he spent more than 90% of the Satoshi coins because of electricity bills.
Now suddenly he claims he has 1MM BTC

>>11623491
Is this news to you? The majority of hashing power is held by people who wanted big blocks and no segwit, but they were huge pussies and let devs get away with hijacking the main chain. Then they continued mining, admitting they're only doing so because of short term profit.
It's not like it's secret, go look it up

could you all kindly fuck off to your plebbit containment sub?

>>11619647
>>11619657
>>11619713
>>11619738
THANKS BASED ABC wow I didn't realize craig was such a SCAMMER.

>>11623246
it's more how a demented LARPer behaves

>>11623170
>tripfag calling wright a faggot

>>11623170
Because he successfully bamboozled Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis.
There's a big chance that he actually didn't bamboozle them, but somehow has a few of the early keys, which he proved to them.
That said, even if he has them, there's no way he has them because he's Satoshi, he's too big of a retard to be Satoshi.

>>11624533
Nah, he's just pretending to be retarded.

What does this have to do with bitcoin? All this drama is centered around bitcoin cash right? It's bitcoin cash that's forking?

>>11619879
>If it weren't for them BTC would be dead due to its bugs
you know that's a lie but you say it anyway.
even if someone exploited it, the funds were safu.
unlike the bug on BCH that would have fucked it hard.
>>11624090
if the majority of miners all supported big blocks they could cuck the devs right now all they want.
its 1 line of code any nigger could change.
hell its not even 1 line its 1 number in 1 line.
the devs would have zero say in them changing it if they actually wanted to.