/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11440973
Here's the real problem.

If your brain is big enough to understand even 10% of the shit he tries to say, you would immediately say how fucking retarded he is.

What is: negative probability

>>11440981
Nicola Tesla was a retard right?

>>11440973
Link to video

https://youtu.be/eUSXZkbVeu4

>>11441068
Tesla was probably one of the smartest (and most troubled) men to have lived -- what does that have to do with Craig Wright's retarded statements?

>>11440973
This guy is a legit 150+ IQer, could even be 160. Impressive.

>>11440973
fucking crawl back in to a shit pipe you came out of

>>11441146
Which statement you're talking about

>>11441158
I look forward for 2020

Will he (if) dump 1 million BTC if there's enough liquidity

>>11441171
Kys

Brainlets hodl btc

>>11441094
This started off decent but now this mulatto is just droning about all the coincidences he can find between maths and how big the moon allegedly is. you can tell craig is getting tired of this dummy trying to have an intellectual discussion

>>11441191
Low hanging fruit example

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/vitalik-buterin-and-joseph-poon-call-out-craig-wright-deconomy-2018/

This interviewer talks too much
But the subject matter is interesting.

>>11440981
lol
thank you based truth anon

>>11441412
LN still doesn't work anon

Poonnnnn dek

>>11440981
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_probability

>>11440981
>negative economic growth is stooopidd
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.1287.pdf

>>11441706
What about distributed oracles?

Link is a scam right?

>>11441568
:+1:

>>11441601
LN is shit, being exposed more and more as a centralization scam

>>11441680
I'm not going to argue the specifics of negative probability. If you understand the context (Gamma cannot be negative) you would understand how fucking retarded he sounds. I'm not as big brained as Vitalik by any means, but I'm smart enough to understand that CSW is a fraud.

>ywn travel the world with 10/10 boi pussy at your disposal

Why even live

>>11441971
>>Fraud
How does he profit from this

>>11442283
He was an early BTC adopter, he doesn't need monetary profit -- he's an egomaniac, he just wants people to think he's really smart.

Look at his claims about how many papers he writes / reads per week. It's absurd.

>>11442322
Ok

Why is this a fraud?

>>11443017
Blatantly making shit up to sound smarter than you are to people that don't know better so you can further the pervasive lie that you're someone very famous and paradigm-changing is exactly the kind of thing one would refer to as "fraud".

Use your fucking brain.

>>11440973
>he's satoshi
zero evidence
>non cult members aren't buying it
>he's part of satoshi
zero evidence
...
>the absolute state

>>11441680
The sense negative probailties can exist is as very contrived tool in physics, like imaginary vectors.

I watched the video where he used the term, this is NOT what he intended. At all. He used it as a component of an expected value which was truly bullshit

CSW Is the biggest frauding faggot in the entire space, literally a clown. The fact that there are so many people who take him seriously just go to show why I've made so much money in this space: half of you are literally retarded.

t. MIT math major

>>11443279
>He used it as a component of an expected value which was truly bullshit
Exactly, thank you.

The best part is he tweeted some paper talking about negative probabilities in defense of it after the fact, and the actual author got called out and responded and said basically "that's not at all what the paper says".

He says bullshit with a sufficient amount of technobabble as to fool the uninitiated, but anyone that actually knows what they're talking about thinks he sounds like a fucking idiot.

>>11441680
>>11442283
>>11443017
>>11443279
>>11443491


Found it!

https://twitter.com/proffaustus/status/1037052677170114562?lang=en

>>11443544

>>11443279
MIT lost all credibility after the enigma vs link fiasco. Sorry fren.

>>11443556
So is the guy a sole arbiter on negative probabilities? He was positive on them at a certain point in time, so the concept is legit, even if to abstract to brainlets to grasp.

>>11443017
He literally scammed the australian government ouf of research funds. He's a fraud through and through.

>>11444722
You're completely missing the point, either purposefully or because you just don't understand. Either way, the gist is negative probabilities exist in the same way that imaginary numbers exist. You would never use an imaginary number to count how many times on average per day you jack off. It makes absolutely no sense in context.

>>11444795
imaginary numbers are important mathematical tools used. Why using neg probs should't be used in his case?
>because its dumb
thats not an answer. you sound like assblasted graduate who is not yet skilled in the concepts he studied, and insecure.

>>11444867
Read the fucking paper they're talking about. The value for gamma was defined as a number between 0 and 1. It's about selfish mining. I'm not going to spoon feed you.

CSW shills are so cringy.

Wait, just checking to be sure, no one *actually* believes CSW is Satoshi, right? It's just a joke, right? You're pretending to believe that he is, for laughs, and to pump Bcash bags, right?

... Anon?

>>11444704
MIT supports LN

Kek

>>11445060
*sniffs u*

>>11440973

late. adopter. fucking. cringe.

>>11440973
Who has the web archive of him editing his blogs to act like he was working on Bitcoin