[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 178 KB, 1914x674, 8oGMsen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11557481 No.11557481 [Reply] [Original]

Do you use the Nano Ledger or other forms of hardware wallets?

>> No.11557497

>>11557481
Yes

>> No.11557556

>>11557481
No, Ledger nano is compromised. Paper wallets until a better hardware wallet is invented.

>> No.11557588

>>11557556
>Ledger nano is compromised.

How so?

>> No.11557630

>>11557556
No proof. Kys faggot

>> No.11557649

>>11557481
Sauce on that qt chub pornstar?

>> No.11557752

>>11557556
paper wallets > all
Don't need some additional piece of unneeded electronics to be able to break on me somehow.

>> No.11557807

>>11557588
>>11557630
Anyone who knows his way around the dark web knows the dangers of nano ledgers. It's okay for shrimps, but everyone who owns >1BTC should stay clear.

>> No.11557823

>>11557807
>baseless FUD
>muh dark web
Ok mr hackerman, pls don't hack my shitcoins

>> No.11557922

>>11557481
Did...did she just brap?

>> No.11558082

>>11557807
post source faggot

>> No.11558144
File: 525 KB, 427x598, 1540265899420.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11558144

>>11557481
>The absolute state of maga pumpers

>> No.11558307

>>11557922
Develop your hypothesis

>> No.11558822

>>11557556
This, ultimate security and convenience. Plus you can physically handle them like old timey stock certificates.

>> No.11558843

>>11557556
>>11557752
>>11558822
creating and accessing a paper wallet that's 100% clean is way more difficult than simply using a hardware wallet

>> No.11558888

>>11558843
Not much more difficult

>> No.11558941

>>11558888
require you to have a totally separate machine that needs to be turned on just because you want to transfer some coins and you need to be sure it's not compromised, no thanks I'd rather use my $70 usb-like stick which is also a way faster solution and doesn't cause constant paranoia

>> No.11559000

>>11557556
this

>> No.11559009

>>11558941
To be completely fair it doesn't matter whether you are using paper of ledger. There's always room for doubt and this room contains infinite supply of paranoia fuel.

>> No.11559034

>>11557481
Binance is the best wallet.

It's online so I can reach my coins from anywhere I want.

Also CZ says funds are safe, so it's all good.

>> No.11559053

>>11559034
3/10 bait

>> No.11559069

>>11557807
what a fucking faggot this guy is

>> No.11559073

>>11557481
Nothing is unhackable, even with paper wallets you have to assume the system used to make your paper wallet was uncompromised.

Hardware wallets like the Ledger Nano S and Trezor are the safest thing going right now. Did I hear Sony might be making one soon?

>> No.11559090

>>11559009
>I dont know how computers work: the post

>> No.11559227 [DELETED] 
File: 314 KB, 469x474, 1387129468802.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11559227

>packers TD

>MFW people say the Rasms have a chance

>> No.11559294

I want an easy way to create a 2-2 multisig with one key generated on a ledger/trezor and the other on a computer running bitcoin core or electrum. With sig aggregation and all that future shit, it would look like a normal address and be as cheap to spend.

>> No.11559316

USB stick, a lot of them, $5k of ETH on each.
Every of them has an offline generated wallet stored on them.

>> No.11559354

>>11559090
>more complexity = no repercussions
no. Things get explicitly rewritten with less functionality so to make any attack surface smaller. Look at OpenBsd OS for examples of that.

>> No.11560368

>>11559354
it would be pretty hard to have less functionality than a hardware wallet.

>> No.11561329

>>11557807
kys you fucking poor brainlet.