/biz/ - Business & Finance

lol get out now. going to 5$

>>11203448
Judging my her face:

>Lies about age.
>Smokes.
>Does drugs.
>Or drinks heavily.

Would not bang or even stay near her to get those bad pee pee poo poo germs.

>>11203448
what a beauty OP. where from?

>>11203448
omg lol it says virgin on your phone so true haha

>>11203448
>27
>looks 40
This what happens to partygirls

>>11203448
>driving 85 miles to fuck a jew skank

>>11203486
>>11203486
>>11203486
>>11203486

>>11203486
kek

>>11204275
>85 miles

>>11203486
OP IS RECKT! HAHAHA

>>11204576
These are the same people who believe in g

>>11204606
I am a Burger and I'm surrounded by retards like this. I fucking loathe this place.

>>11203486

t. saggy wrinkly roastie

>>11203486
It says roastie all on your face you cock carousel dropout

>>11203486
t. kathryn

fuck off you aids ridden whore

>>11205102
TRIGGERED

virgin

>>11203448
HAHAHA I SHORTED 25X

>>11203448
my buddy started buying eth and even made a company that was meant to do smart contracts

dont know how much he lost but a lot i guess

now hes working for another company in crypto thatll obviously fizzle out into a waste of time and investment

are normalfags who think theyre on the cutting edge by being late to the game ever get ahead?

>>11205171
The problem is these normalfags cant use their brain. Starting a company around smartcontracts isnt viable unless you are working on cryptokitty ponzis. Most of the use cases around smartcontracts rely on oracles. Chainlink isnt even a meme. For example, how do you build a decentralized exchange without oracles interfacing with data feeds from the NYSE/NASDAQ?

>>11203448

>>11205216
My biggest problem that I don't think can be resolved is that almost all companies will have no use for smart contracts because they require

1. contract lawyer
2. programmer
3. contract lawyer who can read programming code
4. company who is willing to risk contracts in a new way for no gain
5. company who is willing to accept the contract lawyer and the programmer didnt fuck up the contract code

versus conventional contracts which require

1. lawyer, maybe
2. company who can interpret and edit the plain english contract

I can see how a small segment of very specific smart contracts will be useful for risk takers, but for most companies theyll just either be confused or recognise all the added layers only increase costs and risk rather than diminish them

>>11205278
I've thought about this too and I see what you mean. The first scenario is necessary up until the point where smart contracts become more seamless and simple, at which case they'll be cheaper/easier to use than a dumb contract, but it would take lots of businesses/law firms using extra resources until that happens. That's how I see it anyhow.

>>11203486
roastie strikes back LMAO

>>11205335
You'd end up with programming code that is at least as long as a boiler plate contract, or at least with as many terms and conditions

customers entering into them probably wont care, generally, as they enter into contracts all the time without reading or understanding them

but B2B or businesses entering into contracts wont want the extra problem

then the absolute mindfuck of when you have a contract breach/alleged breach, you have to goto court and go infront of a judge and show him god damn code, he wont know what the fuck youre showing him, and the allegation of who breached what will be a gamble to prove, then your lawyers need to be able to read code, and you need some programmer third party to comment on the code to advise everyone, what a shit show

>>11205278
>>11205335
>>11205411
Attorney anon here. You forget the fact how much contracts cost in the real world. Especially for corporations. There’s an entire industry for lawyers called transactional law. there’s a reason that Accord is made up of all the heavy hitter international transactional law firms. They know the time of reckoning is soon. They know they don’t want to become the next Blockbuster in their industry.

>>11203448
>that feel when shorted ETH at 245

>>11205487
I'm not forgetting that fact. They'd need to pay that much for a smart contract to be written up to be translated into code, plus the const of a programmer plus the cost of a lawyer who can read programming code to ensure it's correctly written.

>>11203460
Nah man I've seen so many of roasties who are not even 30 but look like they are 40. This is what they look like without make up. Hideous spoiled arrogant delusional beasts thinking they are princesses and queens with unrealistically high standards regarding men. It's a real thing.

>>11205278
Its more about the businesses smart contracts can work for. No (extremely low) rake Poker, cash (USDT/ETH) settled futures, where you can have both parties deposit a predetermined amount in a smart contract, that pays out to both parties at a predetermined date/event (after final betting round). Both of these industries are regulated up the ass and Online Poker especially charges insane rake.

>>11205504
based and redpilled

>>11203448
>Tfw all in brapcoin

>>11203448
Thank God she's 85 km away.

>>11205549
would definitely fuck her. she has a good brapper but id tell her to put a bag over her head

>>11205524
I genuinely dont see how smart contracts resolve problems in those systems. I can see how in theory someone sat down and thought itd be great to have more certainty, but I dont see these contracts having issues currently that require replacement which comes with added cost/risk.

>>11205504
retard.
they just say they are 27 when they are 40.

>>11203448
>85 kilometres
found the europoor

>>11205549
God, you know this manatee thought she was real hot shit for this picture.

>>11205498
That cost of writing code as law, in the aggregate, will pale in comparison to today’s attorneys cost. Obviously there will be learning and cost curve. However Transactional lawyers should be shitting on themselves. Shit I even changed my career towards litigation. Anyone who has a CS and law background can see what’s happening. This is a tsunami coming straight at us. I’m hedging against the transactional field I’m buying eth + link. Again I’m not talking about mom and pop contracts. I’m talking contracts for large corporations.

>>11205549
>the bags under my eyes are designer
kek

>>11205674
I am from law too. Think specific instead of in general.

What problem is this solving?

If someone wants to do business in a smart contract, they need the terms in English first. That generally requires a lawyer. Then they need that translated into code, that requires a programmer and/or a lawyer who can write code. That is increased cost and risk. Further assume something goes wrong, one or both parties think they've been mislead or ripped off; how do they mediate a smart contract in a legal setting? Which judge do you know can read programming language? This will add further cost and risk.

Now why would anyone increase their cost and risk?

What problem do conventional contracts have that smartcontracts don't/won't?

>>11205734
>Lawyers + programmers is difficult and costly
It’s already happening. It’s like arguing against the car once it was being developed
>mediate + judge
Uhh those are two different worlds. You can legally contract into a “crypto arbitration”. It is happening
>what problem will it fix
I’m not going to spoon feed you. I’ll give you a hint. Boalt school of law. Yale law school and Cornell have done some fascinating work in the area

>>11205833
>I’m not going to spoon feed you.

It's a pretty simple question that could be answered in a short sentence so I'll take your condescending bullshit as an admittance of fuckall.

I couldn't give a shit which meme colleges study what, everyone always tries to be studying the most new innovative tech, it doesn't mean it has a use case.

>>11205849
Respect the digits anon. Kek has spoken. (Another hint: they’re doing collaborative work with large law firms- so it’s not just a circle jerk)

>>11205873
You genuinely sound like a fucking idiot who has no idea what you're talking about. You speak in generalities

>yale did it therefore good
>big company did it therefore good

but you can't articulate any specific benefits. you said that online poker would benefit, but again, i've never seen anyone fail to win a hand with the better hand.

i genuinely don't think you understand smart contracts or the law

>>11205734
>>11205833
I just graduated law school and I think you're both right. It's going to be a costly and painful transition but eventually smart contracts will have a huge impact on the transactional law side. I don't know if I'm as optimistic as >>11205833 in when that will occur but >>11205734 saying
>What problem do conventional contracts have that smartcontracts don't/won't?

That's just being ignorant. Smart contracts have the potential to solve so many more problems. They're potentially instantaneous and trustless, they solve like every problem that conventional contracts have.

I have $0 in LINK, I see the potential but my city is JUST getting e-filing in 2018 so just lol at the thought of lawyers pushing legal tech that will replace their jobs.

>>11205549
I hope u guys see she made the pic from.dkwnwards keeeek
>>11205594
>>11205724

>>11205903
>they solve like every problem that conventional contracts have.

Contracts general issue is lack of certainty. If you ever end up in court over a contract it's because of a certainty dispute. People know whether they havn't done something and that's resolved long before they pay a lawyer to appear for them in court.

I see that you're saying they allow for instant transactions, that's an argument, that's a use.

>>11205891
>answer my question
>receives only hints
>gets mad
>resorts to name calling
You’re cute. Like a little special snowflake. You will get far in life.

>big law schools + big firms working together don’t mean anything

Grow up. It’s clear You have no idea how the real world works like anon. Where do you practice Zambia? Do your clients trade goats for salt, if you even practice ?

>>11205216
>For example, how do you build a decentralized exchange without oracles interfacing with data feeds from the NYSE/NASDAQ?

WITH A JSON PARSER
A JSON PARSER
A JSON PARSER
CHAINLINK IS A JSON PARSER
CHAINLINK IS A JSON PARSER WITH A "RELIABILITY" SCORE
CHAINLINK IS A CONSENSUS JSON PARSER
CHAINLINKS CONSENSUS AND RELIABILITY ARE YEARS FROM WORKING
CHAINLINK IS JASON PARSER

>>11206045
Every single law school and every single company is trying to remain on the cutting edge. They will investigate any new technology. That does not make the technology valuable in any significant way.

Lawyers know logic, they know fallacies, youre making an appeal to authority fallacy by suggesting because 'big names' study smartcontracts therefore smartcontracts are gamechangers.

You are not a smart person, highly unlikely you have ever completed a law degree let alone practiced. You probably failed after one semester and larp as a lawyer here.

>>11205411
>then your lawyers need to be able to read code
You're saying this like it's bearish on smart contracts but all this tells me is that law has more room for specialization in the coming years because smart contracts will be an interdisciplinary field. If nothing else, rather than saying "but I won't be able to find a coding lawyer" say "we need more lawyers who code"

>>11205549
>>11205594
Seriously, where did we fuck up so badly that these women have such a misplaced sense of confidence and arrogance

>>11206093
Wow. Top kek. Go get em tiger.

>>11206145
It's transparent how little you know about anything

>>11206174
Keep lurking. Maybe you’ll have better luck with other anons that will spoon feed you like a dependent child on welfare.

>>11206223
If you consider having a discussion spoonfeeding then it explains a lot why you failed college

You are a stupid simple person and in all likelihood poor too, and given that, life is good where I am, and I hope you continue to suffer and lose through life

>>11206267
I bet you still live with your mommy. Has she spoon fed you breakfast or lunch yet?
And here’s another hint newfag
If you want to engage someone in a conversation, bring something to the table. It’s clear you haven’t done any research in the area. Anons can smell you out like a homeless person begging for money. But of course youll get frustrated again and cry bc you think you’re special. Plebbit fag.