/biz/ - Business & Finance

Outstanding

>>10778309
Dragonslaying it hard.

btrash absorbs abc for muh node count then spits it out when done

>>10778309
Nobody needs to pick a fork, the miners can always choose to stay on the current version

This will be resolved sooner than you think when a certain someone reveals himself.

>>10778353
And if it splits into 3 chains each with around 30% of the hash power?

Why cant amaury and abc just fuck off
We have over 1000 cryptocurrencies let bitcoin cash be defined by the whitepaper
The insanity of causing contention over canonical transaction ordering when havent even just let bitcoin scale

Go fuck around with some alt you fucks

finally.. this will be the end of bcash

>>10778380
Jihan doesn't seem to want 128mb blocks either, if he feels like it he can easily pull some hashpower from BTC to make sure his preferred chain has the most hashpower.

>>10778309
Lmao just increase the block size dude xD

>>10778450
It would seem this would have to be the case, ABC wouldnt take such a position if they didnt have the hash to back it up
Its good to know jihan has sold most of his btc for bch

>>10778380
haha look at this newfag
>let bitcoin scale
you mean btrash that doesn't even need scaling cause no one uses that piece of fucking garbage?
go fuck yourself an gtfo.

>>10778309
So there is going to be 2 BCASHes???

>>10778527
Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Cash Cash

>>10778560
BCHC lmao

>>10778309

More bcore fud sponsored by Blockstream.

Why are corecucks obsessed with fear of Bitcoin (CASH)? Why don't they just buy their Bitcoin back?

>>10778560
Seems like it will be:
bitmain cash - jihan + abc
BitcoinSV (Satoshis vision) CSW, nchain and coingeek.
It's unclear which one Roger is backing, in theory he can pressure coinbase, bitpay and some other exchanges to back the fork he likes.

>128 MB
That's fucking retarded

>>10778708
fatofisf wifion fff

>>10778783
Retarded because of what reason? It gives room for businesses to experiment and grow

>>10778783
Retarded because of what reason? It gives businesses room to experiment and grow

WE NEED BIGGER BLOCKS

more forks nobody uses, even the chinks realized bitcoin is the only relevant bitcoin-based coin out there, litecoin/bgold/dash/bcash/bdiamond/zcash's days are all numbered

>>10778861
Even LN devs recommended 100mb blocks

I remember when shills were saying that 1GB+ blocksize was just fear mongering from corecu cks.
But it was and still is the logical conclusion for the desire for centralisation from chinks and kikes.

>screwing up with the fundamentals
>expecting anything but to crash and burn
I'll stay with my BTC, the un-vision of Satoshi "Craig" Nakamoto KEK
Good luck with getting rid of the 20% total beecash you hold, congrats on selling gold for yellow plastic, seriously.

>>10778891
Cost to DDoS BCH now

$69,120 USD a day

At 128mb blocks
$276,480 USD

At 2 GB blocks
$4.4 million USD

No block cap, impossible

At 2gb blocks, a 1% miner makes 43,000 USD in a DDoS attempt

Average criminal spends $130,000 to DDoS a site now per day in web attacks

>>10778373
33% of bcash hashpower, which has about 6% of btc hashpower, which makes about 2% each.
thats fun, basically any big mining operation can get majority hashrate easily, not even taking pools into account.

>>10779023
Someone could also bounce hashpower between different forks to cause complete confusion. I can't see how mining can be used for bcash consensus. Even if no outsiders try to influence it odds are one faction will just rent a load of hashpower to win.