3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
Literally shaking. Its all true.
>>10689430True if big.
>>10689430HOLY FUCK
HOLY SHIT GET IN HERE IT'S TRUE
Was there ever any doubt?$1000 EOYLast fucking chance to get in on the floor NoLinkers.
OMG!!!!!!
>>10689430>It's realDoesn't post a link.
>>10689465Just check their twitter, brainlet
>>10689430Fake and gay.
>>10689465Can't you use a computer faggot? it's in their official twitterTO DA MOON MAN
>>10689465https://twitter.com/OpenLawOfficialRetard
1000 EOY
>>10689465https://twitter.com/openlawofficial/status/1029378816706338821?s=21
>>10689430>openlawLiterally a who startup
>>10689430Remember the Anon a couple days ago that said Link to top 50? BOOM. Hope u didn't sell looking for a bigger drop.
>it's fucking realAAAAAAAAHHHHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAALERT ALERTITS HAPPENING ITS HAPPENINGNOLINKERS BTFO IN FIVE...
>>10689487Fake and gay
I thought it was something for a second, it's just another blockchain startup, that's worse than the origami "partnership"What is OpenLaw?OpenLaw is a blockchain-based protocol for the creation and execution of legal agreements. Using OpenLaw, lawyers can more efficiently engage in transactional work and digitally sign and store legal agreements in a highly secure manner, all while leveraging next generation blockchain-based smart contracts.Using OpenLaw, you can create “legal templates” which can be enhanced using our “Legal Markup” language. Our Legal Markup language is akin to Wikipedia’s “wiki text” with greater functionality and enables anyone to wrap logic and other contextual information around traditional legal prose.
who the fook is open law tho
>>10689430>https://twitter.com/OpenLawOfficialIts literally another blockchain product shitcoin. Doesnt mean anything.
Look at their markup language for law contracts though, if the partnership is confirmed by chainlink the it means mainnet is close.https://docs.openlaw.io/markdown/index.html
IT'S REAL HOLY SHIT
priced in
holy shit a partnership with another im shaking but ironically
>>10689499That’s not the point you dip. The point is that this connection was found based on a twitter following and some common fucking sense. God I can’t wait for all the other partnerships to be revealed. This is happening the way that one larper said it would.... looks like September might be the month after all
marine here what is so special about opnenlaw? it aeems that it is just another startup
>>10689594Also, there was a guy who made a thread 2 days ago saying that in 2 days something would happen. He was a real insider too it seems. The trouble is sifting the real insiders from the larpers
Give it to me Sergey. Tell me my dreams will come true.
>>10689499this lol. you nerd cucks get excited just like a redditor when he sees a nintendo>using ChainLink’s middleware, we can calculate the equivalent amount of ETH at the moment of transfer. For example, if a party agrees to a $10,000 per month contract via an OpenLaw agreement, the exchange rate can be converted via ChainLink’s oracle each month to pay in Ether at the latest exchange rates.LOL. no one irl gives a shit unless they get paid in cash, not some gay shitcoins
>>10689617YOUR DREAMS WILL COME TRUE MARINE,CHECK EM
>>10689430OpenLaw is a scam created by Chainllink pajeets
>>10689517? The tweet is real.
>>10689430>THIS MEANS THE UNDERLYING COIN MUST BE WORTH THOUSANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111111
this is just advertising for the openlaw ico
>>10689430Chainlink is love. Chainlink is life.
>>10689595They make creating a legally-binding smart contract very easy. The easier it is the easier adoption will come. If you can write a smart contract that a norm is can understand (i.e. not computer code), legally sign it, and then securely chainlink it to a data feed that will trigger it, you’ve just revolutionized the legal system
>>10689430fuck me. it's true... all of it. Please pepe, let Masters be the next annoucement..... looking more and more like sibos might be the grand daddy of them all
-ic3-Accord-OpenlawNext please!!
>>10689670at this point docusign is all but confirmed
>>10689430It’s true. Make sure to give make claps.
They called us STINKY They called us Deluded.They called us Pajeets (partially true)They called us PND shitcoin.They called us FAT.They called us memecoiners.They called us a 2 man team.They called us Russian Scam.They called us Assblasted.They laughed.They filtered.They ignored.Then they raged.And they despaired.When the cryptoworld is on fire. And now they see LINK for what it is.The saviour.The Chosen.The One crypto to save all Cryptos.And in the darkness bring crypto mainstream.It's not too late noLinkers.Make your choice.
>>10689430Who the fuck is OpenLaw?
>>106894301000 EOY BABY
>a literal no name partnershipholy shit when did linkies become such normalfag moonboys? Congrats on this seriously. Enjoy your bags when this dumps to sub 20 cents. I’ll be accumulating
>>10689770you won't be doing shit you desperate swing trading faggot, stay on the sidelines you cuck
>>10689430Just checked and OpenLaw is a firm with a less than 1kk market value. Topkek, even small cafeterias are worth more than that.
>>10689812Lmao
>>10689793Like I said, enjoy the bags. I’ll pick some up at a lower price.
>>10689430Holy shit it's a fucking no name startup. This is unironically bearish.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUCKFU FUCKCOAJKWFIPHJWFIOHWUIOFHWIOFHWGFIJWFJIAWFIOJIOWFJI'M DEPOSTING $1000 TOMORROW PLS TELL ME NOBODY EVEN KNOWS ABOUT THIS EXCEPT FOR THE MARINES ON BIZ
>>10689830like I said stay in the corner and watch from there loser!
>>10689430Thinking about flipping my LINK stack for ETH while it's about to rebound.Fuck it, I'm doing it
You guys ought to look into Aaron Wright, who "is chair of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance’s Legal Working Group, an academic fellow at CoinCenter, an editor at Ledger, and has a forthcoming book with Primavera DeFilippi (Blockchain Technology and the Law: The Rule of Code) under contract with Harvard University Press."
>>10689862You bought the top of these pnd’s didn’t you?
>>10689812where did you find that information?
>>10689875no retard I bought all my LINK in november or december between 13 and 20c, couldn't give less of a fuck of what some desperate swing trader thinks lmao you fucks think you're better because "hurr I'm a trader" have fun watching from the corner faggot
THIS IS THE BEST TIME LINE LINK $1000 EOY
>OpenLaw>a @ConsenSys spoke.Interesting links desu.
> CTRL-F chainlink> 10 resultsHOLY FUCK, IT'S REAL$2500 EOY
>>10689837Look into ConsenSys. Start here https://new.consensys.net/labs/
>ctrl+f oracles>0 results
>>10689963I think they recently hit 1k employees.
>>10689958lol
Link $2500 end of year.There is literally no stopping us. We are going to overtake bitcoin's market cap. Nobody can stop the coming singularity. People will write books and movies about us. When people think of crypto, their first thoughts will be "those lucky link millionaires". We are the chosen. We are the new elite. We are GOING TO MAKE IT
>>10689982https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/
>>10689737Fucking deluded stinky
you guys dont get it. biz uncovered the open law connection with ease. this ties in together connections like with Dom Steil (Salesforce/Dapps inc) and others making them extremely plausible.
>>10689430What's with all the Factom shilling lately? Honest question. Factom, Storj, these coins are worthless. There is no reason for them. What's with this shilling?
>>10689627You can convert crypto to usd you tard and the dollar has been so manipulated and controlled by the jew bankers convince me why I'd want to put my livelihood in that fucked up system that's doomed to fall anyways.
>>10689430Anyone who doubts link and doesnt know who openlaw is and who they work with has literally done zero research. Its not worth telling them thr who what where and why.Just watch the nolinkers rage in a year or so
>>10689947>>10689963Look who retweeted it...
>>10689430I kind of am shaking lmao.Jesus fucking christ, Chainlink IS crypto at this point.
>>10689856nice, you might be able to afford a whole LINK with that by tomorrow :)
>>10690026OpenLaw.io is not the Openlaw you're thinking of that's affiliated with Harvard
>>10689627? That’s why you have chain link trigger the bank transaction and nobody has to see or think about the internet funny money orchestrating behind the scenes
>>10689430>linkies linking with crumbling institutionsStinkie is right. Gross!
>>10690032
>>10689519This. Just another fag startup. No big leads. Their team are a bunch of fags and idiots.
>>10689812That made me spit my drink out lmfaf
>>10690067LMFAO.cope.
>>10690032:)
>>10690032this is the good shit
i am a senior trader with a major banking institution, and i have a meeting in 30 mins on blockchain. willing to shill chainlink at the meeting, but i need some of you NEETS to research kaleido.io for me. thanks.
What if it's all true? What if we all really make it?
>>10689746Dont worry youll be hearing alot about them
>>10690032my lord this is it boys
>>10690149>ifnigga, we already rich, you just don't have the money physically yet but having enough LINK is like holding a winning lottery ticket that can be redeemed a few months from now, it's basicly the equivalent of already being rich
The word partnership is overused. It sounds like openlaw will use chainlink in their processes. It's like saying I have a partnership with McDonald's because I go there to eat. I'm a client/user/customer, which imo is better than vague partnerships.
>>10690188this.
>>10690188doesn't matter how it's called, the point is Chainlink is the only project in this shitty market that is a solution to an existing problem, it's the customers waiting for LINK not some shitcoin (half-assed) waiting for people willing to use that.
>>10690188Weak. Shitcoin partnerships are overdone. Chainlink partnerships are a different thing. Do you notice how Openlaw is announcing the partnership? Notice any difference to the usual shitcoin partnership announcements?
>>10689430https://medium.com/@OpenLawOfficial/openlaw-2018-the-year-ahead-f52afa5d1760This link gives an idea of the timeframe. They've been in talks with Chainlink since before March. Good info to know how long these partnerships take to develop.
OMG my anal sphincter is literally quivering right now.
>>10689812AHAHAHAHA LINKIES GET BLOWNTHEFUCKOUT
>>10690188
Well i'll be damned..following all those breadcrumbs turned out positive....link fudders BTFO HAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHhHaAhHhHhHaAAHhhAAHHaHAhHHHhHaAAahhHhHhahAAaAAAAAA
>>10690007>https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/
>>10690149it is all true. we all really make it.
>>10689866You sell stable Link right before mainnet and another partnership reveal for freefalling eth? Are you retarded?
>>10689812lmao
>>10689459That's pretty high risk. Chainlink has moved 60 positions on CMC while most things worth dropping have slid. A lateral trade that involves a 60% loss to speculate on Chainlink is too high stakes for most. This is unironically the kind of psychological barrier that keeps people from hurr durr just hopping on when the rocket launches. It's nice to have that one answered too.
Shitcoin partners with a shitcoin. Wew lads, rank 1000 EOY.How's that REQ partnership working out?
>>10690232don't man... let him. it's natural selection.
>>10690188Well Chainlink is not announcing anything, it's actually the companies that want to use it that announce it, that already tells you something.
>>10690213What is the exact status of you guys anal sphincters right this very moment?
>>10690188Exactly. Look at how Accord had to address all the frenzied linkies who bombarded them with autism after "muh partnership"
>>10690188>>10690207>>10690197Shit-tier coping skills lolmao."We're excited to announce our new partnership with @chainlink"t. @OpenLawOfficial
>>10690032>https://consensys.net/ventures/partnerships/HAHA any fudding here is just doing so in hopes of keeping the price down.
>>10690188>>10690258Anon, you didn't.... you didn't sell down there, below 4k sats.... did you? You're too smart to do something like that......
>>10689812>>10689822>>10690079>>10690238>>10690216OpenLaw is an offshoot of Consensys.You do know about Consensys, riiiiiiight anon?
>>10689430When will the morbidly obese russian philosopher announce his partnership with Mcdonalds HIHOHIHOHIII
>>10690295Nah. Some of you guys are just really easy to trigger.
>>10690222czechedwe gon make it
>>10690188He's saying them using chainlink as a client is better than a partnership. He's not fudding, you brainlets.
I have 14.. going to make it? Sold all my holo literally minute ago to go all in link.frens...?
-10.08%
>>10690258You think they give a shit about what people say on twitter? If there's money to be made, voices will be ignored.
>>10690319You can be both a partner and a user/client.The word partnership is indeed a meme in crypto, but it still holds non-meme meaning too.And it's Openlaw who used the word. And Accord (pic related).
it's gona moon mofos, get in now!
>>10690351>Associates
>>10690382Beyond crypto, "partner" and "associate" mean virtually the same thing, and are on the same level.Hence why they share a tab.
>>10690343Just hodl for 10 years and you made it fren.Need 1K to make it in less than 3.
>>10689430Increased my stack from 73k to 151k. Where does that put me on the rankings?
>>10689456IM IN HERE BABE AND IM PRETTY SURE YOU SPELLED YOUR NAME WRONG
Out of every major crash a technological titan rises from the ashes and takes over the world.
>>10689947>>10689963>>10690007>>10690009heres a pretty plain english primer on consensys
>>10690443based and redpilled.
>>10689465>Tweet Fuck man, your not /biz/ worthy.
HOW MUCH LINKIES TO MAKE IT?!?!? NEED TO MAKE SOME MOVES!!!!
>>10690257Primed and prepped for Sergay cock marine!
>>1069049910K eoy 2018tick tock..
>>10690499i have 4,3k links,currently contemplating fomo'ing my fiat savings
Too bad it crapped it's pants yesterday, or we could have a real chad pump
>>10690146> https://kaleido.io/It seems to be a SaaS provider focusing on making easy to use interfaces for B2B use of private blockchains. Simply said if Chainlink is the backend, This could potentially become the front end interface for businesses to use and customize easy to use interfaces for their own ledgers. Seems legit.
>>10690404>associate and partner mean the same thingNo sweetie that’s not how it works. Accord makes the distinction between the two for a reason, and they had to go out of their way to address your autism
The partnership with Zeppelin OS, an Ethereum dApp development framework with secure libraries makes me also bullish on the network effect of ChainLink. The ChainLink Community News website states that 95% of all Ethereum dApps were written via Zeppelin OS. Zeppelin may integrate ChainLink as standard oracle network what in my eyes already happened with the partnership. Thats also already a huge factor for the network effect before mainnet that people don't see
>>10690554>Accord makes the distinction between the twoWell no they don't.They all share the tab.
>>10690146Eat a dick lazy cunt.
look at the medium article and this line:>Our first integration with ChainLink will leverage our existing smart legal contracts to demonstrate the capabilities of this integration with ChainLink. Assets (cryptocurrencies, tokens, etc.) transferred on OpenLaw can now be denominated in U.S. dollars. The key part is the opening words - "our first integration...".These guys must have a fuck tonne of uses for LINK. And not just openlaw. the possibilities are endless.LINK $342,847 eoy
>>10690188As long as it CONTRIBUTES to the Growth of the network, who the fuck cares.
LADSWHAT'S BEST EXCHANGE TO BUY THIS SHIT FROMI CAN FINALLY GET REVENGE ON MYSELF FOR NOT BUYING SHITCOIN AT 0.25 IN EARLY 2011IT'S FUCKING HAPPENING, PLEASE ADVISE
>>10690507That's what we like to hear boyo.
>>10690416Top dog
This is so dope to wake up to
>>10690585binancehttps://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/#markets
>>10690556>this level of bagholder copeThat’s because the tab incorporates both partners and associates, sweetie. Chainlink is an associate. Any oracle service can contribute. It has no exclusivity. Mobius can contribute tomorrow if they want and if they did using your deluded definition they would be “partners” too. Try not to yell fibby wibbies to yourself.
>>10690585DON'T buy the version on Binance, it's a fork and will be worthless sooner rather than later, you need to email Rory directly and send him a cheque in the post and he'll send you a parcel full of Linkieshope this helps lad X
>>10690637>That’s because the tab incorporates both partners and associatesThat's what I said.>Chainlink is an associateOr a partner.Doesn't matter which, they're on the same level. Hence why they share a tab.You have been defeated. Sorry kid.
>>10690639Shut up dude its over you got blown over...only a retarded monkey will believe you now lmfao shadow fork go stick that up your ass faggot
>>10690639This.Everyone holding link bought it from ico or messaged chainlink team directly. The token in binance is erc20 while the real link is erc225
>>10690706cringe
>>10690637Lol no one would really every spend time on a thread that doesnt involve their investment or potential investment. I can sense the fear in the fudders posting here. I know you are scared. You may still have time to accumulate. Better act fast..
>>10690735At least you guys are creative.
>>10690661Wrong, you said that they share the same tab because they’re the same thing. But the distinction Accord makes proves otherwise. If a nigger gets grouped with white people in a tab called “black people & white people”, does the nigger become a white person? No sweetie, you’ll still be a nigger. And Chainlink will always be just another associate.
>>10690753>repeat this every day for the 8 months>60% downLife’s gotta suck for you
>>10690765>you said that they share the same tab because they’re the same thingNo, I said they share the same tab because they're on the same level.YOU are wrong. Better luck next time.
Another prediction came true. We had a big thread about openlaw just yesterday. Link research team always right. We gonna make it Boys.
>>10690790Yeah fucking everything has been down for the past 8 months. You got something to say, or are you just talkin?
>>10690792>on the same level Wrong again sugarplum. “Associate” and “Partner” are definitely not on that same level. See my nigger example and enjoy the cognitive dissonance.
>>10690817The bear market has another 5 months left in it faggot, enjoy the wojaks
>>10690819>“Associate” and “Partner” are definitely not on that same levelSure they are.Hence why Accord puts them in the same tab.You show promise, don't let this one crushing defeat get you down.
>>10690755Nah, get a load of this guy:>>10690765Utter panic and/or hatred. I'm guessing someone who was "too smart" to "fall for it".Probably went in on a sensible hold like vechain
>>10690819your mom and my dick are on the same level though you faggotfucking btfo
>>10689459LITERALLY, UNIRONICALLY FOMOING IN SOME TIME THIS WEEKSORRY FOR ALL THE FUD THREADS LINKIES
>>10690813I'm just sitting here lurking and have absolutely zero clue what any of this shit is or how to even research it properly, let alone buy in on anything.>mfw I probably don't have enough money to anyways
>>10689430https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19
>>10690813What are some notable Openlaw connections?(Other than the obvious consensys)
>>10690832chainlink doesn't have "associates" or "partners"...only customers. Only projects who need them and are willing to pay us >$1000 for a link.
>>10690706Unbased and bluepilled, m8 I was just trying to help the lad out, and I get chastised for trying to be the righteous man? Wowwoo weewoo oh gees Im shaking right now
>>10690832>a nigger and a white person are on the same level if they’re in a tab called “white people & niggers”the kind of cope only a truly deluded stinky linky could fathom
Thread I made yesterday Pay attention >>/biz/thread/S10683579
>>10690859The word "partner" can be a meme both ways.In between those meme extremes is the true non-meme use: two parties working together.
I'm glad most of you fucks are linklets that'll be selling early because holy fuck you can't even comprehend the partnership between a startup founded by one of Ether's billionare cofounders with ChainLink's tech. Fuck off all of you
Gonna make it
>>10690869>>a nigger and a white person are on the same level if they’re in a tab called “white people & niggers”Well yes.But who in their right mind would create such a tab?
>>10690554>sweetiecringe
We're not deluded after all are we? This is amazing biz. Keep up!!
>>10690850>https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19
>>10689812jesus christ its almost like these linktards get off on being humiliated
>>10690846dude just google ityou want to get in soon before it moons
>>10690879that's cool but what openlaw says chainlink is being used for is way to fucking in the weeds to come up in a high-level presentation like that.
>>10690887imagine being so gay that your scale is also gay
>>10689737>They called us Pajeets (partially true)Kek
>>10690839Can always tell a low iq brainlet from his reactionary “yuh mum” rebuke. I honestly wouldn’t expect anything less from an investor in this scamcoin shittoken
>>10690911Mate that's some confido-tier pageet trying to ride the hype.
3cents EOY unironically
>>10690920I did google it but there's a shit ton I still don't understand. I've been lurking for a while and usually end up with more questions than answers.looking at getcrypto.info/chainlink/ right now
>>10690543thanks for the work kid. looks like Kaleido just confirmed they're interested:>https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/status/1029404163183202305?s=19Gonnna shill the shit outta LINK at this meeting. 2500 eoy!
>>10690931Can you stop staring at my dick for a second? Thanks
>>10690893holochain?
>>10690965lol holy shit I thought that was just a beefy vagina
>>10690943That's actually a consensys block chain as a service product.
>>10690942yuh mum
>>10690952Are you the same person who is tweeting@ Kaleido?
>>10690893Anyone can create a group anytime and fill it with whoever they like you utter brainlet. All the group members don’t suddenly morph into the same thing. The fact I’m having to explain this to you is top tier cringe.
>>10689430Been holding since October. It's about time we got some real news. $5k EOY.
>>10690951Just do what most of us did and lurk Link breads for a while, you start to get ideas after some time, and soon after that you become indistinguishable from the rest of us; for once you stare into the abyss long enough, the abyss stares back2500 eoy tho
>>10691020>Anyone can create a group anytime and fill it with whoever they likeExactly.And Accord created a tab grouping together partners and associates, meaning accord believes they are on the same level, relatively.
>>10690996Have you ever seen a vagina irl?
Link $1043 EOY
>>10689430it is true, and it is also vaporhype.
>>10691004Bullshit. It's some rando startup that couldn't even get a retweet. They claim both consensys and AWS (!) as "partners". That alone is enough of a red flag for me to ignore them.I thought they were just some literally whos, but now I'm thinking actual scam.
>>10691044being this close
>>10690639??? I have 10k binance links. Is this a meme
this palce is a chainlink circlejerk now.i hold link, but this isnt a great thing. literally who? a random blockchain company. this is vechain tier in getting hyped over nothing.
>>10691026Is buying link like buying shares? I know that's an absolutely fucking retarded question but I'm literally navigating in the dark here.I don't even know how much this shit costs right now. Or if anything I'm reading from googling is even correct or trustworthy. It seems like I read shit elsewhere, then come here and everyone contradicts what I've just read.
Anybody who buys into this stupid pump and dump shit coin deserves to have every penny of their hard work stolen from them
>>10690585Buy eth on coinbase and transfer them over too binance to buy it.
>>10689617Diamonds
I dont get ithow is this big news at all?
>>10691085>literally whoOpenlaw is a Consensys offshoot you absolute brainlet.
>>10691087holy shit, its a fucking meme dipshit
>>10691120Well it might be news to you that you're a retard; since you don't get this.
>>10690866Shut up lol shadow fork lmao i bet that took 4 iq points to make up, try harder fag
>>10691087its a meme retardno one actually believes this shit
>>10691142or maybe you're the retarded one for thinking this is something big?
>>10691129again, who?
>>10691078Yes, you own meme tokens
>>10691150>>10691151My point exactly.
>>10691078>he actually bought binance LINK instead of ChainLink from chinkdexHow new are you, you'll never make it, the link on binance is a fork made by a famous bitcoin cash shill called Bizonacci to scam normies out of their money, we've been warning people about this for months now.
>>10691030Um no, “associate” and “partner” are not on the same level because they don’t mean the same thing, especially in business and law. A partner is a part of the company. An associate is underneath the partner(s). If someone makes a tab called “Friends & Family”, friends and family are not on the same level. Blood is thicker than water. And your brain is deluded beyond repair.
>>10691101that's what your mom looked like after i pumped and dumped her
>>10689430FUUUUUCK How am I going to FUD linkies now? I know I responsible for getting a handful of you to market sell but I was expecting to get the whole board to eventually.
>>10691166>“associate” and “partner” are not on the same level because they don’t mean the same thingThat makes no sense.
>>10691181Um sweetie, tell me why we have different words and different definitions for different things? Are you feeling ok?
>>10691044OFF BY ONE OH LAWD>>10691087It's a token, not a coin; it isn't a currency so to speak, but it pays people who run the network that Link uses, and, of course the idea is it accumulates value as use of Chainlink grows. If you go to CoinMarketCap . com you will see a search box where you can find the Link token, right now it's about 0.25 USD.Although it is Reddit, the r/linktrader sub may be a good place to find some more solid information, /biz/ threads often divulge into a fud and shill tug-of-war.So in summary, no it isn't like shares, but does/will have value in relation to Link's network. Also official website is a good place to read up on the vision of the thing, etc.Sorry if that's a ramble but good luck mate
Partner or associate, does it matter? The point is that the network is going to be used. See the bigger picture and you'll realize that it's much bigger than some announcement p&d.
Literally who?How do I short this shitcoin?
>>10691178try harder. biz is retarded but not stupid enough to fall for this obvious revers shill. what is your Iq exactly?
>>10690790You are 60% down? Must feel bad. Its ok though you will still make it. Good think I bought at 19 cents. Feels Comfy.
>>10689617Hope you dreams will become reality.
>>10691203acting like reddit link sub isnt just biz shilling it to make it look legit. you are cancer
>>10691163Shut up go make up something better than shadow fork lmao like seriously thats all you got...shadow fork...wow good job buddy/fah
GOOD
>>10691233>replying to an obvious bait. you realise you are just making linkies look stupid by taking that seriously right? this is the intelligence of link holders..
>>10691203Unlike most 4chan scum, I appreciate a good ramble.
>>10691166SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY MANWHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TRYING TO ACHIEVE?
>>10691199>things that aren't the same thing can't be on the same levelYou tried.
>HURRRRR LITERALLY WHO??1) Openlaw/Consensys is not "literally who"2) ETH exploded because a sea of "literally whos" printed their tokens using ETHCope more, harder, and better.
does lose fomo exist too?
>>10691346no. eth exploded because:Bull markethad faster TPS in a time where there was MASSIVE internal struggle on BTC scaling(the main issue of Q1/2 2017)ICOsnot because of the meme alliance. holy shit. your an idiot
>>10691286>friends are on the same level as family because they're in my "friends & family" tab>a 1.0 magnitude Earthquake is on the same level as a category 5 hurricane cause both are in my "natural disasters" tab>people who are actually part of the company are on the same level as those merely contributing to the company
>>10690257stinky
>>10691421You're fucking stupid. Why do you think there was a bull market in the first place? What made ICOs possible?Now with chainlink, you have use cases that don't just magically go away because their devs want to cash out their ICO eth and buy lambos. It will dwarf the ETH run.
>>10690416Top 300
>>10691425I even underlined it for you this time
>>10691421>eth exploded because:>Bull marketA bull market which ETH largely fuelled because of the thousands of ICOs it spawned.>had faster TPSSo did fucking digibyte lmao.There's only ONE reason ETH got to rank 2 on CMC, and that's the shittoken-dispensing smart contracts.
>>10691421Lol you are such a moron. Eth mooning was about ICOs, nothing to do with TPS
>>10691445did you just ignore bitcoin going from 150 dollars back to 800 dollars? thats the bull market idiot. it started in late 2015.you think eth started it, lol.
>>10691425There's a very simple concept of "on the same level but not the same".It's one of the first things you learn after being born: dad and mom are not the same but on the same level called "parents".Guess you were brought up by a pack of liberal lesbians.
>>10691456ok i agree mostly. how is that relevant to this chainlink "partnership" some tarded anon is acting like this is capable of starting a bullrun kek
>>10690951You don't need to understand friend. Just put all your money in chainlink and sit tight. You'll be swimming in cashola. Thank me later... If you can find me on my mega yacht. t.105k linklet.
>>10691276>a business or firm owned and run by two or more partnersSo you're telling me Chainlink owns and/or runs Accord now? Really m8? So when Mobius contributes to Accord it will own a piece of it too?
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.
>>10691518The point is that even if Openlaw is a "literally who", it's still extremely good news since ETH got to rank 2 on a wave of literally whos.And Openlaw/consensys is not literally who.
Copypasta FUD I found on reddit.
no sirs please do not listening and pls to be buying the mobius instead is partners with the "CloseLaw" is very more exclusive than the openedlaw who has many pajoots sirs
>>10691498that's because mom and dad are both parents you fucking doofus. there isn't any other option or definition or "level" available in that context. holy shit youre dumb as a box of rocks.
>>10691542first of all, you're probably autisticand yes, SmartContract is part of the Accord Project, they're contributing with their tech, ChainLinkthat's like saying Santander (or any other bank) owns SWIFT because they're partnereddo you have fun baiting people or are just plain stupid / incapable of accepting you're wrong
>>10691616Feed me another (You).
>>10691542also I assume it's bait because I fucking underlines it for you>associate synonym: partner>partnership synonym: associationyou do know what a synonym is, right?
>>10691166>17 posts by this IDmotherfucker arguing about semanticshow fucking desperate are you? fuck off if you don't like it, no one invited or needs you lmao, fuck off and never come back
>>10691616>that's because mom and dad are both parentsThat’s literally what he said.
A big nothingBURGER
>>10691425my favorite brainlet
>>10689487Hahaha fucking FAKE FUD chainlink is a discord group pump and dump scam, FUCK YOU ASSHOLES I almost bought before I looked into your fake ass twitter accounts now I’m all in on BTC NIGGERS
>>10691698>he unironically just tried samefaggingget a better proxy next time pajeet
>>10691166PLEASE FUCK OFF PLEASE
>>10691421EEA was absolutely what caused ETH to explode you fucking mong. You probably got here in December stop acting like you know shit faggot. God dammit I hate biz.
>>10691725*it
>>10689430So how is this better than a normal contract between parties since "the blockchain" isn't going to be accepted as a legal or judicial authority, and disputes will have to be arbitrated in a court just like regular contracts anyway?
>>10691457ignore them. they're just JIDF operators trying to keep the hordes of neon-nazis away from the one thing that will bring about the end of the israeli state i.e. LINK.
>>10691797yes, don't buy chainlink, it's a scamobviously the current state of things is the best for everyone, nothing can be upgraded with new technologies and laws aren't made everyday
https://twitter.com/Kaleido_io/following
>>10689430who?
>>10691087UnironicallyNOW IS THE TIMELINK will never be below current price.>solves blockchain>usecase all of >first mover advantage
>>10691797>"the blockchain" isn't going to be accepted as a legal or judicial authorityo boy:https://legalconsortium.org/>The world’s oldest and most established legal organizations realize the benefits of blockchain technology. However, without major intermediaries providing convenience and guidance, industries must band together to jointly develop standards and governance.
>>10691457Hmm ok so now you're telling me "business" also unequivocally means the same thing as "partnership" because it's a synonym? And that "confederate" means the exact same thing as "associate"? Are you really that incapable of original thought?
>>10691735lmao, no i wasnt. i experience the last bubble in full time, tahts why i know chanlink is going to 0.09$. i saw ripple faggots go through the same "much partnerships" and "muh usecase" and autistic dot connecting convinced they were not going down with the tide of the market. they did.
>>10691797The whole point of the blockchain, decentralization, and smart contracts is you don't need trusted third parties like legal authorities, attorneys, notaries, ...Your very question shows that you missed the whole point of crypto.
>only 13k LinkI wish i had more, i did my best
>>10691101why would someone even record that?
>>10691885What do you mean "last time"? 8 months ago?Lol
>>10691935Except I think the state of crypto basically makes the case that you do in fact need all of those things.
>>10691877I'm just saying you're either really stupid and stubborn or enjoy trolling, which in my terms also means you're stupid
>>10691977You have no idea what smart contracts and crypto are about.
>>10690554>>10690637
>>10690312EPIC libtard TROLLING fellow kekistani!
>>10691937Is that not a lot?
>>10691977||>|x||
>>10690846Thanks for the info you fucking faggot
>>10691885Hard to say what you're getting at since you type like a fucking pajeet but a few things>we've bounced off 6k 4 times now>mainnet is near as evidenced by marketing director hire, partners being announced, etc>price is holding steady in USD and quickly climbing CMC rankings during this bloodbath>a lot of the breadcrumbs from the past few months are actually materializingIf you don't want to invest your rupees that's fine but don't act like you know shit faggot
>>10689430DOWN 6% TODAY ON THIS EXCITING NEWS. HOLY SHIT BUY BUY BUY.
>>10689594Was open law one of the better dots connected? Are their any other dots that are even more likely than openlaw that are potentially even better?
>>10691542You are a fucking retard, but how big is your link bag?
Okay i've had it with you fucking cancer ass stinky linkys. Every day i come to 4chan biz and see this faggot ass threads about chainlink i literally am starting to get a fucking brain tumor. The filter is going on. But before i leave i will leave you a food of thought:You see little retard faggot ass morons, i have already put a 90c alarm on my etherdelta. Get it? While you faggots research and find out how many cells there are in Sergeys fucking asshole, i just sit back and enjoy the ride by fucking hoes and doing coke. Now when 90c hits, i just buy some suicide insurance CHAINLINK's and i dont even care if you 4x or 5x your money. If this truly is the next fucking revolutionary crypto then going from 90c to 10$ is 10x right? And to 100$ its 100x. The point is im going to get rich as well anyways so it doesnt fucking matter. Wow you made a bit more but who cares. The point is that im not wasting my life on constantly posting shit like this and spamming hell out of this crypto. See you at 90c and yeah i dont care if i buy your bags. Im not an all-in brainlet in 1 coin retard.Filter ON!
>>10692197Damn, you know your shit.I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning.
>>10692194don't even need to ask, look how desperate that faggot is
>>10690416Ranking are skewed because a lot of people probably have 20k in 4 different wallets
>>10692197cool story bro
>>10689670>https://docs.openlaw.io/markdown/index.html<% #Smart Contract to Pay Employee[[@Payment in Wei = Payment in Ether * 1000000000000000000]][[Pay Vendor:EthereumCall(contract:"0xe532d1d1147ab40d0a245283f4457c733b5e3d41";interface:[{"name":"makePayment", "type":"function","inputs": [{"name":"RecipientAddress", "type":"address"},{"type":"uint","name":"PaymentInWei"}],"outputs": []}];function:"makePayment";arguments:Recipient Ethereum Address,Payment in Wei;startDate:Payment Start Date;endDate:Payment End Date;repeatEvery:"1 minute")]]%>This agreement is entered into by [[Party A]] and [[Party B]] on [[Effective Date: Date]].**WHEREAS**, [[Party B]] seeks [[Party A]]'s programming services; and**WHEREAS**, [[Party A]] seeks to be paid in ether;**NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:^ [[Party A]] agrees to pay [[Party B]] [[Payment in Ether: Number]] ether, every minute, starting on [[Payment Start Date: DateTime]] and ending on [[Payment End Date: DateTime]] for programming services. ^ Payment will be paid to [[Party B]]'s ethereum address located at [[Recipient Ethereum Address: EthAddress]], using the Ethereum smart contract found at "0xe532d1d1147ab40d0a245283f4457c733b5e3d41," which is incorporated by reference herein. [[Pay Vendor]]**[[Party A | Uppercase]]**[[Party A Email: Identity | Signature]]_________________________(signature)**[[Party B | Uppercase]]**[[Party B Email: Identity | Signature]]_________________________(signature)
>>10692197Nice. Good to know you'll be there to buy my bags at the top
>>10691994mobius ccould become an accord "partner" any time it likes in your deluded terms since it can contribute just like chainlink does. but would it really be a partner though? i seriously hope it happens just to see your mega cope.
>>10692247With this, a continuously reaffirmable consent-for-sex can be implementable on the blockchain using a kinda roastie undestandable contract language with some nice IoT device monitoring for biological markers
>>10692247>Ohohohohooh muh missing curly brackets
>>10692292Accord IS a community collaboarationif chainlink is a collaborator it means they're associatedthey're the ones to state it, they're the ones to have SmartContract listed as a partnerwhat's your point?
>>10692292And if Mobius makes it to the "partners & associates" page of the Accord website, Mobius will have reason to celebrate.
At this point it's pure retardation not to put all your money into Chain Link, it will go to $1k or maybe even $20k
>>10689430>LINK partners with blockchain startup with 2 man team>literally shakingthe absolute state of deluded linkies
>>10692354yes and? theyre associated because chainlink is a contributor. and they clearly expressed the fact that anyone can become a contributor. a partner owns a piece of the company, which chainlink or any other oracle service, doesn't do. so instead of being some sort of exclusive partner which you make chainlink out to be, it's just one of an infinite amount of possible contributors. hardly has the same fucking ring to it does it m8?>>10692356not really since literally any shit tier oracle service can contribute and become an associate
>>10690555Checked 1k EOY
>>10692459yes, but there's only one oracle provider associated to Accord, and it's ChainLink / SmartContractwhich was called a "leading provider of secure oracle services" by Accord on the partnership announcementcheck it out yourself m8, not the first time they're called leaders in that spacehttps://medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92
>>10692411>using nearly year old fud
>>10692459>not really since literally any shit tier oracle service can contribute and become an associateAnd how many are listed on Accord's partners & associates page?
>>10692613>but there's only one oracle provider associated to Accorduntil literally any other oracle service deices to become associated. in other words it means jack shit. the "leaders of secure oracle providers" is just chainlink's cringey catchphrase.
>>10692645A shit ton of literal who's are there.
jesus I don't get this shitcan you just buy link or do you have to first buy some other crypto to buy it with?
>>10692749You are a literal who.
>>10692733did you sell low?what exactly are you trying to accomplish with this retardism?or are you just butthurt because people are calling out on your stupidity?seriously, "I was just pretending to be retarded" at full force going on here
>>10692859Buy Ethereum on coinbase.Open a binance.Com account.Find your Ethereum adress in binance.Withdraw your coinbase Ethereum to binance.Buy link with your Ethereum in binance.Keep it binance cos you sound like the kinda guy who would fuck up a wallet and storage.Good luck anon
>>10693179Literally the process I'm reading about right now.I already created a wallet, though. So, I guess I'm gona fuck it up.
>>10692411>consensys>2 man teamImagine being this clueless.
>>10693368Buy a Ledger Nano S.Learn how to use it properly. Store everything there. This is only if you are buying an amount above 1K LINK