/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10955610
Who is this guy lol

Dont have twitter, post a screen shot!
Thanks

>>10955634

c’mon op what’s the deal

>>10955650
Nice find mate!

>>10955610
so one of citibank's 100K employees "liked" REQ on Twitter

mate. even as a bagholder... your level of desperation is painful. i just physically cringed

>>10955679
By the picture, it looks like is an employee that is working on blockchain research.

This means that at the end of the research, Req will be exposed as a blockchain player.

>>10955610
What will be revealed later is that Req is one of the biggest scams of the ICO era. I’m actually serious. There’s a reason why their team members never give public speeches or interviews. Ask what happened to the money investors put into Moneytis and why they pivoted so abruptly to Request.

>>10955765
My asshole blah blah blah mozz mozz mozz blah blah pizza

>>10955643
>>10955658
You need to go back

buy now faggots

Why is this person following and liking Request Network tweets? Does this actually mean anything?

"Citibank provides credit cards, mortgages, personal loans, commercial loans, and lines of credit."

>>10955610
Why has the team only spent $400K on this project? How much did they spent on that fancy dinner night?

>>10955610
>YC partner chimes in. I don’t even care if you believe me. I know the truth about this team. I feel bad for the people that defend the Req team

I wanted to wait until I could bail out of req. But fuck it, I'm never making my money back.

https://etherscan.io/address/0xA76bC39aE4B88ef203C6Afe3fD219549d86D12f2#tokentxns

This the req team, vested (for 2 years) account it should contain 150mm. Money is still moving out, keep watch of the dumps, it correlates, we're never going back to $1, we're worthless and officially scammed. I want to fucking die

>>10956196
you realize anyone can google the address and call out your 2 month old bullshit?
https://old.reddit.com/r/RequestNetwork/comments/8q2gip/can_someone_confirm_the_dev_wallets/
none of the trails lead to an exchange.

and if they wanted to dump they could just dump their ETH that they got.

This is actually a somewhat significant find that makes me not feel so bad about holding this dogshit token. He doesn't seem to like tweets from a bunch of different projects, he only likes the REQ updates and one about Ethereum's scaling solutions.

So maybe they actually, unironically are in discussions with some big players?

>>10955789
>>10956196
ppppp-pllease dont buy req because im trying to fill my buy orders

>>10956419
This just confirms that when ICO wallets move CMC considers them "in circulation"

That means that the moment chainlink mainnet goes live the price will halve. Get ready for a lot of swingin boys, we gonna do it like Roger (just don't actually buy btrash)

>>10957097
People actually use CMC? I thought the whole point of crypto was to not be a part of goyims system measured against fiat? Kek guess not...

>>10957115
It doesn't matter if they use it, when the REQ tokens left the main wallet, CMC reflected the change by putting them "in circulation". Like I said before, automatically, the price started dropping. It reflects a market process, not how CMC works

Now, it depends if the LINK team will move all funds out of the 350mil wallet at once or just a fraction of those. Either way I expect it to go like REQ went during that time

>>10955610
Kek req is the new digibyte confirmed. Enjoy losing all your money

>>10955759
Are you retarded?

>>10957148
I remember when pajeets said that for LINK. Then when everything dumped and LINK went to 5k sats and just stayed there, sitting comfy on its fat hairy balls

>>10957148
Not like it matters at this point Kek everything is lost

>>10957161
I say digibyte because of the whole Citibank thing

>>10956892
you can only hope, but i think Req is a big scam. the team has done virtually nothing the past 9 months. the dev teams have done nothing either. no development, no completed projects, no public appearances, hardly any github commits. their hiding of any details smells like a scam.

>dapps don't work on mobile
>no BTC support

good luck reqqies

>>10955610
To clarify, the partnership is with Citibank France.

>>10957674
Are you purposely trying to FUD? Or just that dumb? This month the whole entire dev team are going public at a tech convention centre for you guys to ask questions. It was in yesterday's fucking update you mongrol...

pamp it