/biz/ - Business & Finance

They sold the top to you I would guess.

But unironically this still only has a $527k marketcap and it's a testbed for monero, so seems like a reasonable hold. I'm onto Blur at this point, though.

pajeeted and depleted

>>11486334
It’s all been mined out. There’s a small group of people waiting to dump on you. And it takes forever to mine with no pools. And there’s one dev.

>>11486334
lol, you guys are fucking hilarious, dipping for over a week and it's 'dead'. You would have soled your bags when bitcoin dropped to $2 too....

>>11486523
sold* (and possibly soiled yourself)

>>11486334
Thank you sir, come again

>>11486523
Yeah and there will be adoption in the real world when their project looks like it was from when BTC was $0.25. Can’t wait for the average person to download some .exe files to hold their coins. Stop developing for developers and actually make a product look and feels as good as the $150 theme they put up for their website.

But then again, should I join the discord to see what awesome look and feels advancements the team is coming up with? Chat with the 100 guys who mined half the supply over the summer? That should be fun.

>>11486611
No, you should go back to your erc20 tokens, as they obviously offer the flashy website you crave.

>>11486611
There won't be adoption.....by the time this project starts to catch on almost the entire supply will have been mined....this project would have had hope if it didn't have the insane distribution rate

there is a fork called blur

blur.cash is the website...I mined 1k for shits, doubt it does anything but you never know

>>11486765
Here’s the Nerva marketing team folks. Driving that adoption. They are in it for the tech until they dump on you. They are not a speculation coin, we are talking legitimate adoption roadmap! It’s a discord channel trying to pump some tech. It’s no better than some flashy ERC20 coin. You can’t distinguish youselves beyond trying to give asic, gpu, and pool miners the finger.

>>11486901
I'm not on any team, pal. I'm just adverse to people like you, whose sole purpose is to come here and spread fud. I have no great investment in the project, so I could care less whether or not you buy it.

>>11486975
See this is the difference. Every criticism is taken as FUD. It’s just some tribal game. My coin vs. that coin vs. that coin. I want nothing more than Nerva to succeed. They can get advice in one of two ways. From their channel, in a soft motherly tone, where we wipe peoples asses with soft cloths and play happy music. Or we can give honest OOB reviews on their product. When they come in here championing some satoshi quote talking about another miracle privacy coin that’s going to change the world, but can’t withstand legitimate criticism. Get their nose bloodied and go back and make something better. I wouldn’t let a comparable product reach a VP let alone the boardroom. This live alpha shit is just that. And yes, I agree 98% of the coins out there are no better. We are beyond the bench top product here. You can’t come in here (like they did last week) spitting hot fire that they are the second coming, and then decry FUD when a few people say “no, go back and fix it”. This is internal review and they failed. Come back with you have a better product. Grab some sack and grow up, it’s way more fucking brutal out there than in here. Out there (points to the normies) they expect a level of product Nerva doesn’t have. (And this goes for any other shit coin out there).

>>11486334
Look at the charts!
This thing is still up a few 100% from 3 months ago.
Did you expect a never ending moon?

>>11487387
I actually agree with you there anon, the main sticking point I see here is the project seems to be run solely by one dev, whose main priority seems to be the tech, rather than marketing. As we have seen many times before, you could have the best product in the world, but if it lacks marketing, it suffers from lack of adoption.