/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10983301
I've been saying all along...june 2019 is hopeful. They are literally telling people we are not close and people close their ears. There is so much work to do.

>>10983311
>june 2019
This, 2020 is more likely

LINKERS BTFO

MUH MAINNET

Sergey is laughing at you pathetic RETARDS

>>10983301

>>10983366
Patience. Good things come to those who wait.

>>10983301
B-but Dreamforce

>>10983421

>over a year

>>10983301
LMAO enjoy swingtrading this for another whole fucking year linkies AHAHA

Good. Cashing out a retirement fund I had left over in a month. Putting it in link.

What a relief. More time to accumulate.

>>10983446
This is mental illness

Everyone is thinking that it will launch in September, but thats so fucking optimistic. unless the team have outsourced a shit load of work in secret. the reputation system literally is what makes link the 1000$ meme. i f they are just starting it then then it confirms we have a while to go, and we know they wont launch a half baked product because they have no reason to. 2020, or if they really get their act together 2019 is feasible.

Also, when you look on the github and see their commits its impressive, but looking at exactly what hthey are trying to do with the reputation system and its a bit obvious that there is a lot fo work to be done, and anyone with ANY knowledge of C+and Linux custom script integrated GNU compilers knows it's a minimum 2-3 year AT BEST with a single coder, maybe less with more.

Link devs took the hard route of going for a SE Linux hardened kernel integration into their scripting tool - PRO TIP, since they are using it as part of the foundation for main-net, it is essential it is 100% complete, and with investors like Swift its not going to be fucking risked launching early.

Even Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux) took 2 years to compile a similar scripting tool.

>>10983301
Meh, I got a year to spare.

>>10983590
I'm almost 38... my cock might not even work in a year

>>10983606
Don't worry you'll have enough to hire a dozen nigger bulls

Just checked and this isn’t even real and I’m the telegram, nice try fudders

Any of you faggots have a link to the slack/telegram.

>>10983559
Nice pasta. Fuckk offf

>>10983301

>>10984054

>>10983846
It's real, Just checked. It was posted yesterday (9/6/18) at 1:55pm PST

If mainnet would come out in September we would know.
No one keeps their mainnet release date a secret.

>>10983620
Actually thinking about that.... hire 1k an hour escorts to watch then get fuckes by a nigger.

Might have to start learning to be turned on by this.

My question is do you have to pay the nigger also to fuck the escort?

I'm guessing not since a nigger will fuck anything

>>10984154
Jesus christ, just get some viagra. Alao eat better

>>10983311
Linkies are in denial

>>10983301
LINKIES BTFO

The newfags who think Chainlink are suddenly going to say "ta da!" and release the full network are cancer, hopefully this sends them away for another six months or so.

>>10983301
Thank fuck. Means they won't be releasing in a bear market and I can ccumulate to 50k linkies
>t. coping stinker

Its not that far away as they have been working mostly on bug fixes and operator UI in the pivotal tracker

>>10984406
I don't think you realize the amount of coding (and more importantly testing that a reputation system would take.)

>>10983301
I’m happy for this
Gives me time to buy cheap stinky linky

>>10983301
For fucks sake, that little faggot the other day promising mainnet within 3 weeks confirmed larp. Now I'm gonna have to look for a job again.

>>10984406
Until the team themselves clarify things no one actually knows how long it'll take so at this point, the one who wins this argument is who shouts louder and more aggressively. "AHHAHAHAHAHA LINKIES BTFO MAINNET IN 2020" and the like. No one here is directly involved with the team, and so no one knows what actually needs to be done before mainnet launch.
>>10984415
>I don't think you realize the amount of coding (and more importantly testing that a reputation system would take.)
Like this one for example

It's probably going to take longer than what everyone assumed before though

>>10984406
Operator UI just means there's a basic dashboard for people to play with on the testnet. Then they have to code how all the node responses are securely aggregated. Then they have to code the reputation system that allows nodes to demonstrate their reliability. Aggregation is a big job but is relatively straightforward, and they have laid out the mechanisms pretty clearly in the whitepaper with the whole "commit/reveal" thing.
But reputation is massive. That is such a difficult concept to get correct from the outset and if you have any vulnerabilities or ways to "game" reputation then your entire network is at risk. I'm not a fudder. I hold 130k LINK and have done since last September. But the reputation system has to be absolutely waterproof AT LAUNCH because otherwise malicious node operators will game themselves into early positions of unfair advantage that will then be entrenched. I wouldn't be surprised if reputation takes 6 months on its own. Everyone needs to chill the fuck out and the "wen moon" faggots need to find another project.

>>10984063
Sounds like it probably won't be this year

>>10984436
How is this more difficult than aggregation? Also, the way you word it seems to imply that reputation is more important than aggregation but aggregation is directly related to the work itself (being an oracle) but the reputation system is only to ensure that no one fucks it up.

>>10984458
Because reputation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest node operators whereas aggregation just needs to securely pull responses together. Reputation is a potential vulnerability in a way that aggregation is not.

This is quite a relief. I only have 28k, been waiting for btc to jump or for link to dump so that I can all in and double my holdings.Until then I'll keep increasing by a few thousand each week.

>>10984469
I know that, it doesn't need to be mentioned that the network needs both to work. You can easily turn it around that aggregation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest data provider, so on and so forth. Regardless, both are important, of course. I'm just trying to figure out why he's so sure that aggregation is easy but reputation is difficult. Similar to your reply, it "just needs to securely pull responses together", emphasis on "just" (lmao). You're both so sure that aggregation is easy work and reputation is this very difficult task

>>10984494
I laughed at the "Just", not an attempt to mock, just to be clear

>>10984494
>You can easily turn it around that aggregation is an attack vector for malicious or dishonest data provider
That's not really cogent. And aggregation isn't "easy", it's incredibly complicated. But reputation is even harder.

>>10984505
How is it harder? Can you actually explain what makes aggregation incredibly complicated but reputation is still more complicated than that? Anyway, digging up info on Telegram about reputation, look at what Thomas said regarding 3rd party reputation providers. What do you think it implies?

>>10983559
austic retards like you that repost stale paste pasta fud will never make it.

Of this I am quite certain.......

>>10984538
To me, it implies that they only need something simple to get things going. It's not like they'll stop working on it after mainnet launch. To be clear, I'm deliberately arguing that things are going to be completed much sooner rather than later, just to have a different perspective

I prefer what >>10984436 said where
>Everyone needs to chill the fuck out and the "wen moon" faggots need to find another project.

>>10984538
Another comment by Thomas regarding 3rd party reputation providers

>>10984538
I interpret this as meaning they need a simple reputation module to complete the overall architecture/infrastructure. Once that is in place, it is easy to hire specialists to develop more advanced reputation modules.

>>10984572
Yeah, and emphasis on the "simple". This is another comment by Thomas, and I think the "reputation scores" mentioned in the pics is this >>10984458

Seems like the bulk of the work would be left to the "specialists" and the like, especially considering that it's an actual "goal" of the team, as mentioned by Thomas. I don't know who these 3rd party reputation providers will be though. Thomas didn't reply to the dude who asked this "Will Chainlink create a platform for kyc/aml for node operators or leave that to a third party/ the ones requesting the data" so there aren't much details regarding those 3rd party reputation providers unfortunately

>>10984554
>>10984573
I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider. Presumably given that second comment they are prevented from "messing" with reputation scores by the fact that all the metrics used for calculating reputation are public and on-chain. I also wonder if "amount of link held by node" even factors into reputation beyond penalty staking.

So yeah, this news is bullish amirite

>>10984054
>>10984063
Fucking delphi larper convinced me the other day.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1000$ EOND

>>10984554
This thread is the usual faggot swintraders shitposting bullshit dressed as fud that has no merit value or relevence except they are discouraging the spread of info about the project and thus loosing people who might buy and run nodes and therefore reducing the number of nodes and undermining the project....because tgey don't care and just use the token for crappy pnd swingrades and pist shill and fud crap in time with this via discord.They are literally a tumour on the chainlink project and while its a good project their individual autustic intellectual limitations makes them incapable of setting up, maintaining ir running a decent node or data feed. These are a bunch if retards who spent bitcoin on pharma drugs flipped into eth and need to make a few bucks a month off a few hundred eth the flupped into link to buy pharma drugs on tor. Their junkie 9rk lives are replete with piss bottles and fap rags yet due to the varios amphetamine like substances they consume can repeately repaste crap and in their chemical addled brains they suffer delusions of grandeur. Nothing they post here is of any relevence except signaling their poorly orchestated prajeet outsourced script kiddy binance pnd bots moves. The stink of unwashed bodies, piss bottles, stale fap rags and chemical laden sweat and darkened basements emenates from every single link fud thread. However they matter little because their elimination rate due to mental collapse, drug abuse and economic implosion signaled by frenzied desperation trying to live off ever decreasing crypto capital while jobless, skillless and unemployed is high. When a sufficient number of link fudders lives have collapsed into piss stained oblivion clutching empty adderal bottles and neth pipes link will moon as their cremated corpses are poyred into carboard boxes and their mothers mix their grief with the fact they are free of the insufferable and vile burdens they created following that one night stand in a dock bar.

>Mainnet will launch
>We have partners
I don't know which is my favourite meme, I laugh hard at both equally.

Rory also mentioned previously that mainnet would coincide closely with the hiring of a marketing director, which has already been done. I wouldn't underestimate how much these guys have hiding in private repositories

You know whats gonna happen, right? A year from now, link will drop to an all-time low right before launching the mainnet and normies, who have no clue what link is, will buy it at near all time low. They will make a lot more profit from LINK than any of the long time hodlers. Think about it, they have literally no clue wtf link is or does, bought it and held for a week and then dump it to make insane profits while stinky linkies held for years to make close to nothing.

>>10984622
I think it doesn't seem like it if you take into account the way the team repeatedly states that you don't need to own LINK to run a node. So besides penalty payments, it doesn't matter

>I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider.
I'm trying to read shit about nodes right now to figure it out but I'm a brainlet
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cc4/f4fd36ad5b1ce0af320c545a79749e601700.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.2529.pdf

>>10984669
I don't know if you're serious or not but if you're actually that pissed you might want to install 4chanX (via Violentmonkey) so that you can filter out dumb shit much easier. I can help you if you want

>>10984677
Unless Thomas is lying, they clearly haven't started with the reputation system. No need to make up shit about it

>>10984671
However they matter little because their elimination rate due to mental collapse, drug abuse and economic implosion signaled by frenzied desperation trying to live off ever decreasing crypto capital while jobless, skillless and unemployed is high. When a sufficient number of link fudders lives have collapsed into piss stained oblivion clutching empty adderal bottles and meth pipes link will moon as their cremated corpses are poured into carboard boxes and their mothers mix their grief with the fact they are free of the insufferable and vile burdens they created following that one night stand in a dock bar.

>>10984681
How is millions of dollars close to nothing?? Are you so poor 0.2usd is out of your reach?

>>10984681
I have had this realization but I think the autistic long term holders will have been more educated and developed stronger confidence and will therefore make better profit in the long term. The normies will sell too early and won't be running nodes.

>>10984622
>I wonder what the incentives are to be a third party reputation provider

"Reputation providers would also be able to charge for that service"

Although, Thomas only indicated that the providers can charge for the service since they'll be using gas. So I don't know how profitable would it be. It still doesn't make much sense so I'll keep digging

>>10984758
So as a node operator I'll be paying various reputation providers to list me, paying for monetised data feeds to connect to contracts, and crossing my fingers hoping to be selected for enough jobs to run at a profit.
Starting to wish I'd put money into LinkPool.

>>10984779
>So as a node operator I'll be paying various reputation providers to list me

You only need to pay one reputation provider since it'll ultimately rely on on-chain data which seems to imply that there won't be much difference between various reputation providers. I'll ask Thomas what's the point of 3rd party reputation providers and post his reply soon.

>>10984779
>paying for monetised data feeds to connect to contracts
Not if the API endpoint is open, but yeah

>>10984779
>and crossing my fingers hoping to be selected for enough jobs to run at a profit.
See paragraph about node selection

I guess it all boils down to having a high reputation so you can get picked. And regarding profitability, let's just hope that there's a high enough usage of the network to keep the money flowing

>>10984069
Weak fud. Checked the times and no matter what timezone you are on in India it still doesn't change the minutes.

>>10984688
> you don't need to own LINK to run a node
Top kek

>>10984573
anyone explain what this means to a brainlet?

I fucking hate this coin

fuck you for ruining biz

>>10984859
It means we don't have to make shit up in order to determine reputation because it's all on-chain

>>10984859
It means that every piece of information that is used by a reputation provider to calculate the reputation for a particular node is public. So if a reputation provider says "This node has a reputation score of 86%" it should be possible for any person to dive and and confirm that that is true using publicly available information.

>>10984877
Much better answer

>>10984877
tks a lot

>>10984859
The LiNK vision is completely unrelated to their erc30 token
If you want to run the node your linkies are useless
And you have to pay to be verified by Thurs party at least, but maybe even fourth or fifth
Tldr : you fools are their best (or likely the only) source of income and they are going to milk you once again

>>10984866
Why not just start a thread about something you're interested in? I don't understand why you'd go on a LINK thread where actual discussion is happening and whine about it. If your shitcoin is being ignored then start a thread about it and get a discussion going. LINK threads don't prevent you from doing anything you'd otherwise want to do, especially if you just use filters which are easy as fuck.

>>10983429
>still

>>10985027
>where actual discussion is happening
So that actual discussion won't happen, obviously. Like you said, those who aren't financially involved in LINK will just easily ignore these threads. I don't doubt that there are motivated shills that make LINK threads but it's easier to spot coordinated FUD because why bother with the effort if you don't have this coin? Either to (attempt to) suppress the price to buy in lower, or make LINK threads toxic enough that new money (or previous LINK holders who will sell) will be in other coins that they in turn will shill, like HOLO or some other shit.

>>10984677
Checked

>>10985092
you sound like an 0xbtc pajeet
people shit post about link because you faggots clog up the board. its not contained. its not easily ignored.
calling you 1000eoy retards delusional is not fudding, its just being realistic.

>>10985109
Like the previous anon said, filters are very easy to use. Do you want me to help you? I've been planning on making a thread about it anyway. I can give you easy to follow instructions right now if you're actually interested in avoiding LINK threads instead of falseflagging as a concerned anon.
>You sound like an 0xbtc shill
It's more effective to say "you sound like a paid shill/cultist" because I can just say that I don't own 0xbtc by the way. Especially since you can't exactly contest being blamed a shill.

>>10985109
>clog up the board
Filters and thread hiding takes seconds.

>>10985154
/\bLINK\b/;boards:biz;
/ChainLINK/i;boards:biz;
/Sergey Nazarov/i;boards:biz;
/Sergey/i;boards:biz;
/you are a maniac/i;boards:biz;

Here are some filters you can use that would easily remove 90% LINK content if you are actually serious. For the rest, holding Shift and pressing on threads takes less than a second each thread.

Here are some filters I use by the way


/LET HER FUCK MEN WHILE I'M LOCKED IN CHASTITY/i;boards:biz;
/is AGP a legitimate thing/i;boards:biz;
/flower maidens of Moonlight Garden/i;boards:biz;
/but I still despise being with boys and I only like girls/i;boards:biz;

These are some nonsensical pastas that clog up LINK threads by the way, usually as a way of disrupting actual discussion

That's obviously not the whole list but you get the point.

>>10985109

You can see in this thread >>10985192 where someone is posting new breadcrumbs about LINK. Someone immediately posted a stale FUD pasta to shit the thread up. Fortunately for me, it got blocked by my filter. I think filters are quite effective if you know what to look out for.

>>10983311
pls stop you are hurting my feelings

>>10983311
fuck off, main net is in 3 weeks

>>10984677
Dingx3

DELET this nons3nse now

I fucking hate this shitcoin. Link ruined my life.
Fuck all of you shills. I hate your guts. I should've never fallen for it.

Mainnet is in thread weeks

You guys should try googling decentralized reputation providers. There's a fair amount of projects already working on this. Their Twitter follows consist of the same people already known to be involved with link. Reputation will be outsourced to multiple providers

>>10986113
Which projects do you see?
Loopring? Openbazaar? Not sure if they're actually reputation providers but they're first Google results and have interesting Twitter connections

>>10986108
How is so?

STOP FUCKING SELLING REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Centralized 'mainnet' coming within a month.

Act accordingly

>>10986363
The top result for decentralized reputation is a medium article by Rika sukenik, no connected follows or specific projects mentioned but she works at consensys

>>10985730
How is so?

>>10983301
Capped. I wish you had a trip because you will be embarrassed within 20 days (maybe a bit less).

>>10986457

>>10986453
a few days ago there was a (larper?) "close family member" of one of the teammates.

he said that we can expect the mainnet within 3 weeks.

>>10986487
That was the LARPingest LARP that ever LARPed

I really hope you didn't believe it

>>10986497
there's always the possibility anon.

but I'm seriously when the mainnet comes out.

>>10986476

>>10986497
When I saw you shitting on the street all you did was stare at the ground, but now that I'm gone and you're online all you care about is saving me money.

>>10986497
It was so LARPy...it just might be true

>>10986476
Fuck yeh, two caps. Get a trip.

>>10983301
Well it was kinda hard to believe it would be released in september, judging solely from the pivotal tracker. However the comments saying june 2019 and so, are equally stupid. It's clear that we are nearing mainnet as most service agreement tasks are done and a marketing director has been hired. Although the fact of the matter is that we all don't know. It could be november or december. Or maybe even Q1 or Q2 for that matter. No one knows, except the team.

Imagine not having sold this already

>>10984806
How many open API endpoints can one connect to at once?

>>10986570
>mfw only one test for service agreement
kek yet you fucks are expecting mainnet in 3 weeks?

have any of you link bagholders just sat down and worked out how much money youve lost sittin in a shitcoin like chainlink for a whole year while the rest of the market did a 20-50x?

the best chainlink could do was 2-3x. doesn't exactly perform like you would expect a network to if it was in fact a breakthrough in oracles.

>>10987396
Are you asking from the perspective of a node operator? If so, you don't need to bother with it because it's up to the contract creator to point your node to the open API endpoint. You don't have to "connect your node to many open APIs" if that's what you were wondering. The contract creator will request your node to get data from this specific API, you don't have to do shit, except having your node up and running. Only problem is when the API requires a subscription then you need to gain access first but you only asked about open API endpoints. Common sense dictates that your node can only take on one request at a time so I guess you can only connect to one open API endpoint at once (because otherwise why not just one node for everything, that is, a centralized oracle).

>>10988001
so node operators dont do shit but keep theri node up?

>>10988001
Why would you not be able to connect to mulyiple api's and fulfill multiple requests at once? That's retarded

>>10988001
Not sure if this is true.
Pretty sure not operators need to manage and offer their own bridges

>>10988018
>>10988033
Yeah, you're right. In the image itself he talked about using an external adapter to connect to the API that requires subscription or some shit.

>>10988050
I forgot because I'm dumb but luckily it's in the comment itself

>>10988030
I don't know, that's what I just assumed. I'll ask Thomas if you want or you can ask yourself t.me/chainlinkofficial

>>10988033
To be fair the comment I replied to only asked about open API endpoints, where I'm 90% sure you only need to have your node up and running.

>>10988018
For public API endpoints, sure, but those will be the lowest value ones. If you want to differentiate your node you'd want to have access to paid feeds.

>>10988101
not true. the value of the transactions dictate the value given to node operators. most contracts will just use free price data.

>>10986435
ConsenSys are going to be all over ChainLink with many of the ‘spokes’ utilising the network

Notice how Thomas responds to the question of reputation needing to be complete before main net: "that wouldn't be the complete system." He doesn't clarify that main net could be launched with reputation added later. The FAQ also says the system "wouldn't be complete" without reputation. I think they are going to launch the network around the 1 year anniversary of their ICO date, just like ethereum did. Ethereum started out incomplete, and it still is.

>>10988137
But if you have 10k nodes all just connected to open endpoints it's basically a lucky dip as to who gets chosen for the first jobs, and then those nodes, being the first to have a reputation score, instantly rise to the top. The opening months of node operation and the mechanisms to ensure a level playing field for node operators raises so many questions, and I'm honestly no teven sure the team would be dedicating mental resources to these sorts of questions.

>>10988074
Please ask him, I am wageleling and can only check biz while I shit. It doesn't make sense, though. Why would you hard cap the possible requests/sec to a number smaller than the number of available nodes?

>>10988278
We don’t know for sure what they are going to do. It’s so fucking annoying that they don’t ever say shit. At this point I’m starting to thing link is a low key place for people to hold there money that’s not tether

>>10988278
This is a bit of a reach but yes he is dodging the question instead of answering it directly like "mainnet needs reputation" or some shit

>>10988299
Maybe this is relevant? I dunno
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.2529.pdf
See pic related

>>10988324
Sure, I'll ask him maybe tomorrow. I'll post a thread for you.

>>10988345
sounds like a strech. its true he skipped those who asked him if the live network would run only as a complete version, but he still said aggregation needs to be fully tested before they think about implementing reputation, something which hasn't really happened, as far as i know.

>>10988428
I agree, it's just annoying how it isn't directly answered so it gives a glimmer of hope but yeah if you read between the lines like how we do with most of our speculation and dots-connecting then yes, mainnet needs reputation

>>10988463
So 0.25 EOY?

>>10988299
I don't even know why this thread exists and why were going into this considering jonnys latest article. it goes into all of this stuff, are you too much of a brainlet to understand?
people will manually pick nodes manually on the listing service to begin with, it literally says it in black and white

>>10988278
>>10988327
>>10988345
>>10988428
>>10988463
>>10988604
We'll know by Monday (when they add more tasks to the Pivotal) if Main net is being released the last week of September. A sign will be if the team works on the project over the weekend. They're making fantastic progress this week and John Barker just started on one of next week's tasks. We'll see. We'll know in 3 days.

>another year of wagecucking

I am a huge fan of chainlink and discovered it on my favorite reddit forum /r/cryptocurrency. Today when I was out, I met this guy called Sergey at McDonalds, he saw my chainlink t-shirt, proceeded to sit at my table without my permission and mumble something about oracles and repeating numbers under his breath before he grabbed my big mac and ate it. I was absolutely shocked, until I realize I am sitting in front of the ChainLink CEO. Then he took out his 2005 flip phone, which he said he had so the CIA couldn't intercept his facebook messages (I don't even think that phone has facebook). And then proceeded to snap a picture of me and insisted I receive it via infrared to post on "biz". I didn't know what it was but googled it and landed here. Really strange guy this Sergey.

>>10988649
is there a set time every monday when they add tasks? I want to know when to be looking out for it.

>>10988702
topkek

There's actually a very specific reason why thodges and the team has to pretend that they're not currently working on reputation, but I cant reveal why. suffice to say, it has to do with who is actually taking care of that for them.

ok, off to buy me some new IBM software....

>>10988799
laaaaaarp
proof
source
anything

>>10988799
Why didn't they just outsource the dev of the whole network to IBM

>>10988799
it is obviously another network? Polkadot, maybe?

>>10988824
there will be reputation systems provided by other entities though. that is entirely possible.

>>10988821
>>10988824
only larp jesting about IBM, but the rep system is definitely being done by another team embedded in a post-grad project somewhere on the east coast. i cant say exactly where cos this group is attached to some military stuff and it'd blow cover on some of the engineers there.
there's something about the rep system that needs a very rare skillset to solve it. dont ask me what that is, i'm not a coder or network architecture guy, but whatever it is this team has it.

>>10988906
ps and it's not ari juels's research group, if that's what youre thinking.

>>10988781
not really. Sometimes if they're still working on stuff from the previous week they won't even do it until Tuesday or Wednesday :/

>>10988799
Why couldn't they just say they were working on it without disclosing this alleged connection to IBM? lol

>>10988799
Another Delphi faggot

>>10988921
Not Cornell and top secret military stuff?
How do you even come up with stuff like this

>>10988924
At least you gotta admit they're getting creative

>>10988936
They just know what buttons to push with trail and error. It’s crazy how people get with money they start to believe anything when normally they wouldn’t.

>>10988936
>How do you even come up with stuff like this
i assumed most ppl here knew that the rep stuff was being mostly outsourced. i'm not revealing anything new there, just that i know who's doing it. research groups oftentimes do a lot of work for military. nothing unusual in that.

>>10988906
>>10988921
Why couldn't they just say they're working on it without disclosing who is really doing the work until it's released? Your larp doesn't make sense

>>10984857
Do you need bitcoin to run a bitcoin node? Do you need ether to run an ethereum node?
That's what I thought, cucklord.

>>10988980
Just dump who you think it is or fuckoff. I’m tired you idiots ducking with everyone. You would get more recognition if you tripped and dumped small leaks

https://www.cypherium.io/landing/index.html

>>10984436

how should we square this with rory's comment about mainnet coinciding with the hiring of the marketing director? based on his comment i can see mainnet being q4 2018 but anything beyond that seems contradictory.

>>10988980
Is it the group that has the dashboard up and running on a sort of testnet? I came across it the other week.

just gonna drop this here
https://www.fidelitylabs.com/

>>10983474
Open up.. for accumulation

Might be this.
http://poc.fern.network/

https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/09/04/1565143/0/en/Cypherium-Releases-Scalable-Enterprise-Ready-Blockchain-in-Beta.html

>>10983301

Thank fuck. Now Link can dump all October and November since the rumors will be dead and I can accumulate super low.

>>10985730

Impatient faggot lol. I hope you sell in disappointment on October 1st when there is no mainnet. Just sell and buy back mid 2019.

>>10989066
>>10989111
OK ic3 partners, Fidelity labs in Boston, affiliated with MIT and plenty of blockchain connections

this is great news..i can sell my LINK and buy back in later

>>10988799

I fucking hate you rumor mill shits. Stop starting these fucking baseless rumors and generating hype for your swing trading pumps you stupid shits. Fuck. Just let it go down sub 20 cents so we can accumulate shittons. I mean do you want 100k linkies or a million linkies when mainnet launches?

>>10989066
>>10989111
>>10989148
>>10989191
so...

>>10989315
Main net is not launching for another year

>>10988799
fuck off delphi

>>10983311
It's her special day today so I dedicate this the thread for the best sniper in the universe Sinon/Asada Shino.

Happy Birthday!

>>10989204
I don’t remember asking for your fucking opinion, Pinocchio. Main net is in 3 weeks

>>10989410
are we talking about marmalade?

mainnet 2025

>>10989538
montana mark's municipal marmalade manifests mediocre militiamen

Why doesn't anybody talk about all the work that,neds to be done by companies that would use link? Mainnet won't release until they have their shit together too.

>>10989560
maritime mission municipal marmalade Monday mixer

>>10989089
Rory is literally just the community manager. He’s the lowest on the totem pole and things are subject to change. Thomas should be considered a much more trustworthy source of info.

>>10989563
They've been collaborating with SWIFT and Microsoft for years, as well as others we probably don't know about

but ... but muh director of marketing before mainnet

>>10984063
how do i apply for welfare?

>>10989703
Yeah, but nobody knows anything about the progress these collaborators have made. The only thing we know is that they've had over a year to develop using the centralized oracle on the backend. Is that enough time?

>>10989563
Look at mulesoft, town crier, SGX development etc etc. Those companies are doing tons in terms of providing safe API data. PSD2 requires safe open API's by next year.

>>10983559
I come to this shit board way to fucking much to not recognize your pasta you god damn faggot

>>10991018
this entire thread tastes like fudding pasta

>>10991124
I don't even know anymore. Crypto is fucked, but I know I am not selling. Whether the ship sinks or swims, I will not sell. It's too much of a pain in the ass anyway that comes with being accused of money laundering from the Gov

>>10991142

if you were here in October you'd know that edging is a cornerstone of the SmartContract.com company. There is no hype, only energy spent towards working on the product. In fact edging was what Sergey focused on for his Philosophy degree. This explains why partnerships are being kept secret and the suddenness of the inevitable singularity. When the singularity happens, be sure to open the Citizen app if you live in the SF bay area and look for an incident titled "office building flooded with semen" as Sergey et al will no longer be able to contain themselves. Sergey will blow the biggest load though as he's expressed a greater propensity of a hard on for decentralization. In fact in his interviews the first word Sergey says to candidates is "decentralization." No sentences or words around it. He looks intensely at their crotch, and if the candidate doesn't get wet or hard in 30 seconds the candidate is rejected.
With this information the reasoning is clear: a significant partnership has been secured, and the smartcontract team has been vigorously doing laundry or buying new underwear. This isn't sustainable however because the massive volume of pre cum will ruin the dry cleaning machines. It's only a matter of time until the laundromats find out whats going on. Hence it is a race against ejaculation, and a rigorous mental battle to keep their enthusiasm in check.

>>10989315
mainnet will take a lot of people by surprise. in fact, it will take the dev team by surprise.
why might that be? think abt it. september will be a massive month for LINK.....

>>10991189
If you have actual info tell us, if you're a LARPer please leave.

>>10991189
That doesn't make any sense. Could you explain further (your obviously larping, but it's amusing.)

>>10983311
I really hope you check your privilege

>>10991222
Obviously Sergey has already finished the reputation system while he was couchsurfing and getting 2048.

>>10991216
>>10991222
it's known to a few people that sergay isnt running the show at LINK. the big enterprise overlords are. that means that they get to decide when to launch mainnet.
listening to thodges and rory on telegram is a joke. they're just acting as chum to keep the neet army in order.
it's 95% certain that Swift will give the go-ahead to launch sept/oct. then sit back and watch the singularity happen before your very eyes.....

>>10991260
This is a bad LARP and you should feel bad.

>>10991260
kys

>>10991260
Hmmm interesting theory, won't believe you just yet. Allready all in Link so nothing changes. Can you post some proof?
Otherwise we will just have to wait then.

>>10991260
>sergay
>overlords
Xenu Warrior Princess and the Thetans of Zanzibar

>>10991348
Municipal marmalade makes manchurians meditate

>>10991260
Weird I was just about to post something VERY similar to this. Adelyn also would not have been hired if they weren't getting very close. As it has been discussed "the hiring of a marketing director will coincide with launch of main-net."

>>10991260

>>10984436
>Operator UI just means there's a basic dashboard for people to play with on the testnet. Then they have to code how all the node responses are securely aggregated. Then they have to code the reputation system that allows nodes to demonstrate their reliability. Aggregation is a big job but is relatively straightforward, and they have laid out the mechanisms pretty clearly in the whitepaper with the whole "commit/reveal" thing.
>But reputation is massive. That is such a difficult concept to get correct from the outset and if you have any vulnerabilities or ways to "game" reputation then your entire network is at risk. I'm not a fudder. I hold 130k LINK and have done since last September. But the reputation system has to be absolutely waterproof AT LAUNCH because otherwise malicious node operators will game themselves into early positions of unfair advantage that will then be entrenched. I wouldn't be surprised if reputation takes 6 months on its own. Everyone needs to chill the fuck out and the "wen moon" faggots need to find another project.

>>10983301
Why is this a bad thing? Link is a minimum 2 year hold anyways

>>10991260
This makes a lot of sense and I believe it. Also it is exactly what I want to believe.

>>10990936
this..we are ready for launch

>>10984681
Link is hovering around 30 cents...it's already dirt cheap

>>10992134
>Link is a minimum 2 year hold anyways
fuck outta here with that BS, no one knows how much of this shitty industry will be left in 2 years. I'm getting out on the first +$5 pump and you "long term hodl marines" enjoy waiting for your 1keoy meme that will never come

>>10992134
If you look in the archive from like 2015/2016 you hear people saying Ethereum is a 4-5 year hold. In reality it was a 1-2 year hold.

>>10992237
Indeed many projects will not succeed. For many crypto projects this is already evident or has been from their pathetic outset. However, don't forget that this is cutting edge technology with excellent long term potential. If you truly feel that it isn't worth much, I think that you will be proven wrong due to strong pushes for adoption. I understand your sentiment though. It is costly to implement new technologies to replace the status quo so naturally they must be expected to be sufficiently superior to warrant the expenditure. In Link's case, there is substantial evidence that it will indeed be used.

>>10992237
You're going to look back at this post and weep someday

>>10992319
I believe in LINK, imo it's the only and last thing that can trully moon in this shitty market but holding ANYTHING for 2 years or more is basicly gambling because there can be million things that can go wrong along the way, from the tech being replaced/the sec banning the shit out of eveything etc. If someone doesn't cash out on the first pump that guarantees him a comfy life but keeps hodling instead and then watches everything go to shit then he deserves to be poor because of greed

>>10992499

>>10992563
>mainnet never ever
>mainnet next week
fuck this board

>>10992762
Apparently its happening tonight

>>10988644
This is not true, there would be 2 ways to have nodes selected, either have it automatically matched if it fits your criteria, or manually picking it on a listing service like you said. Source is Thomas on reddit

>>10993250

>>10986967
Do you even know anything about software projects? I bet you've never coded a single line of code in your life boy.

>>10984669
Kek, that was great.

>>10989284
>>10989111
>>10989066

who else has MIT connections?

>>10991260

>>10988799
2nd.
t. someone in the loop.