/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10808487
I'm surprised I haven't seen more people deducting the mainnet release date like this. Have you looked into other projects confirmed to be working with CL?

If their roadmap also points to late autumn, it's definitely a worthwhile lead.

Bump

>>10808521
This is why the 2 September mainnet makes sense. They'll need a little time to give node operators a chance to set up prior to these other products launching.

>>10808592
You really think it's that close? I would imagine that people can anticipate the release date from Github once it starts to seem complete. So far I get the impression that there's still work to be done.

I'm no expert though.

It is important to understand that you do not succeede in technology by releasing perfect, flawless and complete product. You give it out to the market as soon as possible and then build on top. Apple (Steve Jobs) understood that premise more than anyone and I have no doubt that Sergey and his team are on the same level.

>>10808721
And this is why software will never be real engineering.

>>10808521
wtf was that other partner CL had that basically said launch in q3 2018 for their network? I cannot think of it

>>10808487
priced in.

>>10808736
It is called continuous development. It does not mean that the initial product is shit. You can not release the today’s version of Facebook for example in the first go.

>>10808521
>>10808757
Figure it out. It's Origami Network. October and November mainnet is pretty much confirmed for CL.

>>10808658
Nothing on the pivotal goes beyond 2 September.

>>10808769
Imagine a worldview where civil engineers are in a race to finish first and thought of it as “patching it”

Oh that suspension cable on the bridge isn’t enough to hold it after a certain point? We’ll patch it later we need access across this area

I’m not saying this approach for software is bad, it’s gow it is, but it’s not engineering

>>10808795
I don’t really care about this issue. This thread is not about such discussion anyway.. It is about Chainlink’s main net which is getting closer and closer. If you want to talk about what is and isn’t engineering go to another sub or something.

>>10808773
so buy Origami?

>>10808721
>push out buggy trash
>expect this to go well
no

>>10808999
Getting a little nervous?
You still have time to accumalate, fren.

>>10808487
Has anyone else started to recognise this anon by the style of their screenshots?
I don't even have to read this to know what coin it's about.

>>10808789
In fact it had earlier this week, but they moved a lot of tasks up

>>10810060
What do you think the Fork epic means?

ChainLink mainnet goes live

Price dumps 50%

Massive new forms of cope ensue.

I can’t wait

>>10808795
Maybe it’s just different and you have a really narrow definition. And bridges collapse, phones explode, cars get recalled, shit happens.

Bump

>>10810125
ChainLink mainnet goes live

Price pumps 5000%

Massive new forms of cope ensue.

I can’t wait

>>10808795
wow maybe software and civil engineering are not the same. get out of here, autist

>>10808789
Still a lot to do in the 'service agreement' epic. October is more realistic.

>>10810121
That's the shadowfork

>>10808721
That’s why Rory said they have one shot at mainnet launch right? What you mean is that all the stuff in the icebox can be added on top later but the shit has to work.

>>10808721
>>10808999
This is exactly what they plan to do. Get an early version out for dev feedback. Just look at all the 'continuous delivery' tasks that are being completed on Pivotal Tracker. Continuous Delivery is the stage at which you apply regular small updates to a product that is already released to customers in some form.
I've mentioned this like 3 times on biz and nobody gives a fuck. The Pivotal Tracker is basically saying early main net IMMINENT!

>>10808487
DELETE THIS THREAD
DELETE IT
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO DIVULGE THIS INFORMATION ON BIZ
DELETE THIS THREAD
NOWWWWW

>>10808736
Well, software can be formally proven to be bug-free.

>>10810230
continous delivery is an internal process too. doesnt mean its released, can be released to a test team for example. t.steve

>>10808795
structural engineers were genius though. some still are
software coders are mostly ants.

>>10808487
Article link for you lazy autists

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhansen/2018/07/26/11-companies-join-agreements-network-to-develop-ethereum-platform-for-lawyers/#61b943ee4aec

>>10810343
Isn't that continuous integration?

>>10810343
nvm i reread it, i get what you're saying.

>>10808487
is that supposed to be a shill for link?
This is a private Cosmos blockchain that relies on trusting validators, which means they can act as oracles for anything. There's literally zero place to utilize link anywhere in this.

It's only good for ethereum because the token itself is going to be erc20, whether the ico is going to be sold for eth or fiat is not explained

>>10808789
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons. I'm a certified decentralized pivotal stalker. They always schedule like that. Next week there will be stuff scheduled for the week after the 2nd

>>10810605
Literally nothing

>>10808795
imagine a worldview where two different things serve two different functions
>imaginemyshock.jpg

>>10808999
trips from an indigo child confirms