/biz/ - Business & Finance

We're literally gonna make it anon.

Damn, this is fucking comprehensive. Based and redpilled

>>11563968
>It’s hard to believe that come January 9, 2019, it will have been 10 years since Bitcoin was first introduced to the world by an unknown entity called Satoshi Nakamoto.

boys...

what if Sergay announced Main-net on the decade anniversary of Bitcoin?

>>11564058
S. N.
Seek the truth.

>>11564058
Friendly reminder Sergey Nazarov is Satoshi Nakamoto

SN SN

>>11563968
NIce.

>>11564107
>SergeyNetSingularity confirmed

>>11563968
Nice

>>11564110
Don't post this meme unprovoked.

>>11563968
delete this thread
NOW
RIGHT FUCKING NOW
THEY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THIS
DELETE IT

>>11564143
u mad, kikeboi?

>>11564107
>>11564109
/S/ERGEY
/S/ATOSHI

/N/AZAROV
/N/AKAMOTO

OH GOD ITS HAPPENING, I'M GONNA CUM LADS

ooooooOoooooooOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo

I have only 200 LINK. All I want is to be able to buy a plot of land with my earnings.

fFUCK I only have .4 BTC and the fomo is getting to me after reading that article how much do I put in to a bag of LINKIES???

>>11564253
An amateur meme blogpost regurgitating alot of the stupid made up "breadcrumbs" from this board, is making you fomo?

>>11563968
nice one OP. you actually delivered

>>11564271
the potential applications for a tech like this are actually a compelling reason to invest. I'm a crypto maximalist and so seeing this potential makes me rock hard.

that's a very professional writeup

>>11563968

some guy on here told me this was all "priced in"??

>>11564302
Yeah. Reading it now and did not expect this at first. Big red pill

>>11564271
kek. we all know hes just a larping bagholder

I wish Nick Szabo gave a fuck enough about altcoins to kill this meme with a single tweet.

>>11563968

strong handed individuals will soon be living out their wildest dreams. I love you all

>>11564292
Oh yeah, I think there's a huge asymmetrical upside to link, so I hold. But this article seems a bit too amateurish and biz-like for me. Not saying it's not good for some people or that it's flat out wrong. It's ok and it's quite detailed. But it sounds too much like listening to a bag holder.

If Nick Szabo retweets, prepare your anus.

>>11564384
Instead of that he started following Chainlink

>>11564460
hes following sergey and smart contracts on twitter my dude

>>11563968
Is @The_Crypto_Oracle well-known or something?

>>11564513
I know, but his 220k followers don't search his profile to see who he his following like a typical /biz/ autist. If he were to retweet this, you are going to see a ton of new eyes on the project.

>>11564110

>>11564460
>>11564513
>>11564544

The only question is if Szabo is done accumulating or not.

>>11564558
Maybe he'll move the genesis block to cash out and buy LINK

>>11564558
Only dirt-poor trenchbrains "accumulate".

>>11564460
If your anus isn't ready to go at a moment's notice, you're wrong.

The god protocol is a band aid solution?

>>11564555
Delete this goy, Jewish beauties for Jewish cock only

I hate you twitter fags so goddam much. You are the same pile of trash that takes things from here and posts them to reddit.

>>11563968
and on the 8th day, god said, "let there be trust".

>>11564558
Uhh. Szabo is rich AF and likely has several top wallets of LINK from the ICO.

>>11564728
>szabo is rich air force
>szabo is rich air force
>szabo is rich air force

>>11564699

Hes spamming this shit on reddit any way we can get the thread locked

>dumps

>>11564458
Agreed it's not very well written, it feels like whoever wrote it was as much doing it inorder to try & understand everything himself, as much as telling others. But it's still a good attempt, and isn't wrong

>>11564722
Top kek, I like how it uses both logos

>Since LINK acts as a kind of collateral insurance on smart contracts, the total market cap of the LINK token must equal the total amount of insurance demanded on all the contracts at a given time.
thoughts?

good article

>>11563968
If some people could crosspost it around that would be much appreciated. Hopefully this can bring a bunch of new linkies on board

>>11565061

Kek wills it

link is a scam

>>11565061
that's technically true but the question is how much demand there will be in the beginning and how many of all the contracts will require collateral in the first place.
It's easy to get bullish making assumptions like that but I would be careful.
Jibtards were spreading their BS about "tokenized assets = market cap" and we all know how it ended for them
Luckily Chainlink > pile of shit > Jibrel so I remain moderately bullish anyway

>>11564525
I follow him, posts good content on smart contracts, oracles, enterprise use cases. I think his reach is mostly with the Chainlink community though, i.e. /biz/.

https://twitter.com/Crypto___Oracle

>>11564460
Szabo knows about chainlink my dude. He’s liked tweets before mentioning chainlink is the god protocol. I’m too busy to go dig it up you’ll have to take my word for it

>>11566263
I believe it. I just think him retweeting this article would boost a lot of interest from people who have not been following the project.

>>11564525
>Is @The_Crypto_Oracle well-known or something?
he is now.

shit article that medium should take down. reported for intentional misdirection

>>11566542
Thank you schlomo.

>>11565061
this is what Jonny Huxtable speculates and it makes sense, and the amount each node would stake to the contract would equal that total divided by the number of nodes they use.

>>11566539
hes just as bad as the faggots on reddit coming here and taking shit for e cred

>>11564384
Imagine him saying to himself. This isn’t remotely close to what the god protocols are kek

>>11566563
No it’s a great saying though and hopefully it sticks but it doesn’t make sense lol just how insurance companies act as collateral for disasters there marketcaps aren’t in the multi trillions.

>>11566772
I think you're forgetting about the use cases it can solver. You're also forgetting that if they succeed in off-chain computation, it's not just for node insurance, but they are also going to get paid to do computation in secure enclaves, which brings another whole separate market that requires paying nodes frequently

How long before it's too late to buy?

Delphi...?

>>11566858
We are getting closer. Twitter is getting very excited about oracles lately and everyone is realizing how important they are. LINK stands out in a major way and its potential is very high. I would at least start getting some base position so aren't completely naked to it. Then if it goes down you can grab more.

>>11566898
no just a few dedicated autists, no mind games, pure shill
>t.anautist

>>11566898
Nah sometimes you need to write it all out to make sure you’re not crazy and then why not post it to the internet seeing it could help someone else. That’s what most have done why haven’t you yet?

Can't wait to see the eternal /CHAINLINK/ thread pinned

Another Chainlink user lined up: Icon.

>>11567226
>potentially
IT'S A SURE BET GUYS

>>11567251
What other decentralized oracles are in talk with this many companies? That's right. Only link.

>>11567251
cope, boyfriend

>>11566898
fuck off delphi

>>11566898
holy shit i see it

>>11567226
we made it frens

>>11564558
He's already rich as fuck there is no "accumulating" when youre wealthy you just invest or you don't. Accumulating is for biz poorfags that work at McDonald's.

>>11564579
Kek. Beat me to it.

>>11566125
So happy the jibbies all necked themselves. They were the worst.

>>11564109
sergey didn't get hold of thay domain until like 2016

>>11566898
i see it too, i thought delphi was just a fud/pnd group?

>>11568481
Wrong.

From the early 2000s until 2008 the domain was for some vague internet service around traditional paper contracts.
In 2008 the domain was registered under Sergey's name, after which the site said "under construction" or some shit until the Chainlink stuff started to appear.

You can check the waybackmachine and whois for yourself.

It would make zero sense for whois to say that the domain was registered in 2008 when it existed years before.
Whois simply shows that Sergey himself registered it in 2008.

>>11568719
Based Sergey inventing smart contracts when most biz newfags were in elementary school

>>11568481
false; check the whois

>>11568606
the image is credited to "The Nomads"
What does it mean? The image is a custom

>>11569383
>the real jew is a wanderer.

>>11569383
well, it still has the logo in it
Maybe they changed names?

>>11570302
>the order of nomads
sounds stupid to me, you need to stop smoking whatever you're smoking fren

>>11567226
Kek $12.50 ICX cause they had a vending machine

>>11570302
enough with the conspiracy theories guys, haven't we seen from recent attacks how damaging they can be?

>>11568606
They are, that faggot astro was the mastermind behind delphi and all of their schemes on biz.

>>11564571
This is my wet dream. Satoshi returns, cashes out the genesis block, buys Chainlink and FYE/TTP, I retire.

>>11570597
and I bet you think bush did 9/11 too. sheesh, you guys are so gullible.

>>11570720
he did though, i remember the back in the days when he started posting on here always about a delphi group pump and dump, are you new here?

>>11568719
Sergey registered it in his name in 2014, before that the owners name was not provided. It was in existence clear back in about 1999 under several different owners. It was re-registered in 2008 about 6 days prior to Satoshis public announcement of Bitcoin. Does that mean anything? Maybe, or could just be a huge coincidence. Personally I believe it was owned at that time by Nick Szabo, and I also believe Szabo and Hal Finney are Satoshi Nakamoto but there is no proof of that.

>>11568481
2014..

>>11571721
Check those digits Marines..

>>11571721
wait so how does delphi tie into this?

>>11571721
>Sergey registered it in his name in 2014, before that the owners name was not provided.
Source?

>>11571871
Trust me, this has been hashed out several times, I speak truth.

>>11572090

>>11572098
1 of 3 ... this is what it looked like in 2008 ...

>>11572166
2 of 3.. this is what it looked like a year later in 2009 ..

>>11568719
we have gone through this a hundred times before and all history for the domain owners has been ousted
sergey did not own it in 2008
end of fucking story

>>11572166
3 of 3 .. this is what it looked like in 2014

>>11572201
Actually we dont know who owned it in 2008 as it was in Zag Media Corp Privacy Services name. Could have been anybody at that time, my feeling was always Szabo but there is no proof.

>>11572210
>>11572201
So why does whois state 2008 as the creation date even though it existed long before?

>>11564141
>Fuckin saved

>>11572239
That isnt the creation date, it is the date of registry .. it was renewed at that time. It was originally created in like 1999 ..

>>11572256
>That isnt the creation date
that's what it literally says though.

>it was renewed at that time
And never after?

>>11572239
Here is the original date we found months ago doing this exercise. April 2001, my memory was off a tad.

>>11572288
It was renewed in 2014 when Sergey obtained it.

>>11572330
So why does whois still say 2008?

>>11572350
Typo? No idea, but it was obviously created well before 2008.

bump cuz i get a boner everytime i read the title

Haven't been on /biz/ for three months or so, but it looks like Link has been steadily appreciating in value. What's the latest news on it?

>>11572322
Is this the post causing the board to be flooded?

Just win baby

Here it comes

Bump - good article - SHARE IT FAR AND WIDE MARINES...

>>11573556
Bump because winning

kek does not will it, I do
>domp it