/biz/ - Business & Finance

Except that it doesn't

>>10926281
Except that it does

Only niggers and nigger-minded people fud Link nowadays

>>10926264
This

>>10926287
No mainnet means Link can't technically do anything right now.

It won't work, it's an utility token, you should get over it.

>>10926287
No, it’s just really clear that a large majority of the Linkies here don’t even understand what ChainLink is trying to accomplish (like OP). No one is able to have interesting conversations about it because they just parrot the same meme information. There are so many facets of ChainLink that are never discussed like that it may not be a long term used product (maybe eventually the majority of individuals and institutions will use tokenized assets and such and won’t need payouts/output of offchain info. Maybe a large portion of smart contracts won’t even opt to use the ChainLink network, viewing it as an extra unnecessary expense seeing two steps ahead that eventually everything they may need will be on chain. Maybe it won’t be worth the extra expense to pay for a large number of nodes for your application and hardly any nodes get used besides a few huge, good reputation ones. Some people “fud” because they want smart people to discuss the project with, but fewer and fewer anons offer that. Months ago there was some interesting discussion about ChainLink, but for some reason it became a cult and a guarantee that it’ll make everyone rich. People can’t view it objectively for what it is: a fucking oracle nerwork...

>>10926382

>>10926382
All data businesses will ever need will be on chain? Lol k

>>10926458
Stop comparing Link with Ethereum.

>>10926467
Yes...why is that less realistic than “1k EOY!!!”

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>10926486
you are a MANIAC

>>10926467
They’re getting a huge majority of data now through APIs and info stored and disseminated by large servers...I think a lot of that data will eventually be on something like hyperledger, and will therefore be onchain

>>10926471
yeah you’re right, it’s going to be a lot bigger

>>10926458
What is your point? Why do people compare ChainLink to Ethereum? They aren’t comparable projects. Ethereum can potentially hold tons of information and applications securely, ChainLink offers a way for people to get info onto such a network...if they really think they need to use a decentralized oracle network and want to pay extra to use one. Most people will just have developers make oracles and develop smart contracts relevant to their needs, get it onchain, and see that there are no issues and probably not look any further. Maybe SOME people will have some kind of use case for needing a decentralized oracle network for constantly transferring data on and off chain...but I bet a lot of those entities will fall behind

>>10926471
Ethereum is a fucking distributed database. Chainlink will bring smart vontracts to the masses. Blockchains will just keep data tamperproof for chainlink to use.

>>10926553
Bigger how and why? What if developers for huge corporations that handle API info don’t want to use ChainLink to get stuff on chain? What if they are already devising ways to get all necessary info on chain by 2025 and wouldn’t need link beyond that anyway and have very secure oracles to achieve this? Why do people see this as such a sure thing? A lot of people though ETH was gonna be incredible, and it is becoming prettt clear that it is shit compared to something like hyperledger.

>>10926556
>Most people will just have developers make oracles and develop smart contracts relevant to their needs

>most people will just build their own chairs for the office, no need for extra expense

>>10926579
How will ChainLink being Smart Contracts to the masses? The masses will use smart contracts with or without ChainLink if there is a financial incentive. People have been using them already. Smartcontracts.com has been developing smart contracts for use cases for years already...they just see a decentralized oracle network as useful in some instances. I disagree with them and I’m interested in seeing why you think it is so necessary.

>>10926612
You're right. Noone will use chainlink .001 cents and 1k suicides eoy

>>10926264
right now is magic
if chainlink works it will usher in a new era of trustless transactions
make all business more efficient
and make us all filthy rich

if it works

right now nobody knows
it is a coin flipping slowly in the air
complete uncertainty
with the world in the balance
and everyone smart enough to understand watching

magic

>>10926287
After a lot of time contemplating and reading many 'lovely' comments about trans women from cis guys on this board I've come to the conclusion they're just not worth it.

Trans men are, for several reasons better
-they won't objectify me and see me as more than an actual sex object
-they can actually emphatize with what dysphoria and depression feels like
-they won't make me question my womanhood despite me being trans
-they'll be more likely to be okay with my neo vag and not make fun of it or call it an "axe wound"
-they're generally not as douchy as all the cis guys here
-at the same time they're more handsome

The only problem is what they've down there, but I don't care. I mean they probably don't like it either. And people with functional dicks are dicks themselves for the most part anyways.
Inb4: 't.larping ftm',
I'm mtf and cis guys just suck and everyone should avoid dating them if they can, I'd actually become prison transbian if trans guys wouldn't exist
Inb4 "lol ftm are women"
they're more masculine than any of you will ever be

>>10926622
Your analogy is shit. It should read like this:

>most people will have developers make oracles
>most people will have carpenters make chairs

Both cases it is true.

>>10926635
>>10926612
>>10926556
>>10926503
>>10926480
>>10926382
>how
>what
>why
>where
>who
>why
>what
>how
drink bleach

>>10926637
You should be concerned that this is the response that anyone inevitably gives when they don’t want to discuss the project in any way that isn’t glowingly positive or suggesting Twitter follows equal partnerships. And then a bunch of pasta about trans people and “we’re all in this together” follows. I really don’t think most people here have any idea of how smart contracts are being made, it is bizarre.

>>10926556
Link will not be used by “some people”. Rather institutions, like the derivatives and banking markets. Think about it,The banking institution hasn’t had any significant level of automation. It’s archaic. Link will destroy those paper pushers who profit from distorting numbers.

>>10926635
Even if the only thing chainlink solves is no downtime it will still be a massive improvement over oraclize

>>10926612
>the trillion dollar derivatives market already sees the potential in trustless smart contracts yet some contrarian on a chinese image board thinks he knows better

>>10926671
All I’m saying is ETH made people rich based off of massive hype about it being incredible and a bunch of idiots bought into it and right now it doesn’t appear to be that useful and is currently way over valued for its lack of utility. Maybe ChainLink can have a similar jump, but people here deliberately don’t want people discussing this project elsewhere. No one NEEDS ChainLink for smart contracts. And anyone that has convinced you that that is true, was either being deliberately dishonest or just doesn’t understand how things are being developed...

>>10926671

>>10926734
They’ve barely started marketing. There will be normie hype.

>>10926382
Your "criticisms" are so asinine that you don't have any right to be skeptical. You accuse other people of not understanding Chainlink and then suggest it might fail because tokenised assets might not need oracles. You honestly don't even understand what the fuck you're talking about and I think you're just bloviating in an attempt to create pasta.

>>10926734
this is only partially correct
they need a way to monetize apis that will become part of the smart contract economy in a way that allows for protection of vendor data in a secure manner
no other project is even saying that, much less getting ready to deliver it

>>10926496
Stop writing the same fucking shit you stupid retarded inbreed fuck

>>10926690
By “some people,” that’s what I meant: corporations, legal entities, etc. I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m just wondering why people seem to believe this advancement is contingent on Chainlink’s use in any way. Smart contracts will happen with or without ChainLink.

>>10926761
No

>>10926264
Linkie doesn't gno about ISO TC307.

>>10926677
>trans people
you fucking piece of shit. you belong in an oven right along with those freaks.

>>10926503
>I think a lot of that data will eventually be on something like hyperledger, and will therefore be onchain
How will it get on chain? How will live data coming from API feeds end up "on chain"? By what mechanism will that happen?

>>10926753
Tokenized assets won’t need oracles for getting info on and off chain if all the info they need is already onchain. This obviously isn’t the case right now, furthermore, I’m not suggesting they don’t need oracles now, but I am suggesting that they don’t need a decentralized oracle network.

>>10926772
Why no?

>>10926761
>smart contracts will [be brought to the institutional masses] with or without [the guy with who registered the smartcontract.com domain nearly a decade ago]
this has to be bait

The link delusion continues. Imagine being the person who believes that a gypsy russian with a philosophy degree and no programming experience is going to instantiate a global, paradigm shifting economic system where banks and other entities are going to willfully funnel hundreds of billions of dollars into and sit around idly while said gypsy russian and his family of neet fags take profits.

Now imagine being the person who believes that the worlds banking cartels, with arguably some of the most brilliant computer scientists out there, are going to sit by and let a gypsy russian take profits they could have had by using a simple JSON parser.


Consider this snippet from the following article:
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/10736960/High-frequency-trading-when-milliseconds-mean-millions.html]

"No wonder that Spread Networks, the company building the fibre-optic connection, proudly boasted: “Round-trip travel time from Chicago to New Jersey has been cut to 13 milliseconds.”

And HFTs were willing to pay through the nose to use it, with the first 200 to sign up forking out $2.8bn between them."
These fucking jews spend billions of dollars just to get a 13 millisecond improvement so their algorithms can get the data faster. So you're telling me that if there was any money in the chainlink area these guys wouldn't be all over it? Get the fuck out of here.

So explain to me why this is going to work again? Or is it just a PnD like 99% of other crypto's out there.

>>10926797
I don’t know, and I’m thinking in the future where people are using blockchains more for the internet of finance, the internet of legal info, internet of voting, identity, etc. Maybe people will always use HTTP and large centralized data centers going forward, but I dunno. I’m speaking speculatively in that regard.

>>10926881
>I’m speaking speculatively in that regard.
No, you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. The answer to my question is simple. The mechanism by which live data is connected and fed onto a blockchain is through an oracle. That's literally the definition of an oracle. This is absolutely fucking rudimentary.

>>10926761
If smart contracts happen then chainlink will somehow be apart of its growth. The guys at cl have been working on this before eth existed and the fact that they had some sort of relationship with swift speaks volumes.

>>10926846
You aren’t making a logical argument. There is tons of development occurring on smart contracts that have nothing to do with smartcontracts.com, just like I’m sure Dell and Apple have accomplished way more than whoever owns computers.com and huge corporate law entities do way more than the guy or group that owns lawyers.com

>>10926635
>smart contracts with or without ChainLink
How will real world data be brought onto the blockchain without an oracle though? Without an oracle smart contracts are extremely limited in usecase and might as well not even exist.

>>10926900
Obviously yes. Right now, oracles are being used to feed API info into smart contract/block applications. I’m thinking in a future where less financial communication occurs via HTTP interaction amongst huge servers owned by third party centralized entities and websites interacting with APIs. I think this is the ultimate goal because it will be less efficient to constantly be exchanging information with these legacy systems. I think there will be an intermediary step where something like ChainLink COULD be used. And maybe it will be, I’m not saying it won’t. But it seems like a lot of people here think smart contract communication between onchain resources and legacy resources could never and would never occur without a decentralized oracle network. I think more people (corporations, etc) will just let their devs take care of the whole process and in most instances that will involve creating an oracle for a specific usecase, API feed, etc.

>>10926923
>>10926921

>>10926961
I never said it won’t. I said that data doesn’t necessarily need to be brought onchain by ChainLink’s decentralized oracle network now and will be brought on the the same way SmartContracts.com and several other developers have interacted information on and off chain: by good oracles developed by smart developers.

>>10926987
If a part of the process is centralized then why use smart contracts at all.

Does Link stand a chance against Oraclize and Mobious? They have a much better communication

>>10926921
Maybe just the guys at Smart Contracts.com will be a part of its growth, that doesn’t GUARANTEE that ChainLink will. These guys have been developing smart contracts for years with their “schedule” paradigm, so clearly ChainLink isn’t necessary for ALL (or probably even most) instances...

>>10926987
In Ari Juels words, smart contracts are "data hungry". For them to be useful they need to be connected to external information, not just legacy financial systems, but triggering events that come from real world happenings. Flight delays, weather events, etc etc etc. So smart contracts need oracles in a way that is literally indispensable. This is not an intermediate step. It is a fundamental component of an operational smart contract that it needs to know what is happening from external sources so it knows when to trigger. And it's pointless to have a complex smart contract agreement with a trusted oracle because you might as well not bother with the oracle and just have a trusted mediator/executor. Trustlessness is a necessary and indispensable component of an actually useful oracle service at scale.
You're spitballing about shit that you honestly haven't gone to the trouble to understand properly.

>>10927030
Blaire asked her bf “do you wish I was cis” and he said no, and he was telling the truth. CHASER SCUM. How didn’t she dump him right then and there, he actively wants her to have a penis

I just need $3 link.

It's just a erc 20 Jason parser utility token!!! 2 man team!!! Philosophy degree!!!

>>10927052
Which models would you like to see walk in this year's Victoria's Secret Fashion Show? For me it's Jessica Clements.

>>10927042
Agreed, without an oracle, smart contracts have no future...and the oracle cannot be centralized or else smart contracts have no point.

>>10927011
Once the information is onchain, it is no longer centralized. ChainLink just allows you to decentrally verify that info by choosing two or more of their nodes for your particular use case. So I mean, maybe some people don’t trust the security associated with their API set up, or the developer creating their oracle, but anyone expecting their money to be handled by smart contracts should obviously have multiple parties ensure that the oracle used is sound and isn’t going to fuck up the API info being fed on chain. In some cases, yes ChainLink could be a valuable layer of security for this, but if you’ve got a trusted, cryptographically sound oracle, I’m not sure why that’d be a problem. I’m actually hoping someone could help me understand that a bit better.

>>10927075
Does anyone have that react pic of Riko from Made in Abyss looking like she's screaming angrily?

>>10927042
Why is it pointless to have a “trusted oracle?” If that oracle is cryptographically secure...

>>10926761
Single point of failure. Without a decentralized node, each of the central node is vulnerable to attack and can be compromised. It’s recreating the distributes ledger idea from bitcoin to the outside world. Bitcoin has become bitcoin precisely because it cannot be compromised. Hence if we have truly trusted data that Cannot be compromised then we can provide reliable mediums transfer and automation. Banks and other large scale institutions would use it since they can properly rely in it.

Other companies can have a centralized oracle, but that’s creating plenty of opportunities to be compromised. Only time will tell. But it seems that the idea of a decentralized oracle is the best solution looking ahead

>>10927124
You might as well ask what is the point of smart contracts...the point of smart contracts and decentralized is trustlessness as well as to eliminate single point of failures. If a single step of the process is not trustless, then might as well go with a traditional contract instead of bothering with "smart" contracts.

>>10927124
Because a centralised oracle provider is a trusted third party. And if you're going to have a trusted third party who acts as a central point of failure then you might as well just get a professional mediator to do your exchange instead of a smart contract.
A smart contract with a trusted oracle is actually less efficient than a mediated exchange of value because it has pointless steps. The whole smart contract part is a waste. It has to be trustless so that all the contracting parties can enter into the agreement knowing that there literally can't be collusion between one of the parties and a trusted third party. That's why a decentralised oracle network is an absolute goldmine solution.

>>10927129
I mean sure, it can be a “single point of failure,” but there are realistically ways that you could create that oracle that if it were to go down, there are probably bigger issues to worry about (like when people say “what would you do if you held BTC and there was a solar flair that knocked out the power grid...well if the power grid is destroyed, I think BTC isn’t your biggest initial concern). I think this fact will exist as long as there is offchain data and information being sent and received via API, HTTP, etc.

>>10927170
Hey guys just thought i would post this website here, they've got all sorts of space related papercraft pdfs.

Lots of real rockets, and lots of variation. ICBMs too if thats your things.

Happy folding!

http://jleslie48.com/gallery_models_real.html

>>10927170
its that time of year again,

since october and by association halloween is right around the corner let's post halloween themed papercraft, origami and costume ideas/tips so we can help our fellow /po/lite friends

please no arguing this board is too slow for that shit

ill start with this wolf head i found in my folder and a question on whether i should do something like this or a helmet from skyrim

>>10926382
>>10926480
>>10926503
>>10926556
>>10926612
>>10926635

I like your way of thinking.

Could you unironically shill me some coins that in your opinion have a potential?

>>10927180
>power grid is destroyed
We have to stay grounded here...if the power grid is destroyed civilization itself is over. Obviously chainlink isn't 100% foolproof since as you stated, a global apocalypse can render it useless, but that scenario isn't very grounded in reality.

>>10927181
I this fag a bot? Wtf is this cunt doing

Could this scenario happen with chainlink?

>>10926846
There's a guy at work who is pretty twinky, but also taller then me even though I'm 6'. Ive never been in a relationship before and idk what I do. Should I just blatantly ask him or should I not. I've talked to him a little and other then being flamboyant, he seemed pretty cool. I'm nervous to make a move. Any tips?

>>10927210
Im not a bot you black nigger

>>10927211
Decentralised oracles are the solution to that sort of problem. It's the opposite.

>>10927075
This can’t be true. It can’t be that simple. There’s gotta be another way smart contracts can work.

>>10927231
Go away faggot.

>>10927211
why ponzi scheme tho

>>10927203
Another playoff tier pitching matchup for the Cubs for this rubber match.

Chicago Cubs
1. Daniel Murphy (L) 2B
2. Javier Baez (R) SS
3. Anthony Rizzo (L) 1B
4. Kris Bryant (R) RF
5. Kyle Schwarber (L) LF
6. Willson Contreras (R) C
7. Ian Happ (S) CF
8. Jon Lester (L) P
9. David Bote (R) 3B

Philadelphia Phillies
1. Roman Quinn (S) CF
2. Rhys Hoskins (R) LF
3. Jose Bautista (R) RF
4. Carlos Santana (S) 1B
5. Asdrubal Cabrera (S) 3B
6. Scott Kingery (R) SS
7. Pedro Florimon (S) 2B
8. Jorge Alfaro (R) C
9. Aaron Nola (R) P

Gamenotes
>Gametime Forecast: 81°F • Humid and Mostly Clo • 1% PoP
>Start Time: 12:35pm CST
>Philadelphia Phillies activated 1B Justin Bour.

>>10927211
Remember, if the source of data is bad that is not chainlink's problem. Chainlink is simply the mailman that makes sure the mail is delivered without anyone tampering with it on the way...it is not chainlink's job to open the mail and inspect if for foul play.

>>10927266
The natural armpit odor because of men's dominant pheromones. There's nothing women like better than a stingy, masculine, and sweaty armpit.

>>10927236
The smart contract has to get information from the outside world, right? It has to "know" when to pay X, or when to transfer X tokens, or when to do the thing that is it programmed to do. So step one to understanding is that for smart contracts to have any use they have to have some connection to outside data. That way once they are written both parties can "take their hands off" the smart contract and it will execute in the proper way when it "knows" the time is right.
The second thing to understand is simply that if your data bridge between the smart contract and the outside world (which is the oracle) is a private company then you might as well just get a private company to hold both of your collateral and pay you out.
So step 1 is understanding that smart contracts are basically useless without outside data (through oracles), and potentially insanely valuable with them. Step 2 is understanding that the oracle MUST be trustless for the smart contract to actually be a better solution than just getting a trusted third party involved.

>>10927211
So I was talking with my friend and the topic of Tiny Toon Adventures came up. He asked why they made kid versions of everyone except for Yosemite Sam. I told him they did, Montana Max. Only real difference is instead of guns like Sam, Max has money to solve his problems. That and they had similar naming styles. He said he never thought they were the same.

Did anyone else miss this or not get Max was the Tiny Toon version of Sam or is my friend just dumb as a bag of rocks?

>>10927266
Unless you use trusted hardware + chainlink that’s the holy grail protocol

>>10927208
That was my point. You could create an oracle that isn’t going to “fail” because it is down. Furthermore, if your oracle is cryptographically secure to get the needed API info onchain, does it really matter if you got decentralized consensus by N nodes that the data is sound? I guess maybe in some cases.

>>10927308
In this scenario you might as well not bother with smart contracts then since it adds unnecessary steps, that other anon laid it out in a good way.

>>10927266
Ok that may be right but that could lead to catastrophic scenarios... like your house get sold for 1 dollar because the oracle mistaken the value of the house in your are for the value of 1 can of cocacola

>>10927266
So you essentially agree with me. There isn’t much benefit to using a decentralized oracle network if you know you have a great dev making sound oracles (who you could pay once for development instead of paying ChainLink every time you need to put info on and off chain)

>>10927302
Don't you think that they are managing Little Donny Disease in an inefficient way? For a bike they could just make him wear a pair of bike shorts over full baselayer bottoms. Zip ties seem excessive IMO.

>>10927233
So all the legal institutions and consortia currently defining the standardization of smart contracts such as openlaw, accord and data61/ANB are conscious of the oracle problem. People like Aaron Wright and Houman Shadab understand centralized oracles are worthless and cannot achieve trustlessness. Keep in mind these people are working with the top global law firms, and these firms are working to suit the needs of the other industries like derivatives and insurance. Institutions like SWIFT, leaders of the e signature industry like Gonser also endorsing.

Why isn't oraclize working with any of these type of players?

I wonder which oracle will ANB use...

>>10927334
Then wherever that bad data came from would get sued to oblivion, a bad data source has nothing to do with chainlink...only way to combat bad data source would be something like creating a benevolent ai...in other words we would have to get into scifi territory.

>>10927335
The source of data is different from how that data gets onto the chain as well as how it is triggered though.

>>10927203
I’m sorry, I don’t really like to shill or fud anything here. I honestly just like to discuss projects that seem interesting and/or have hype because I want to make sure there isn’t something vastly important I’m missing. I kept feeling like I’m missing something with ChainLink until I watched more of Sergey’s presentations and such, and I realized I don’t think I’m missing anything.

>>10926328
If i travel back in time and kill Hitler before his rise to power, that would place me in an alternate timeline where Hitler was never evil. Hence I just killed an innocent man.

The solution is obvious, just kill Hitler after he became evil right? But to become evil he first has to commit an evil act, hence I have done evil by letting him do evil so I would not kill an innocent man.

Hence we can conclude there is no way to go back in time and kill Hitler without ceasing to be good.

By the same argument, there is no way to fix the future of pokemon.

>>10927388
There's easily enough replies in this thread that have addressed any concerns you have raised. If you can't see the value of decentralised oracles at this point then it honestly seems like you have a bone to pick.

>>10926797
I know this is a basic question, but how do I summon a demon to assist me in finding love? I need precise steps pls

>>10927430
this bot is out of control.

>>10927430
>>21379966 (OP) #
filenames in this format: "8CC28DC0-7FEC-4FD0-A57D-986FB785CCC5.jpg" are part of a data-mining operation.

NOW YOU KNOW

>>10927440
I'm not a bot Jeffery

>>10927388
You don’t think decentralized oracles are needed bruh? Tell me why

>>10927403

I'm starting to suspect that children's cartoons featuring anthropomorphic animals are a psyop.

This show got me into furfaggotry, which in turn got me into actual faggotry and watching beast shit. Media completely fucking destroyed my sense of self worth. Everyone's even aware that many animal-focused "children's" cartoons have copious amou

>>10927477
This show got me into furfaggotry, which in turn got me into actual faggotry and watching beast shit. Media completely fucking destroyed my sense of self worth. Everyone's even aware that many animal-focused "children's" cartoons have copious amounts of sexual innuendo.

>>10927231
So you're just a cock sucking faggot? Neck yourself and end your worthless existence you belong in a fucking oven.

>>10927440
Modern electric towers are based off ancient temples. The Ancient civilizations used sacred geometry (squaring the circle) to design buildings so that they would be channel celestial energies from above. In fact, The inspiration for temple designs also comes from the Human's chakra energetic system.

Surprisingly enough, These Ancient designs are effective for channeling the flow of electricity which really is a primitive form of energy when compared to how things were eons ago....

https://nasiresearch.org/2015/04/23/jacobs-ladder-and-the-antenna-of-the-temple/

>>10927513
The mast (yasti) of the stupa, which represents the cosmic axis, functions like an antenna that channels the aether (celestial) energy from the heavens into the earth. The heavens are represented by the chatras/umbrellas that are on the mast.

That's right there are multiple heavens!

>>10927477
>>10927492
Get in you sub 90 IQ mongrel

>>10927511
Investigators from the U.S. Air Force and the Department of Homeland Security searched a Sanford tomato warehouse Wednesday, but they wouldn’t say why.

The agents blocked access to Todd’s Tomatoes and Wholesale Produce on Wednesday morning and closed operations. Several agents, who wore Homeland Security badges, let employees out one by one in their cars. None of the employees would comment.

>>10927403
Not really. Let’s take this scenario:

You’re building a smart contract that will handle a large sum of money that receives info from an API. You have an awesome developer building the smart contract and he builds an oracle to handle inputs and outputs. You pay a separate dev once (maybe even a third) to review the contract and oracle construction and it all seems perfect.

Why is this a worse mode of operation than paying a dev, then paying the ChainLink network for X nodes every time you need to get info on and off chain.

If the likelihood of there being any issues in the first case is so statistically low, is that worth the money saved for having to continually pay the ChainLink network for use?

>>10927511
It's your existence that is worthless talking about an ERC-14 shitoken.

I'm trying to derail these threads to save you money and buy holo or tron

>>10927547
Fuck of subhuman piece of shit.

>>10927539
You're paying a small fee to use the Chainlink network or you're paying a dev to build an entire functioning and secure oracle for a single smart contract. Paying a dev is way, way more expensive.
But that's actually beside the point, what it really comes down to (and this has been repeated a few times already) is that if your dev builds the oracle then I (assuming I'm the other contracting party) have to trust that you and the dev haven't colluded. And we're not just talking about one smart contract here, we're talking about business applications where a large number of contracts are operating in a range of different ways. Do you pay a whole fleet of devs to code you a bunch of secure oracles from scratch for each contract, and then more devs to double check them, only to realise that you could have just outsourced that entire complex process to a company that has a trustless solution already in place. It's why Sergey draws analogies to SaaS. Businesses will outsource it if it saves them time, money and trouble, and Chainlink will do that by miles over the sort of solution you're suggesting.

>>10927539
Not him, but I will admit this is a risk. Chainlink will work if it manages to get a Microsoft-esque stranglehold on the market that forces everyone to use it, which would allow it to bypass the problem you mention. If not, it will remain a marginal player.

One thing to keep in mind are the potential partnerships. If these companies are really partnered with Link as the team says they are, their adoption of the system might trigger a FOMO-effect among their competitors, but the chance of this happening is admittedly slim.

>>10927547
>save you money and buy holo or tron

>>10927084
the whole point of crypto is the trustlessness
that's the reason it has value - individuals do not have to trust anybody (not the government, not the police, not an api/oracle provider that can be bribed or have conflicts of interest)

>>10927522
Cute Holohoax "ovens", mordecai. Everyone knows the Soviets built those after the war ended.

>>10927698
478 KB JPG
Electricity is a crucial component of the hidden temple. Once desecrated, now rebuilt. Read the Bible, pray, God bless all you who walk in the Light

>>10927663
TBQH, buying a little bit of Holo is a pretty good idea, just in case that Link fails and Holo makes good on its promises and drives blockchain into obsolescence.

>>10927616
Wouldn't it be possible to simply build a template for an oracle that can modify itself to the smart contract it needs to oversee? Or is that still too complex for the average programmer to handle?

>>10927698
Someone has to make the oracle. It’s not like it just magically appears. Either you trust the people from smartcontract.com to make it and decentrally verify the data or trust someone else to make it well...

>>10927789
read the whitepaper

>>10927782
Trustlessness is vital and you can't build a proprietary oracle for your own contract that is trustless, but that's been covered multiple times in this thread already

>>10927547
>I'm trying to derail this thread with nigger garbage instead of making a logical argument as to why you shouldn't by link

You're fucking life is worthless and you're never amount to anything and you'll always be a poorfag who sucks 50 dicks on the weekend to get by.

>>10927723
Because I told him to get into an oven doesn't mean I'm perpetrating the holohoax meme. And no you're rucking retarded the Germans had single person ovens. You don't know shit.

>>10927547
You are a nigger

>>10927644
>>10928797
>>10928805
I BECAME A WOMAN AGED 81 Oldest person in Britain to have reassignment surgery shares her joy at becoming a woman thanks to the NHS
Ruth Rose, 85, had the surgery four years ago after her doctor told her she could be considered for the full procedure
By Carri-Ann Taylor
2nd September 2018, 11:04 pm
Updated: 3rd September 2018, 12:45 am
A TRANSGENDER woman has spoken of her joy at becoming the oldest person in Britain to have surgery.

Ruth Rose, 85, had a reassignment op four years ago after her doctor told her she could be considered for the full procedure.

Ruth Rose, 85, became the oldest person in Britain to have a reassignment op four years agoDAN CHARITY - THE SUN
8
Ruth Rose, 85, became the oldest person in Britain to have a reassignment op four years ago
Get the best Sun stories with our daily Sun10 newsletter
Your information will be used in accordance with our privacy policy


She has defended the £4,000 cost of the surgery by sitting on an NHS advisory board and volunteering for charities that support old people.

Ruth told the BBC: “It is only in the past 15 years that this has become acceptable. Before that people thought it was just for freaks.”

Ruth had the surgery after living as a woman for several years.

She had been known as James Rose, an ex-RAF navigator, mechanical engineer and financial consultant.

Ruth Rose, formerly James Rose pictured in 1956 aged 23 while in the RAFDAN CHARITY - THE SUN
8
Ruth Rose, formerly James Rose pictured in 1956 aged 23 while in the RAF
Rose married and kept her gender identity secret - pictured in 1992DAN CHARITY - THE SUN
8
Rose married and kept her gender identity secret - pictured in 1992
Ruth Rose, formerly James Rose, pictured on a yacht in the same yearDAN CHARITY - THE SUN
8
Ruth Rose, formerly James Rose, pictured on a yacht in the same year
It was not until 1973 that Ruth's then-wife found pictures of her

>>10926612
I can tell you’ve never had a big boy job. Very low test too.

>>10927644
>>19804167 (OP) #
There are more fangames than oficial games, it's just a matter of numbers and this apply to mangas too.

As long as people keep their fan interpretations away from oficial stuff everything will be fine

>>10927789
>25 posts by this ID
Are you ok sweetie?

>>10928893
Let's celebrate our forbidden love with oniichan /fa/ by dumping every fa-tan x cgl-tan pic we can.

Join the Fashion x CGL discord here:
The /fa/gs there are only a little thirsty and the gulls are cool.

>>10926814
>tokenisied assets won’t need a thing to do a thing if that thing is already done by a different thing
Fuck me lol

>>10926814
WHO TE FUCK IS TALKING ABOUT NEED PHAGGOT. No one needs Bitcoin either. We can work with the jew banks and everything works "fine". Oracles NEED to be decentralized. If you don't understand this the get out of crypto and buy some stocks.

>>10927884
>And no you're rucking retarded the Germans had single person ovens.
this is thee dumbest shit i've ever read here.

it's a json parser

>>10927547
> I'm trying to derail these threads to save you money and buy holo or tron
Hahahaha. You were a bit too obvious with this one. Quality up until that point though.

Why the fuck are there completely off topic posts in this subreddit??? Is this some new psyops?

>>10927723
Real video recorded evidence of jews beong led into the "showers" and gassed to death.

"Everyone knows people weren't killed in the ovens, the soviets just built them to make germany look bad"

>>10931355
Post video, thanks

Literally one year ago you faggots told me that each stinky linkie would be worth 100$, It's not even worth one 1% of that, why are you faggots so delusional?

All the chainlink scammers had to do is pay a couple social media shills to keep biz humming and you neets started literally doing it for free, creating memes and hogging the catalog with dozens of chainlink spam threads.

>>10927390
base n pill

>>10926640
I like the way You think