/biz/ - Business & Finance

Thanks. Bought 100k.

>>11010263
i think so too. not that i know anything, but companies don't simply pick big companies logos to exemplify how their project will work

>>11010359
Maybe it'll truly be one of those "how did I not see it" moments a year later

we gon make it frens

>>11010394
The larper from last night said that the partnership he knows about "is screamingly obvious"

>>11010263
True however you can use big campany names to showcase how your product could work which is exactly what sergey was doing. Can you think of any major use of logos used which fall outside of the "free use" scope?

>>11010866
SWIFT .. you have to be a complete idiot not to realize that Swift is backing this project based on the timing of the successful poc and subsequent ICO and the fact it was sold out in 4 minutes. Swift is sitting on a fat stack of the Link that is not in circulation, as adoption takes place they are going to make a shit ton of cash off of it. As usual the Banks that own Swift all get fat. Buy your Link now at these prices if you believe in the project or stay poor.

>>11010957
The intelligent lawyer article on link flat out confirmed the partnership with swift and the price didn't move an inch.

>Swift is priced in?

We’re all gonna make it

Here's a breadcrumb for you - Steve Easterbrook

>>11011005
The porn star?

>>11010957
But SWIFT is already known, anon. We've known about SWIFT for a good year now. The larp said it was inside info.

Its paypal visa chase hyperledger

>>11011014
There was never an official statement of a partnership. Just a successful poc and swifts logo pastered on sergeys slides and official website. Sergey mentioned in presentations that they partner with high quality data and payments providers "like swift". Never actually confirming it directly. The artificial lawyer post was the first real statement

>>11011022
My guess from the larp of the day is Visa and MasterCard. Logos have been there forever, but have gotten far less attention than PayPal/Swift/salesforce/etc, and MasterCard has shown an inclination towards enterprise-level blockchain payment processing. LINK for pricing the fiat conversions at either end.

>>11011073
>MasterCard

>>11011073
Visa is highly involved with coinbase and there is some talk from larpers of link being added to coinbase.

>>11011073
>Visa

>>11011092
God I fucking love this board

>>11010263
Except it's been confirmed that they're not working with Hyperledger

>>11011345
Where?

>>11011432
>Where?
Private conversation I had with Thomas.
I know you mouth breathers wouldn't believe me so here's a screen grab.

>>11010263
>implying those companies give a shit that a whitepaper project references them
deluded linkies

YOU GUYS ALWAYS POST THE SAME SHIT
HOLY FUCK

>>11011518
its in their website

>>11011482
why did you screen cap a part of the convo? post the whole quote you retard. stop leaving shit out of context.

>>11011482
>>11011345
>implying the Hodge would tell you the truth
>implying the Hodge knows everything or gets told everything
>implying IC3 isn't associate member in the hyperledger project

>>11011547
Not exposing my username to you tards.
I also don't want to violate his trust, so I deleted the screenshot.
Lastly, the conversation was regarding a POC I have been working on to use an EVM to provide off-chain data (via LINK) to Hyperledger.
It's easier to go Hyperledger -> Eth, than it is the other way.

>>11011549
Yeah, maybe their technical liaison doesn't know what he's talking about.
Are you fucking retarded?

I'm a huge LINK holder, so I'm not spreading FUD, I'm just keeping you guys in the loop.

>>11011614
>Yeah, maybe their technical liaison doesn't know what he's talking about.
Are you fucking retarded?

Even if he knew, he wouldn‘t admit it to some literally who moonboy in the slack because its a secret protected by buttloads of NDAs, however everyone with 2 working braincells can see that everyone close to chainlink is also close to the Hyperledger project and these niggers don‘t hang out together just for fun.
Do some more research.

>>11011650
I give you <70s good information, and you refuse to believe it.

>>11011660
Just see for yourself

>https://www.hyperledger.org/members

>>11011674
Oh my God. You're right!
Look at this link too!
https://www.hyperledger.org/testimonials/ic3
How could I have missed all of this?
THANK YOU!!

Jesus, you really are dumb, I'm not going to spoon feed you anymore.
Like I said, it's not FUD that ChainLink isn't working directly with Hyperledger to provide an oracle service.
If you had enough brain cells, you'd see it's bullish.
GL in life, you'll need it.

>>11010263
That’s the thing tho, how fucking retarded do you think Sergey is to put those logos up on an ICO website without having actual connections to those institutions. Having those up make us do a double take and wonder if they work with those firms. Anyone with a public reputation wouldn’t invoke a token sale and take that risk.

>>11011717
>THANK YOU!!
no problem dude, good for you that you figured out that Hyperledger will use chainlink oracles in the future.

>>11011062
That post can simply be lazy journalism and just repeating breadcrumbs like we are.

>>11011721
Fair use law of copyright logos:
Collateral use.If you own a lawn mower repair shop, you can legally advertise the fact you repair Brand X lawn mowers, even though you don't make those lawn mowers or own the company's logo. You just can't suggest that you have a relationship with the company or that the company has approved of you.

So LINK can claim compatibility, but if ANY claims of approval, support, or sponsorship is violation of fair use.

>>11011062
He’s referred to the “SWIFT chainlink” at an ethereum oracle meet up. The video is here

https://youtu.be/Nu-g2nzO8fs

Go to 14:00 and listen.

>>11011092
This level of detective work is admirable...but this is still reaching.

>>11011795
Yes you’re right, but the lawn mower shop didn’t place those logos on a website before launching an ICO raising capital in an unregulated market. There are no absolutes but the evidence seems to lean towards Smartcontract.com having these connections. You think a guy like Sergey would do nothing for 4 years? His resume has been packed with work that requires connections, and has full continuity.

>>11011721
It can just be to make the website look more professional...using logos IIRC is not illegal.

>>11011821
I'm trying to provide some counter context to the comments in this thread.

LINK will moon.
I'm not FUDing.
I promise that we will all make it.

So you're telling me they're working with Cloud, Lock and Chart??!!!

>>11011833
Why aren’t you addressing my argument about the whole “raised 32 million for something that is a borderline security”

>>11011843
It seems very likely at this point.
Vitalik has connections to the researcher elite of the world.
Sergey has connections to the financial elite of the world.

>>11011859
Don't really have an answer to that

>>11011721
Remember when he put up a website that was copy and pasted from another ico and didn't even bother changing their name to chainlink

Remember when he put up a website with typos in every word

>>11011886
Maaan that’s the thing. It’s just so bizarre that someone of Sergey’s stature would take that risk

>>11011804
so basically:
>Mastercard provides the technology they got from their connections to chainlink to their business partners
>these business partners bring this technology (or better said the idea of how its going to function) to the Fraunhofer Society
>together with a couple other players they work on a study about supply chains called SOFIA which seems to build on smart contracts like they are described at smartcontract.com

>but this is still reaching
no idea where this is even leading to but that all of them show that much interest in the tech is already telling a lot.

>>11011913
Kek. They’ve had documentation for their codebase for much longer. Nothing was wrong with their documentation then, and it’s only better now.

>>11011913
>Remember when he put up a website that was copy and pasted from another ico
that ICO seems to be more important than most people think, tierion is also in the Hyperledger project and their goal is something like a notary for smart contracts (obviously their product can only work when smart contracts actually exist).

>>11010263
i have a paypal logo on my site too because i accept it. doesn't mean im working with paypal. also i have a salesforce app, so i use that too.

nothing special

>>11011934
I would say it's healthy pessimism because all of this is too good to be true.

>>11011954
BUT YOU DIDNT RAISE 32 MILLION DOLLARS AND DISTRIBUTE A TOKEN

It pains me to have to constantly say this, but you guys are making incorrect assumptions.

You're assuming the use of logos like Mastercard's or Hyperledger's on SmartContract.com's website means they are partnered with them. Do you think every merchant and/or website that displays Mastercard's logo is "partnered" with them? That's a ridiculous way to view it. Just because SmartContract.com wants to potentially allow people to easily utilize existing Mastercard functionality with some smart contract deployment doesn't mean that Mastercard necessarily even knows ANYTHING about it (ESPECIALLY not a partnership). This is the same with Hyperledger.

I'm afraid you all are wrong. My company is listed as a Hyperledger General Member (won't say which one), and I can FUCKING GUARANTEE YOU that Chainlink would be there if they were working WITH Hyperledger. I literally have been working on Blockchain/Smart Contract projects for the past 1.5 years and will happily answer any questions anyone has, but my company won't use Chainlink because there is no need to for us. I really don't think people understand the nature of how Hyperledger works. Just because Chainlink may want to offer some sort of Oracle functionality for people that might want to develop a smart contract with Hyperledger, doesn't mean Hyperledger is involved, supports, participates, etc. in any way.

You all are literally so misunderstanding about Chainlink, its potential, and the smart contract space in general it is laughable. I'm not saying this to be mean or "FUD" or anything anymore...and I could be 100% wrong, but I feel like everyone is in for MAJOR disappointment for even believing 1/10th of the grandiose claims that get thrown around here regarding Chainlink.

t. former Link holder/someone who gives 0 fucks whether Link is a huge success or massive failure.

>>11010406

GOD BLESS

>>11012056
Cool FUD bro

>>11012071
damn Noire lookin fine

>>11012056
Wow thanks you are a true connected insider with significant knowledge, I am selling all my Link immediately.

>>11012091
>>11012076
Even if that is larp, what he said is true...just because a logo is being used doesn't mean there is a partnership.

>>11012091
I just find it funny that people want to believe in Chainlink so much, that they won't even TRY to be objective. I'm actually quite interested in the psychological status created in these people because I think it'd be an interesting marketing phenomenon to take advantage of.

I would very happily watch everyone get rich here and for me to be wrong. You, for example, I bet you got excited about the infographic posted above. What makes you think that any of that pasted info has to do with Chainlink? What makes you think any of those goals aren't already possible without Chainlink? I'm serious.

I already know your response, it is going to be something about "oracle is a single point of failure" or "end to end decentralization." To which I'd reply, "what sort of blockchain application(s) are you working on" and your response would be "none."

Am I wrong?

>>11010995

Because everyone who wants LINK already owns it.

And for anyone whose not a complete idiot they already knew LINK is working with SWIFT because of SIBOS.

Acting like that's some big new information is retarded

The truth is, I don't care if you think I'm larping or not. It's just entertaining to me at this point. I already know no one WANTS to believe any of the information I post here anymore because they're so emotionally attached to an opportunity they think will make them rich.

No one would believe that I actually know of several people who have contributed to Chainlink. They wouldn't believe I've been in contact with several of the team members and have worked on a simple application for the project, they wouldn't believe how actual blockchain engineers view the project. So, I just try to get people to view things objectively and they prefer to believe a bunch of anonymous people on an imageboard that tell them what they want to hear instead of those that present information that clashes with anything that doesn't suggest they'll get rich soon.

At this point, I'm much more interested in how this psychological state was created.

>>11012144
>just because a logo is being used doesn't mean there is a partnership.
if they truly just copy pasted logos on their site without a reason then we wouldn't be able to find more information like >>11011107 , >>11011092

>>11012164
>he doesn't understand the oracle problem

you sound like that retard from yesterday
>>11006368
the tard with the blue ID "B+cFbmz1", is that you?

>>11012056
Chainlink will have users not partners

>>11011107
Just because the company name is chain doesn't mean it's chainlink

>>11012246
None of that "more information" has ANYTHING to do with Chainlink though! That's what I'm trying to tell you! I sincerely don't understand why you think it does.

Just because Chain and Chainlink are both listed on and IC3 page doesn't mean all of the aforementioned information about Chain has ANYTHING to do with Chainlink. It's so bizarre how people make these huge jumps here then get excited.

Do you know anything about Chain? It is a great project.

>>11012292
It is bizarre. And a lot of times people see "smart contract" and think it refers to smartcontract.com...which in itself STILL isn't Chainlink. Smart contract.com has been making smart contracts for years before even conceiving the idea for chainlink...and there are a lot of other companies making smart contracts that just don't have the name "smartcontract.com."

>>11012243
The truth is I don't give a flying eff what you think about Link or the logos on their website. I invested in Link because of their success with Swift and who owns Swift, the timing of the ICO, how the ICO went down along with my review of the whitepaper. Toss PSD2 in there as well. You on the other hand, strike me as a complete douche bag who probably fills paper in the copy machines at your place of business but gets a hard on effing with people on the internet. Good day to you m8.

>>11012246
I wasn't online at all yesterday btw, so to whomever you're referring is not I.

>>11010263
has anyone sent a screencap to paypal, swift, etc. asking if they authorized this use of their logo?

>>11012342
based ari

>>11012344
Someone asked Salesforce online chat and they said they woudn't let anyone use it unless they were working together.
Also see this:
>>11012108

>>11010263
Keep on telling yourself that. These are public logos of massive companies. You think they’re going to waste their time paying a fleet of lawyers to go around writing up cease and desists over no name crypto start ups? Doubt it.

>>11012342
Genuinely curious: why do you feel so attached to this investment that you literally feel the urge to try to insult someone who is trying to give you objective information that opposes the view you have? The normal response in such a situation would be something like, "Hmm, that's interesting, I'm going to look into that." Most Linkies, however, immediately get irate as though you've insulted their first born child.

>>11012344
Swift is understandable because they did a POC.

Next time you're out or surfing the web, why don't you take notice of how many stores and/or websites display the following logos:

Mastercard
Visa
Discover
AMEX
Paypal

>>11012292
are you blind or something?
chain and chainlink are not the same thing, chain works with Visa but chain is also in IC3 where they very likely discuss the future standards for smart contracts (hint: decentralized oracles are important for this)

>>11012295
yea they all meet up at their IC3 meeting and eat lunch while Vitalik jerks off in the corner. they don't talk about industry standards or smart contracts or oracles at all. LMAO

>>11012343
you sound exactly like that retard tho

>>11012295
You keep implying that you have information which contradicts the assumltion that chainlink is working with 'X company,' but you don't provide that information. Spill the beans and spell it out or waste people's time elsewhere, thanks.

>>11012422
pretty sure its that retard larper from yesterday, he also larped and claimed to know his shit but then turned out to be completely illiterate when it comes to blockchain or computers.

>>11011022
>MasterCard
I’ll leave this here.

>>11012465

So TrueUSD (https://www.trusttoken.com/trueusd/)) is partnered with Google, Facebook, PayPal, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs? Deluded linkies

>>11011965
dogecoin is worth more than that

>>11012481
THIS HOLY FUCK ITS OVER

>>11012481
>Hope they don’t see this Fine print at the top

>>11012481
no there not..

>>11010995
Because the chainlink network is being used to provide information to the bots to keep LINK price stable. They tell potential customers to watch the price to see chainlink in action.

I didn't t know any more than biz collectively knows. But I would be extremely surprised if it were under $1k eoy

>>11012533
Yeah it’s literally a different claim

No dots with PayPal’?

>>11012418
>4
the logos are in an infographic explaining how chainlink works and which payment providers it works with. not a "pay with paypal" button. totally different

>they are just examples nothing is concrete.

>>11012706
it's not really totally different. Chainlink's site is just saying "use paypal's payment infrastructure to transact money with your smart contract" which is essentially the same thing merchants are saying: "use paypal's payment infrastructure to transact money within your store"

>>11012706
Put it this way, I can guarantee you Paypal isn't going to be using Chainlink for every transaction; however, the guys at SmartContract.com may facilitate someone to use Paypal in some sort of smart contract application.

>>11011868
It’s all so mysterious. I always wondered how Sergey has managed to create the connections that he has. I guess a lot of it is just being at the right place at the right time.

>>11012822
Yeah people forget that chainlink is middleware and will be used by end point api’s, payments, gps. They don’t have “partners” maybe someone will use PayPals api as a third party reseller because they think people would see a demand for this data feed.

>>11012622
>But I would be extremely surprised if it were under $1k eoy
i'm about as deluded as stinkies come, but i'm starting to doubt the big price run up to eoy 2018. i'd be quite happy waiting another 12 months.
i hope to be proved wrong, but i dont see what series of events could propel LINK to a sizeable MC by year's end.

Chainlink will let smart contracts trigger payments via paypal/visa/mastercard. 'Working with' these companies probably means that chainlink helps them write adapters to interact with their products. This is all that needs to happen for now, in my opinion, and it's a good thing.

>>11012910
Literally $2 is a pipe dream for 2018. I could $10 **maybe** EOY 2019 and if all goes well 16-24 bucks 2020. $10 link is basically $100 eth.

>>11011795
>honestly if you're not getting your butthole bleached you have no concept of aesthetics.
No argument there.

>>11012835
what the larper said last night lines up perfectly with him having knowledge about paypal

>>11013005
do you have the wairosu link anon? thx

>>11013014
It matches because of this: >>11012108 →
>>/biz/thread/S11004317
i cant see any other explanation

>>11012164
>I already know your response, it is going to be something about [perfectly valid responses] To which I'd reply, [argument from authority]
Fucking lol, absolutely pathetic tier LARP.

>>11013037
Thanks i will read the full OP's articles anon.

>>11013064
tell me what you think after you read it, give me your best guess...

>>11013000

>Giving a shit about what your shithole color is.
>Damaging your skin to appease others.
>Being this insecure.

>>11013142
I will not say my entire guess as i'm not an perfect english speaking guy, but will give you some hashtags.

#DATASARETHENEWGOLD #IOT #AI #CARS #SECURITY #INDUSTRIES #NORMALIZATION #REGULATORY #GOV #FORBES50 #NOSPOF #CONSENSUS

> make me remind the sexy girl of the us gov sitting next to sergey.

>>11013234
#DATAISTHENEWCURRENCY not gold ;-)))

>>11013142
my only question after reading this, and thanks by the way is: what about data protection? (like gps)

>>11013234
You’re an idiot.

Wait you guys are still actually holding LINK?

>day 402 that linkies are desperatly looking for good news, even though it doesn't excist
you guys are so fucking dumb

>>11013234
tell us more
mainnet when?

>>11013300
Argument like a man, and don't speak like a boomer then.

> btw if redlights are and they are more and more connected to IOT, make more sense thanks to the capcha.

Sold my stack already.
LINK is going nowhere.
We cant even break 4300 sats.

How LINK hasnt gone back to ICO prices is the biggest mystery.
It literally does NOTHING and is an ERC20.
They are being vague af because they know if they give a release date for mainnet, LINK would CRASH.

>>11012957
>Literally $2 is a pipe dream for 2018. I could $10 **maybe** EOY 2019 and if all goes well 16-24 bucks 2020. $10 link is basically $100 eth.
Damn, you know your shit!
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning.

>>11013363
stop gambling & start acting like a vc.

>>11011101
means Ý in binary
nice lol

>>11011744
Artificial Lawyer is a reputable website that reports facts. The auther of the article os also tge creator of artificial lawyer. He runs a company called Tromans consulting tromansconsulting.com. Tromans must've gotten confirmation from Chainlink to state the Swift Partnership. Also Sherlocklink stated months ago that Chainlink would partner with accord and openlaw then something about sergey guest posting on artificial lawyer...the guest post never happened but the timing of this post is weird...almost same timing Sherlock gave a while back.

>>11012200
100m market cap coin only when its partnered will swift who controls all crossboarder payments for 11000+ banks. Xrp went from 30 million to 16 billion market cap because of 2 crappy bank partnerships.

>>11012056
you almost have me. Continue pls

>>11013571
>Xrp went from 30 million to 16 billion market cap because of 2 crappy bank partnerships
How long did this take?

>>11013571
this is what i've been saying all along.
if swift is on board, link grows exponentially. people dont understand how big swift really is.

>>11012164
>I'm actually quite interested in the psychological status created in these
they are spammers or they have no life and spend all their time he online. So they start to belive what they see every minute of the day. I took a week off of my computer and came back to biz and am starting to regret my link holdings

>>11013370
Even if link tops off at 3 dollars per token, that is still a 1000% increase...a 1000% increase in traditional stocks would take 100 years to achieve!

>>11013612
xrp pumped for 2 straight months

>>11012957
>comparing ETH to Link

>>11013686
a 15 billion dollar mcap for link would be around 40 dollars per token...more than a 100x from current prices...sounds very nice.

>>11013729
could be less (the mcap) if there's a lot of nodes live.

>>11010263
Not to fud but chain link could take inputs and make outputs from these companies without being ‘partnered’ with them. That’s the whole point.

If it has an API, it can be used in a smart contract - regardless of whether LINK is ‘partnered’ with them

>>11013729
forgot to say, xrp mcap during peak bullrun was 130Billion...

>>11013786
I don't follow, lots of nodes means more staking correct? More staking decreases the circulating supply...so what your saying is link can hit 40 dollars per token even if the mcap is less than 15 billion because of staking?

>>11012835
i think you're taking the pajeets and 16 year olds too seriously. The phenomenon of posting any random article that says "smart contract" in the text with a smug pepe and the chainlink logo is a pretty new development on /biz/ and that sort of stuff is so blatantly stupid intelligent posters don't even look at it, or have entirely left /biz/ for greener pastures.

If you stick to the facts and things that have reasonable evidence, chainlink is still pretty compelling, you just have to ignore the bottom feeders who are treating it like a lottery ticket. .

>>11013817
Jeez...even a 100 billion mcap for link would be close to 300 per token...more than a 1000x from current prices

>>11013818
yes (assuming a fully functioning mainnet).

>>11013817
cripple comparisons are stupid. link market makers aren't crypto og's on bitfinex. who will be link's market maker and which exchange will they use? why isn't this ever discussed?

>>11013943
Binance.

>>11012056
fucking pussy capping random words you probably talk like that in real life you fucking wierdo

>>11013943
That is a whole lot of words for somebody who doesn't know what he talking about.

>>11014367
continue.

>>11012243
>>11012243
>WANTS
>>11012164
>TRY
>>11012056
>MAJOR
>>11012056
>FUCKING GUARANTEE YOU
>>11012056
>ANYTHING
>>11012056
>ESPECIALLY
>>11012056
>WITH
>>11012334
>STILL
fuck off capslock faggot everything you say is void because you talk like a bitch

Listen I genuinely care about about Anons financial well being. Its hard as shit to get ahead in life now, not just working 9-5 for the rest of your life. The sooner you start saving the sooner you can get ahead in life.

Chainlink is a meme started by 4chan (an infamous trolling board) to lead people to financial ruin. This is NOT A JOKE. Don't let your saved wealth be thrown away over night.

Vitalik Buterin the creator of ethereum said himself the days of making x100 or x1000 are over, that right the guy who created the second most popular crypto said himself those days are over.

Now 4chan is trying to get people to lose even more money after the December/January bloodbath. Smart money already exited the crypto world. Crypto is basically a highly specialized database, companies don't need this. They will just create their own private blockchains. There is no need for crypto chainlink isn't even needed to run the nodes. Think XRP when you think chainlink. The company ripple (smartcontracts) is doing well but the coin XRP(chainlink) isn't even needed for the companies technology.

Considering what Vitalik said "The days of making x100 or x1000 returns are over." Chainlink needs a 399900% increase in price over the next couple of months to reach $1000 this is ludicrous. Don't fall for it, chainlink its a meme to fuck you over.

Consider this for chainlink at current price to reach $1 you need an increase of 700% or a 233% increase every month until EOY.

This is a 4chan meme to siphon money out of the hands of the already vulnerable.

>>11014453
yeah so this >>11012906

>>11014472
karma is real and it never forgets

>>11014472
>NOT A JOKE
another capping faggot congrats everything you said is now bullshit by default

>>11014432
That dude is definitely a pussy

>>11014472
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=Listen+I+genuinely+care+about+about+Anons+financial+well+being.+Its+hard+as+shit+to+get+ahead+in+life+now%2C+not+just+working+9-5+for+the+rest+of+your+life.+The+sooner+you+start+saving+the+sooner+you+can+get+ahead+in+life..

>>11014627
Listen I genuinely care about about Anons financial well being. Its hard as shit to get ahead in life now, not just working 9-5 for the rest of your life. The sooner you start saving the sooner you can get ahead in life.

Chainlink is a meme started by 4chan (an infamous trolling board) to lead people to financial ruin. This is NOT A JOKE. Don't let your saved wealth be thrown away over night.

Vitalik Buterin the creator of ethereum said himself the days of making x100 or x1000 are over, that right the guy who created the second most popular crypto said himself those days are over.

Now 4chan is trying to get people to lose even more money after the December/January bloodbath. Smart money already exited the crypto world. Crypto is basically a highly specialized database, companies don't need this. They will just create their own private blockchains. There is no need for crypto chainlink isn't even needed to run the nodes. Think XRP when you think chainlink. The company ripple (smartcontracts) is doing well but the coin XRP(chainlink) isn't even needed for the companies technology.

Considering what Vitalik said "The days of making x100 or x1000 returns are over." Chainlink needs a 399900% increase in price over the next couple of months to reach $1000 this is ludicrous. Don't fall for it, chainlink its a meme to fuck you over.

Consider this for chainlink at current price to reach $1 you need an increase of 700% or a 233% increase every month until EOY.

This is a 4chan meme to siphon money out of the hands of the already vulnerable.

>>11014704
karma is real and it never forgets

>>11014704
go fuck yourself. seriously

>>11012056
>t. former Link holder/someone who gives 0 fucks whether Link is a huge success or massive failure.
>0 fucks
>8 replies
You're obviously emotionally invested in your position.

Lol dump this shitcoin and buy $tic if u want a 5-10x in the next week

>>11012906
considering this, what kind of news would have to come out about chainlink for it to actually pump without high end partnership news? I guess it would just have to be a working product and when people see the utility, itll pump hard?

>>11014763
looks interesting tell me more about it

>>11010957
People don't really get it yet and SWIFT has made no announcements. Just be patient

>>11014763
Wow nice gonna dump some link for that

>>11015024
Yeah same here need to dump this shitcoins for $tic to finally make money

We've always known about Mastercard, it's just small shit compared to the rest of Chainlink's applications.