[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 24 KB, 755x493, epics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10935247 No.10935247 [Reply] [Original]

>service agreement
>74% complete
>operator-ui
>84% complete

After this week, apart from 2 service agreement tasks it's nothing but bugs and Circle CI work on the tracker. Main net is probably before the end of September.

>> No.10935284

Those equal to 79% average.
Project is over 1 year old.
Main net confirmed not til q1 2019


Drop those bags and pick up some holo for the golden alt run.

>> No.10935301

>Reputation
>0% complete

Main net 2019 confirmed, pajeet.

>> No.10935398

>>10935247

estimated completion dates in pivotal tracker are a complete meme

>> No.10935407
File: 94 KB, 1065x831, coinbase.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10935407

>>10935398
what about this in pivotal tracker?

>> No.10935425

>>10935407

requested aug 29th, 2018

Description:

The current job spec format currently takes all of the different task params merged together as a single JSON object. This becomes problematic when you want to do the same action twice in a row, but differently; ie HTTP GET to Binance and HTTP GET to Coinbase. This is could be handled a number of ways, but none are intuitive, because of the mixing of task params into one object.

An alternate more verbose structure has been proposed to clear this up:

{
tasks: [
{type: "httpGet", params: {url: "A1.example.com/api/..."}},
{type: "httpGet", params: {url: "B2.example.com/api/..."}},
{type: "httpGet"},
...
]
}

Run requests for these tasks would be specified as an array of objects:

[
{},
{},
{url: "C3.example.com"},
...
]

This format is a cleaner mapping, but also comes with the tradeoff of being more verbose, and thus more expensive to specify on-chain.

>> No.10935429

>>10935301
they already said that won't be done at first

>> No.10935432

>>10935398
not the dates, how completed the epics are

>>10935407
they used coinbase as an example, click the arrow to open up the story

>> No.10935440

>>10935247
stop shitting up the board and use the general:
>>10932831

>> No.10935447

>>10935425
So it was just another json partner after all.

>> No.10935493

>>10935425
>using Gets

>> No.10935602

>>10935440
Nolinker detected

>> No.10935646

>>10935425
literally a json parser. linkies are so deluded. never gonna make it. sell your LINKs now if you want to save your money for when this shit hits $0

>> No.10935668

>>10935646
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS

>> No.10936117
File: 12 KB, 275x183, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10936117

>>10935646
>trust me
>everyone on /biz/ is looking out for you

>> No.10936658

>>10935301
It's all soo tiring. Reputation is 3rd party. How can they finish something they aren't doing?
>Look at the tracker, p2p currency not even started! Mainnet never suck it linkfags

>> No.10937116

>>10935440
gtfo nolinker

>> No.10937177 [DELETED] 

>>10935425
HAVING SEX WITH MY WIFE IS A MYSTERY
LET HER FUCK MEN WHILE I'M LOCKED IN CHASTITY
MAYBE ONE DAY SHE'LL LET ME LICK HER PUSSY

3 CHILDREN THAT I HAVE LOST
NOW BEING RAISED BY SHANE
WHEN I SEE THEM I CRY OUT IN PAIN

A COCK IN MY WIFE
IT'S BIG, BLACK AND LOOKS REALLY NICE
I JERK OFF AND LET HER BANG OTHER GUYS...

>> No.10937858

>>10935440
Fuck off faggot, get out of our Link thread.

>> No.10937865

>>10935247
Fake and gay

>> No.10938229

>>10935247
>epic progress
holy shit i didn't know i invested in minecraft kids, dumping on the next pump
next thing you know is sergey tipping his fedora to the crowd..

>> No.10938344
File: 69 KB, 1071x561, 1525874283550.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10938344

>>10938229

>> No.10938367

>>10938344
thanks fren, you're #1 though :)

>> No.10938593

>>10935247
Ok, this is epic.

>> No.10938703
File: 97 KB, 1267x785, pepe under rug.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10938703

>>10935440
>Leave

>> No.10938724

>>10935247
main net will be 2019

guaranteed

and no meaningful gains in clients until 2021

you delusional linktards are the worst

>> No.10938765

Everyone is thinking that it will launch in September, but thats so fucking optimistic. unless the team have outsourced a shit load of work in secret. the reputation system literally is what makes link the 1000$ meme. i f they are just starting it then then it confirms we have a while to go, and we know they wont launch a half baked product because they have no reason to. Next year, or if they really get their act together November-December is feasible.

Also, when you look on the github and see their commits its impressive, but looking at exactly what hthey are trying to do with the reputation system and its a bit obvious that there is a lot fo work to be done, and anyone with ANY knowledge of C+and Linux custom script integrated GNU compilers knows it's a minimum 2-3 year AT BEST with a single coder, maybe less with more.

Link devs took the hard route of going for a SE Linux hardened kernel integration into their scripting tool - PRO TIP, since they are using it as part of the foundation for main-net, it is essential it is 100% complete, and with investors like Swift its not going to be fucking risked launching early.

Even Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux) took 2 years to compile a similar scripting tool.

>> No.10938802

>>10938724
>main net will be 2019 guaranteed
>trust me sirs
>no meaningful gains in clients until 2021
>but i will not provide any logic or evidence behind how i reached this conclusion because linktards are delusional heh heh heh heh heh
anything else to pull out of your ass to say without any backing whatsoever? fuck off and go buy the top of the HOT pump you utter brainlet. stay fucking poor hahahaha

>> No.10938844

>>10938765
Kek Jason parsers take like two days to complete with reputation decentralization is a meme