/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10736184
Well thought out post. I see your reasoning, that question should be answered by the old days who were here pre-2017 moon days.

Did partnerships have any merit in 2015/2016?

Then again, if a speculative bull run does come like last time then any news regarding a project will undoubtedly cause FOMO due to speculative buyers.

A well thought out 4chan thread!Honestly if we go bull again, I think news will pump any coin just like 2017.Think of it more like Pokemon trading cards, than real things,

>>10736209
>Did partnerships have any merit in 2015/2016?
it was virtually non-existent until chink shit started tweeting it. So to answer the question, no.

>>10736184
DYOR
https://conventment.com
https://dlacenter.com/conventment/conventment_whitepaper.pdf

I've been in BTC for 8 years.
ETH for 3.
I've been in 20 ICOs. I know the signs and I know the "aura" to look for.

Conventment is the next project. Underrated and still under the radar. Good team, good white paper. $5 EASILY by mid-2019.

Screencap it. Our black swan is already here.

>>10736209
Now that I think about it, there probably will always be speculative announcement pumps. I'm sure we will be more weary of them based on our experience.

But in a bull market, people are euphoric, so probably in general more willing to throw their newly gotten gains into things. How many people made a shit ton off the ETH run up, and started dumping it into ICOs? So I'm sure even if we go bull in the future, the announcements will still cause pumps, but people will expect more out of the announcements.

Like when Antshares had that conference at the Microsoft headquarters in China or whatever, it ran up because everyone assumed their was a partnership. In the future, the announcement or partnership needs to clearly demonstrate how it impacts the coin price and if it will cause the price to increase.

>>10736386
another pot coin. pass.

>>10736386
Fuck off pajeet.

Nobody is going to keep track of cannabis on ETH, and it sure as fuck doesnt need a scam ERC20 token.

They spent literally 5 minutes on their website..

>>10736386
Post proof you’ve been in btc for 8 years and I’ll buy 5 btc worth right now

>>10736410
Do some damn research. The website isn’t even the service kek.

>>10736403
>implying it’s another DUDE WEED coin

>>10736410

>>10736386
I actually did some research on this the other day and it could be a game changer if they can prove ETH to be a good DLT for whatever IOT shit they come up with.

>>10736428
>>10736436
>Built with scalability and productibity in mind.

Lmao you fucking pajeets smell worse than my dookie after Indian buffet dinner.

How the fuck will anyone take this seriously when the project revolves around keeping track of weed and can’t even spell right. Image related is both of you (assuming you are two different people).

>>10736471
Must be the mobile version. Desktop version shows productivity kek.

>>10736410
Excellent FUD lol
You know what that means ;)

>>10736497
FUD vs Facts.

Nobody falling for your bullshit.

You want to see FUD, go look at the weekly vechain FUD thread for a classic example of people fucking around.

or just buy link

>>10736386
What are the tokens used for

>>10736533
the team uses them to scam idiots.

>>10736533
exit scamming

>>10736533
exactly why I never trust erc20 shit

>>10736410

Yeah this. Single use case tokens are rediculous - a complete IoT platform is something, but why does "Dude, Weed lmao!" need it's own specialist token? Pajeetery of the highest order.

>>10736184
It's more than having the information first, it's also about not being fucking retarded. I remember someone was posting a bunch of shit about XRP last year, literally all of it came true, he even predicted that it would go over $3. I think he must have been an insider or something. Anyways everyone was saying shit like "muh centralization muh bankz muh joos etc. etc." and retarded shit like "muh market cap, it will never go to even $1" fucking LOL